Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 241, 1 April 2019, Pages 884-891
Fuel

Full Length Article
Fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.098Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A fully aerobic process for purification of H2S-rich biogas was developed.

  • H2S removal efficiencies between 85% and 94% were achieved.

  • High and stable sulfur oxidation performance was obtained.

  • The bioscrubber was robust and resilient towards operational shutdowns.

  • Thioalkalimicrobium cyclicum was the most abundant bacteria.

Abstract

A fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas was developed in the present study by coupling an absorption column and a bubble column bioreactor. The bioscrubber treated H2S loading rates of 37, 59, and 100 g S mliquid−3 h−1 at gas residence times of 6.6, 4.1 and 2.4 min in the absorption column, respectively. Stable H2S removal efficiencies above 80% were recorded at all the conditions tested. The bioscrubber was robust towards short- and long-term operation shutdowns (5 and 18 days), the H2S removal performance being recovered after few hours. The aerated bubble column bioreactor was operated at slightly alkaline conditions (pH 8 ± 0.5), which prevented H2S stripping and allowed sulfur oxidation performances higher than 75% regardless of the operating conditions tested. Bacterial community characterization by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing revealed that the operating conditions (slightly alkaline pH, sulfate concentrations of up to 25,000 g m−3 and dilution rates of 5.7 × 10−3–8.6 × 10−3 h−1) shaped a specialized community highly efficient for H2S oxidation. Three Proteobacteria were predominant in the bubble column bioreactor, namely Thioalkalimicrobium cyclicum, Stappia sp. and Ochrobactrum sp. with relative abundances of 68.18, 13.49 and 7.61%, respectively.

Introduction

Biogas, mainly composed of ∼60–65% CH4 and ∼35–40% CO2 is a renewable fuel obtained from the anaerobic degradation of organic matter [1]. Depending on the characteristics of the organic matter, biogas may contain a sort of pollutants that must be removed prior its use in engines or turbines to produce heat and power [2]. H2S is one of the most common biogas pollutants, which causes corrosion to internal combustion devices and industrial pipes [3]. H2S is also toxic for humans, being lethal at a concentration of 300 ppmv (0.03% v/v) [4]. The biogas generated from sulfur-rich effluents (e.g. wastewaters from pulp and paper mills, citric acid production, sugar/ethanol production from molasses, edible oil industry refineries, wine production and intensive pig farms) typically contains H2S concentrations between 2000 and 20,000 ppmv (0.2–2.0% v/v) [5], [6], [7]. However, the maximum H2S concentration acceptable in combined heat and power engines is in the range of 100–500 ppmv [4]. Therefore, H2S-rich biogas must be desulfurized before its use for heat and power generation.

Physical-chemical technologies for biogas desulfurization such as adsorption on activated carbon, chemical scrubbing or thermal decomposition are costly and generate secondary pollution [8], [9]. Chemical scrubbing, a common purification technology for H2S-rich biogas, requires large volumes of alkaline water that must be subsequently treated [10]. Alternative technologies based on the activity of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria are also available even at industrial scale. This is the case of the commercial THIOPAQ® process, which is a reference technology for biogas desulfurization at industrial scale (as well as its variation SHELL-PAQUES® developed for purification of natural gas under pressure) [11], [12]. In this technology, H2S is absorbed in a scrubber under alkaline conditions (H2S + OH → HS + H2O). Then, the absorbed HS is partially oxidized to elemental sulfur (S0) by chemolithoautotrophic bacteria in an aerated bioreactor (HS + 0.5 O2 → S0 + OH). There are also commercial desulfurization technologies based on biotrickling filtration that target the full H2S oxidation to sulfate [13], [14], [15]. This is the case of the Sulphus® and SOX® technologies developed by Pure Air Solutions and Aeris, respectively [16], [17]. Fertilizer production is a main application of the sulfur recovered during biogas desulfurization [18], [19]. Since SO42− is the chemical form taken up by plants, the liquid stream leaving the desulfurization system might be valorized as liquid fertilizer after adding adequate proportions of other nutrients (e.g. N, P or K) [11], [20]. Hence, the production of sulfate rather than S0 could be in some instances more convenient [21].

