Technical NotePorosity increment and strength degradation of low-porosity sedimentary rocks under different loading conditions
Introduction
Rock is quasi-brittle material containing pores, flaws and other types of discontinuities. Unlike some visible discontinuities and flaws, the pores are randomly distributed in rocks and usually invisible by naked eye. The essentially random distribution of pores has close correlation to rock׳s mechanical and engineering properties such as unconfined compression strength (UCS), Young׳s modulus, shear strength and sonic velocity. Several experimental and numerical studies have been conducted upon the relationship between porosity and mechanical properties of rocks. Brace and Riley [1] selected 15 different rock samples with porosity ranging from nearly zero to 40%, and reported variation in static uniaxial deformation between the low-and high-porosity rocks. Dunn et al. [2] carried out extensive laboratory tests and proposed an equation y=a×xb to quantify the strong dependence of fracture strength on porosity (where y equals the stress difference at failure and x represents porosity, parameter a varied with degree of loading and b is a dimensionless constant ranging between −0.8 and −1.0). Vernik et al. [3] derived an empirical formula for a set of sandstones linking the compressive and shear strength and incorporating porosity as a textural parameter using an image analysis technique. Al-Harthi et al. [4] systemically investigated the influence of the porosity of vesicular basalt on its engineering properties such as compressive strength, Poisson׳s ratio and sonic pulse velocity. In the tests, the compressive strength decreased rapidly with the increasing porosity up to a porosity of 20%, after which the decrease was lessened. A three dimensional Discrete Element Method (DEM) was employed by Martin et al. to investigate the dependence of strength, elasticity and friction angle on porosity and crack density [5]. The 3D DEM simulation results demonstrated that ratio of unconfined compressive strength to unconfined tensile strength (UCS/UTS) decreases as the porosity increases. Fakhimi and Gharahbagh [6] similarly used DEM to study the effect of porosity, pore size and distribution on the mechanical behaviour of rock and demonstrated drastic effects on UCS, UTS, elastic modulus and crack initiation. Baud et al. [7] proposed an analytical model in which UCS and initial level of damage (initial porosity) and/or crack density in a rock were related.
For porous media such as rocks, the pores inside the intact rock in its original condition could be regarded as an initial damage condition for the rock, which can approximately be indicated and quantified by initial porosity (IP) [8], [9]. Generally, the volume of micro-pores of rock materials will increase gradually with the increasing loading applied on rocks whereas the strength decreases, which indicates the phenomenon of rock strength degradation. This can be quantified by a strength degradation parameter (SDP) defined as the strength of a rock specimen after a degree of loading, σc from that of initial specimen σc and expressed as a percentage of original strength according to
In this study, the porosity changes associated with strength degradation were investigated for a series of low-porosity rocks under uniaxial loading. Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) was used to measure porosity.
Section snippets
Test apparatus
A servo-controlled, Instronl 342 material testing machine with a maximum loading capability of 2000 KN was used for the compression tests. The Nuclear Magnetic Resonance System (NMR) was used to measure the signal decay of hydrogen atoms in the fully-saturated pore space of rock. Measured transverse relaxation time distribution (T2), which depends on the size of water-saturated pores, can be converted to a pore size distribution [10], [11] as illustrated in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, the shaded area
Initial porosity of specimens
The initial T2 pore size distributions of all specimens are presented in Fig. 2. For the majority of specimens, the signals are at the highest point around 5000 µs, which means that the number of pores with similar size is the largest. Table 2 shows initial porosity of specimens.
Porosity increment of specimens under different loading conditions
The measured UCS of the group A samples were 76.4, 87.9 and 77.6 MPa; the 2nd stage tests for the other groups of samples were therefore terminated at 8, 16, 32, 48 and 64 MPa respectively as discussed earlier. Fig. 3
Conclusions
In this study, a non-destructive methodology of quantifying the strength degradation of a low-porosity sedimentary rock was presented. Porosity was identified initially using the NMR technique to understand the initial damage level of rocks. A servo-controlled material testing machine was employed for the compression tests. Specimens were loaded to approximately 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of the UCS. Porosity increments of these partially loaded specimens were then identified by NMR. This is
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Prof. Steve Hencher of the University of Leeds for helping authors with language editing as well as some technical suggestions. The first author is also grateful to Xiaomeng Xue for his support in specimen preparation. This research is financially support by the Postgraduate Research and Innovation Foundation Program of Central South University (Grant no. 2011ssxt274).
References (13)
- et al.
Static uniaxial deformation of 15 rocks to 50 kb
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1972) - et al.
Empirical relations between compressive strength and porosity of siliciclastic rocks
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1993) - et al.
The porosity and engineering properties of vesicular basalt in Saudi Arabia
Eng Geol
(1999) - et al.
Discrete element analysis of the effect of pore size and pore distribution on the mechanical behaviour of rock
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2011) - et al.
Porosity dependence and mechanism of brittle fracture in sandstone
J Geophys Res
(1973) - et al.
The impact of porosity and crack density on the elasticity, strength and friction of cohesive granular materials: insight from DEM modelling
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2009)
Cited by (43)
Experimental investigation on multiscale damage characteristics of plagioclase amphibolite under water immersion
2023, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyEffect of the in situ leaching solution of ion-absorbed rare earth on the mechanical behavior of basement rock
2022, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringEffect of grain size or anisotropy on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Schmidt hammer test for building stones
2021, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Cutting is the crucial operation during both the quarrying and processing of building stones [2]. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is a significant mechanical parameter for rock abrasiveness, which affects the cutting operation performance of the building stones and functions as the reliable basis for the selection of the cutting materials as well [3–5]. Moreover, a lot of civil structures, such as dams, bridges, tunnels, have been constructed with building stones.
Analysis of energy dissipation characteristics in granite under high confining pressure cyclic load
2020, Alexandria Engineering JournalCross-scale characteristics of backfill material using NMR and fractal theory
2020, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition)