Potential improvements of the presently applied in-service inspection of wheelset axles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Wheelset axles are safety relevant components because they are subject to high dynamic and static loads during operation. Therefore, they have to undergo periodic non-destructive examination to find potential defects before they can lead to failure. Minimizing the risk of fatigue failure for 3.5 million axles, potentially in service in Europe, was the objective of the 3.5 years R&D project EURAXLES which ended in April 2014. EURAXLES aimed to propose a global concept approach for axles design, production, and maintenance. An important objective within Work Package 5 was the analysis of the present status of in-service inspections. The strengths and weaknesses of the presently applied inspection systems and practices were evaluated with the aim to identify potential improvements provided by new technologies. That evaluation was firstly based on the results of a questionnaire which was distributed to the main European railway operators with the request to describe the testing procedures and equipment applied in their maintenance facilities. Secondly, the results of benchmark tests with presently applied ultrasonic inspection equipment were exploited for the analysis. These tests were performed at hollow axles and solid axles with implemented artificial defects.

Introduction

The purpose of non-destructive testing of wheelset axles is the detection of defects which are caused by static and dynamic loads during operation. These loads lead to torsional and bending stresses. Torsional stresses can cause longitudinal cracks in the axle, bending stresses might lead to transverse cracks. The maximum bending stresses occur in the center of the axle shaft. By the superposition of torsional and bending stresses critical stress peaks can occur at certain locations. Torsional stresses appear predominantly in disk-braked axles at locations between wheel seat and brake disk seat.

Typically, possible cracks propagate from the surface of the axle. Potential causes are corroded areas emanating from damages at the protective coating or notches due to ballast pick-up. Possibly, also non-metallic inclusions very close to the surface, particularly at spots of corrosion or notches can lead to crack initiation.

The EURAXLES project which was launched within the FP7 Framework Program of the European Community aimed to minimize the risk of fatigue failure of wheelset axles proposing a global concept approach for axles design, production and maintenance. Non-destructive testing was addressed in Work Package 5 of EURAXLES. An essential objective of this work package was to define optimal technologies and methods for reliable detection of critical defects in railway axles during in-service inspection. They are ranging from improvements of existing technologies and methods to the development of new ones. In this context, predictive techniques and methodologies for on-board continuous measurement of physical parameters, enabling the establishment of reliable and effective condition based maintenance, had to be considered.

Following a brief overview of the state of the art of the presently applied technology for in-service inspection of hollow axles and solid axles, the results of an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the presently applied inspection systems and practices are outlined. The essential shortcomings are addressed with the aim to propose improvements of the detection sensitivity and reliability of non-destructive testing.

Section snippets

Hollow axle testing

Hollow axles are applied in all speed ranges for passenger traffic; no applications exist so far for freight traffic. The bore diameters vary between 25 mm and 90 mm. For the periodic maintenance, ultrasonic testing (UT) is the main method for the inspection of hollow axles [1]. Some operators additionally apply magnetic particle testing (MT) which is performed at fully or partly disassembled wheelsets [2]. Ultrasonic testing of materials from the physical fundamentals of ultrasonics and

Conclusions from the gap analysis related to in-service inspection

As a part of the work performed in work package 5 of the EURAXLES project, a gap analysis was performed which aimed to identify potential shortcomings of the presently applied methods for non-destructive testing of axles.

In the first step, the gap analysis considered the results of a questionnaire which was distributed to the main European railway operators. They were asked to describe the testing procedures and equipment applied in their maintenance facilities. Secondly, benchmark tests were

Identification of potential improvements

The improvements suggested following the gap analysis aim to increase the sensitivity and reliability of ultrasonic testing of hollow axles and solid axles. Such improvements have to consider the most critical areas in both axle types. The focus was on advanced UT techniques but also alternative or supplementary techniques were considered, such as induction thermography.

The potential of ultrasonic testing with respect to defect detection sensitivity and reliability can be considerably increased

Conclusion

The paper summarizes some essential results achieved in the framework of the Work Package 5 “Non-destructive Testing (NDT) and Verification of the Reliability of Axles in Service” of the EURAXLES project. EURAXLES aimed to propose a global concept approach for axles design, production and maintenance.

Based on the results of a questionnaire which was distributed to the main European railway operators with the request to describe the testing procedures applied in their maintenance facilities and

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the European Commission for funding the project “EURAXLES: Minimizing the risk of fatigue failure of railway axles” under Grant Agreement No. 265706 within the Seventh Framework Program. Thanks also go to the project coordinator UNIFE, to the Work Package 5 project partners and to those companies who gave an essential contribution to the project carefully filling the questionnaire on the current European practices on NDT.

References (30)

  • AAE technical specification operation – module 11, Non-destructive testing. Appendix 01 ultrasonic testing of axles...
  • VPI 09-3. Process instructions P-UT-01. Non-destructive testing of railway components as part of maintenance – manual...
  • Carboni Michele, Cantini Stefano, Gilardoni Cristina. Validation of the rotating UT probe for in-service inspections of...
  • García Ares Ernesto, García Alonso José Luis, Fernández Plaza Juan A., Buitrago Carrillo Antonio, Crespo Giménez...
  • Kappes Wolfgang, Bähr Werner, Salzburger Hans-Jürgen, Walte Friedhelm. Automated systems for in-service non-destructive...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text