Elsevier

Fusion Engineering and Design

Volume 122, November 2017, Pages 256-273
Fusion Engineering and Design

Power exhaust in tokamaks and scenario integration issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.06.024Get rights and content

Abstract

A review of the main concepts, proposed solutions and results of R&D as well as outstanding issues on power exhaust in tokamaks is presented with specific emphasis on the expected issues that need to be resolved for ITER and future fusion reactors such as DEMO for both conventional and advanced divertor concepts.

Introduction

The achievement of fusion production in tokamak reactors can only be realized through the integration of DT plasmas with thermonuclear characteristic (achievement of T > 10 keV and nTτE  1022 m−3 keVs) with power and particle fluxes to the reactor vessel which are compatible with the power handling capabilities and erosion lifetime of the components that protect it (plasma-facing components or PFCs). In turn, the erosion of the plasma-facing components generates impurities that can enter the confined plasma and decrease fusion power production by DT fuel dilution and increased electromagnetic radiative losses. In addition the helium ash from DT reactions must be removed by the plasma to avoid DT fuel dilution and this must be achieved within a given total fuel throughput to limit the amount of tritium that is required for the operation of the fusion reactor. These integration issues already have to be addressed to maintain plasma performance in the present generation of experiments, particularly those operating with high Z PFCs [1], [2], [3] and with DT plasmas [4], [5]. Moreover, the successful resolution of such integration issues is essential for the success of ITER, presently under construction, DEMO and future fusion power plants given the significantly larger edge power and particle fluxes and duration of plasma discharges (from several minutes to continuous operation). These large particle and power fluxes and the long duration of the plasma discharges requires that the PFCs are actively cooled; this limits the power fluxes that can be deposited by the plasma (≤10 MW m−2) on the PFCs [6] and the thickness of the PFCs themselves (≤1 cm) [7] and thus their erosion lifetime.

Extensive R&D carried out in present tokamaks to resolve the challenges of particle and power exhaust has already provided the basic concepts on which the designs of ITER [8] and DEMO (a demonstration fusion reactor e.g. [9]) are based:

  • -

    the modification of the magnetic field at the edge plasma by coils external to the plasma which creates a magnetic separatrix in which the poloidal magnetic field is zero at one or more points (so called poloidal divertor configuration and X-points respectively see Fig. 1). This separates the region of interaction between the confined thermonuclear plasma, through a region of open field lines or scrape-off layer (SOL), and the PFCs and allows the reduction of the power flux on the PFCs (so-called divertor targets) and the increase of particle exhaust by the establishment of high density and low temperature conditions in the divertor plasma itself.

  • -

    the use of metallic PFCs, in particular made of tungsten (W), for the divertor targets which are subject to high fluxes, which do not form strongly bound chemical compounds with hydrogenic isotopes and thus prevent T to be trapped in the reactor vessel [14]. While this PFC choice is not directly linked with the general problem of power and particle exhaust it leads to specific issues due to the erosion of the materials resulting from the interaction with the plasma and to the very small amounts of W which can be tolerated in thermonuclear plasmas due to its large electromagnetic radiation efficiency [15]. It should be pointed out that another potential solution to the power exhaust problem is based on the use of liquid metals which has potential advantages with respect to erosion lifetime and, potentially allows the achievement of power handling capabilities in excess of 10 MW m−2. This approach presents specific issues regarding plasma-wall interactions and the interaction of liquid metals with magnetic fields that will be not be discussed here; the reader is referred to Mazzitelli et al. [16] for details on this topic.

In this paper we review the basic concepts for power and particle exhaust in tokamaks and progress in R&D to address the integration issues mentioned above. We also highlight the remaining challenges that need to be resolved for DEMO both in ITER and other smaller scale devices where the conventional divertor and advanced divertor approaches to this challenge will be investigated. The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 addresses first the basic issues related to power exhaust in tokamaks and the consequences of divertor geometry on this, Section 3 describes the dissipative processes that are utilized to decrease the divertor power flux level, Section 4 describes the use of dissipative processes in the confined plasma to ease the divertor power exhaust problem and the outstanding integration issues, Section 5 discusses issues related to the integration of power exhaust and particle exhaust and finally Section 6 summarises the conclusions.

Section snippets

Edge power flow characteristics in present tokamaks and fusion reactors

The so-called power exhaust problem in tokamaks is caused by the large difference in the rate of transport of plasma energy across and along the magnetic field lines. The magnetic field provides very good thermal insulation and leads to a very low effective heat diffusivity across the magnetic field that provides the energy confinement required for the achievement of thermonuclear temperatures in fusion reactors. On the other hand, magnetic fields do not have an effect on the heat diffusivity

Radiative divertors and detachment

To reduce the magnitude of the power fluxes at the divertor target beyond what can be achieved by divertor magnetic geometry and the associated heat transport within the divertor itself it is necessary to dissipate the power by other means than plasma transport over a larger area of the PFCs. This can be achieved by increasing the ionization and electromagnetic losses by impurities and re-ionizing neutrals in the divertor plasma. These atomic processes and electromagnetic radiation tend to lead

Power dissipation by radiation in the confined plasma and core-edge integration issues

In addition to dissipation of power by atomic and impurity losses at the divertor, it is also possible to decrease the power that flows to the divertor target PFCs by increased core plasma radiation. Obviously, such increase must be compatible with maintaining the required plasma performance for high gain fusion power production for an integrated solution of the power exhaust problem. This involves both maintaining an appropriate edge power flow to sustain high quality H-mode confinement and a

Power exhaust during confinement transients and ELMs

In addition to the exhaust of power during stationary phases discussed above, power exhaust must also be provided during transients that take place during H-mode scenarios in energy confinement time timescales (transitions between L-mode and H-mode regimes) and MHD timescales (Edge Localized Modes ELMs [58]) and/or avoiding such fast transients.

Providing power exhaust during H-mode access and exit is not conceptually different from stationary H-mode conditions. However, it is much more complex

Relation between power exhaust and fuel, helium and impurity exhaust

While not explicitly discussed above, the issues related to particle exhaust are strongly correlated with power exhaust. In particular, for a fusion reactor to operate both power and particle exhaust should be integrated with the core plasma performance to achieve the required energy gain. In many cases the conditions required for power exhaust are well aligned to provide appropriate particle exhaust and impurity exhaust as well. In general, access to high density radiative divertor conditions

Conclusions

The solution of the power exhaust problem remains a key open issue for the demonstration of fusion reactors based in the tokamak concept. Besides the use of alternative divertor target designs with the use of liquid metals, two main approaches are presently being considered: one based on the conventional divertor approach and the other on advanced divertors. The conventional divertor follows the ITER power exhaust strategy based of partially detached divertor operation supplemented by a

Acknowledgements

ITER is the Nuclear Facility INB no. 174. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the ITER Organization. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014–2018 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.

References (80)

  • M. Merola

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2002)
  • T. Hirai

    Fusion Eng. Des.

    (2013)
  • G. Federici

    Fusion Eng. Des.

    (2016)
  • R.A. Pitts

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2013)
  • A. Loarte

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2015)
  • K. Borrass

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1997)
  • M. Wischmeier

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2015)
  • S. Lisgo

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2005)
  • A. Kukushkin

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2013)
  • R. Neu

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2005)
  • F. Romanelli

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2013)
  • M. Greenwald

    Phys. Plasmas.

    (2014)
  • L.D. Horton

    Nucl. Fusion

    (1999)
  • J.D. Strachan

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (1997)
  • R. Aymar

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2002)
  • A. Soukhanovskii

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2015)
  • E. Havlíčková

    Plasma Phys Control. Fusion

    (2014)
  • M. Kotschenreuther

    Phys. Plasmas.

    (2013)
  • J. Roth

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2008)
  • A. Kallenbach

    Plasma Phys Control. Fusion

    (2005)
  • G. Mazzitelli

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2015)
  • M. Greenwald

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2002)
  • Nucl. Fusion

    (2007)
  • R. Wenninger

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2015)
  • F. Wagner

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1982)
  • R.J. Goldston

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2012)
  • T. Eich

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2013)
  • A.S. Kukushkin

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2005)
  • H. Reimerdes

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2013)
  • A. Loarte

    Nucl. Fusion

    (1998)
  • A. Kallenbach

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2013)
  • G.M. McCracken

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (1993)
  • P.C. Stangeby

    Nucl. Fusion

    (1993)
  • B. LaBombard

    Phys. Plasmas

    (1995)
  • U. Wenzel

    Nucl. Fusion

    (1999)
  • T.W. Petrie

    Nucl. Fusion

    (1997)
  • A.S. Kukushkin

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2009)
  • R.D. Monk

    PhD Thesis

    (1996)
  • Mertens

    Nucl. Fusion

    (2000)
  • C. Guillemaut

    Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion

    (2017)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Divertor of the European DEMO: Engineering and technologies for power exhaust

      2022, Fusion Engineering and Design
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ratio of the front face armor thickness to the average erosion rate determines the erosion lifetime of the targets. Edge localized modes (ELMs) with the particle energy of a few keV will have a decisive impact on the erosion lifetime [8,20,24]. The lifetime of the structural materials (copper alloy, steel) is likely to be affected by neutron irradiation due to embrittlement and reduction of strength.

    • Development of 2D GEM-based SXR plasma imaging for DTT device: Focus on readout structure

      2021, Fusion Engineering and Design
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ITER and DEMO oriented machines are designed with the optimized spatial distribution of the magnetic field aiming to minimize region of interaction between the confined plasma and the Plasma-Facing Components (PFCs). This will lead to a decrease of the power flux on the PFCs and enlarge the particle exhaust by reaching favorable plasma conditions at the divertor [3]. In addition, if the edge plasma density is increased and impurities are forced into the Scrape-Off Layer (SOL) region, heating power that reaches PFCs/divertor could be lowered down, via impurity irradiation, aiming to reach strategic values of 5−10 MW/m2, i.e., the values with which the current, or near-future materials can cope [4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text