Effect of phosphorus on soot formation and flame retardancy in fires
Introduction
Phosphorus is widely used as an alternative to halogens in flame retardant additives. Phosphorus-containing compounds have been drawing more attention recently as flame retardant additives because of their supposed gas phase activity as well as condensed phase char promoting reactions [1,2]. The effect of phosphorous flame retardant (FR) is sensitive to fuel type and combustion environment. A variety of phosphorous compounds have been tested in premixed hydrogen or hydrocarbon flames [[3], [4], [5], [6]], and phosphorus was found to inhibit combustion mostly in hydrocarbon flames. These studies are narrowly focused on well-characterized liquid or gaseous fuels at a steady fuel supply and the findings cannot be easily extended to solid polymeric fuels. The inhibition effect was mostly expressed as reduced flame temperature or reduced premixed flame speed. In the detailed chemistry modeling [[4], [5], [6]], the effect on soot formation and oxidation was never discussed.
Stoliarov et al. [7] and Guo et al. [1] used Microscale Combustion Calorimetry (MCC) to isolate gas-phase activity of FR from its condensed-phase activity. Incomplete combustion was achieved by reducing the combustor temperature. In Refs. [1], a two-step gas phase reaction model was used to investigate both halogen- and phosphorus-containing compound effects on polymer burning. It was found that bromine significantly inhibits the chemical reaction whereas phosphorus does not have a noticeable effect on the rate of premixed homogeneous combustion. Unfortunately, the MCC combustor temperature is typically below 1000 °C, which is insufficient to obverse the soot formation.
In larger scale non-premixed flames, the reaction is more limited by the supply of oxygen into the fuel stream either through diffusion or by turbulent mixing. The gas phase flame speed effect becomes less important, and is often simplified to be infinitely fast during the modeling of large scale fires. More attention is given to the peak heat release rate, total heat output, and the smoke yield. It is recognized that for a specific polymer type, heat release can be suppressed through either char formation or incomplete combustion products formation (CO, soot, etc.). In conditions where char formation is not significant, suppressing heat release is typically achieved at a sacrifice of more smoke yield, and vice versa [1,8]. Both bromine and phosphorous compounds were found to reduce the heat release mainly by promoting incomplete combustion products [1]. The incomplete combustion products is of particular interest to the aviation industry because it is be hazardous to flight crew and passengers. Soot, as the primary radiative emitter, also affects the fire spread through the radiative component of heat transfer. In the work of Tewarson [9], the radiative efficiency depends on the fire size, combustion efficiency, and fuel type.
Halogen additives were found to substantially increase the tendency of fuels to soot under diffusion flame conditions, as a homogeneous catalyst for hydrogen atom recombination [10]. Soot formation is hence promoted as a result of the enhanced hydrogen abstraction/acetylene addition (HACA) mechanism [11]. In contrast, metal and organometallic compounds have been found effective in suppressing the yield of soot through a catalyzed soot oxidation process [8,12], with a large amount of metallic compound on the soot nanoparticles [8]. The heat release rate is substantially increased under the influence of metallic compound.
Unfortunately, the mechanism through which phosphorus promotes soot formation is still not well understood. And there lacks sufficient characterization of phosphorus affected post-combustion soot. In order to isolate the effect of phosphorus on incomplete combustion products in the gas phase, char formation in the condensed phase should be avoided or minimized. In this study, our objectives are to: examine the impact of phosphorous compound on soot formation in fire tests; perform detailed characterization of soot collected in the post-combustion gas stream; and propose a possible soot formation path under the influence of phosphorus.
