Determinants of foreign ownership in international R&D joint ventures: Transaction costs and national culture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, we integrate the transaction costs economics and national culture perspectives by examining the determinants of foreign equity ownership in international R&D joint ventures. Specifically, we focus on the impact of different uncertainty dimensions–environmental and behavioral–on the share of equity that multinational enterprises take in their overseas R&D joint ventures. We further investigate the roles that two national culture components–power distance and uncertainty avoidance–play in this process. Using 543 international R&D joint venture announcements by foreign enterprises in China, India, Japan, and the United States during the period of 1985 to 2004, our results provide support for both transaction costs economics and the national culture perspectives.

Introduction

R&D and technology innovation have long been important issues in management research (e.g., Gunasekaran, 1997). In general, there are three ways to enhance a firm's innovation capability and expand its technology capacity: (1) acquisition of technology from outside; (2) internal R&D activity; and (3) collaboration with partners. In recent years, there has been a proliferation of research in international R&D collaboration (e.g., Gunasekaran, 1997, McArthur and Schill, 1995). This interest reflects the fact that technological advances and globalization create the need for inter-firm R&D cooperation in order to stay competitive. In this paper, we focus on international R&D joint ventures as the research locus, since joint ventures have been a frequently used form of R&D collaboration (Gunasekaran, 1997).

The purpose of our study is to examine the factors that are related to multinationals' equity ownership in international R&D equity joint ventures (henceforth referred to as simply international R&D joint ventures). Compared to wholly owned overseas R&D subsidiaries, the major advantage of R&D joint ventures is sharing the costs and risk of in-house R&D activities with partners. However, the risk of technology spillover to rival firms and partner opportunism also increases the control costs of such R&D collaboration. Therefore, selecting the appropriate equity ownership level to enter an equity R&D joint venture is a very important strategic decision facing managers.

In the last decades, researchers have analyzed ownership strategies as well as governance structures in international business, for example, wholly owned versus joint ownership (e.g., Buckley and Casson, 1976, Hennart, 1982). In particular, a number of studies have explored the equity ownership strategies of multinationals when they form joint ventures (e.g., Blodgett, 1991, Gatignon and Anderson, 1988, Hennart, 1991, Pan, 2002). The R&D joint venture, as one governance mode, has been compared with other types of non-equity R&D alliances (e.g., Oxley, 1997). However, little research, to date, has examined equity ownership strategy within the domain of R&D joint ventures. Considering the unique characteristics of R&D joint ventures, such as the high risk of partner opportunism and R&D spillover, the issue of equity ownership and governance structure in such joint ventures deserves further research. In addition, equity ownership strategy in R&D joint ventures may be more sensitive to factors that are related to these characteristics than are non-R&D joint ventures (e.g., purely marketing and/or manufacturing joint ventures).

Our study contributes to the literature by integrating the transaction costs economics (TCE) and national culture perspectives. TCE more or less assumes risk neutrality on the part of organizations. It is the situation–the uncertainty, the transaction frequency, and the asset specificity–that determines the mode of ownership and control desired. The national culture perspective takes a more behavioral view, as opposed to an economic one. Culture will impact not only attitudes toward risk, but also the mode or degree of control desired.

Our study also contributes to the literature on international joint ventures because of its multi-country sample. Prior studies on equity ownership tend to be limited to a single source country (e.g., Gatignon and Anderson, 1988, Hennart, 1991) or to a single host country (e.g., Pan, 1996, Pan, 1997, Pan, 2002, Pan and Li, 2000). Our sample consists of 543 R&D joint ventures located in four countries: China, India, Japan and the United States. First, we believe that our sample provides a diversity of both host countries and source countries, and makes our results robust, since it consists of two major developed countries: the United States and Japan, and the two largest emerging economies: China and India.

Second, prior international joint venture studies have focused on R&D activities only in developed countries (e.g., Vonortas, 1997, Katz et al., 1996). However, multinational companies are now starting to enter research partnerships in emerging economies, since research infrastructures are improving there, local markets are growing, and R&D labor costs are low. We expect some variables that influence the R&D decisions of multinational companies in emerging economies may be different from those in developed countries.

