Research papersAxially and radially inhomogeneous swelling in commercial 18650 Li-ion battery cells
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are a key technology for many kinds of mobile technologies, especially due to their high energy density and tunable power characteristics, while also providing a sufficiently long lifetime. Recently battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have become a dominant market segment for LIBs and have hence also started to drive battery technology development [[1], [2], [3]]. For BEVs, where large batteries are required for sufficient driving ranges, and the battery constitutes a large portion of the total cost, the lifetime of the battery is of crucial importance as battery replacement would often be economically unviable. This let battery/cell aging and lifetime become a focus of research interest [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8]], following many different approaches and often focusing on individual pieces of the puzzle towards a comprehensive understanding of this complex topic [9]. Cell aging manifests itself not only in a reduced electrical capacity of the cell but also in an increased thickness of the cell's active materials (electrode stack swelling) [10,11]. Capacity fade and swelling are two strongly interconnected manifestations of cell aging. Whereas the capacity fade is technologically seen as a global effect of the cell, swelling should be analyzed on a more local and, therefore, microscopic level to fully understand the driving factors of the structural changes in the active material.
Various processes are known to result in structural and mechanical changes of the cell both during charging and discharging as well as during storage. This includes plating of metallic Li at the carbonaceous anode as the main degradation mechanism, brought on especially by high charging currents at a high state of charge (SOC) and at low ambient temperatures [9]. During the first cycle of Li+ intercalation, a so-called solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer forms on the porous graphite anode and consumes a certain amount of the inventory of cyclable Li, reducing the available capacity of the cell [12]. In general, the largest volume changes occur within LIBs in the anode and cathode materials. The reversible volume expansion upon lithiating the graphite anode towards the LiC6 phase was found to be up to 13% [13]. As the anode experiences these volume changes repeatedly during every cycle, a certain degree of SEI fracturing and regrowth consuming electrolyte species and Li-ions is inevitable. [[14], [15], [16]]. Moreover, dissolved transition metals from the cathode active materials can be reduced on the anode surface, triggering further SEI formation and hence capacity fade [17]. Volumetric changes of cathode materials are less significant and highly dependent on the type of active material. LFP LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes exhibit 6.8% volume changes during cycling [18] and common NMC cathodes such as NMC522 (LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2) exhibit volumetric changes of around 2% only [19]. Nickel-rich structures, such as NCA (LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2) on the other hand show highly anisotropic volume changes upon a high degree of delithation. At voltages above 4 V vs. Li/Li+, the c parameter goes through a maximum before it suddenly collapses [20]. While the overall volume change is around 5% only [20], the anisotropy has been suggested to cause microcracking in the polycrystalline cathode material, resulting in exposure of more surface area to the electrolyte and material isolation. [21]. Xia et al. observed that the cracking is further depended on the applied charging rate, where increased cracking was observed for higher rates, resulting in an increased porosity and a specific surface area between about 7% and 11%. This cracking leads to overall volume expansion of the active layers of the electrode [22]. The exposure of additional surface area is detrimental as it can lead to increased CO2 and O2 gas formation by oxidative side reaction on the cathode at high potentials [23]. Gas formation because of abuse or degradation can result in worsened contact within the jelly roll [24] and will cause pressure build up in the cell, which can ultimately lead to swelling of the cell case or venting [25].
All abovementioned phenomena lead to geometrical changes in the batteries' architecture over time. Due to the fact that available space for the cell's active material is often confined, an electrode stack thickness increase usually results also in a higher mechanical pressure in the active materials, possibly even accelerating the related processes and, therefore, resulting in a severely reduced lifetime.
Evidently, analyses focused on the direct observation of geometrical changes inside the electrode stacks of LIB cells can thus provide valuable insights into cell aging, complementing the observations gained from other widely used methods using the cells' electrical characteristics [9,[26], [27], [28]] to infer aging mechanisms taking place inside LIBs. Thus, recent studies have employed micro-X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) to non-destructively investigate the inner volume of cells that showed rapid capacity fade during cycling. Often, investigated cells were of the cylindrical 18650-type that features a so-called jelly-roll of wound cell layers, widely employed in commercial products. Waldmann et al. [29] have found that kinks in the layered structure can form in the vicinity of current collector tabs, exacerbated by high charging rates and that they could possibly be suppressed by the presence of a central pin stabilizing the layer structure. However, Pfrang et al. [30] could find the same phenomenon also in cells featuring a central pin and again attributed it to geometrical inhomogeneities in the jelly-roll, while Willenberg et al. [31] could see kinks forming also relatively far away from current collector tabs, but starting preferentially in the center of the jelly-roll. They connected the formation of kinks with the progressing formation of the SEI layer and eventual buckling of the layered structure at its weakest point in the cell. Blanc et al. [32] introduced virtual unrolling of 18650-type cells as a useful tool for visualization and analysis of morphological changes in electrodes due to battery aging. Kok et al. [33] used virtual unrolling to examine layer thickness changes without having to open a battery and could thereby show that pre-existing geometrical inhomogeneities get amplified by cycling. With the exception of the studies by Pfrang et al. and Kok et al., the geometrical changes occurring during cycling of cylindrical LIBs have only really be addressed on circular virtual cross-sections, while any observed axial inhomogeneities were ascribed to the presence of a current collector tab or progressively forming kinked regions. One reason for this lack of detail is most likely found in the trade-off between achievable resolution and imaged volume, which is necessary with classical micro-CT.
