Hydrogen production from biogas reforming and the effect of H2S on CH4 conversion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.162Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Biogas reforming was studied at 650, 750 and 850 °C using nickel based catalyst.

  • CH4 and CO2 conversions were about 64% and 86%, respectively at 750 °C.

  • Experimental results followed a similar trend as predicted using ASPEN plus.

  • Introduction of small amount of H2S dropped methane conversion as low as 20%.

Abstract

Biogas produced during anaerobic decomposition of plant and animal wastes consists of high concentrations of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and traces of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The primary focus of this research was on investigating the effect of a major impurity (i.e., H2S) on a commercial methane reforming catalyst during hydrogen production. The effect of temperature on CH4 and CO2 conversions was studied at three temperatures (650, 750 and 850 °C) during catalytic biogas reforming. The experimental CH4 and CO2 conversions thus obtained were found to follow a trend similar to the simulated conversions predicted using ASPEN plus. The gas compositions at thermodynamic equilibrium were estimated as a function of temperature to understand the intermediate reactions taking place during biogas dry reforming. The exit gas concentrations as a function of temperature during catalytic reforming also followed a trend similar to that predicted by the model. Finally, catalytic reforming experiments were carried out using three different H2S concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mol%). The study found that even with the introduction of small amount of H2S (0.5 mol%), the CH4 and CO2 conversions dropped to about 20% each as compared to 65% and 85%, respectively in the absence of H2S.

Introduction

Growing energy demand due to population expansion has heightened the need for alternate energy sources. An ideal source of energy would be cheap, clean, renewable and sustainable in nature. One such energy source is biogas produced by anaerobic decomposition of plant and animal wastes typically consisting of 55–75% methane (CH4), 25–44% carbon dioxide (CO2) and 0.5–2% of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) [1]. It is usually produced in landfills, sewage sludge and bio-waste digesters [2]. Methane and CO2 are the two main greenhouse gases, which upon release into earth's atmosphere, yield unfavorable results such as global warming. Methane and CO2 contribute to 4–9% and 9–26% of the total greenhouse effect, respectively, and hence their emissions needs to be controlled [3]. The steady increase in the atmospheric CH4 concentration (0.6–0.8% annually) has been a major concern [4]. Landfills are important sources for the emission of methane into the atmosphere and contribute to about 10% of total anthropogenic methane emitted [5]. About 2.6 million tons of CH4 are captured annually from landfills across the U.S., 70% of which is converted to heat and electricity [6]. Steam reforming, dry reforming and partial oxidation (Equations (1), (2), (3), respectively) are three major techniques for conversion of CH4 in biogas to H2 and CO, which then can be used for the production of liquid fuels or used in the fuel cells [7], [8].Steamreforming:CH4+H2O3H2+COΔH298Kº¯=206kJmol1Dryreforming:CH4+CO22H2+2COΔH298Kº¯=247kJmol1Partialoxidationreforming:CH4+12O22H2+COΔH298Kº¯=35.7kJmol1

Hydrogen has a very high energy content of 144 MJ/kg and burns clean without leaving ash [9]. Braga et al. conducted an economic and ecological analysis of H2 production by steam reforming of biogas and reported the process was economically feasible and free from causing environmental impacts. The cost for H2 production was estimated to be 0.27 US$/kWh with a payback period of eight years and the ecological efficiency was 94.95% [10].

