Full Length ArticleFully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Biogas, mainly composed of ∼60–65% CH4 and ∼35–40% CO2 is a renewable fuel obtained from the anaerobic degradation of organic matter [1]. Depending on the characteristics of the organic matter, biogas may contain a sort of pollutants that must be removed prior its use in engines or turbines to produce heat and power [2]. H2S is one of the most common biogas pollutants, which causes corrosion to internal combustion devices and industrial pipes [3]. H2S is also toxic for humans, being lethal at a concentration of 300 ppmv (0.03% v/v) [4]. The biogas generated from sulfur-rich effluents (e.g. wastewaters from pulp and paper mills, citric acid production, sugar/ethanol production from molasses, edible oil industry refineries, wine production and intensive pig farms) typically contains H2S concentrations between 2000 and 20,000 ppmv (0.2–2.0% v/v) [5], [6], [7]. However, the maximum H2S concentration acceptable in combined heat and power engines is in the range of 100–500 ppmv [4]. Therefore, H2S-rich biogas must be desulfurized before its use for heat and power generation.
Physical-chemical technologies for biogas desulfurization such as adsorption on activated carbon, chemical scrubbing or thermal decomposition are costly and generate secondary pollution [8], [9]. Chemical scrubbing, a common purification technology for H2S-rich biogas, requires large volumes of alkaline water that must be subsequently treated [10]. Alternative technologies based on the activity of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria are also available even at industrial scale. This is the case of the commercial THIOPAQ® process, which is a reference technology for biogas desulfurization at industrial scale (as well as its variation SHELL-PAQUES® developed for purification of natural gas under pressure) [11], [12]. In this technology, H2S is absorbed in a scrubber under alkaline conditions (H2S + OH− → HS− + H2O). Then, the absorbed HS− is partially oxidized to elemental sulfur (S0) by chemolithoautotrophic bacteria in an aerated bioreactor (HS− + 0.5 O2 → S0 + OH−). There are also commercial desulfurization technologies based on biotrickling filtration that target the full H2S oxidation to sulfate [13], [14], [15]. This is the case of the Sulphus® and SOX® technologies developed by Pure Air Solutions and Aeris, respectively [16], [17]. Fertilizer production is a main application of the sulfur recovered during biogas desulfurization [18], [19]. Since SO42− is the chemical form taken up by plants, the liquid stream leaving the desulfurization system might be valorized as liquid fertilizer after adding adequate proportions of other nutrients (e.g. N, P or K) [11], [20]. Hence, the production of sulfate rather than S0 could be in some instances more convenient [21].
In biotrickling filters the H2S absorption and biological oxidation occur in the same unit. The absorbed HS− is oxidized by chemolithoautotrophic bacteria adhered on a packed bed under aerobic conditions (HS− + 2O2 → SO42− + H+) [6], [13], [14], [15] However, a critical operating issue in biotrickling filters treating H2S-rich biogas is the frequent clogging of the packed bed due to accumulation of elemental sulfur [9], [14], [21], [22]. Bed clogging comes from supplying less O2 than that required to achieve the full oxidation of H2S to SO42− (2 mol of O2 per mole of H2S). On the contrary, biogas dilution is likely to occur in biotrickling filters operated with excess of O2 supply [9], [14], [22], [23]. Therefore, fully aerobic biological technologies must still be improved for the efficient and robust desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas.
The performance of a fully aerobic two-stage bioscrubber for the aerobic desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas was investigated in the present study. In this configuration air and biogas do not mix, which avoids biogas dilution, while allowing the full oxygenation of the liquid phase to prevent elemental sulfur accumulation. The scrubber was operated under slightly alkaline pH conditions to prevent H2S stripping from the aerated liquid phase. The desulfurization performance was evaluated in terms of S-H2S removal efficiency, S-H2S elimination capacity and the percentage of S-H2S consumed that was fully oxidized to S-SO42−. The bacterial communities established after 80 days of operation were also characterized by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing.
Section snippets
Chemicals and mineral salt medium
All chemicals for mineral salt medium (MSM) preparation were purchased from VWR with a purity of at least 99%. MSM (final pH, 8.5) used for operating the desulfurization system contained (g L−1): NaHCO3 3.50, NH4Cl 1.00, K2HPO4 0.15, KH2PO4 0.12, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 and CaCl2 0.02, along with 1 mL/LMSM of a trace element solution (g L−1: H3BO3 2.86, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.22, MnCl2·4H2O 1.4, CoCl2·H2O 0.01, Na2MoO4·2H2O 0.39). A stock solution of NaHCO3 (75 g L−1) was used for pH control. Synthetic biogas
Desulfurization performance
Fig. 2a shows the time course of the RE and the SIL of the two-stage desulfurization system. The start-up was carried out by using a SIL of 37 g S m−3 h−1, yielding a GRT in the absorption column of 6.6 min (phase A). An average RE value of 94 ± 3% was obtained in this experimental phase, corresponding to a SEC of 35 ± 1 g S m−3 h−1. On day 16 (phase B-I), the SIL was increased to 59 g S m−3 h−1 by decreasing the GRT to 4.1 min, obtaining an average RE value of 82 ± 3% (SEC = 47 ± 1 g S m−3 h−1
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the technical feasibility of a fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas. Typical operating problems in biotrickling filters such as packed bed clogging (due to elemental sulfur accumulation) or biogas dilution are avoided in the present system. Moreover, the main end-product of the process was sulfate, which can be readily valorized for fertilizer production. It was observed that no significant H2S stripping occurred from the aerated
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Project CTM2014-54517-R co-financed with FEDER funds) and from Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energética SENER–CONACYT (Mexico), through the project 247006 Gaseous Biofuels Cluster. G. Quijano acknowledges the “Atracció de Talent” grant from the University of Valencia (UV-INV-EPC17-548351). P. San-Valero acknowledges her postdoctoral contract granted by Generalitat Valenciana (Spain, APOSTD/2017/121).
References (40)
- et al.
Investigation of the degradation of a low-cost untreated biogas engine using preheated biogas with phase separation for electric power generation
Renewable Energy
(2013) - et al.
Biological sweetening of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters
Chemosphere
(2008) - et al.
Prediction of hydrogen sulphide production during anaerobic digestion of organic substrates
Bioresour Technol
(2012) - et al.
Bio-desulfurization of biogas using acidic biotrickling filter with dissolved oxygen in step feed recirculation
Bioresour Technol
(2015) - et al.
Aerobic desulfurization of biogas by acidic biotrickling filtration in a randomly packed reactor
J Hazard Mater
(2014) - et al.
Hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas by an anoxic biotrickling filter packed with Pall rings
Chem Eng J
(2013) - et al.
Biotrickling filters for biogas sweetening: oxygen transfer improvement for a reliable operation
Process Saf Environ Prot
(2014) - et al.
Hydrolysis of microalgal biomass using ruminal microorganisms as a pretreatment to increase methane recovery
Bioresour Technol
(2017) - et al.
Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in biogas using dissolved oxygen in the extreme acidic biofiltration operation
Bioresour Technol
(2013) - et al.
Monitoring and performance of a desulphurizing biotrickling filter with an integrated continuous gas/liquid flow analyser
Chem Eng J
(2010)
Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental technology
Biotechnol Adv
Operational aspects of the desulfurization process of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters
Water Res
Bacterial community analysis of a gas-phase biotrickling filter for biogas mimics desulfurization through the rRNA approach
Chemosphere
Microbial community structure and function in response to the shift of sulfide/nitrate loading ratio during the denitrifying sulfide removal process
Bioresour Technol
Enrichment, isolation and identification of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from sulfide removing bioreactor
J Environ Sci
Treatment of biogas produced in anaerobic reactors for domestic wastewater: odor control and energy/resource recovery
Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol
Comparison of various alkaline solutions for H2S/CO2-selective absorption applied to biogas purification
Chem Eng Technol
Biofiltration of H2S-rich biogas using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
Clean Technol Environ Policy
The sulfur chain in biogas production from sulfate-rich liquid substrates: a review on dynamic modeling with vinasse as model substrate
J Chem Technol Biotechnol
Application of the redox potential for controling a sulfide oxidizing bioreactor
Biotechnol Bioeng
Cited by (55)
Biodesulfurization of landfill biogas by a pilot-scale bioscrubber: Operational limits and microbial analysis.
2024, Environmental ResearchBiochemical engineering for elemental sulfur from flue gases through multi-enzymatic based approaches – A review
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentBiological desulfurization of biogas: A comprehensive review on sulfide microbial metabolism and treatment biotechnologies
2023, Science of the Total Environment