Review ArticleTonsillectomy or tonsillotomy? A systematic review for paediatric sleep-disordered breathing
Introduction
Tonsillectomy (tonsillectomy) is currently the mainstay of surgical treatment for paediatric sleep-disordered breathing due to tonsillar hypertrophy. It involves the complete removal of the tonsils, including the tonsillar capsule, leaving the underlying pharyngeal muscles exposed to heal by secondary intention. In contrast, tonsillotomy (tonsillotomy, or partial/intracapsular tonsillectomy) avoids capsular disruption by only removing the obstructive tonsillar segment.
While tonsillectomy is the preferred procedure in recurrent tonsillar infection [1], [2], studies have suggested that tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy have similar effectiveness in treating isolated sleep-disordered breathing, both clinically and on polysomnographic testing [3], [4], [5]. There is evidence that tonsillotomy has less post-operative morbidity, as larger-calibre blood vessels near the capsule and pharyngeal muscles remain intact [6], [7], [8]. This in turn may decrease post-operative pain, minimising analgesia use and allowing patients a faster return to normal diet and activity. It may also decrease the risk of both primary and secondary haemorrhage, the latter of which may sometimes result in life-threatening hypovolemia necessitating a return to theatre. All of these factors raise the possibility that tonsillotomy may be more cost-effective than tonsillectomy, with lower rates of readmission and medical re-contact for complications; the potentially faster recovery times observed in tonsillotomy may also decrease the time caregivers are required to take off work.
However, there is concern that the tonsillar remnant in tonsillotomy may predispose to post-operative infection [7]. Tonsillar remnants may also re-hypertrophy, with possible recurrence of sleep-disordered breathing which may require a revision tonsillectomy if severe [9], thus exposing the patient to additional operative morbidity and increasing healthcare cost. It is therefore important to determine whether these risks outweigh the potential improved post-operative morbidity and cost-effectiveness offered by tonsillotomy.
Previous systematic reviews comparing the two techniques have either included non-target populations or excluded data from large non-randomised studies. Both Acevedo et al. [10] and Kim et al. [11] incorporated adult patient populations within their analyses, while Walton et al. [12] conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials only. Our study aims to systematically review the literature comparing clinical efficacy, post-operative morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy, performed in the paediatric population for sleep-disordered breathing. Based on findings from both randomised trials and non-randomised real-world patient registers, this review hopes to make a recommendation on the best procedure for this patient population.
Section snippets
Study selection
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were systematically searched (1948–July 2014) using the key words “tonsillectomy”, “adenotonsillectomy”, “tonsillotomy”, “intracapsular”, “subtotal”, “partial”, “subcapsular”, “supracapsular”, and “reduction” in combinations. Both randomised and non-randomised articles in English were included if they studied paediatric patients (<16yo) without comorbidities (obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, etc.) undergoing tonsillar surgery of any technique for obstructive
Results
In total, 453 articles were identified via search strategy from the three databases (Fig. 1). Thirty studies complied with criteria and were included in the final review. Sixty-six additional studies were identified in the reference lists of included studies, with one study meeting eligibility criteria. Another study, in-press, was identified by the leading author via the journal's mailing list. Three studies originally considered for inclusion were excluded as authors were not contactable. The
Summary and significance of main findings
This systematic review of 32 randomised and non-randomised studies comparing tonsillectomy with tonsillotomy found equal long-term effectiveness, with similar patient satisfaction and quality-of-life end-points. Polysomnographic improvement was also similar. These results suggest that tonsillotomy and tonsillectomy are both equally effective in treating paediatric sleep-disordered breathing.
It has been well established that haemorrhage, especially secondary haemorrhage, is one of the most
Conclusions
Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing can occur secondary to tonsillar enlargement. Tonsillotomy has demonstrated similar effectiveness compared to tonsillectomy in treating tonsillar hypertrophy. However, tonsillotomy decreases the odds of secondary haemorrhage by 79%, reduces intensity of post-operative pain, and allows a 3 day earlier return to normal diet and activity. A 62% reduction in the odds of readmission was also found. While further clarification regarding the severity of secondary
Financial support/funding
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
References (57)
- et al.
Tonsillotomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children: polysomnographic results
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2008) - et al.
Tonsillar regrowth following partial tonsillectomy with radiofrequency
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2008) - et al.
Pre-surgical child behavior ratings and pain management after two different techniques of tonsil surgery
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2006) - et al.
Long-term effects of intracapsular partial tonsillectomy (tonsillotomy) compared with full tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2005) - et al.
Tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy? - A randomized study comparing postoperative pain and long-term effects
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(1999) - et al.
Polysomnography outcomes for partial intracapsular versus total tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2010) - et al.
Subtotal bipolar tonsillectomy does not decrease postoperative pain compared to total monopolar tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2007) - et al.
Child behavior and quality of life before and after tonsillotomy versus tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2009) - et al.
Intracapsular tonsillar reduction (partial tonsillectomy): reviving a historical procedure for obstructive sleep disordered breathing in children
Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
(2003) - et al.
Post-tonsillectomy morbidity and quality of life in pediatric patients with obstructive tonsils and adenoid: microdebrider vs electrocautery
Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
(2006)
Tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy performed with scissors in children with tonsillar hypertrophy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Tonsillectomy vs. partial tonsillectomy for OSAS in children-10 years post-surgery follow-up
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Lethal post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage
Auris Nasus Larynx
General practitioner consultations after a paediatric tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Bipolar cautery tonsillectomy using different energy doses
Pain Bleed.
Age-related tonsillar regrowth in children undergoing powered intracapsular tonsillectomy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Randomized controlled trial of Coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy
Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
Partial tonsillectomy with scalpel in children with obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Radiofrequency tonsillotomy versus bipolar scissors tonsillectomy for the treatment of OSAS in children: a prospective study
Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head. Neck Dis.
Comparison of microdebrider subcapsular tonsillectomy to harmonic scalpel and electrocautery total tonsillectomy
Am. J. Otolaryngol.
Safety and efficacy of powered intracapsular tonsillectomy in children: a multi-center retrospective case series
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
Factors influencing the indication for tonsillectomy: a historical overview and current concepts
ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec.
Tonsil operations in children - indications and contradictions
New Med.
Efficacy of microdebrider intracapsular adenotonsillectomy as validated by polysomnography
Laryngoscope
Efficacy of powered intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy
Laryngoscope
Microdebrider intracapsular tonsillectomy
ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec.
Intracapsular versus standard tonsillectomy: review of literature
J. La State Med. Soc.
Complete excision versus tonsil ablation for surgical management of tonsillar disease
Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.
Cited by (44)
Assessing outcomes after partial and total tonsillectomy for sleep-disordered breathing in children using Clinical Assessment Score-15
2022, American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and SurgeryCitation Excerpt :This suggests that both operations provide similar improvements to SDB. Recent reviews [15,18] have indicated that both procedures are equally effective, though PIT may have additional perioperative benefits. Patients experience lower postoperative bleeding rates [18], which is a common complication and significant source of morbidity after surgery [20,21], and other postoperative complications [22] following PIT compared to TT.
Evaluation and Management of Snoring
2022, Sleep Medicine ClinicsDoes perioperative ketorolac increase bleeding risk after intracapsular tonsillectomy?
2021, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :Tonsillectomy can be performed in an intracapsular or extracapsular plane. Intracapsular tonsillectomy (ICT) is generally thought to result in less postoperative pain and lower incidences of PTB [14–16]. Our institution noted an incidence of 1.1% for delayed hemorrhage after ICT versus 3.4% after extracapsular electrodissection tonsillectomy [14].
Adenotonsillectomy in high risk patients: Hematologic abnormalities and COVID-19 considerations
2021, World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryCitation Excerpt :One systematic review comparing the two techniques compiled the data from available randomized controlled trials and found the aggregate secondary bleed rate was 0.7% for partial tonsillectomy vs 2.0% for total tonsillectomy.17 Another similar systematic review found that partial tonsillectomy reduced the risk of secondary post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage by 79%.18 Since this difference is most pronounced for secondary hemorrhage, surgeons who utilize diathermy for total tonsillectomy could consider a partial tonsillectomy approach in patients with a known coagulopathy as a way to potentially avoid a bleeding event post-operatively.
“The importance of preoperative evaluations prior to pediatric otorhinolaryngological surgery”
2020, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :Several studies in the literature have highlighted the spontaneous resolution of recurrent tonsillitis and OME [5,6,7], with OME showing spontaneous resolution or improvement rates ranging from 28% to 52% within 3–4 months of diagnosis. Indeed, the guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology recommend that OME be documented for at least 3 months before a surgical intervention is carried out in order to avoid unnecessary surgery [8]. Furthermore, the adenoid and tonsil tissues reach their maximum level of development at around the age of 5 years and then regress.