Elsevier

Epidemics

Volume 11, June 2015, Pages 32-47
Epidemics

Impact of coverage-dependent marginal costs on optimal HPV vaccination strategies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2015.01.003Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Evidence suggests that marginal HPV vaccination costs may increase with uptake.

  • We assess the impact of increasing marginal costs on optimal resource allocation.

  • We find that increasing marginal costs may favor both-sex HPV vaccination.

  • More empirical research on cost curves is needed for policy recommendations.

Abstract

The effectiveness of vaccinating males against the human papillomavirus (HPV) remains a controversial subject. Many existing studies conclude that increasing female coverage is more effective than diverting resources into male vaccination. Recently, several empirical studies on HPV immunization have been published, providing evidence of the fact that marginal vaccination costs increase with coverage. In this study, we use a stochastic agent-based modeling framework to revisit the male vaccination debate in light of these new findings. Within this framework, we assess the impact of coverage-dependent marginal costs of vaccine distribution on optimal immunization strategies against HPV. Focusing on the two scenarios of ongoing and new vaccination programs, we analyze different resource allocation policies and their effects on overall disease burden. Our results suggest that if the costs associated with vaccinating males are relatively close to those associated with vaccinating females, then coverage-dependent, increasing marginal costs may favor vaccination strategies that entail immunization of both genders. In particular, this study emphasizes the necessity for further empirical research on the nature of coverage-dependent vaccination costs.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus vaccination
Marginal distribution costs
Stochastic agent-based models
Male HPV vaccination
Optimal vaccine distribution

Cited by (0)