Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 295, 1 May 2013, Pages 118-125
Forest Ecology and Management

Which factors influence the occurrence and density of tree microhabitats in Mediterranean oak forests?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Managed forests have the potential to promote tree microhabitats and hence to conserve the biodiversity, especially of birds, bats, and saproxylic insects, associated with such features. Although the value of tree microhabitats for biodiversity has been described, surprisingly, the factors that explain the occurrence and density of tree microhabitats in managed forests remain poorly known, especially in Mediterranean forests. To address this gap, we studied the occurrence and density of nine types of tree microhabitats inventoried in 1630 trees and 59 forest stands: canopy dead wood; woodpecker cavities; non-woodpecker cavities (with a distinction between lower, medium, and upper cavities); Cerambyx cavities; loose barks or cracks; conks of fungi; and ivy. Each tree was described according to the presence/absence of microhabitats as well as tree diameter, vitality, and species. In each stand, structural variables (basal area, stem density, log volume, stand height, diameter class distribution) and the time since last cutting (i.e., the number of years since the last cutting) were assessed. At the tree level, large-diameter trees, snags, and non-coniferous species supported a higher richness of microhabitats than trees of small diameter, living trees, and conifers. Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.), which is a typical species of Mediterranean forests, exhibited a particularly high ability to host microhabitats. Tree diameter was the best predictor of the occurrence of most microhabitats (7 out of 9). We studied co-occurrences among microhabitats, but our results indicated that microhabitat types served poorly as proxies of other microhabitats due to frequent but unspecific positive relationships. At the stand level, time since last cutting was the best predictor of density of microhabitat-bearing trees and the occurrence of most tree microhabitats. The density of microhabitat-bearing trees was approximately 13 times higher in older stands (>90 years post-cutting) than in recently cut stands (<30 years). To maintain biodiversity in forests, we suggest that managers conserve large trees and snags and preferentially use holm oaks for wood production. Silvicultural practices should include a long rotation period and favor harvesting by group selection to maintain forest stands with a time since last cutting >90 years.

Highlights

► We studied nine types of tree microhabitats in three managed forests. ► We examined changes in tree microhabitats with tree and stand characteristics. ► The richness of microhabitats per tree is influenced by diameter, vitality, and species. ► Microhabitat types are poor predictors of other microhabitat types. ► Time since last cutting strongly influence the density of microhabitats per stand.

Introduction

In many parts of the world, forest managers have to balance wood production with biodiversity conservation over the long term (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010). Stand structure, the composition of tree species, deadwood volume and tree microhabitats (i.e., microhabitats that grow on trees) are important components of conserving biodiversity in forests (Grove, 2002, Hunter, 1999, Paillet et al., 2010). Many species depend on tree microhabitats for food, shelter and breeding habitat (Michel and Winter, 2009, Winter and Möller, 2008). For example, dead branches are food sources for saproxylic insects and fungi (Jonsell and Nordlander, 2002, Vanderwel et al., 2006). Cavities provide habitats for breeding birds, mammals, and invertebrates but also lichens and bryophytes (Fritz and Heilmann-Clausen, 2010, Lučan et al., 2009, Parsons et al., 2003, Ranius, 2002). Many forest bats nest or roost behind cracked and loose bark (Pénicaud, 2000, Russo et al., 2004, Vonhof and Gwilliam, 2007). Other microhabitats, such as conks of fungi or ivy, are homes to insects and provide potential nesting and foraging sites for birds (Bässler et al., 2012, Dajoz, 2005, Mitchell, 1973). Tree microhabitats support a large food web and may have an important role in the functioning of forest ecosystems (Aitken and Martin, 2007, Martin and Eadie, 1999). Some species linked to tree microhabitats are also of major concern for biodiversity conservation, such as some saproxylic insects (e.g., Limoniscus violaceus – Gouix and Brustel, 2011), birds (e.g., the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos – Lehikoinen et al., 2011), and bats (e.g., Barbastella barbastellus – Russo et al., 2010).

Surprisingly, the links between trees, stand characteristics and tree microhabitats remain poorly explored compared to other research areas related to biodiversity indicators (Michel and Winter, 2009, Vuidot et al., 2011). Recently, several studies investigated the occurrence of tree microhabitats by comparing managed and unmanaged forests (Larrieu et al., 2012, Michel and Winter, 2009, Vuidot et al., 2011, Winter and Möller, 2008). However, the distinction between ‘managed’ and ‘unmanaged’ forests may involve a large array of silvicultural practices. For example, two managed forests may have contrasting management histories, leading to different structural characteristics and biodiversity levels (Bengtsson et al., 2000, Burger, 2009, Summerville, 2011).

Silvicultural practices tend to convert forests into simplified ecosystems (with reductions in species tree diversity, vertical stratification, and age structure) compared to unmanaged forests (Paillet et al., 2010). However, forest management also has the potential to maintain natural structural complexity and support the development of microhabitats (Bauhus et al., 2009, Larrieu et al., 2012). Although microhabitats are believed to play a key role in the conservation of biodiversity in managed forests (Michel and Winter, 2009, Winter and Möller, 2008), the factors that underlie their occurrence and density remain poorly known. To our knowledge, only Michel and Winter (2009) have explored the role of management history and stand structure in the occurrence of tree microhabitats in Douglas fir forests (USA). Yet, better understanding of the factors that allow the development of microhabitats in managed forests is of strong interest for managers and decision-makers, especially in Europe, where most forests are subject to silvicultural treatments (Bengtsson et al., 2000, Vanbergen et al., 2005).

