Toward adaptive robust state estimation based on MCC by using the generalized Gaussian density as kernel functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.03.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A generic formulation for robust state estimator is proposed.

  • The proposed formulation unifies several existing robust state estimator models.

  • A method is proposed to identify the distribution type of measurement noise.

  • An adaptive robust state estimator is proposed for suppressing different noises.

Abstract

In this paper, a generic formulation is proposed for robust state estimation (RSE) based on maximum correntropy criterion (MCC), leading to an adaptive robust state estimator. By using the generalized Gaussian density (GGD) as the kernel function, the proposed formulation theoretically unifies several existing RSE models, each of which is optimal for a specific type of measurement noise and error distribution. As the noise and error distribution is generally unknown ex-ante and time-varying in operation, a statistical learning scheme is proposed to heuristically identify the actual distribution type online. Afterwards, the optimal RSE can be properly selected so as to adapt to the variation of noise and error distribution types. Simulations are carried on a rudimentary 2-bus system and the standard IEEE-118 bus system, illustrating the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Introduction

Power system state estimation (SE) is one of the core functions of modern energy management system (EMS) [1]. It was firstly investigated by Schweppe and Wildes in 1970 [2], and so far various SE models have been proposed, among which the weighted least square (WLS) model is the most popular one. To improve the computational efficiency of WLS, the fast-decoupled SE is proposed in [3].

As conventional WLS estimators are usually sensitive to gross error, much attention has been devoted to suppress the effects of bad data [4], [5], [6]. Thus, various robust state estimation (RSE) models are proposed to achieve unbiased estimation in the presence of various types of gross errors. The M-estimators are the typical of these RSEs, mainly including the weighted least absolute value (WLAV) estimator [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], the quadratic-linear (QL) estimator [12], [13] and the quadratic-constant (QC) estimator [14], [15], etc. Most recently, the maximum normal measurement rate (M NMR) estimator, the maximum exponential square (MES) estimator and the maximum exponential absolute value (MEAV) estimator have been suggested in [16], [17], [18], respectively, showing appealing performance for suppressing gross errors. However, it should be pointed out that the distribution type of measurement noise and error will effect on the performance of these SE methods. To the best of authors’ knowledge, this issue has not been discussed in-depth in literature yet. As the distribution type of measurement noises is unknown ex-ante in real operation, a possible way is to assume a certain distribution type of measurement noise and error, e.g. Gaussian distribution or Laplace distribution, and then to use the most appropriate SE method. Unfortunately, Turkey has pointed out that the actual measurement error distributions are always far away from the assumed types [19]. This indicates that one cannot expect to use only a fixed SE method to deal with all types of measurement noises perfectly, especially when the noise and error distribution is time-varying. To circumvent this problem, it is desirable to develop an adjustable SE method that can adapt to the change of measurement noise and error distribution types.

Recent literature suggests applying information theory, such as minimum information loss principle [20], [21] and the maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) [22], [23], to improve the performance and applicability of RSE methods. From the information-theoretic point of view, the essential difference among these RSE methods is that they use different kernel functions. Similar to the aforementioned problem, each of the information-theoretic RSE methods can theoretically achieve optimal performance only when its kernel function matches its associated type of measurement noise and error distribution. Thus, when the distribution type is unknown or time-varying, a specific method cannot guarantee its optimality on rejecting measurement noise and error.

In [24], a parametric generalized Gaussian probability density function is proposed for RSE. This inspiring the main idea of this paper that uses the parametric generalized Gaussian density (GGD) as a family of kernel functions, further deriving an adaptive RSE for optimally depressing a variety of measurement noise and error with different distribution types. The main contributions of this paper are threefold:

  • (1)

    A generic formulation is proposed for RSE based on MCC by using the parameterized GGD as kernel functions. This formulation unifies several existing RSE models, based on which new RSE models can also be derived by changing the counterpart noise and error distributions of interest.

  • (2)

    A statistical learning scheme is proposed to heuristically identify the actual distribution type of measurement noise and error, guiding to choose the proper RSE model online.

  • (3)

    Based on (1), (2), an adaptive robust state estimator (ARSE) is derived for optimally suppressing wide variety of measurement noise and errors, even when the distribution types are time-varying.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Three RSE models are shortly reviewed in section ‘Three existing robust state estimation models’. Section ‘A generic RSE formulation’ presents a generic RSE formulation. A statistical learning scheme is proposed to identify the distribution type of measurement noise and error and an ARSE model for measurement errors is proposed in section ‘Estimating the distribution type’. The overall algorithm is also presented in section ‘Estimating the distribution type’. Case studies on a rudimentary 2-bus system and standard IEEE 118-bus system are given in section ‘An illustrative example. Finally, conclusions are drawn in section ‘Conclusion’.

Section snippets

Measurement equations

For SE, the relationship between measurements and state variables is described by the measurement equationsz=h(x)+εwhere z is the m-dimensional measurement vector (the measurements), usually including the line power flows, bus power injections, bus voltage magnitudes and line current flow magnitudes, etc.; N the number of buses, x the n-dimensional state vector (n = 2N  1); h:RnRm the nonlinear vector function mapping the state vector to the measurement vector; ε the m-dimensional measurement

A generic RSE formulation based on MCC using GGD

Refs. [22], [23] propose the RSE model based on MCC using the Gaussian density function as the kernel. However, the actual measurement noise and error may not follow the Gaussian distribution. In [24], it is revealed that the generalized Gaussian density (GGD) is a more suitable candidate of kernel functions used in density estimation. This motivates us to use the GGD as the kernel function in MCC for RSE.

