Elsevier

Gene

Volume 428, Issues 1–2, 1 January 2009, Pages 31-35
Gene

Characterization of Bacillus stearothermophilus infA and of its product IF1

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Bacillus stearothermophilus infA encoding translation initiation factor IF1 was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli and its transcript and protein product characterized. Although the functional properties of B. stearothermophilus and E. coli IF1, compared in several translational tests in the presence of both homologous and heterologous components, are not entirely identical, the two proteins are interchangeable in an in vitro translational system programmed with a natural mRNA. The availability of purified B. stearothermophilus IF1 now allows us to analyze the translation initiation pathway using efficient in vitro tests based entirely on purified components derived from this thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium.

Introduction

IF1, one of the three factors essential to initiate protein synthesis in bacteria is a β-barrel RNA binding protein (Gualerzi, 2001, Boelens and Gualerzi, 2002, Laursen et al., 2005) with RNA chaperone activity (Croitoru et al., 2006) which binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit (Celano et al., 1988, Carter, 2001) induces a conformational change of the subunit mainly involving helix 44 of 16S rRNA (Carter et al., 2001) and stimulates, together with IF2 and IF3, the formation of both 30S and 70S initiation complexes (30SIC and 70SIC) (Wintermeyer and Gualerzi, 1983, Pon and Gualerzi, 1984). Furthermore, IF1 cooperates with IF3 to maintain a sufficient pool of free subunits (Godefroy-Colburn et al., 1975, Giangrossi et al., 2007) and to ensure initiation fidelity by discriminating against non-canonical 30S initiation complexes (Milon et al., 2008).

Although IF1 is one of the universally conserved translational factors (Kyrpides and Woese, 1998), several attempts to isolate and characterize Bacillus stearothermophilus (Bst) infA and its product BstIF1 had failed in the past in our laboratory, unlike the case of infB (Brombach et al., 1986) and infC (Pon et al., 1989) of this organism which were successfully isolated, characterized and expressed, yielding large amounts of thermophilic IF2 and IF3.

The present isolation, characterization and expression of B. stearothermophilus infA fill this gap, while the consequent availability of purified BstIF1 allows us to use translational components derived from this organism to set up one of the most active initiation tests available for Gram positive bacteria.

Section snippets

Buffers

  • Buffer I: 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.7, 60 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM MgAcetate

  • Buffer II: 20 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.1, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.0, 10% Glycerol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mM benzamidine

  • Buffer III: 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.1, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.0, 10% Glycerol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mM benzamidine

  • TBS Buffer: 0.05 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.6), 0.9% NaCl.

Formation of 30SIC and 70SIC, kinetic experiments by FRET stopped-flow experiments and in vitro translation of 027mRNA were performed as

Isolation, sequencing and cloning of Bst infA

A preliminary genomic comparison of B. subtilis and B. (Geobacillus) stearothermophilus, partially available on line (http://www.genome.ou.edu/bstearo.html) revealed a high degree of sequence and gene organization conservation within the regions chosen for comparison (i.e. the S10, the spc and the alfa operons) (Fig. 1A). However, the available B. stearothermophilus sequence comprised only a limited portion of what seemed to be infA (Fig. 1B). To isolate and characterize infA it was therefore

Acknowledgments

Grants of the Italian MIUR (PRIN 2005) to COG and CLP are gratefully acknowledged.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Phylogenomic re-assessment of the thermophilic genus Geobacillus

    2016, Systematic and Applied Microbiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    As of June 2016, a further 834 strains have been affiliated to the genus on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis [7]. DNA sequences of the infB, rpoB and spo0A genes have also been shown to be useful for the affiliation of new strains in the genus Geobacillus [17,23,30]. However, the full gene sequence of recN has been demonstrated to be the most robust marker for assigning bacterial strains at the genus and species levels [54].

View full text