Elsevier

Inorganica Chimica Acta

Volume 358, Issue 6, 30 March 2005, Pages 1993-1998
Inorganica Chimica Acta

FACS analysis of oxidative stress induced on tumour cells by SERMs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2004.11.027Get rights and content

Abstract

This study confirms previous reports of the antiproliferative effect of OH–ferrocifen on both hormone-dependent MCF-7 and hormone-independent MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell models. Contrastive analysis of the proliferative effects of classical agonists (including estradiol and ethynylestradiol) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen and its active metabolite, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, was also performed. Previous studies have attributed the effects of OH–ferrocifen on hormone-independent cells to an underlying mechanism based on intracellular oxidation, production of hydroxyl radicals and oxidative damage of DNA. Here we report that the chemically generated OH–ferrocifen cation (as well as the decamethylferrocenium cation) is less cytotoxic to both cell lines than the neutral parent complex. Moreover, fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of 8-oxo-guanine production indicates that, even at relatively high concentrations, OH–ferrocifen produces negligible oxidative DNA damage as compared to other SERMs, namely tamoxifen and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. Alternative pathways to explain the remarkable activity of OH–ferrocifen must therefore be sought.

Graphical abstract

This study confirms previous reports on the anti-proliferative effect of OH–ferrocifen on both ER(+) and ER(−) cell lines. The growth inhibition observed cannot be attribute to oxidative stress.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs)offer great potential for applications in clinical practice. Unlike estrogens and their pure antagonists, SERMs exert selective activity on various estrogen target tissues [1], [2], [3]. For example, the SERM tamoxifen 1, which is converted in vivo into its more active metabolite, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen 2 (Scheme 1), exhibits estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist activity in breast tissue, but agonist activity in uterus and bone tissue [4].

SERMs are a set of chemically diverse compounds whose structure lacks the steroid skeleton of estrogens but is still capable of interacting with the estrogen receptor-binding site. Like estrogens, SERMs operate by diffusing into the cell and binding to the receptor. This causes conformational changes and dimerization, leading to direct interaction of the adduct with specific DNA promoter portions (estrogen response elements, ERE) present on target genes [5]. However, while it has been very successfully employed in the treatment of breast cancer, compound 1 has also been associated to thromboembolism, vasomotor symptoms, and an increased risk for developing endometrial cancer and cataracts [6]. Further complexity derives from the fact that two subtypes of estradiol receptor (ER), namely ERα and ERβ, can coexist in breast cancer cells [7]. A clearer understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of SERMs is thus necessary if we are to take full advantage of their therapeutic potential.

Transition-metal (especially platinum) complexes have been widely employed as anti-cancer agents [8]. However, due to their high general toxicity and narrow spectrum of activity, effective “drug targeting and delivery” strategies are being explored. A typical example using OH–ferrocifen 3 [9], [10], [11], [12], is shown in Scheme 1. The significant ER binding affinity of compound 3, coupled with its lipophilicity, led to suppose that the organometallic moiety could be directed towards specific intracellular targets.

This paper presents results from a study on the putative relationship between the antiproliferative activity of compound 3 and oxidative damage to DNA. We used compounds 1 and 2 as reference molecules to estimate the basic DNA oxidative stress level caused by the hormone carrier. Oxidative damage was assessed by measuring 8-oxo-G, a marker of nucleobase oxidative damage [13], [14].

In addition, we investigated the biological effects of ferrocenium cation derivative 3+, the postulated first active species produced by oxidation of compound 3 in the cell. The biological effects of decamethylferrocenium tetrafluoroborate (4+), a stable and cytotoxic ferrocenium derivative lacking SERM activity, was used as the experimental control [15].

Section snippets

Chemicals

All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma, unless otherwise noted. Compound 3 was synthesized as described in previous reports [9], [10], [11], [12]. Compound 4+ was synthesized according to standard procedures [15], [16].

Synthesis of OH–ferrocifen cation (3+)

The oxidant AgBF4 (38.16 mg, 0.196 mmol) was added under stirring conditions to 10 ml of acetone solution of compound 3 (100 mg, 0.196 mmol). A dark grey precipitate appeared immediately. The reaction mixture was filtered to remove metallic silver. The solvent was

Results and discussion

In the present work we have built on previous studies on the antiproliferative activity of compound 3 in MCF-7 (ERα positive) and MDA-MB-231 (ERα negative, ERß positive) breast cancer cell lines [9], [10], [11], [12]. The effects of ER agonists (estradiol (E2) and ethynylestradiol (EE)) and ER antagonists (compounds 1 and 2) on cell proliferation were similar to those reported by other authors [18], [19], [20]. The results given in Fig. 1 represent the reference for 1 μM concentration.

The

Acknowledgements

This work received the financial support of MIUR (Roma) within the auspices of the COFIN2001 project. Research was carried out within the framework of the European Cooperation COST D20 action (Metal compounds in the treatment of cancer and viral diseases) and COST B16 action (Multidrug resistance reversal). G.C. gratefully acknowledges the EU for a Marie Curie training fellowship (HMPT-CT-2000-00186). Thanks are due to Dr. L. McLean for her assistance in writing this manuscript.

References (35)

  • T.L. Taras et al.

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2001)
  • J.L. Borgna et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1981)
  • K.C. Morello et al.

    Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.

    (2002)
  • G. Jaouen et al.

    C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. IIc, Chim/Chem.

    (2000)
  • S. Top et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2001)
  • D. Osella et al.

    Inorg. Chim. Acta

    (2000)
  • T. Mosmann

    J. Immunol. Meth.

    (1983)
  • M.M. Montano et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • C.L. Fattman et al.

    Cancer Lett.

    (1998)
  • U. Gundimeda et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • N.K. Wenger et al.

    J. Endocrinol. Invest.

    (1999)
  • D.B. Muchmore

    Oncologist

    (2000)
  • L. Bernstein et al.

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1999)
  • P. de Cremoux et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2002)
  • S. Top et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (1996)
  • S. Top et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Ferrocene-steroid conjugates: Synthesis, structure and biological activity

      2017, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the important point on this finding is the presence of ferrocene enhances the anti-proliferative activity. Although we do not have experimental data on these complexes, their enhancement in anti-proliferative activities must likely could be related to the ROS production capacity, as previously reported for ferrocenium and ferrocene complexes [37–40]. However, we cannot separate quantitatively which portion of the anti-proliferative activity belongs to receptor recognition and ROS contribution.

    • Ferrocenes as potential chemotherapeutic drugs: Synthesis, cytotoxic activity, reactive oxygen species production and micronucleus assay

      2015, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Estrogens genotoxic mechanism may involve DNA adduct formation by estrogen metabolites, free radical by redox cycling of estrogens through microsomal, mitochondrial or nuclear processes.35–38 For ferrocene derivatives, DNA damage may be caused by oxygen free radical species, inducing oxidative damage.12–14,27,28,39 Those oxidative species cause DNA fragmentation resulting in micronucleated cells.

    • Functionalized ferrocenes: The role of the para substituent on the phenoxy pendant group

      2014, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to Jaouen et al., this high anti-proliferative activity is related to the ability of electron transfer from the phenol to the ferrocenyl to form the quinine methide radical species, which subsequently activates the redox process on the cell [15]. It is known that the main mechanism of action of ferrocene is by increasing activity of ROS formation [17,18]. Based on the above arguments, we could explain the high anti-proliferative activity of 4-(1H-pyrrol-yl)phenyl ferrocenecarboxylate on both cell lines as a result of having two redox active moieties which could be coupled increasing the production of ROS and stimulating the redox signaling process in the cell, combined with an increase in lipophilic character brought by the 4-(1H-pyrrol-yl)phenyl group.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Martin Luther King Jr Way, Oakland, CA 94609, USA.

    View full text