Elsevier

Inorganica Chimica Acta

Volume 358, Issue 7, 15 April 2005, Pages 2255-2261
Inorganica Chimica Acta

The amide bridge photocleavage in ruthenium bichromophoric complex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2005.01.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Photoinduced electron transfer between [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex, where mbpy = 4-methyl-4′-carbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine and pyr = 1-aminopyrene, and N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA) gives rise to an irreversible process which ultimately leads to the cleavage of the amide bond that links the pyrene to the ruthenium diimine complex. The photochemical reaction under stationary irradiation was monitored by emission and IR spectroscopic techniques as well as by HPLC chromatographic methods. The results suggest that the amide bond fragmentation occurs after the initial electron transfer process, involving the 3MLCT state of the Ru complex and DMA moiety that results in the formation of [Ru(bpy)2mbpy]2+ complex and pyrene-1-isocyanate primary photoproducts. This last photoproduct suffers hydrolysis in aqueous medium regenerating the 1-aminopyrene ligand and carbon dioxide.

Graphical abstract

Photoinduced electron transfer between [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ and N,N-dimethylaniline originates an irreversible process, leading to the cleavage of the amide bridge. The amide bond fragmentation occurs after the initial electron transfer process, involving the 3MLCT state of the Ru complex and DMA moiety forming [Ru(bpy)2mbpy]2+ and pyrene-1-isocyanate photoproducts. The last species suffers hydrolysis in aqueous medium regenerating the 1-aminopyrene ligand and carbon dioxide.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

One of the most active topics of investigation in photochemistry over the last two decades has been photoinduced electron transfer within model compounds [1], [2]. The design of luminescent polypyridine–ruthenium(II) complexes is a subject of great interest in light-harverting units for elaboration of multi-component supramolecular systems endowed with photo- and electroactive properties [3], [4]. There are a large number of transition metal complexes which exhibit metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited states involving diimine ligands [5], [6]. This is in part due to the fact that diimine complexes of the metals like Re(I), Ru(II) and Os(II) serve as effective sensitizers for photochemical reactions involving net electron transfer [5], [6], [7], [8]. The properties of the excited states of these complexes can be varied systematically by introducing a range of appropriate ligands. For instance, several compounds have been prepared with amide bridges. These have allowed studies concerning peptides and protein modification studies by using metal moieties as chromophores such as polypyridyl ruthenium complexes [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Recently, we reported the synthesis and the photophysical study of the complex [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+, illustrated in Fig. 1, where mbpy = 4-methyl-4′-carbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine and pyr = 1-aminopyrene [14]. This system shows a low efficiency of energy transfer due to small difference in triplet energy between donor and acceptor species and weak electronic coupling and unfavorable Franck–Condon factors, despite the short distance separation of donor and acceptor species by an amide bridge. However, the close lying triplet excited state of donor and acceptor results in a long lived component due to reversible energy transfer between the two chromophores.

Ru(II) diimine complex covalently linked to pyrene by an alkyl bridge was reported in the early 1990s by Ford and Rodgers [15]. The photoexcitation of the MLCT transition of this complex was followed by rapid relaxation to an equilibrium mixture of the two states and the transient absorption spectra revealed bands assigned to the 3MLCT state of the Ru(II) complex and the 3(π–π*) state of pyrene. Similar behavior was reported by Sasse and co-workers in the study of a related ruthenium complex with a shorter alkyl tether [16], [17]. More recently, the Schmehl and co-workers [18] prepared a complex having pyrene covalently attached to 2,2′-bipyridine through a single C–C bond.

Very often, quenching by electron transfer in solution leads initially to the formation of a complex between the excited-state and the ground-state quencher. This complex we call an exciplex [19]. Exciplexes are distinct intermediates in their own right and possess unique properties. The most conspicuous property of exciplexes is their luminescence, which almost always is at longer wavelengths (lower energy) than the luminescence of the excited state. It is well known that pyrene singlet excited state is quenched by N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA) in solution by an exciplex mechanism [20]. Also, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in the 3MLCT state has a high afinity for electron transfer with DMA or other electron donors. In this work, the luminescence quenching and reactivity of [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex with DMA was investigated in tetrahydrofuran (THF) as well as in micellar aqueous environment formed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). We report here the photochemistry of the bichromophoric compound [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ studied by steady state and time resolved luminescence techniques combined with standard HPLC and IR analysis of products.

Section snippets

Equipment

Absorption spectra were measured with a HITACHI U-2000 spectrophotometer, and the corrected steady-state emission and excitation spectra were recorded using a CD-900 Edinburgh spectrofluorimeter. Luminescence decays were measured by time-correlated single photon counting technique using a CD-900 Edinburgh spectrometer operating with a hydrogen-filled nanosecond flash lamp at 40 kHz pulse frequency and a cooled PMT Hamamatsu R955. The decays were analyzed by monoexponential or biexponential

Results and discussions

Emission spectra of the [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex at varying DMA concentration in aqueous SDS micellar solution are shown in Fig. 2. The λmax of [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ emission in H2O is red-shifted as compared to that of the parent compound [5], [6] [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and the closely related complexes reported in the literature [15], [16], [17] (λmax = 637 [14] 624 and 640 nm, respectively). The luminescence spectrum of the [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex with excitation at 355 nm shows the emission

Conclusions

The data collected here indicate that the [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex and probably other similar compounds are not completely photostable in the presence of a strong electron donor as dimethylaniline. The photoinduced electron transfer between [Ru(bpy)2mbpy–pyr]2+ complex and N,N-dimethylaniline originates an irreversible process, which ultimately leads to the cleavage of the amide bridge. The fragmentation of the amide bond takes place after the initial electron transfer process, involving

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge CNPq, FAPESP and CAPES, the Brazilian financial agencies.

References (24)

  • A. Juris et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (1988)
  • K. Kalyanasundaram

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (1982)
  • D.G. McCafferty et al.

    Tetrahedron

    (1995)
  • E.R. Gaillard et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (1996)
  • V. Balzani et al.

    Supramolecular photoinduced

    (1990)
  • J.-H. Lehn

    Supramolecular chemistry

    (1995)
  • V. Balzani et al.

    Supramolecular photochemistry

    (1991)
  • P. Chen et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1998)
  • M. Graetzel

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (1991)
  • B. Durham et al.

    Biochemistry

    (1989)
  • R.-Q. Liu et al.

    Biochemistry

    (1994)
  • D.S. Wuttke et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1993)
  • View full text