Effect of material elastic properties and surface roughness on grip performances of ski boot soles under wet and icy conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2017.04.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Grip of ski-boot soles is studied by a coupled experimental-simulation approach.

  • Soles friction is correlated to material chemical composition and surface morphology.

  • High grip is associated to low material stiffness and surface roughness.

  • The coefficient of friction represents a performance indicator of overall grip.

  • Results have considerable application in the design of anti-slip sports equipment.

Abstract

A set of thermoplastic materials employed in soles for alpine skiing boots were characterized in terms of chemical composition, cristallinity, hardness, surface roughness, and grip. The results of friction experiments on different substrates reproducing the real environmental scenarios point out that materials provide more grip as they become softer. Moreover, higher roughness results in lower dynamic coefficient of friction (COF). Finite element simulations corroborate the experimental measures of COF and let to rationalize the role of material elasticity and surface roughness on the frictional characteristics of soles. The measure of grip on an inclined wet surface provides analogous results, indicating that COF can be used as key performance indicator in the design of ski-boot soles and of other anti-slip equipments in wet and icy environments.

Introduction

Slips and falls are very common when walking on ice (Fleischer et al. (2014)) and they can be the cause of injuries of skiers in both outdoor environment (e.g., on ski slopes and resort walking areas) and indoor. For example, it is reported by Fleischer et al. (2014) that in Alaska approximately 10% of the injuries related to falling-through-the-ice (FTI) are connected to sport activities such as skiing and other adventure sports. For this reason, it is of crucial importance to identify the factors that influence the grip of the materials used for the production of soles on wet and icy surfaces (Tsai and Powers (2013)). The soles of alpine ski boots are generally made of the same hard materials (polyolefines- or polyurethane-based thermoplastic polymers) used for the main body of the boot, ranging from 50 to 65 Shore D hardness (Colonna et al., 2013, Nicotra et al., 2015, Colonna et al., 2014), and have a limited tread which result in a limited friction with slippery surfaces (Grönqvist and Hirvonen (1995)). This type of construction aims at reducing the costs and complexity of the moulds used for the production (Colonna et al. (2014)). Nevertheless, in recent years several manufacturers have started to produce boots with interchangeable soles (Colonna et al. (2013)) made of softer materials with respect to the plastics used for the body, in order to improve their anti-slip properties. On the other hand, the soles for ski-touring and freeride skiing boots are made of thermoplastic elastomers or vulcanized (natural or synthetic) rubber, to provide good grip when hiking and climbing.

The sole of a ski boot must have a stiff behaviour in order to efficiently transmit the impulse from the boot to the ski but, at the same time, a good grip on icy and wet surfaces. Generally, stiffer materials have lower friction resistance on hard and wet surfaces compared to soft materials (Gao et al. (2003)). The drawback of using soft rubbers is the lack in power transfer between the skier and the ski due to sole excessive bending under load, leading to a less precise control of the skis. Moreover, the efficient and safe behaviour of the binding in releasing the boot during a fall is strongly influenced by the geometry and the hardness of the parts in contact. In recent years some producers have provided the possibility to change the heel and the toe of the sole in order to have boots with desired properties according to the specific application. This type of sole is generally attached to the shell using metal screws. Therefore, alpine ski boots must be realized observing limits and prescriptions in terms of dimensions, materials and design of the boot interface. Two ISO standards (5355 and 9523, ISO 5355, 2005, ISO 9523, 2008) rule the design of ski boots (Colonna et al. (2013)), defining the area of the ski boot in contact with the binding. In terms of materials used, both standards require that the hardness of the material at the toe and heel binding interface must be not less than 50 Shore D, measured at a temperature of +23° in accordance with ISO 868 (ISO (2003)). ISO 5355 specifies that the dynamic friction coefficient between the boot material and a low friction element of PTFE must be less than 0.1. Only when materials different from thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) are used in the heel part of the boot, there must be at least one longitudinal low friction area to act as a bearing surface for the ski-brake. ISO 9523 requires a minimum percentage of the area in contact with the bearing surface of the binding of 25% in the toe and of 40% in the heel but no restriction in the characteristics of the material for the sole are prescribed. Ski-boots producers are currently pushing for the development of new standards that take into account different types of bindings. Since the amount of ski-mountaineering boots produced is less than 5% of the overall ski boots market (Colonna et al., 2013, Nicotra et al., 2015) the interest of ski boot manufacturers and of researchers is mainly focused toward the study of soles for alpine skiing.

