Psychiatric–Medical ComorbidityPsychological correlates of vasovagal versus medically unexplained syncope
Introduction
Syncope is a sudden transient loss of consciousness associated with a drop in postural tone due to transient global cerebral hypoperfusion and hypoxia. It is characterized by rapid onset, short duration and spontaneous complete recovery [1].
Syncope might have three different kinds of etiology [1]: cardiovascular, orthostatic hypotensive and neurally mediated. Neurally mediated (or reflex) syncope has a prevalence of 21% in the general population [2], with a lifetime cumulative incidence of 35% [3]. It varies from 35% to 48% in patients referred to an emergency department [4], [5], [6] and from 56% to 73% in syncope-dedicated units [5], [7], [8], [9]. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) belongs to this latter group, and it is frequently triggered by emotions or orthostatic stress [1]. Vasovagal etiology is the most frequent cause of syncope in all settings [1]. Among patients with suspected VVS, up to 40% [2], [10] have a negative response to the Head-Up Tilt test (HUT). This medical procedure is specifically designed to diagnose presence of VVS through passive head-up tilting. If vasovagal symptoms are triggered in conjunction with significant decreases in blood pressure, then a diagnosis of VVS is made. HUT-negative patients are mostly identified as having medically unexplained syncope (US) [11].
In the last two decades, the possible association between syncope and psychiatric disorders has been widely explored [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Kouakam and colleagues [15] reported a prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 65% of patients referred for HUT, and it was significantly higher than that observed in a control group of arrhythmic patients. While some research highlighted a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders or psychological distress in US patients compared to the ones with VVS [11], [13], [14], contradictory evidences exist [17], [18], [19]. In addition, studies focusing on the psychological correlates of patients with VVS showed that blood/injury phobia [1], [11], [20], somatization and affective disorders [19] may be common in this population. Leftheriotis and colleagues [21] have also corroborated some earlier evidences in the literature [22] about the high prevalence of minor psychiatric disorders among patients with VVS. The authors show how patients with subclinical depressive symptomatology and anxiety disorders (i.e., panic and generalized anxiety disorder) had an increased rate of positive response to HUT compared to normal controls. On the other hand, studies concerning the psychological correlates of recurrent US suggested that specific psychiatric disorders such as generalized anxiety, panic attacks and major depression can develop in patients with this kind of syncope [12], [23], [24]. Only few studies have investigated psychosomatic complaints of patients with syncope through the use of standard psychiatric nosography. Among these, Ventura et al. [16] evaluated psychosomatic disorders of 26 patients with unexplained syncope by means of self-administered questionnaires and semistructured psychosomatic interview based on criteria from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. The authors found a prevalence rate of somatization of 12%. In the same vein, Giada et al. [19] found a 10-fold higher prevalence (near 30%) of somatization disorders [according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria] among VVS patients compared to healthy subjects.
However, a wide body of evidence has accumulated in psychosomatic medicine, highlighting both clinical impact and implications of psychosomatic complaints, even in their subclinical presentation, on quality of life and psychological well-being [25], [26], [27]. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) [25] offer an alternative to the traditional psychiatric nosography and allow the clinician to characterize a patient's mode of perceiving, experiencing, evaluating and responding to his/her health status [28].
Given the paucity of studies comparing VVS and US patients, for what concerns both psychological and psychosomatic profile, the objectives of the present study are (a) to evaluate psychological and psychosomatic distress through the use of reliable observer- and self-rated measures in patients with suspected VVS who underwent tilt testing and (b) to compare it among patients with a positive response to HUT (indicative of VVS) and those with a negative result to tilt testing (indicative of US).
Section snippets
Subjects
A consecutive series of 102 patients, whose syncope was not cardiac or orthostatic in origin, was recruited over a 3-year period. These subjects were scheduled to undergo HUT after being admitted to the emergency room or evaluated as outpatient at the Syncope Unit of the Cardiology Department of Bentivoglio Hospital in Bologna. Fifteen patients (14.7%) refused to participate in the study because of noninterest. Another 20 patients (19.6%) were not enrolled in the study because they presented
Results
The mean age of the entire sample was 48.3±18.8 years. Compared by each sociodemographic variable, the two clinical groups showed no significant differences (Table 1).
Concerning syncope's expression prior to evaluation, most of the VVS patients (75.6%) usually lost consciousness during their syncopal events, while 45.5% of US subjects experienced only presyncope symptoms, even though there were no statistical differences between the two groups. If compared to patients with loss of
Discussion
The most interesting finding of this study is that, despite similar psychopathology, the US group reported higher self-perceived distress than VVS subjects. Compared to VVS, patients with unexplained syncope reported to feel significantly more anxious, depressed and hostile. If compared to the medium scores obtained on the SQ by the general population (anxiety: M= 3.84, S.D.= 3.87; depression: M= 2.56, S.D.= 2.87; somatization: M= 4.49, S.D.= 4.14; hostility: M= 3.90, S.D.= 3.79) [43], in our sample,
References (69)
- et al.
Syncope prevalence in the ED compared to that in the general practice and population: a strong selection process
Am J Emerg Med
(2009) - et al.
Prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients with multiple potential causes of syncope
Mayo Clin Proc
(2003) - et al.
Prospective evaluation of psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in recurrent vasovagal and unexplained syncope
J Psychosom Res
(2009) - et al.
Psychiatric syncope: a new look at an old disease
Psychosomatics
(1990) - et al.
Psychiatric illnesses in patients with syncope
Am J Med
(1995) - et al.
Prevalence and prognostic significance of psychiatric disorders in patients evaluated for recurrent unexplained syncope
Am J Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Use of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) in a community sample
Psychosomatics
(2006) - et al.
Methodology of head-up tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to, ICD-10 diagnoses of the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research in consultation–liaison psychiatry patients
Psychosomatics
(2004) - et al.
Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients
Behav Res Ther
(1979)