Elsevier

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volume 35, Issue 3, May–June 2013, Pages 246-252
General Hospital Psychiatry

Psychiatric–Medical Comorbidity
Psychological correlates of vasovagal versus medically unexplained syncope

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.01.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Psychiatric morbidity is quite common in vasovagal syncope (VVS), but findings are sometimes contradictory. Among patients with suspected VVS, up to 40% has a negative response to Head-Up Tilt test (HUT), the cause of syncope remaining unexplained (US). The authors evaluated and compared the psychological and psychosomatic profile in patients with positive (VVS) and negative HUT (US).

Method

A consecutive series of 67 patients with suspected VVS underwent HUT: 45 patients had a positive HUT, 22 negative. They were evaluated by means of observer- and self-rated measures.

Results

Of the total sample, 95.5% had at least one Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnosis or one psychosomatic syndrome, such as specific and social phobias, illness denial and demoralization. Comparing VVS and US patients, no statistical differences on diagnoses' frequencies were found. However, the US group had significantly poorer health habits, lower levels of well-being and higher psychological distress. They also reported to be more anxious, depressed and hostile. VVS patients were significantly more blood and social phobic than US patients.

Conclusion

Despite similar and remarkable observer-rated psychopathology, US patients reported higher self-perceived psychological distress than VVS patients. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing HUT should incorporate both clinical and subclinical methods to better address syncope management.

Introduction

Syncope is a sudden transient loss of consciousness associated with a drop in postural tone due to transient global cerebral hypoperfusion and hypoxia. It is characterized by rapid onset, short duration and spontaneous complete recovery [1].

Syncope might have three different kinds of etiology [1]: cardiovascular, orthostatic hypotensive and neurally mediated. Neurally mediated (or reflex) syncope has a prevalence of 21% in the general population [2], with a lifetime cumulative incidence of 35% [3]. It varies from 35% to 48% in patients referred to an emergency department [4], [5], [6] and from 56% to 73% in syncope-dedicated units [5], [7], [8], [9]. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) belongs to this latter group, and it is frequently triggered by emotions or orthostatic stress [1]. Vasovagal etiology is the most frequent cause of syncope in all settings [1]. Among patients with suspected VVS, up to 40% [2], [10] have a negative response to the Head-Up Tilt test (HUT). This medical procedure is specifically designed to diagnose presence of VVS through passive head-up tilting. If vasovagal symptoms are triggered in conjunction with significant decreases in blood pressure, then a diagnosis of VVS is made. HUT-negative patients are mostly identified as having medically unexplained syncope (US) [11].

In the last two decades, the possible association between syncope and psychiatric disorders has been widely explored [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Kouakam and colleagues [15] reported a prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 65% of patients referred for HUT, and it was significantly higher than that observed in a control group of arrhythmic patients. While some research highlighted a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders or psychological distress in US patients compared to the ones with VVS [11], [13], [14], contradictory evidences exist [17], [18], [19]. In addition, studies focusing on the psychological correlates of patients with VVS showed that blood/injury phobia [1], [11], [20], somatization and affective disorders [19] may be common in this population. Leftheriotis and colleagues [21] have also corroborated some earlier evidences in the literature [22] about the high prevalence of minor psychiatric disorders among patients with VVS. The authors show how patients with subclinical depressive symptomatology and anxiety disorders (i.e., panic and generalized anxiety disorder) had an increased rate of positive response to HUT compared to normal controls. On the other hand, studies concerning the psychological correlates of recurrent US suggested that specific psychiatric disorders such as generalized anxiety, panic attacks and major depression can develop in patients with this kind of syncope [12], [23], [24]. Only few studies have investigated psychosomatic complaints of patients with syncope through the use of standard psychiatric nosography. Among these, Ventura et al. [16] evaluated psychosomatic disorders of 26 patients with unexplained syncope by means of self-administered questionnaires and semistructured psychosomatic interview based on criteria from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. The authors found a prevalence rate of somatization of 12%. In the same vein, Giada et al. [19] found a 10-fold higher prevalence (near 30%) of somatization disorders [according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria] among VVS patients compared to healthy subjects.

However, a wide body of evidence has accumulated in psychosomatic medicine, highlighting both clinical impact and implications of psychosomatic complaints, even in their subclinical presentation, on quality of life and psychological well-being [25], [26], [27]. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) [25] offer an alternative to the traditional psychiatric nosography and allow the clinician to characterize a patient's mode of perceiving, experiencing, evaluating and responding to his/her health status [28].