Section snippets

R&D equity joint ventures and equity ownership strategies

This study specifically focuses on R&D equity joint ventures. Typically, this venture is an independent business entity created by two or more separate organizations with shared equity ownership for the purpose of technology research and development. R&D joint ventures are one approach to R&D collaboration. The transaction cost theory of joint ventures (Hennart, 1988) argues that joint ventures arise from the simultaneous failure of both markets. This failure may be due to asset specificity. As

Hypothesis development

In this section, we elaborate on each hypothesized relationship between different uncertainty dimensions (environmental vs. behavioral) and equity ownership structures in international R&D joint ventures. Furthermore, we integrate transaction cost analysis with the national culture perspective. Specifically, we examine how uncertainty avoidance interacts with uncertainty through different managerial risk perceptions and preferences, and ultimately influences different equity ownership

Sample characteristics

This study focuses on R&D equity joint venture agreements between two partners (one local and one foreign) in China, India, Japan, and the United States. China and India are important developing countries, while Japan and the United States represent large developed economies. The unit of our analysis is the joint venture agreement. Our final sample includes 543 R&D joint venture agreements announced between 1985 and 2004.5

Results

We used ordinary least squared regression models to examine the relationships between the independent variables and the foreign partner's equity ownership of an international R&D joint venture in China, India, Japan, and the United States. All variables used for interactions were centered. The results are reported in Table 5.

Table 5 reports the relationships between the independent and control variables and the percentage of equity ownership held by the foreign partner in the R&D joint venture.

Discussion

The objective of this study was to explain the equity ownership decision by multinational enterprises in their international R&D joint ventures. We integrated the transaction costs economics and national culture perspectives to achieve this objective. Our arguments focused on: (1) environmental uncertainty, and (2) behavioral uncertainty faced by the foreign partner, (3) two components of national culture-power distance and uncertainty avoidance, and (4) the moderating effects of uncertainty

Acknowledgments

Authors are listed alphabetically. Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript. The authors would like to thank Keith Brouthers, Daniel Indro, John Schaubroeck, and three anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.

References (65)

  • P.J. Buckley et al.

    The Future of Multinational Enterprise

    (1976)
  • P.J. Buckley et al.

    Models of the multinational enterprise

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1998)
  • J. Child et al.

    Host-country managerial behavior and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures

    Journal of Management Studies

    (1993)
  • T.H. Chiles et al.

    Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics

    Academy of Management Review

    (1996)
  • S. Das et al.

    Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1998)
  • J.H. Dunning

    The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1988)
  • J.H. Dunning et al.

    The influence of Hymer's dissertation on the theory of foreign direct investment

  • B. Einhorn et al.

    High tech in China: is it a threat to Silicon Valley?

    BusinessWeek

    (2002)
  • M.K. Erramilli

    Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1996)
  • M.K. Erramilli et al.

    Service firms' international entry-mode choice: a modified transaction-cost analysis approach

    Journal of Marketing

    (1996)
  • D. Ford

    The development of buyer–seller relationships in industrial markets

    European Journal of Marketing

    (1980)
  • B. Gomes-Casseres

    Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: an integrated approach

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1990)
  • H. Gatignon et al.

    Multinational corporation degree of control over foreign subsidiaries, an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation

    Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization

    (1988)
  • R. Gulati

    Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1995)
  • J. Hennart

    A Theory of Multinational Enterprise

    (1982)
  • J. Hennart

    A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures

    Strategic Management Journal

    (1988)
  • J. Hennart

    The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States

    Management Science

    (1991)
  • J. Hennart et al.

    The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: does national origin affect ownership decisions?

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1998)
  • R.C. Hill et al.

    Critical contingencies in joint venture management: some lessons from managers

    Organization Science

    (1994)
  • K.J. Hladik et al.

    Is an international joint venture in R&D for you?

    Research & Technology Management

    (1989)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values

    (1980)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture: Software of the Mind

    (1991)
  • Cited by (54)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 978 934 2813; fax: +1 978 934 2064.

    View full text