Section snippets
Material and methods
In this study, a crosslinked diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A epoxy (DER-332) was used as the blank thermosetting polymer because it mixes easily with additives. The DER-332 resin was hardened by hardener of triethylenetetramine (TETA). The epoxy systems were mixed with triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO). The epoxy and its phosphorus blends were then pyrolyzed under nitrogen in a MCC and the mass fraction of char remaining at 900 °C was measured to obtain the char yield. The combination of DER-332
Fire calorimetry
The representative fire calorimeter test results of epoxy and epoxy mixed with TPPO are shown in Fig. 1. The heat release rate, mass loss rate, soot production rate, and CO production rate are reported. It is seen that the peak heat release rate is reduced from 1680 to 850 kW/m2 when 2% phosphorus is added. Integrating yields the total heat release that shows a similar decrease. However, there is not significant change in the mass loss rate. The char yield is changing from 12% to 20%, which
Conclusions
Different amounts of triphenylphosphineoxide were mixed with epoxy and burned in a fire calorimeter to examine the effect of phosphorus on gas phase flame retardancy. The phosphorus was completely vaporized with the epoxy decomposition products during the burning process and significantly promoted the formation of soot, which reduced the release of heat. Detailed characterizations of soot collected in the post-flame region were performed including: diameter, element analysis of C, H, N, O, and
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the FTIR support of Dr. Mark Beach and Dr. Mark Richard from Dow Chemical.
References (26)
- et al.
A simplified model on carbon monoxide yield in burning of polymeric solids containing flame retardants
Fuel
(2018) - et al.
Kinetic study of the combustion of organophosphorus compounds
Proc. Combust. Inst.
(2000) - et al.
Measurement of the global kinetics of combustion for gaseous pyrolyzates of polymeric solids containing flame retardants
Combust. Flame
(2016) - et al.
Insightful investigation of smoke suppression behavior and mechanism of polystyrene with ferrocene: an important role of intermediate smoke
Fire Mater.
(2018) Combustion efficiency and its radiative component
Fire Saf. J.
(2004)- et al.
Catalytic oxidation of an amorphous carbon black
Combust. Flame
(1994) - et al.
Measurement of the mass specific extinction coefficient for acetylene and ethene smoke using the large agglomerate optics facility
Proc. Combust. Inst.
(1998) - et al.
A light-scattering method for soot concentration measurements
Combust. Flame
(1970) - et al.
Repeatability and reproducibility of TEM soot primary particle size measurements and comparison of automated methods
J. Aerosol Sci.
(2017) - et al.
Optimized rate expressions for soot oxidation by OH and O2
Fuel
(2016)
Kinetics of nascent soot oxidation by molecular oxygen in a flow reactor
Proc. Combust. Inst.
A review of phosphorus-containing flame retardants
J. Fire Flammabl.
Experimental and numerical investigation of the gas-phase effectiveness of phosphorus compounds
Fire Mater.
Cited by (6)
The effects of various flame retardants on the combustion of polypropylene: Combining optical diagnostics and pyrolysis fragment analysis
2023, Polymer Degradation and StabilityFire compliance of construction materials for building claddings: A critical review
2022, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Flame retardants can be categorized into three classes namely gas-phase, endothermic and char-forming. Gas phase flame retardants (e.g., halogen and nitrogen-containing) reduce the heat release rates by scavenging for reactive free radicals [108,109]. The endothermic flame retardants (e.g., metal hydroxides and metal carbonates) release non-flammable gases (e.g., H2O and CO2) which have a diluent effect on the flaming-combustion process cooling both gaseous phase and condensed phase components.
Oriented growth of LDH for constructing multifunctional cotton fabric with flame retardancy, smoke suppression, and filtering capability
2022, Applied Clay ScienceCitation Excerpt :Chemicals rich in phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) are the ideal alternatives (Li et al., 2019) to replace the conventional halogen-containing flame retardants. Upon heating, P/N-containing flame retardants produce free radicals which react with the pyrolysis products of cotton and interrupt the combustion, but a large amount of smoke and toxic gases are also produced at the same time (Guo et al., 2021). It has been found that layered double hydroxides (LDH) are able to construct a physical barrier to suppress smoke emission and also insulate heat release (Wang et al., 2016; Ren et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2020a, 2020b; Lyu et al., 2020).
Research Progress on Synergists of Phosphorous Flame Retardants in Epoxy Resin
2023, Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry