Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 222, 1 June 2018, Pages 1-11
Field Crops Research

Water use efficiency in perennial forage species: Interactions between nitrogen nutrition and water deficit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.031Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We used a simplified method for estimating separately the two components of water consumption: Evaporation and Transpiration.

  • Effects of combined N deficiency and water supply restriction on ET and water use efficiency have been analysed.

  • Crop N status is always depressed by water shortage whatever the main source of N for the crop: N2 fixation or mineral N.

  • Water deficit provokes a decline in transpiration efficiency strictly proportional to the decline in crop N status.

  • The Nuptake/Transpiration ratio appears to be a relevant index for analyzing variations of transpiration efficiency of crops.

Abstract

Interactions between nitrogen and water may vary between N2 fixing species and species that rely only mineral soil nitrogen. Here we compared above ground biomass accumulation (W), nitrogen uptake (N), evapotranspiration (ET) of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) during regrowth periods under contrasting supply of water (irrigated vs non-irrigated) and N (for non-fixing species). Using previously published data, we estimated the dynamics of the two components of ET, evaporation from soil (E) and transpiration (T), in order to analyse the impact of E/T, of the transpiration efficiency (TE = W/T) and the role of crop N nutrition on water use efficiency (WUE= W/ET). In tall fescue, limiting N supply reduced WUE by both increasing E/T ratio and decreasing TE. Water limitation in both alfalfa and tall fescue led to crop nitrogen deficit. This drought-induced N deficiency resulted in a proportional reduction in TE irrespective of the source of N for the plant. We propose that the ratio N/T, representing the apparent N concentration of water transpired by the crop, is relevant for analysing N-water interactions. Comparisons of dynamics of N/T ratio must be done at similar biomass or similar transpiration because N and T are related allometrically.

Introduction

Water and N supply are two major limitations in crop production (Sinclair and Rufty, 2012). Recent reviews on the interactions between water and nitrogen (N) highlight the reduction in water use efficiency caused by N deficit and the reciprocal impact of water deficit on the N economy of crops and pastures (Sadras et al., 2016; Sinclair and Rufty, 2012; Gonzales-Dugo et al., 2010). Crop responses to the combination of water and N supply is thus important for evaluating the interactions among crop management, species, cultivar and environment.

Many studies analysed water use efficiency (WUE) as the relationship between biomass or grain yield and evapotranspiration (ET) (Dagdelen et al., 2006; Fischer, 1979; Garafolo and Rinaldi, 2013; Kresovic et al., 2016; Suyker and Verna, 2009; Tolk et al., 1998; Yimam et al., 2015). Separating the components of ET, soil evaporation (E) and crop transpiration (T) (Cooper et al., 1987; de Wit, 1958):WUE=W/T1+EThighlights that biomass per unit ET (WUE) increases with transpiration efficiency (W/T) and smaller E/T fraction. Further, TE is related to CO2 assimilation, transpiration, stomatal control of gas exchange, and plant nutritional status (Jones, 2004; Monneveux et al., 2006; Schulze and Hall, 1982), thus providing a solid physiological basis to investigate effects of N on WUE. Methods to separate E and T include statistics (Hanks et al., 1969), modelling (Fandino et al., 2015; Sanchez et al., 2015; Sutanto et al., 2012), microlysimeters (Villalobos and Fereres, 1990), and isotope discrimination (Wang et al., 2015; Yidana et al., 2016).

Nitrogen deficit reduces both (i) the crop leaf area index (LAI, Bélanger et al., 1992a), hence increasing E/T (Ritchie, 1972); and (ii) leaf photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency (RUE, biomass per unit of intercepted radiation) (Bélanger et al., 1992a; Gastal and Bélanger, 1993; Sadras et al., 2016; Sinclair and Muchow, 1999). On the other hand, water deficit can decrease N availability in legumes by impairing N2 fixation (Durand et al., 1987), and in both legumes and grasses by decreasing availability of mineral N in soil, as mineralisation and N transport from bulk soil to rhizosphere are constrained in dry soil (Hungria and Vargas, 2000; Marino et al., 2007; Serraj et al., 1999). The ratio between N uptake and ET or T has been used to capture N-water interactions, and their effect on water use efficiency (French and Schultz, 1984a; Sadras, 2004; Sadras and Rodriguez, 2010; Sadras et al., 2016).

This paper focuses on perennial forage species, and the objectives are to examine the following hypothesis:

  • 1.

    Does TE vary between seasonal growth cycles, in relation to seasonal variation in growth potential (water and N non-limiting) and climatic conditions?

  • 2.

    How do crop N status and water availability affect TE? As a consequence, how to use crop N status as a benchmark for comparisons of TE among different crops or growing conditions?

  • 3.

    Is the ratio between crop N uptake and transpiration useful for analysing interactions between water and N affecting crop growth and transpiration efficiency?

  • 4.

    Are the water-N relations different according to the main source of N, namely N2-fixation in legumes or soil mineral N in grasses?

  • 5.

    To test these hypotheses, we compared tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) for which production is directly linked to shoot biomass.

Section snippets

Conceptual framework

We used dynamic accumulation variables recorded during the regrowth of alfalfa and tall fescue: (i) shoot biomass Wt (t ha−1), (ii) N uptake Nt (kg ha−1) and (iii) evapotranspiration ETt (mm), where the subscript “t” is time (day) since beginning of regrowth (date of cutting). Data were sourced from previous publications (Section 3).

Data set

We compiled a database of shoot biomass, N uptake, and evapotranspiration for tall fescue and alfalfa recorded at approximately weekly intervals during several regrowth periods following cutting of stands (Table 1). Crops were grown at INRA Lusignan (46°24′55 N, 0°07′09 E) between 1979 and 1985. The main features as well as the data sources are described in Table 1. For details of the method used for each species, year and treatment see Durand et al. (1989) and Lemaire et al. (1989) for

Dynamics of biomass accumulation and water use

Fig. 3 shows the dynamics of shoot biomass accumulation against cumulative evapotranspiration during each regrowth period for alfalfa and tall fescue, and Table 2 shows the parameters of fitted regressions. For all treatments the quadratic coefficient of the quadratic regression Wt vs ETt was not different from 0 at P > 0.05, supporting the assumption of a constant TE during each regrowth period. For three treatments (dry alfalfa, 2nd cut in 1982; for tall fescue in 1979, irrigated +N, and dry

Accuracy and limits of the method for separating soil evaporation and crop transpiration

The use of a linear regression between accumulation of biomass and evapotranspiration allows for an approximated separation of soil evaporation and transpiration in stands of perennial forages. Two conditions are necessary for this approximation: (i) the Wt-ETt regression must be restricted to Wt > 1 t ha−1 that corresponds to LAI > 2 to meet the assumption of minor soil evaporation; and (ii) TE during the period is constant. The first assumption is robust, but constancy of TE during a period

Conclusion

The simplified method of separating soil evaporation and transpiration by plotting the dynamic of crop biomass accumulation Wt vs the dynamic of water consumption ETt can be useful for analyzing regrowth of forages after cutting. The assumption of constant transpiration efficiency is the main required condition for the accuracy of this approach.

Water shortage led to N deficiency and a decline in transpiration efficiency strictly proportional to the N deficiency induced by drought. As a result,

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for providing financial assistance (PDE – Project 233600/2014-0). The Grains Research and Development Corporation (grant DAS-00166) supports VOS.

References (75)

  • H.G. Jones

    Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology

    Adv. Bot. Res.

    (2004)
  • A.R. Kemanian et al.

    Transpiration-use efficiency of barley

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2005)
  • B. Kresovic et al.

    Grain yield and water use efficiency of maize as influenced by different irrigation regimes through sprinkler irrigation under temperate climate

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2016)
  • G. Lemaire et al.

    Is crop demand more closely related to dry matter accumulation of leaf area expansion during vegetative growth?

    Field Crops Res.

    (2007)
  • G. Lemaire et al.

    Diagnosis tool for plant and crop N status in vegetative stage: theory and pratices for crop N management

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2008)
  • P. Monneveux et al.

    Effect of drought on gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency and productivity in field grown durum wheat genotypes

    Plant Sci.

    (2006)
  • J.B. Passioura et al.

    Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments

    Adv. Agric.

    (2010)
  • V.O. Sadras et al.

    Modelling the nitrogen-driven trade-off between nitrogen utilization efficiency and water use efficiency of wheat in eastern Australia

    Field Crops Res.

    (2010)
  • V.O. Sadras

    Yield and water-use efficiency of water and nitrogen stressed wheat crops increase with degree of co-limitation

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2004)
  • Z.P. Shangguan et al.

    Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on leaf photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency in winter wheat

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2000)
  • T.R. Sinclair et al.

    Radiation-use efficiency

    Adv. Agron.

    (1999)
  • T.R. Sinclair et al.

    Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics

    Glob. Food Secur.

    (2012)
  • A.E. Suyker et al.

    Evapotranspiration of irrigated and rained maize-soybean cropping systems

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2009)
  • P. Thiébeau et al.

    Radiation use efficiency and shoot:root dry matter partitioning in seedling growths and regrowth crops of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) after spring and autumn sowings

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2011)
  • K. Verburg et al.

    Fallow management in dryland agriculture: explaining soil water accumulation using a pulse paradigm

    Field Crops Res.

    (2012)
  • P. Wang et al.

    Partitioning evapotranspiration in a temperate grassland ecosystem: numerical modelling with isotopic tracers

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2015)
  • Y.T. Yimam et al.

    Evapotranspiration partitioning and water use efficiency of switchgrass and biomass sorghum managed for biofuel

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2015)
  • D. Zhao et al.

    Nitrogen deficiency effects on plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, and hyperspectral reflectance properties of sorghum

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2005)
  • P.E. Abbate et al.

    Climatic and water availability effects on watre-use efficiency in wheat

    Crop Sci.

    (2004)
  • G. Bélanger et al.

    Growth analysis of a tall fescue sward fertilized with different rates of nitrogen

    Crop Sci.

    (1992)
  • G. Bélanger et al.

    The effects of nitrogen fertilization and the growing season on carbon partitioning in a sward of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)

    Ann. Bot.

    (1992)
  • P.J.M. Cooper et al.

    Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in rainfed systems of west Asia and North Africa

    Exp. Agric.

    (1987)
  • V.R. de Dios et al.

    Processes driving nocturnal transpiration and implications for estimating land evapotranspiration

    Sci. Rep.

    (2015)
  • C.T. de Wit

    Transpiration and crop yields

    (1958)
  • J.L. Durand et al.

    Nitrogenase activity, photosynthesis and nodule water potential in soyabean plants experiencing water deprivation

    J. Exp. Bot.

    (1987)
  • J.L. Durand et al.

    Analyse de la conversion de l’energie solaire en matière séche par un peuplement de luzerne (Medicago sativa L.) soumis à un déficit hydrique

    Agronomie

    (1989)
  • J.L. Durand et al.

    How much do water deficits alter the nitrogen nutrition status of forage crops?

    Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text