In recent years a significant work was performed in order to understand and model the friction behaviour of elastomers, mainly due to the interest of the automotive industry on this topic. For example, Heinrich and Klüppel (2008) have investigated the role of rubber friction on tire traction, focusing on the load and velocity dependence of the friction coefficient. Attention has also been given to the study of materials used for the sole of shoes. Especially, Derler et al. (2008) have studied the influence of abrasion and temperature on grip, combining measurements of friction and hardness. Li et al. (2006) have investigated the correlation between the tread groove depth and the coefficient of friction on different wet and water-detergent covered floors, finding to be not significant in those conditions.

Some authors have focused their attention on soles friction on ice. For instance, Grönqvist and Hirvonen (1995) have tested 49 types of winter footwear on dry and wet ice. From their evaluation, material type and hardness, as well as cleat design, were the most important factors on dry ice. On the other hand, only on wet ice the tread design had an influence on the friction properties. The high slipperiness of melted or wet ice was confirmed by Gao et al. (2003) who measured the effect of sole abrasive wear on the coefficient of friction on dry and melting ice. The results proved that artificially induced abrasive wear of soles increased slip resistance on hard ice, but not on melting ice. In the end, the chemical composition and the hardness (the latter dependent from the first) have an effect also on the scratch resistance that may affect the surface roughness in the long term (Budinski (1997)). Thus, it is clear the need of a study that takes into account different material parameters (namely chemical composition, hardness, and surface roughness) in order to obtain the best balance in terms of energy transfer and of grip on wet and icy surfaces.

The exploitation of numerical simulations in the realization of sports equipment is widely acknowledged by the industries and it represents an unavoidable step for the design of optimized and high performance products, limiting the cost of physical experimentation and prototyping to few calibration and verification tests. Regarding ski boots a number of work has focused on the structural design and optimization (Corazza and Cobelli, 2005, Parisotto et al., 2012, Natali et al., 2014). However, to the best of authors' knowledge, no specific application of computational tools was use in the study and design of the grip performances of soles.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the friction performance of different materials used in ski boot soles on wet floors and icy conditions, correlating the performances with the chemical composition of the material, with its elasticity (hardness) and with the sole surface roughness. Finite Element Method (FEM) numerical simulations were used to fit the experimental results in order to understand general trends and extend the investigation domain.

Section snippets

Materials characterization

A total of six different mould injected soles were tested: soles 1 and 2 are bi-injected with a geometry (design 1) shown in Fig. 1(a) while soles from 3 to 6 are mono-injected with a geometry (design 2) shown in Fig. 1(b). Materials for sole groups 1–4 and 5–6 were provided by two different manufacturers. All the soles are conform to the ISO 5355 standard.

The chemical composition of all the soles was determined via Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum

Chemical and mechanical characterization of materials

The resulting FT-IR spectra were compared to a database of known polymeric materials. The analysis (Fig. 2) shows that the soles are made of thermoplastic polyurethanes due to the presence of a peak at 1699 cm−1, of a shoulder at 1725 cm−1 and of a peak at 1525 cm−1 (Colonna et al. (2013)). The polyurethanes that compose the soles are based on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) due to the presence in FT-IR spectra of a peak at 1596 cm−1 (Colonna et al. (2013)). All materials tested show the

Discussion and conclusions

The carried analysis on the friction behaviour of ski boot soles for alpine skiing shows that the dynamic coefficient of friction depends on the roughness and on the crystalline structure of the materials, with the smother surfaces and the softer materials having the best grip properties. The thermoplastic polyurethane soles have more grip on glass compared to porcelain stoneware surfaces. The grip on ice is significantly lower than wet surfaces, also due to the low temperature that increases

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

NMP is supported by the European Research Council (ERC PoC 2015 SILKENE no. 693670) and by the European Commission H2020 under the Graphene FET Flagship Core 1 (WP14 “Polymer Composites”, no. 696656) and under the FET Proactive (“Neurofibres” no. 732344). SS acknowledges support from SILKENE.

References (23)

  • DIN 51130

    Antislip Classifications

    (2004)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Reversible wettability switching of melamine sponges for oil/water separation

      2021, Materials Chemistry and Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The wettability of the materials depends on the micro-nano structure morphology and the chemical composition of the surface. The surface energy [30] and roughness [31–33] are two decisive factors to regulate the wettability of the surface. Therefore, the materials surface with superhydrophilic or superhydrophobic can be adjusted by changing the surface morphology.

    • INVESTIGATION OF FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF THE SURFCAE OF ROBOTIC GRIPPER

      2021, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Tribology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text