Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 65, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages 723-730
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Kidney Cancer
Editorial by Joaquim Bellmunt and Jeffrey J. Leow on pp. 731–732 of this issue
The Impact of Low Serum Sodium on Treatment Outcome of Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Hyponatremia has been associated with poor survival in many solid tumors and more recently found to be of prognostic and predictive value in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with immunotherapy.

Objective

To investigate the influence of baseline hyponatremia in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.

Design, setting, and participants

Data on 1661 patients treated with first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) targeted therapy for mRCC were available from 18 cancer centers to study the impact of hyponatremia (serum sodium level <135 mmol/l) on clinical outcomes.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary objective was overall survival (OS) and secondary end points included time to treatment failure (TTF) and the disease control rate (DCR). The chi-square test was used to compare the DCR in patients with and without hyponatremia. OS and TTF were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were examined by the log-rank test. Multivariable logistic regression (for DCR) and Cox regression (for OS and TTF) were undertaken adjusted for prognostic risk factors.

Results and limitations

Median OS after treatment initiation was 18.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5–19.8 mo), with 552 (33.2%) of patients remaining alive on a median follow-up of 22.1 mo. Median baseline serum sodium was 138 mmol/l (range: 122–159 mmol/l), and hyponatremia was found in 14.6% of patients. On univariate analysis, hyponatremia was associated with shorter OS (7.0 vs 20.9 mo), shorter TTF (2.9 vs 7.4 mo), and lower DCR rate (54.9% vs 78.8%) (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). In multivariate analysis, these effects remain significant (hazard ratios: 1.51 [95% CI, 1.26–1.80] for OS, and 1.57 [95% CI, 1.34–1.83] for TTF; odds ratio: 0.50 [95% CI, 34–0.72] for DCR; adjusted p < 0.001). Results were similar if sodium was analyzed as a continuous variable (adjusted p < 0.0001 for OS, TTF, and DCR).

Conclusions

This is the largest multi-institutional report to show that hyponatremia is independently associated with a worse outcome in mRCC patients treated with VEGF- and mTOR-targeted agents.

Introduction

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is the sixth most common cancer in United States [1], accounting for an estimated 64 770 new cases and 13 570 deaths in 2012. Patients can present with metastatic disease or recur after nephrectomy. Currently, patients with advanced RCC are stratified into three different risk groups based on the two prognostic models used most [2], [3]. These prognostic models take into account several baseline clinical and laboratory values, and capture the natural history of metastatic RCC (mRCC).

Hyponatremia is one of the most common electrolyte disorders observed in hospitalized patients [4], and it is probably highly underestimated. According to the studied populations and the definition of hyponatremia, its reported frequency varies greatly, from <1% to >40% [5]. Hyponatremia can be caused by either dilution of the serum sodium by excess retained free water or by excessive sodium losses.

Hyponatremia has been associated with poor survival in several nonmalignant diseases, such as congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and infectious diseases (pneumonia, childhood meningitis, necrotizing soft-tissue infection) [6], [7], [8]. Serum sodium has been analyzed in mRCC patients treated with cytokines [9], and hyponatremia was found to be associated with a worse outcome. Similar observations have been made in malignancies, such as advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [10], advanced gastric cancer [11], advanced small cell lung cancer [12], and localized RCC [13]. However, the role of hyponatremia in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapies is not well defined. One study including 87 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib showed that hyponatremia was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival [14]. Since serum sodium levels are routinely measured and, therefore, widely available most of the time, we sought to investigate the association of hyponatremia on treatment outcomes in mRCC patients treated with contemporary targeted therapies.

Section snippets

Patient population

The International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) includes 20 academic cancer centers from Canada, the United States, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Denmark. As of October 10, 2012, a total of 2370 patients who had received first-line targeted therapy between 2003 and 2012 were included. For this study, 1661 patients from 18 centers had baseline serum sodium level information readily available.

All patients were diagnosed with mRCC of any pathologic subtype with no

Patient characteristics

Patient and disease characteristics at the initiation of targeted therapy, both of all patients (n = 1661) and separated by hyponatremia status, are presented in Table 1. Most patients were male (74%). Fifty-three percent of patients were older than 60 yr. The majority of patients had clear cell histology (89%). Patients received one of the following VEGF-targeted therapies: sunitinib (75%), sorafenib (17%), bevacizumab (4%), pazopanib (2%), tivozanib (<1%), or axitinib (<1%); or mTOR-targeted

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate the association of hyponatremia on outcome of mRCC patients treated with targeted agents. Hyponatremia was found to be associated with a significant lower OS, TTF, and DCR at first staging evaluation in mRCC patients receiving targeted therapy. Hyponatremic patients had 57% and 51% increase in the risk of treatment failure or death, respectively. In addition, the 50% reduction in the odds of disease control according to RECIST criteria

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have shown that, in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy, baseline hyponatremia is associated with a poorer OS, TTF, and DCR. Hyponatremia may be a quick and efficient method of stratifying patients beyond the IMDC criteria. Hyponatremia deserves to be further investigated as a prognostic factor and evaluated for inclusion in future prognostic tools.

References (26)

  • V. Nair et al.

    Hyponatremia in community-acquired pneumonia

    Am J Nephrol

    (2007)
  • J. Rossi et al.

    Improvement in hyponatremia during hospitalization for worsening heart failure is associated with improved outcomes: insights from the Acute and Chronic Therapeutic Impact of a Vasopressin Antagonist in Chronic Heart Failure (ACTIV in CHF) trial

    Acute Card Care

    (2007)
  • A.N. Jeppesen et al.

    Hyponatremia as a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

    Br J Cancer

    (2010)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Clinical laboratory tests associated with survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A Laboratory Wide Association Study (LWAS)

      2022, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      This analysis further supports prior findings that low serum sodium levels are associated with survival for patients with mRCC [26,27]. Schutz et al. demonstrated that hyponatremia (serum sodium concentration <135 mmol/L) was associated with disease progression and poor survival in 1,661 patients in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium [26]. Hyponatremia has been further linked with outcomes for patients receiving tyrosine kinase therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma [28], non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian carcinoma, and glioblastoma [29,30].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Co-senior authors.

    View full text