Although there are different reforming techniques, the focus of this work was on dry reforming of biogas for the conversion of both CH4 and CO2 to more useful syngas: H2 and CO. Syngas can be converted to liquid hydrocarbons in the presence of Fe and Co catalysts via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [11]. Dry reforming reaction is an endothermic reaction usually dominant at 750 °C–850 °C [7]. Many researchers have studied dry reforming of biogas. For example, Lau et al. studied the conversion of biogas to syngas using dry and oxidative reforming. They reported that oxidative reforming is dominant at low temperatures, while dry reforming is dominant at higher (>600 °C) temperatures [12]. Asencios et al. tested the performance of NiO–MgO–ZrO2 catalyst on reforming model biogas at 750 °C and demonstrated that the addition of MgO to Ni/ZrO2 improved CH4 and CO2 conversions [13]. A comparative study of fixed bed reactor and micro-reactor for H2 production by biogas reforming using Ni, Rh–Ni promoted on alumina catalyst was done by Izquierdo et al. Furthermore, the importance of catalytic surface properties and morphology in driving the reforming reaction was emphasized by performing physicochemical catalyst characterizations like TPR, SEM, XPS, XRD, H2 chemisorption, N2 physisorption and ICP-AES [14]. Xu et al. investigated biogas reforming over Ni and Co/Al2O3–La2O3 catalyst in a fixed bed reactor using an inlet gas consisting of CH4 and CO2 having a molar ratio of one. They found that the addition of Co improved the performance of the Ni/Al La catalyst in terms of CH4 and CO2 conversions [15]. Lucredio et al. investigated the effect of adding La on Ni–Rh/Al2O3 catalyst during reforming of model sulfur-free biogas. They observed that La reduced the carbon deposition by favoring gasification of carbon species [16]. Kohn et al. studied dry reforming of biogas in the presence of CH3Cl using 4% Rh/Al2O3 catalyst in the temperature range 350–700 °C. They observed an increase in acidity of the catalyst due to the adsorption of chloride on its surface. The study also reported that thermodynamically, the chloride adsorption is less favored at higher temperatures. However, the CH4 concentration did not change and the only factor that was affected by CH3Cl was H2:CO ratio [17].

Although a number of studies have been conducted on biogas reforming, most of them have assumed a model gas mixture that does not contain H2S. The work done by Appari et al. is an exception who proposed a detailed kinetic model capable of simulating the reforming of biogas even in the presence of H2S over Ni based catalyst. They reported that operating at high temperatures (900 °C) mitigates sulfur adsorption, while lower temperature (700 °C) operation results in complete catalyst deactivation [18].

The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature and H2S concentration in biogas since many studies have neglected H2S while conducting biogas reforming studies. The poisoning effect on the commercial catalyst was evaluated in terms of reduction in CH4 and CO2 conversions with the introduction of H2S at three different concentrations.

Section snippets

Materials

Dry reforming of biogas was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor as described elsewhere [7]. Reforming reactions were performed at temperatures from 650 °C to 850 °C and atmospheric pressure using a commercial CH4 reforming catalyst (Reformax® 250). Experiments were conducted both in the presence and absence of H2S. For runs performed in the absence of H2S, the inlet gas consisted of a mixture of 59% CH4, 2% N2, and 39% CO2 (all in mole percentage). For runs conducted in the presence of H2S, the

Temperature programmed reduction

Hydrogen TPR analysis of the catalyst was carried out to determine the precise reduction temperature. A ten point moving average of the signal generated corresponding to H2 consumed was plotted as a function of temperature. From the data, the maximum H2 consumption (implying best reduction) took place at approximately 800 °C and hence that temperature was selected to be the reduction temperature for the catalyst.

Mass transfer limitation test

For a given catalyst weight and size, a minimum flow rate of inlet gas is necessary

Conclusion

Catalytic conversion of biogas to syngas was studied using a commercial catalyst. The effect of H2S on the CH4 and CO2 conversions was studied by using three H2S concentrations. It was noticed that even with the introduction of 0.5 mol% H2S drastically reduced the CH4 and CO2 conversions from 67% and 87% to 19% and 22%, respectively. From the catalyst characterization work, it was observed that the coking reaction which was mainly dominant in the absence of H2S became less pronounced with the

Acknowledgments

The author (Shyamsundar Ayalur Chattanathan) acknowledges Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station for funding this study. Also, the author (Matthew McVey) would like to thank National Science Foundation (NSF-EEC-1149940) for funding while he worked in biogas reforming project as an REU Fellow. However, only the authors are responsible for any remaining errors in this manuscript.

Cited by (0)

View full text