Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 314, 15 April 2022, 122768
Fuel

Full Length Article
Performance and sensitivity analysis of packed-column absorption process using multi-amine solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122768Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The performance analysis of CO2 capture process using multi-amines was studied.

  • DETA in a conventional process achieved lower energy consumption of 8.57% than MEA.

  • CSS modification using DETA achieved further energy improvement, 2.962 GJ/tonCO2.

  • Number of amine moles and desorption rate in stripper were critical for efficiency.

  • Potential of multi-amines was suggested for post-combustion CO2 capture process.

Abstract

Although many novel multi-amine solvents with high CO2 solubility were reported, they have not yet been evaluated for the performance in CO2 absorption processes. In this study, the efficiency and inside profile of the packed-column CO2 absorption process using a novel multi-amine solvent were investigated by using a mathematical model. Three amine solvents were selected: 2-(2-aminoethylamino)-ethanol (AEEA) and diethylenetriamine (DETA) as multi-amine solvents and monoethanolamine (MEA) as a reference. Based on the 90% capture efficiency of flue gas CO2 from a coal-fired power plant, a sensitivity analysis using the liquid-to-gas ratio was conducted to minimize the energy consumption for CO2 capture. Based on the utilization of the same 30 wt% solvent, the lowest reboiler thermal energy achieved by the process using DETA was 3.242 GJ/tonCO2, which was 8.57% lower than that obtained when MEA was employed. In contrast, the process using AEEA required 7.04% higher energy than MEA. In the process modified by rich-solvent split for further enhancing efficiency, the DETA process could achieve 2.962 GJ/tonCO2, which reduced the reboiler duty by 16.8% from the MEA process. The CO2 capture performance of absorbents could not be evaluated not only by the absorption rate and capacity. Owing to the larger molecular weight of multi-amines than MEA, the performance of capture and regeneration was discussed with respect to the amine properties and number of amine moles in the solution. A well-selected multi-amine for a modified process configuration has considerable potential for improving the energy efficiency of CO2 capture.

Introduction

Power generation via fossil fuel-fired power plants is regarded as the largest single source of CO2 emissions [1]. Carbon capture and storage technologies remain critical solutions for rapid CO2 emission reduction. Compared with other carbon capture technologies, the solvent absorption process is the most applicable mature technology for large-scale CO2 capture [1], [2].

The solvent using commercial scale CO2 capture technologies can be divided into two categories; chemical and physical solvent. The chemical solvents achieve CO2 capture by reactions while the physical solvents dissolve CO2 without reactions. Therefore, temperature is one of the key operating variables in chemical absorption processes, but pressure is an important operating variable in physical absorption processes [3]. Alternatively, it was also reported that dry solid sorbents has high potential for CO2 capture [4]. However, the further enhancement of the sorption rate, stability, and/or particle size control for many advanced solid sorbents is required for practical applications [5], [6].

The CO2 capture process using a physical solvent is widely accepted for an integrated gas turbine combined cycle (IGCC) power plant as a pre-combustion CO2 capture [7], [8]. However, in post-combustion CO2 capture, the chemical solvent absorption process is a commercially available competitive technology for fossil fuel-fired power plants [9], [10]. Since a substantial amount of energy is required for chemical solvent regeneration [11], [12], various configurations for absorption process have been developed to reduce high energy demand [13], [14]. The rich-solvent split (RSS) modification for absorption processes could enhance energy efficiency. In addition, since the RSS modification does not need additional devices, the modified configuration of the absorption process is relatively simple and the capital cost is cheap compared with other modifications [13].

Commercially available monoethanolamine (MEA), a representative primary amine, has been widely applied to the absorption process for CO2 capture. However, MEA is not enough to achieve efficient and economical CO2 capture due to high energy consumption in absorption processes. Therefore, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of advanced amine solvents, which have been reported to have higher CO2 capture capacity than MEA [15], [16].

Primary and secondary amines are known to have fast reaction rates and high heat of absorption. In contrast, tertiary amines are known to have a slow reaction and low heat of absorption [17]. Primary and secondary amines mainly have two amine molecules that can react with one CO2 molecule; hence, a CO2 loading exceeding 0.5 mol CO2/mol amine is difficult to achieve. On the contrary, one tertiary amine molecule can react with one CO2 molecule [18]. Accordingly, many studies have developed solvent blends of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines to supplement their strengths and weaknesses [15], [19]. Different from solvent blends, multi-amines have several amine groups in one molecule. It was reported that some multi-amines could achieve a CO2 loading exceeding 1.0 mol CO2/mol [20]. In addition, multi-amines with primary and secondary amine groups exhibited high reaction rates with CO2.

Many studies have concentrated on measuring and modelling the properties and solubility of CO2 in various advanced and blended absorbents [21], [22]. In addition, the absorption rates and capacities of absorbents have widely been reviewed [20], [23]. On the other hand, only limited absorbents have been evaluated with respect to the efficiency evaluation of absorption processes using newly developed absorbents. Furthermore, few studies for the absorption process using multi-amines is rarely investigated even though the high performance of their absorption capacity and rate were reported. There is a great knowledge gap between the properties of absorbents and the performance of processes using advanced amine solvents because energy consumption mainly occurs in regeneration. Therefore, the feasibility and reliability of multi-amines should be evaluated again in absorption processes regardless of their high absorption rate and capacity.

In this study, the performance and sensitivity of the CO2 absorption process employing multi-amines were evaluated through a rate-based model. The detailed inside phenomena in the absorption process was elucidated to establish the relationship between performance and operating variables. Two multi-amines were selected: 2-(2-aminoethylamino)-ethanol (AEEA) with two amine groups and diethylenetriamine (DETA) with three amine groups as the representative multi-amines because the properties of these two multi-amines were well established as shown in Table 1, compared with other multi-amines. Therefore, the assumptions and uncertainty to simulate the absorption process, resulting from the multi-amines’ properties, could be minimized. The absorption process using MEA was selected as a reference to compare the performance and energy efficiency with the processes using the multi-amines. However, multi-amines with tertiary amine groups were not selected because of their slow reaction rates.

Both of selected multi-amines contain primary and secondary amine groups; hence, the reaction with CO2 can be faster than MEA. However, the information of absorption capacity and rate of absorbents is not sufficient to evaluate the capture efficiency and energy consumption of the absorption process because the cyclic absorption process is operated with an absorber and a stripper. Therefore, the efficiency of the absorption process must be evaluated in detail with respect to the mutual effect of multi-amines on absorption and stripping. Since the comparison was based on the same 30 wt% solvent, the effect of number of amine groups on the performance of the absorption process was also studied.

A rate-based model of the absorption process was use to simulate the capture process, incorporating the equations for vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE), reaction heat, physical properties, mass transfer, and reaction rate. The rate-based model used in the study was validated with reference to the pilot data of MEA [10], [38], [39]. In this study, the CO2 capture efficiency was defined as the ratio of the flow rate of CO2 produced from a stripper to that supplied from the flue gas. The reboiler duty was determined to achieve 90% of CO2 capture efficiency because many previous studies reported a minimum energy penalty at this capture efficiency [40], [41], [42]. Then, as an important operating parameter, the effect of the liquid-to-gas (L/G) ratio on energy efficiency was investigated based on a 90% CO2 capture efficiency. The energy consumption analysis was categorized based on the latent heat of H2O, CO2 desorption, and sensible heat.

Since the properties of AEEA, DETA and MEA are very different, it was expected that the enhancement by the absorption process modification could be different among the solvents. Therefore, the feasibility of enhancing the energy efficiency of the absorption process using each solvent was also evaluated by modifying the configuration with RSS. Finally, the potential improvements for the absorption process with multi-amines were suggested to increase the energy efficiency of CO2 capture.

Section snippets

Process description

The operational results from a CESAR pilot plant using MEA (Tests 1A-1–1A-4) were selected to validate the simulation and used as comparative reference [10], [38]. The CESAR pilot plant was operated on a slipstream of flue gas from the Dong Esbjerg power station (a 400-MW pulverized bituminous coal power plant). This conventional process using MEA consists of an absorber, a stripper, and a rich/lean solvent heat exchanger, as shown in Fig. 1. The process could capture 90% of the incoming carbon

Validation of a rate-based model

The operational results of the CESAR pilot plant using MEA (Tests 1A-1 to 1A-4) were employed to validate the developed rate-based model. The operating conditions and operating results for Test 1A-1 to 1A-4 were used as the reference values [10], [38]. All the packed-bed column properties and operating conditions are summarized in Table 2. Each operation was conducted at different amine flow rates (different L/G ratio). Therefore, the main difference between the Tests was the circulation flow

Assessment of process modification

It was reported that the RSS configuration, applied to a conventional absorption process using MEA, could enhance the capture efficiency [12]. In this study, the change in reboiler duty is evaluated when the same RSS configuration as that shown in Fig. 1 (red line) is applied to the absorption process using multi-amines. The split ratio in the RSS configuration indicated that a portion of the rich amine flow was directly supplied to the top of the stripper without passing the rich/lean amine

Conclusion

The performance of the absorption process using multi-amines for post-combustion CO2 capture was investigated by developing a rate-based model. The energy efficiency and sensitivity analysis of the absorption process using AEEA and DETA were conducted based on a 90% CO2 capture and 30 wt% amine solution. The results were compared with those obtained using MEA as the reference solvent.

The reboiler duty of the conventional configuration using DETA was 3.242 GJ/tonCO2, which was 8.57% lower than

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2019K1A4A7A03113187).

References (56)

  • P. Pakzad et al.

    CO2 absorption by common solvents

  • M. Afkhamipour et al.

    Experimental and theoretical investigation of equilibrium absorption performance of CO2 using a mixed 1-dimethylamino-2-propanol (1DMA2P) and monoethanolamine (MEA) solution

    Fuel

    (2019)
  • H.F. Svendsen et al.

    Carbon dioxide capture by absorption, challenges and possibilities

    Chem Eng J

    (2011)
  • N. El Hadri et al.

    Aqueous amine solution characterization for post-combustion CO2 capture process

    Appl Energy

    (2017)
  • I.M. Bernhardsen et al.

    A review of potential amine solvents for CO2 absorption process: Absorption capacity, cyclic capacity and pKa

    Int J Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2017)
  • M. Afkhamipour et al.

    Thermodynamic modelling of CO2 absorption into aqueous solutions of 2-diethylaminoethanol, piperazine, and blended diethylaminoethanol with piperazine

    Fluid Phase Equilib

    (2019)
  • M. Afkhamipour et al.

    Thermodynamic Modelling Using e-UNIQUAC Model for CO2 Absorption by Novel Amine Solutions: 1-dimethylamino-2-propanol (1DMA2P), 3-dimethylamino-1-propanol (3DMA1P) and 4-diethylamino-2-butanol (DEAB)

    Fluid Phase Equilib

    (2018)
  • Z.(. Liang et al.

    Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents

    Int J Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2015)
  • A. Hartono et al.

    Density, viscosity, and excess properties of aqueous solution of diethylenetriamine (DETA)

    J Chem Thermodyn

    (2009)
  • S.-Y. Lin et al.

    Molar heat capacities of diethylenetriamine and 3-(methylamino) propylamine, their aqueous binaries, and aqueous ternaries with piperazine

    Thermochim Acta

    (2014)
  • A. Hartono et al.

    Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous 2.5 M of diethylenetriamine (DETA) solution

    Energy Procedia

    (2011)
  • Ardi Hartono et al.

    Kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption in aqueous solution of diethylenetriamine (DETA)

    Chem Eng Sci

    (2009)
  • Inga von Harbou et al.

    Modeling and simulation of reactive absorption of CO2 with MEA: results for four different packings on two different scales

    Chem Eng Sci

    (2014)
  • Richard Faber et al.

    Open-loop step responses for the MEA post-combustion capture process: Experimental results from the Esbjerg pilot plant

    Energy Procedia

    (2011)
  • Woo-Sung Lee et al.

    Performance analysis and carbon reduction assessment of an integrated syngas purification process for the co-production of hydrogen and power in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant

    Energy

    (2019)
  • Inna Kim et al.

    Comparative study of the heats of absorption of post-combustion CO2 absorbents

    Int J Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2011)
  • R. Wang et al.

    Superior energy-saving splitter in monoethanolamine-based biphasic solvents for CO2 capture from coal-fired flue gas

    Appl Energy

    (2019)
  • Sanoja A. Jayarathna et al.

    Dynamic modelling of the absorber of a post-combustion CO2 capture plant: Modelling and simulations

    Comput Chem Eng

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text