Recovery of Ni, Co and rare earths from spent Ni–metal hydride batteries and preparation of spherical Ni(OH)2
Introduction
Ni–MH batteries have been applied widely in many fields since they were commercialized in 1990. Their electrodes consist of foamed-nickel or copper plating strip as substrate and nickel hydroxide and AB5-type hydrogen-storage alloy as active electrode material. Therefore Ni–MH batteries contain valuable metals in which the average content of Ni, Co and light rare earths is about 30% 4% and 10% respectively (Zhang et al., 1999). The output of Ni–MH batteries is steadily rising due to their low cost, high electrochemical capacity, quick charging capability, long cycle life, good security, good environmental compatibility, wide range of usable temperature, etc. It is estimated that the Ni–MH batteries will occupy ~ 30% of the international battery market in 2010 (Tzanetakis and Scott, 2004a, Tzanetakis and Scott, 2004b) and have an average service life of about two years. In 2005, it was determined that the total number of spent Ni–MH batteries reached one billion, in which there exists about 7500 ton Ni, 1000 ton Co and 2500 ton light RE. Because the arbitrary dumping of spent Ni–MH batteries could lead to serious heavy metal pollution, the recovery of valuable metals from spent Ni–MH batteries has received much attention (Espinosa et al., 2004, Bertuol et al., 2006, Muller and Friedrich, 2006, Rabah et al., 2008).
Many hydrometallurgical processes have been developed to recover metals from spent Ni–MH batteries in recent years. Tenorio and Espinosa (2002) used ore-dressing methods to recover the nickel-based alloy from Ni–MH batteries whilst Wang et al. (2002) regenerated the hydrogen-storage alloy from Ni–MH batteries, whose structure and electrochemical properties could be restored. Zhang et al., 1998, Zhang et al., 1999 reported a hydrometallurgical process for the separation and recovery of metal values such as nickel, cobalt and rare earths from spent Ni–MH batteries. In their research work, the electrode materials were dissolved in 2 M H2SO4 at 95 °C with a leach efficiency of 97% Ni, 100% Co and 96% RE. The rare earth values were recovered from the leach liquor by solvent extraction with 25% D2EHPA, followed by precipitation with oxalic acid and calcination. The cobalt and nickel in the raffinate were then separated by 20% Cyanex 272 and recovered as oxalates by the addition of oxalic acid. More recently, Tzanetakis and Scott, 2004a, Tzanetakis and Scott, 2004b also used D2EHPA to extract rare earths from the leach solution, then nickel and cobalt powders were separated and recovered through electrochemical deposition.
Because the solubilities of rare earth sulphates are low, especially at higher temperature, a large ratio of liquid to solid must be used to ensure a high leach recovery of rare earths, which makes the final nickel concentration low. This leads to large amounts of wastewater and high energy consumption.
This work develops a facile and low-cost flowsheet to recover and separate rare earth, nickel and cobalt from the electrode materials of spent Ni–MH batteries. Higher concentrations of H2SO4 and lower ratios of liquid to solid were adopted in the leaching step, which precipitated most of the rare earths as sulphates in the leach residues. Consequently, the leach liquor contained relatively low concentrations of rare earths and high concentrations of nickel, which decreased the consumption of extractant and the emission of wastewater. Subsequently, a high-density spherical Ni(OH)2 with wide size distribution was prepared from the concentrated nickel solution by the “controlled crystallization method”. This material can be used to produce the positive active material of Ni–MH batteries and thereby realize the recycling of nickel from Ni–MH batteries.
Section snippets
Materials
Cylinder shaped Ni–MH batteries, used in this work, were provided by a battery plant. The commercial extractants employed, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (P204) and bis-(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272) were purchased from Luoyang Zhongda Chemical Co. Ltd and Cytec Industries, respectively. These extractants were utilized without any further purification with kerosene diluents. All other reagents were of analytical reagent grade.
The spent Ni–MH batteries were cut to
Leaching
The rare earths in the spent Ni–MH batteries are mainly light rare earths, such as La, Ce, Pr and Nd. The solubility of rare earth sulphates obviously reduces with rising temperature (Xu, 2002), as shown in Fig. 1. Whereas, the solubilities of NiSO4, CoSO4, MnSO4, FeSO4 and Fe2(SO4)3 are high enough at room temperature and generally increase with rising temperature up to 100 °C.
Based on the differences in the solubility characteristics between the sulphates of rare earths and those of cobalt,
Conclusions
A hydrometallurgical procedure including leaching, solvent extraction, evaporation and crystallization has been performed to recover rare earths, nickel and cobalt from the spent Ni–MH batteries. By using the recovered nickel sulphate as starting material, spherical nickel hydroxide doped with Co, Zn and Cd was prepared with wide size distribution under strict control of the reaction conditions. An overall flowsheet for recovery of Ni, Co and RE and preparation of spherical Ni(OH)2 from spent
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50674060, 50734005) and the National Key Technology R & D Program of China (2008BAC4603).
References (27)
- et al.
Some effects of cobalt hydroxide upon the electrochemical behaviour of nickel hydroxide electrodes
Journal of Power Sources
(1989) - et al.
Spent NiMH batteries: characterization and metal recovery through mechanical processing
Journal of Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
Separation and recovery of cobalt(II) and nickel(II) from sulphate solutions using sodium salts of D2EHPA, PC 88A and Cyanex 272
Hydrometallurgy
(1998) - et al.
Acidic organophosphorus extractants—XIX. Extraction of Cu, Co, Ni, Zn and Cd by di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid
Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry
(1974) - et al.
Development of a recycling process for nickel–metal hydride batteries
Journal of Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
Separation of Zn(II) and Mn(II) from sulphate solutions using sodium salts of D2EHPA, PC88A and Cyanex 272
Hydrometallurgy
(2006) Solvent extraction of cobalt and nickel by organo-phosphorus acids I. Comparison of phosphoric, phosphonic and phosphinic acid systems
Hydrometallurgy
(1982)- et al.
Recovery of nickel, cobalt and some salts from spent Ni–MH batteries
Waste Management
(2008) - et al.
Recovery of Ni-based alloys from spent Ni–MH batteries
Journal of Power Sources
(2002) - et al.
Synthesis and characterization of stable Co and Cd doped nickel hydroxide nanoparticles for electrochemical applications
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
(2009)
Regeneration of hydrogen storage alloy in spent nickel–metal hydride batteries
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Hydrometallurgical process for recovery of metal values from spent nickel–metal hydride secondary batteries
Hydrometallurgy
Recovery of metal values from spent nickel–metal hydride rechargeable batteries
Journal of Power Sources
Cited by (123)
Biosorption and biomagnetic recovery of La<sup>3+</sup> by Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1 biomass
2022, Separation and Purification TechnologyChemical processes for the recovery of valuable metals from spent nickel metal hydride batteries: A review
2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsProduction of AB<inf>5</inf> materials from spent Ni-MH batteries with further tests of hydrogen storage suitability
2022, Journal of Power SourcesCitation Excerpt :The leachate is then submitted to a separation step of REEs and other metals using solvent extraction or precipitation methods [10,12,15]. Pure rare-earth chloride was recovered with an overall recovery of about 97.8% [17]. The leaching with 3 M H2SO4 results in 94.8% of REEs recovery [17].
Effective separation and recovery of valuable metals from waste Ni-based batteries: A comprehensive review
2022, Chemical Engineering Journal