The GGD is defined as follows [24]:Gσ(ε)=τ2σΓ(1/τ)exp-ε-μστwhere Gσ(ε) is the density

Estimating the distribution type

To estimate the distribution type of measurement noise and error, it is required to determine the shape parameter defined in the generic RSE model (8).

ARSE based on the error distribution type estimation

Fig. 3 illustrates the proposed procedure of ARSE that includes two diagrams: the online estimation of distribution types of noise and error using historical data and the real-time RSE calculation using current measurements. These two diagrams are processed separately. As soon as the distribution type is estimated, the corresponding RSE method can be determined and employed in the real-time state estimation. Detail of the procedure is given in Fig. 4.

An illustrative example

In this subsection, the performance of the proposed ARSE will be tested on a rudimentary 2-bus system and IEEE bus systems. The algorithm is coded in JAVA and performed on a Laptop with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5, 2.60 GHz processor and 4 GB RAM.

Conclusion

In this paper, a general RSE model and an ARSE methodology are proposed. The presented general model can unify many existing RSE models in theory and can also deduce some new RSE models, while the proposed ARSE can switch among different RSE models corresponding to different distribution types of measurement noise and error, thereby adapting for various distribution types of noise and error. Numerical experiments illustrate the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

It is worth

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (2012AA050208) and in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51407069).

References (26)

  • K. Kokkinakis et al.

    Exponent parameter estimation for generalized Gaussian probability density functions with application to speech modeling

    Signal Process

    (2005)
  • A. Abur et al.

    Power system state estimation: theory and implementation

    (2004)
  • F.C. Schweppe et al.

    Power system static state estimation, part I–III

    IEEE Trans Power App Syst

    (1970)
  • A. Garcia et al.

    Fast decoupled state estimation and bad data processing

    IEEE Trans Power App Syst

    (1979)
  • A. Monticelli et al.

    Multiple bad data identification for state estimation by combinatorial optimization

    IEEE Trans Power Deliv

    (1986)
  • B.M. Zhang et al.

    A linear recursive bad data identification method with real-time application to power system state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1992)
  • H.M. Merrill et al.

    Bad data suppression in power system static state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1971)
  • M.R. Irving et al.

    Power system state estimation using linear programming

    IEE Proc

    (1978)
  • W.W. Kotiuga et al.

    Bad data rejection properties of weighted least absolute value techniques applied to static state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power App Syst

    (1982)
  • A. Abur

    A bad data identification method for linear programming state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1990)
  • R.A. Jabr et al.

    Iteratively reweighted least-squares implementation of the WLAV state estimation method

    IEE Proc Gen Transm Distrib

    (2004)
  • H. Wei et al.

    An interior method for power system weighted nonlinear L1 norm static state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1998)
  • E. Handshin et al.

    Bad data analysis for power state estimation

    IEEE Trans Power App Syst

    (1975)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Assessment on power systems non-deterministic state estimation algorithms

      2023, Electric Power Systems Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among them, they use kernels to calculate which distribution best fits the error. For example; Bayesian estimators, where the prior PDF is calculated using kernel distribution fitting [24,71], or Maximum Correntropy Criterion (MCC) based on Information Theory [129–133]. This article studies the SE algorithms used at transmission and distribution levels separately since they are generally operated by different control centers.

    • An adaptive hybrid dynamic state estimation method of the medium-voltage DC integrated power system with pulse load

      2022, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent years, scholars such as Vladimir Terzija, Junbo Zhao, Bikash Pal, Ali Abur, Innocent Kamwa and Sassan Goleijani have done a lot of work on the state estimation. Their researches refer to the DSE robustness [8–11], unknown input [12–13], error detection [14], constraints [15,16], parameter estimation [17–18] and hybrid measurement [19–21]. In [22,23], a technical summary was offered about the status quo of DSE and more relevant contents about DSE could be found.

    • Practical state estimation model and algorithm based on kernel density theory

      2022, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      The robust state estimator based on MEAV was proposed in [26–28]. The model of MEAV is continuous and differentiable due to the use of an equivalent transformation which eliminates the absolute symbol in the objective function. [29] proposed an adaptive robust state estimation merging the MNMR, MEAV and MES model.

    • Modeling and application of ship density based on ship scale conversion and grid

      2021, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Theoretically, under the condition of independent distribution of the same sample, kernel estimation method has the properties of asymptotic normality, asymptotic unbiasedness and strong consistent, hence, reliable density estimation results can be obtained by using any kernel function. Some literatures use the parametric generalized Gaussian (Chen et al., 2015) or Laplace (Chen et al., 2017) as kernel functions to derive the robust state estimator. To verify the influence of different kernel functions on ship density estimation, four common kernel functions are selected for experimental comparison to select the optimal kernel function.

    • Information Theoretic Generalized State Estimation in power systems

      2020, Electric Power Systems Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This contrasts with conventional LS-based estimators, which require further iterative steps to remove suspicious measurements from the data set as part of the SE procedure. After the seminal publication [14], several research efforts have attempted to explore this approach, by proposing alternative implementations [15], employing a slightly distinct terminology [16], or exploiting distinct correntropy definitions based on a generalized version of the Gaussian density function [17]. All of them, however, are concerned with state estimation under the assumption of a known topology.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text