The Mediterranean region is considered a priority area for biodiversity conservation (Cuttelod et al., 2008, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005, Myers et al., 2000). Biodiversity conservation in Mediterranean forests is the subject of several research programs (see for example the on-going program ‘Mediterranean Integrated STudies at Regional And Local Scales’ (MISTRALS, 2012); however, to our knowledge, research on the factors underlying the occurrence of tree microhabitats has never been conducted in Mediterranean forests (Vuidot et al., 2011).

The overall objective of our study is to test the effect of tree and stand characteristics (time since last cutting and stand structure) on the occurrence and density of tree microhabitats in managed forest stands in the Mediterranean region, specifically southern France. We distinguished between the tree and stand levels following the Vuidot et al. (2011) approach: at the tree level, the objectives were to (a) investigate the relationships between tree characteristics (species, vitality, and diameter) and tree microhabitats, and (b) determine co-occurrences among tree microhabitats. At the stand level (c), we examined the effects of time since last cutting (i.e., the number of years since the last cutting) and stand structure on the density of microhabitats. We showed that managed forests have the potential to conserve microhabitats, and we discuss measuring and promoting microhabitats from the perspective of forest managers.

Section snippets

Study area

The studied stands were located in southern France, in Saint-Paul-lès-Durance (44°41′16″N/5°42′30″E, surface area 1415 ha, mean altitude 300 m), Ribiers (44°13′55″N/5°21′26″E, area 126 ha, alt. 800 m), and Saint-Vincent-sur-Jabron (44°10′18″N/5°44′33″E, area 90 ha, alt. 850 m). Climate conditions were typical of the Mediterranean region with a long sun exposure (2500–2800 h annually) and warm summers (mean temperature in summer = 27 °C; annual mean = 12 °C) (Météo France, 2012). Annual precipitations

Influences of diameter, vitality and tree species on tree microhabitats

The model with the lowest AIC was the complete additive model without interactions (Appendix C). The richness of microhabitats per tree was influenced by diameter (GLM, F1,1618 = 236.58, p < 0.001), vitality (GLM, F1,1618 = 58.57, p < 0.001), and species (GLM, F3,1618 = 35.99, p < 0.001). We found a positive relationship between the tree diameter and the richness of microhabitats (slope estimate (SE) of the variable ‘tree diameter’ = 0.14 (0.01)). Living trees supported a lower richness of microhabitats than

Influence of diameter, vitality and tree species on tree microhabitats

We found a positive relationship between tree diameter and the richness of microhabitats, which confirmed several previous observations in contrasting ecological contexts (Larrieu et al., 2012, Michel and Winter, 2009, Vuidot et al., 2011). However, this relationship may not be systematic, as Winter and Möller (2008) found no significant relationship in managed or recently unmanaged stands. Generally, it appears that larger trees host more microhabitats than smaller ones, most likely due to

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Emmanuel Cosson (Groupe Chiroptères de Provence) and Olivier Ferreira (ONF), who developed the inventory protocol for microhabitats. Many thanks to the officers of the ONF, Olivier Ferreira and Jérôme Guyot, who performed the surveys of microhabitats, and Rémi Bonardo, Jean-Pierre Viguier, and Jeanne Dulac for their helpful discussions on microhabitats in Mediterranean forests. Funding was provided by the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (prefectorial decree no 200863-5

References (66)

  • K. Martin et al.

    Nest Webs: a community wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity nesting birds

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (1999)
  • C. McElhinny et al.

    Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2005)
  • A.K. Michel et al.

    Tree microhabitat structures as indicators of biodiversity in Douglas-fir forests of different stand ages and management histories in the Pacific Northwest USA

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2009)
  • S. Parsons et al.

    Relationships between roosting habitat of bats and decay of aspen in the sub-boreal forests of British Columbia

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2003)
  • T. Ranius

    Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in Sweden

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2002)
  • J.-M. Roberge et al.

    Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2008)
  • D. Russo et al.

    Roost selection by barbastelle bats (Barbastella barbastellus, Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in beech woodlands of central Italy: consequences for conservation

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2004)
  • Stupak

    Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: a review of current standards for sustainable forest management

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2011)
  • M.C. Vanderwel et al.

    Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2006)
  • M.J. Vonhof et al.

    Intra- and interspecific patterns of day roost selection by three species of forest-dwelling bats in Southern British Columbia

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2007)
  • A. Vuidot et al.

    Influence of tree characteristics and forest management on tree microhabitats

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2011)
  • S. Winter et al.

    Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2008)
  • K.E.H. Aitken et al.

    The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada

    J. Ornithol.

    (2007)
  • C. Bässler et al.

    Diversity of wood-decaying fungi under different disturbance regimes-a case study from spruce mountain forests

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2012)
  • A. Blackman et al.

    Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2011)
  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. A Practical Information Theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • M.J. Crawley

    The R book

    (2009)
  • A. Cuttelod et al.

    The Mediterranean: a biodiversity hotspot under threat

  • R. Dajoz

    Les insects des fôrets. Rôle et diversité des insectes dans le milieu forestier

    (2005)
  • V. Devictor et al.

    Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation

    Oikos

    (2008)
  • A. Doxa et al.

    Low-intensity agriculture increases farmland bird abundances in France

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • European Economic Community (EEC)

    Council directive 92/43EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora

    Off. J.

    (1992)
  • J.J. Faraway

    Extending the linear model with R

    (2006)
  • Cited by (84)

    • How do stand features shape deadwood diversity?

      2024, Forest Ecology and Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text