In biotrickling filters the H2S absorption and biological oxidation occur in the same unit. The absorbed HS is oxidized by chemolithoautotrophic bacteria adhered on a packed bed under aerobic conditions (HS + 2O2 → SO42− + H+) [6], [13], [14], [15] However, a critical operating issue in biotrickling filters treating H2S-rich biogas is the frequent clogging of the packed bed due to accumulation of elemental sulfur [9], [14], [21], [22]. Bed clogging comes from supplying less O2 than that required to achieve the full oxidation of H2S to SO42− (2 mol of O2 per mole of H2S). On the contrary, biogas dilution is likely to occur in biotrickling filters operated with excess of O2 supply [9], [14], [22], [23]. Therefore, fully aerobic biological technologies must still be improved for the efficient and robust desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas.

The performance of a fully aerobic two-stage bioscrubber for the aerobic desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas was investigated in the present study. In this configuration air and biogas do not mix, which avoids biogas dilution, while allowing the full oxygenation of the liquid phase to prevent elemental sulfur accumulation. The scrubber was operated under slightly alkaline pH conditions to prevent H2S stripping from the aerated liquid phase. The desulfurization performance was evaluated in terms of S-H2S removal efficiency, S-H2S elimination capacity and the percentage of S-H2S consumed that was fully oxidized to S-SO42−. The bacterial communities established after 80 days of operation were also characterized by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing.

Section snippets

Chemicals and mineral salt medium

All chemicals for mineral salt medium (MSM) preparation were purchased from VWR with a purity of at least 99%. MSM (final pH, 8.5) used for operating the desulfurization system contained (g L−1): NaHCO3 3.50, NH4Cl 1.00, K2HPO4 0.15, KH2PO4 0.12, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 and CaCl2 0.02, along with 1 mL/LMSM of a trace element solution (g L−1: H3BO3 2.86, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.22, MnCl2·4H2O 1.4, CoCl2·H2O 0.01, Na2MoO4·2H2O 0.39). A stock solution of NaHCO3 (75 g L−1) was used for pH control. Synthetic biogas

Desulfurization performance

Fig. 2a shows the time course of the RE and the SIL of the two-stage desulfurization system. The start-up was carried out by using a SIL of 37 g S m−3 h−1, yielding a GRT in the absorption column of 6.6 min (phase A). An average RE value of 94 ± 3% was obtained in this experimental phase, corresponding to a SEC of 35 ± 1 g S m−3 h−1. On day 16 (phase B-I), the SIL was increased to 59 g S m−3 h−1 by decreasing the GRT to 4.1 min, obtaining an average RE value of 82 ± 3% (SEC = 47 ± 1 g S m−3 h−1

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the technical feasibility of a fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas. Typical operating problems in biotrickling filters such as packed bed clogging (due to elemental sulfur accumulation) or biogas dilution are avoided in the present system. Moreover, the main end-product of the process was sulfate, which can be readily valorized for fertilizer production. It was observed that no significant H2S stripping occurred from the aerated

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Project CTM2014-54517-R co-financed with FEDER funds) and from Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energética SENER–CONACYT (Mexico), through the project 247006 Gaseous Biofuels Cluster. G. Quijano acknowledges the “Atracció de Talent” grant from the University of Valencia (UV-INV-EPC17-548351). P. San-Valero acknowledges her postdoctoral contract granted by Generalitat Valenciana (Spain, APOSTD/2017/121).

References (40)

  • D. Pokorna et al.

    Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental technology

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2015)
  • M. Fortuny et al.

    Operational aspects of the desulfurization process of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters

    Water Res

    (2011)
  • J.P. Maestre et al.

    Bacterial community analysis of a gas-phase biotrickling filter for biogas mimics desulfurization through the rRNA approach

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • C. Huang et al.

    Microbial community structure and function in response to the shift of sulfide/nitrate loading ratio during the denitrifying sulfide removal process

    Bioresour Technol

    (2015)
  • J. Luo et al.

    Enrichment, isolation and identification of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from sulfide removing bioreactor

    J Environ Sci

    (2013)
  • A. Noyola et al.

    Treatment of biogas produced in anaerobic reactors for domestic wastewater: odor control and energy/resource recovery

    Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol

    (2006)
  • L. Dubois et al.

    Comparison of various alkaline solutions for H2S/CO2-selective absorption applied to biogas purification

    Chem Eng Technol

    (2010)
  • B.C. Aita et al.

    Biofiltration of H2S-rich biogas using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans

    Clean Technol Environ Policy

    (2016)
  • E.L. Barrera et al.

    The sulfur chain in biogas production from sulfate-rich liquid substrates: a review on dynamic modeling with vinasse as model substrate

    J Chem Technol Biotechnol

    (2013)
  • A.J.H. Janssen et al.

    Application of the redox potential for controling a sulfide oxidizing bioreactor

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1998)
  • Cited by (55)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text