Given the paucity of studies comparing VVS and US patients, for what concerns both psychological and psychosomatic profile, the objectives of the present study are (a) to evaluate psychological and psychosomatic distress through the use of reliable observer- and self-rated measures in patients with suspected VVS who underwent tilt testing and (b) to compare it among patients with a positive response to HUT (indicative of VVS) and those with a negative result to tilt testing (indicative of US).

Section snippets

Subjects

A consecutive series of 102 patients, whose syncope was not cardiac or orthostatic in origin, was recruited over a 3-year period. These subjects were scheduled to undergo HUT after being admitted to the emergency room or evaluated as outpatient at the Syncope Unit of the Cardiology Department of Bentivoglio Hospital in Bologna. Fifteen patients (14.7%) refused to participate in the study because of noninterest. Another 20 patients (19.6%) were not enrolled in the study because they presented

Results

The mean age of the entire sample was 48.3±18.8 years. Compared by each sociodemographic variable, the two clinical groups showed no significant differences (Table 1).

Concerning syncope's expression prior to evaluation, most of the VVS patients (75.6%) usually lost consciousness during their syncopal events, while 45.5% of US subjects experienced only presyncope symptoms, even though there were no statistical differences between the two groups. If compared to patients with loss of

Discussion

The most interesting finding of this study is that, despite similar psychopathology, the US group reported higher self-perceived distress than VVS subjects. Compared to VVS, patients with unexplained syncope reported to feel significantly more anxious, depressed and hostile. If compared to the medium scores obtained on the SQ by the general population (anxiety: M= 3.84, S.D.= 3.87; depression: M= 2.56, S.D.= 2.87; somatization: M= 4.49, S.D.= 4.14; hostility: M= 3.90, S.D.= 3.79) [43], in our sample,

References (69)

  • G.A. Fava et al.

    Hypochondriacal fears and beliefs in agoraphobia

    J Affect Disorders

    (1988)
  • A.E. Speckens et al.

    A validation study of the Whitley Index, the Illness Attitude Scales and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale in general medical and general practice patients

    J Psychosom Res

    (1996)
  • E. Ferguson et al.

    The Illness Attitudes Scale (IAS): a psychometric evaluation on a non-clinical population

    Pers Indiv Differ

    (1995)
  • L. Busweiler et al.

    Sleep syncope: important clinical associations with phobia and vagotonia

    Sleep Med

    (2010)
  • C. Podoleanu et al.

    Lower limb and abdominal compression bandages prevent progressive orthostatic hypotension in the elderly: a randomized placebo-controlled study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • European Society of Cardiology

    Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009)

    Eur Heart J

    (2009)
  • E.S. Sooteriades et al.

    Incidence and prognosis of syncope

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • K.S. Ganzeboom et al.

    Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35–60 years

    J Cardiovasc Electr

    (2006)
  • J.J. Blanc et al.

    Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period

    Eur Heart J

    (2002)
  • F. Ammirati et al.

    Management of syncope: clinical and economic impact of a Syncope Unit

    Europace

    (2008)
  • W.K. Shen et al.

    Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS): a multidisciplinary approach to syncope management

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • M. Brignole et al.

    Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals

    Europace

    (2006)
  • L. Mohan et al.

    Vasovagal syncope: an enigma

    J Assoc Physicians India

    (2004)
  • C. Kouakam et al.

    Troubles anxieux et syncopes inexpliquées présumées d'origine vasovagale

    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss

    (1996)
  • R. Ventura et al.

    Psychiatric conditions in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope

    Europace

    (2001)
  • T.J. Cohen et al.

    An association between anxiety and neurocardiogenic syncope during head-up tilt table testing

    PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (2000)
  • A. McGrady et al.

    Psychological and physiological factors associated with tilt table testing for neurally mediated syncopal syndromes

    PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (2001)
  • F. Giada et al.

    Psychiatric profile, quality of life and risk of syncopal recurrence in patients with tilt-induced vasovagal syncope

    Europace

    (2005)
  • V. Accurso et al.

    Predisposition to vasovagal syncope in subjects with blood/injury phobia

    Circulation

    (2001)
  • D. Leftheriotis et al.

    Minor psychiatric disorders and syncope: the role of psychopathology in the expression of vasovagal reflex

    Psychother Psychosom

    (2008)
  • M. Linzer et al.

    Medically unexplained syncope: relationship to psychiatric illness

    Am J Med

    (1992)
  • M.E.V. Petersen et al.

    Psychogenic syncope diagnosed by prolonged head-up tilt testing

    QJM

    (1995)
  • C.J. Mathias et al.

    Familial vasovagal syncope and pseudosyncope: observations in a case with both natural and adopted siblings

    Clin Auton Res

    (2000)
  • G.A. Fava et al.

    Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text