In this work, therefore, helical trajectory micro-CT was employed for the first time to image the entire volume of 18650-type LIBs with high enough resolution to distinguish all the battery's components and providing the ability to perform precise geometrical measurements throughout the entire volume of the battery. This is a major improvement compared to earlier works that had to focus on either low-resolution observation on the scale of the whole LIB cell (as in the studies listed above) or on the high-resolution analysis of only small parts like selected cross-sections, individual layers of the electrode stack or single particles/grains within the layers [34,35]. This opens up the possibility to both locate and analyze small volumetric changes taking place at the onset of aging, i.e. at a high state of health (SOH). We investigate a commercial LIB employed in a prominent BEV application, cycled in a moderate SOC range and with a moderate load profile, but with a high charging rate and compared it to a fresh and unused LIB. Pronounced radial and axial gradients could be found, even in the absence of major distortions such as kinks in the layered jelly-roll electrode structure.
Section snippets
Li-ion cells
The LIBs investigated in this work are two cylindrical cells labelled NCR18650BD with a nominal capacity of 3.18 Ah. The cells, with the geometrical format 18650, were extracted from the battery pack of a 2013 Tesla Model S P85 and are composed of LixNiyCozAlO2 (NCA) as cathode and carbon (graphite) as anode materials. As they are both from the same battery pack and manufacturing batch, we assume that the initial differences are negligible compared to changes induced by the aging process.
For
Results
The space-filling helical trajectory allows us to cover the whole cell in one high-resolution stitching-free scan. Resolution is sufficient to distinguish the cathode (LiNixCoyAlzO2) and the anode (carbon), as well as the current collectors (aluminum and copper) and even the separators (polymer), as shown in Fig. 4. This enables us to perform a quantitative geometrical evaluation of these structures throughout the cell's entire volume. Furthermore, image artefacts like beam-hardening or metal
Discussion
Since the electrical cycling parameters chosen for this study are relatively moderate, no significant aging and capacity fade as observed in earlier micro-CT studies [[29], [30], [31],33] had been expected. In fact, after already 10–15 full-equivalent cycles the SOH of the aged cell exceeds that of the “nominal” reference load profile presented in manufacturer's datasheet and after the aging protocol of 400 cycles at 40% cycle depth used in this work, less than 5% of the nominal capacity have
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that helical trajectory micro-CT coupled with the virtual unrolling technique is a sensitive and effective tool in addressing the minute geometrical changes taking place inside LIBs during early stages of cycle aging, which are not easily accessible by other characterization techniques.
Within the NCR18650BD cylindrical cell investigated in the fresh state and aged to 400 cycles of 40% cycle depth, it was found that at the top and bottom of the innermost windings, swelling
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Pavel Blazek: Writing - Original Draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis.
Peter Westenberger: Software, Formal analysis, Methodology.
Simon Erker: Writing - Review & Editing.
Adam Brinek: Software, Methodology.
Tomas Zikmund: Conceptualization, Validation.
Daniel Rettenwander: Writing - Review & Editing.
Nils Peter Wagner: Writing - Review & Editing.
Jozef Keckes: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision.
Jozef Kaiser: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision.
Tomas Kazda: Writing -
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge CzechNanoLab Research Infrastructure supported by MEYS CR (LM2018110). J.K. thanks to the support of grant FSI-S-20-6353 and P.B. thanks to the support of BUT Internal grants project, reg. no. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016948 and graduate research of the Brno University of Technology No. FEKT-S-20-6206.
This work was supported by Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG, project number 872380), through the transnational M-ERA.NET project “StressLIC”. A part of
References (44)
- et al.
Understanding structural changes in NMC Li-ion cells by in situ neutron diffraction
J. Power Sources
(2014) - et al.
Chemomechanical interplay of layered cathode materials undergoing fast charging in lithium batteries
Nano Energy
(2018) - et al.
A review of gas evolution in lithium ion batteries
Energy Rep.
(2020) - et al.
Equivalent circuit model parameters extraction for lithium ion batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
J. Energy Storage
(2018) - et al.
Constitutive behavior and progressive mechanical failure of electrodes in lithium-ion batteries
J. Power Sources
(2017) - B. Scrosati, J. Garche, Lithium batteries: status, prospects and future, 195 (n.d.) 2419–2430....
- R. Schmuch, R. Wagner, G. Hörpel, T. Placke, M. Winter, Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based...
- D. Deng, Li-ion batteries: basics, progress, and challenges, 3 (n.d.) 385–418....
- J. Vetter, P. Novák, M.R. Wagner, C. Veit, K.-C. Möller, J.O. Besenhard, M. Winter, M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, C. Vogler, A....
- A. Barré, B. Deguilhem, S. Grolleau, M. Gérard, F. Suard, D. Riu, A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and...
Volume changes of graphite anodes revisited: a combined operando X-ray diffraction and in situ pressure analysis study
J. Phys. Chem. C
Nickel, manganese, and cobalt dissolution from Ni-rich NMC and their effects on NMC622-graphite cells
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Cited by (16)
Two strain modes and transition point of 18650 lithium-ion battery at different charging rates
2024, Journal of Energy StorageLithiation-induced swelling of electrodes
2024, Journal of Energy StorageA short review of the effect of external pressure on the batteries
2024, Monatshefte fur Chemie