Effect of Sm co-doping on structural, mechanical and electrical properties of Gd doped ceria solid electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology has become one of the notable electric power generating technologies among the electrochemical devices [1,2]. The researchers have been showing great interest in the development of efficient electrolyte material as the operating temperature of SOFC has been governed by the performance of electrolytes [3,4]. Doped cerium oxides are well known material for their excellent ionic conductivity in the intermediate temperature range (673–1073 K) [5]. The doping process plays a crucial role in modifying the microstructure and electrical properties. A small amount of dopants such as Li2O [6] Cu [7], Zn [8] are helpful to increase the grain boundary conductivities by trapping (scavenging effect) the impurity at the grain boundaries [9]. The rare earth doped ceria has been widely studied and used as solid electrolyte towards SOFC application [10,11]. The type of the dopant determines the electrical properties of the ceria. Anirban et al. [12] recently investigated the effect of ionic radii of various rare earth dopants (Er, Ho, Gd, Sm, Eu, Nd, La) and found that Gd3+ doped ceria shows the highest conductivity due to the minimum strain among the other dopants. Similarly Arabaci et al. [13] studied the effect of Gd or Sm on structural and electrical properties of ceria. They found that Sm doped ceria has higher sinterability compared to that of the Gd-doped sample at low sintering temperature (1573 K) due to smaller grain volume. Ruston et al. [14] studied the impact of lattice strain and doping on oxygen diffusion in rare earth doped ceria (Gd, Sm, Ho, Dy, Yb, Er, Nd, La) using dynamic atomic scale simulation techniques. They reported that the Nd doped ceria has the lowest activation energy of migration (Ea = 0.48 eV). However Sm doped ceria exhibits minimum strain (4%) and activation energy increases beyond this strain level.
In the case of electrical properties, conductivity enhancement of ceria has been achieved mainly due to the defect formation by doping process. In general, when ceria is partially doped (substituted) with tri or divalent cations (aliovalent), it results in the production of oxygen vacancy in the crystal system. The oxygen vacancy is responsible for the oxide ion conductivity through vacancy migration (hopping) mechanism [15]. The vacancy concentration increases with increasing dopant concentration. Although doping generates structural defects (oxygen vacancies) in the ceria lattice, the fluorite structures are capable of accepting certain limit, but above an optimum dopant level, defect association (RE-) takes place between the dopant cation and vacancy which tends to decrease the ionic conductivity. Minimization of the defect association with preferred dopant at optimized level is still challenging for improving the ionic conductivity for few decades. In this aspect, recent reports have suggested that co-doping strategy as an effective methodology for tailoring electrical conductivity of ceria solid solution [[16], [17], [18]]. The method is recommended to reduce the defect association, and grain refinement for the enhancement of grain-boundary conduction [19]. The choice of the dopant is very important in minimizing defect association to reduce the activation energy for oxygen diffusion reactions. It is well known that the 10 mol% gadolinia-doped ceria (GDC10) is a high performing conductive electrolyte among the singly doped ceria [20]. However, a great amount of interest is also shown in search of a suitable co-dopant for Gd to establish a potential electrolyte with improved electrical characteristics. Many of the recent reports reveal that the influence of the co-dopant on densification and conductivity. An improved microstructure, sintered density and electrochemical properties (σ600 = 3.5✕10−2 S cm−1) were achieved by the addition of 3 mol% Li in GDC10 [21]. Similarly a small amount of cobalt (0.5 mol% of Co2+) addition to GDC enhances the densification and superior conductivity (σ600 = 4.5✕10−2 S cm−1) as reported by Accardo et al. [22]. The same research group also investigated the effect on addition of Bi in GDC10 and reported an extremely high density (ρ = 99.7%, T = 1200 °C) for 5 mol% bismuth co-doped GDC. Arabaci et al. [23] have reported an improved density and ionic conductivity by co-doping of Pr in to GDC20. Spiridigliozzi et al. [24] have recently reported a remarkable effect of Pr on sintering behavior of GDC pellets and achieved the highest electrical conductivity (σ800 = 1.25 S cm−1) for 6 mol% of co-doped GDC synthesized by co-precipitation method. However, utilizing Pr precusours as co-dopant is considered to be an expensive approach in the commercialization of the electrolyte in bulk quantities. The synthesis parameters can also influence the electrical and micro structural properties of GDC electrolytes. Dell″Agli et al. [25] reported an improved sintering behavior of various di-valent and trivalent co-doped (Ca, Sr, Er, Pr) samarium co-doped ceria (SDC20) using ammonium carbonate precipitant in different carbonate environments. Anwar et al. [26] have investigated Er as a potential co-dopant for SDC20 system. They reported improved electrical properties (σ600 = 1.3✕10−2 S cm−1, Ea = 0.58 eV) for the 10 mol% of Er co-doped composition. They also found a negative effect on the electrical conductivity by co-doping Sr into erbium doped ceria (EDC) due to the formation SrCeO3 secondary phase with EDC [27]. A significantly improved conductivity was found by the addition of ternary carbonate salt compositions (Li2CO3, Na2CO3, K2CO3) to Sr single doped ceria (Ce0.95Sr0.05O2-δ) due to the mixed (H+/O2−) conduction phenomenon reported by Anwar et al. [28]. Interestingly, some of the recent investigation showed encouraging structural properties of Sm and Gd co-doping in ceria [11,29,30]. For instance, 5 mol% Sm co-doping in GDC10 exhibited an improved conductivity (σ750 = 4.2✕10−2 S cm−1) as reported by Accardo et al. [31]. However, some of the molecular dynamics stimulation studies showed conflicting evidence that co-doping strategy is an average effect of the conductivities of the parent singly doped compositions [32]. However, the key reason for the conductivity enhancement in the nanocrystalline co-doped ceria electrolytes is not clearly understood so far. Therefore Gd3+ and Sm3+ co-doping in ceria would be of a great interest in order to understand the co-doping effect in the ceria.
In this study, we prepared two series of compositions comprising Sm co-doped in 10 mol.% Gd singly doped ceria (GDC10) formulated to be Ce substituted by samarium Ce0.9-xSmxGd0.1O2-δ(CS) and Gd substituted by Sm in Ce0.9Gd0.1-xSmxO2-δ(GS) (x = 0.0, 0.03, 0.05, 0.10) to understand the compositional effects on their structural, mechanical and electrical properties.
Section snippets
Materials preparation
The electrolyte nanopowders were synthesized by simple glycine nitrate auto combustion method. The Ce0.9-xSmxGd0.1O2-δ (CS) and Ce0.9Gd0.1-xSmxO2-δ (GS) (x = 0.0, 0.03, 0.05 0.10) series compositions were prepared by mixing stoichiometric amount of cerium nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, SRL, 99.9%), gadolinium nitrate hexahydrate (Gd(NO3)3·6H2O), Alfa easer 99.9%) and samarium nitrate hexahydrate (Sm(NO3)3·6H2O, Alfa easer, 99.9%) in deionized water under constant stirring for 20 minutes to
X-ray diffraction
Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b) show the XRD diffraction patterns of the calcined nanopowders of CS and GS, respectively. The diffraction pattern indicated that the synthesized nanopowders are well crystalline and exhibit cubic fluorite phase structure without any secondary phases. The crystallite sizes (D) of CS and GS nanopowders were calculated using the following Scherrer's equation:where the D is the crystallite size, λ is the X-ray wavelength, β is the full width at half maximum
Conclusions
In the present study, a systematic investigation on the effect of Sm co-doping in 10 mol% Gd doped ceria (GDC10) has been carried out. Emphasis has been placed on evaluating microstructural and electrical properties to understand their inter-relationship between the structure, dopant concentration and ionic conductivity to establish an advanced electrolyte material for IT-SOFC.
An increased lattice parameter and decreased crystallite size with the addition of Sm concentration in both Ce
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank the Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD), Government of India, New Delhi for the financial support for the current study vide sanction letter No. 5-8/2014-TS.VII Dtd.24-09-2014. The authors also thank the Ministry of Education in Taiwan for the financial support through TEEP@India internship program. They are thankful to Chancellor, Pro Vice Chancellor, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai-600119 for providing infrastructure and
References (67)
- et al.
Progress in material selection for solid oxide fuel cell technology: a review
Prog Mater Sci
(2015) - et al.
Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation—a review
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2013) - et al.
A brief review on ceria based solid electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cells
J Alloy Comp
(2019) - et al.
Evaluation of Li2O as an efficient sintering aid for gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte for solid oxide fuel cells
J Power Sources
(2014) - et al.
Structure, densification and electrical properties of Gd3+ and Cu2+ co-doped ceria solid electrolytes for SOFC applications: effects of Gd2O3 content
Ceram Int
(2018) - et al.
Zn as sintering aid for ceria-based electrolytes
Solid State Ion
(2014) - et al.
Grain boundary scavenging through reactive sintering of strontium and iron in samarium doped ceria electrolyte for ITSOFC applications
Mater Res Bull
(2018) Effect of Sm and Gd dopants on structural characteristics and ionic conductivity of ceria
Ceram Int
(2015)- et al.
Effect of strain on the oxygen diffusion in yttria and gadolinia co-doped ceria
Solid State Ion
(2013) - et al.
A co-doping approach towards enhanced ionic conductivity in fluorite-based electrolytes
Solid State Ion
(2006)