Elsevier

Environmental Science & Policy

Volume 101, November 2019, Pages 255-261
Environmental Science & Policy

Historical development of climate change policies and the Climate Change Secretariat in Sri Lanka

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In 25 years, Sri Lanka enhanced the ability to mobilize financing support from international organizations.

  • The Climate Change Secretariat (CCS) laid the foundation for Sri Lanka’s institutional capacity development for climate change policies.

  • In formulating and implementing climate change policies, experts with extensive international academic background played important roles.

  • Wide stakeholder involvement in policy formulation led to relatively effective policy implementation under the CCS.

  • Sri Lanka needs to establish its own fund to implement Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) and the National Adaptation Plan.

Abstract

The IPCC, 2014 report found that the roles institutions played in implementing coastal adaptation policies were yet understudied. In particular, limited research was done to examine the evolution of policies and institutional actions in small island nations. Partly to fill this gap, this study traces the historical development of climate change policies in Sri Lanka and the critical roles its main climate change policy institution played in engaging with the public and experts, negotiating with international organizations, and coordinating with other stakeholder agencies. We examine how these intensive institutional efforts began in March 2008, when, in the midst of rising interests in and concerns about global climate change impacts, the Sri Lanka Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment (MMD&E) established the Climate Change Secretariat (CCS). In Sri Lanka’s political history, the establishment of the CCS signalled the dawn of the new era, leading to a series of climate change mitigation and adaptation policy actions and improved institutional capacity in the following decade. CCS’s actions in drafting the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) and implementing various coordinated intergovernmental programs under the policy demonstrated how a small island nation with limited financial and technical capacities could still mobilize domestic experts and international financial support to attain some tangible results. The CCS also followed international movements for public participation by engaging with the public.

Introduction

Studies on institutional mitigation and adaptation responses to climate change have clarified the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of climate change governance (Hewawasam and Matsui, 2018), but, as the IPCC, 2014 report found, the roles institutions played in implementing coastal adaptation were yet understudied (IPCC, 2014: 388-389). In these studies, small developing island nations were portrayed as having weak and vulnerable governance structures (Yamane, 2009), whereas European regions (McInnes, 2006) and American states like California (Bedsworth and Hanak, 2010) were often depicted as having implemented good practices (McInnes, 2006).

Partly because of this research trend, limited research was done to examine the evolution of policies and institutional actions in small island nations. In particular, we do not yet know much about what government institutions in these nations have actually done and improved in mitigating and adapting to climate change. This paper attempts to fill out this gap by examining the historical development of climate change policies in Sri Lanka. It traces active government actions in formulating and implementing climate change policies. In so doing, we attempt to address questions as to what major factors drove government institutions to act; how institutional structures experienced changes; what financial sources these institutions mobilized to fund their actions; and who played influential roles in formulating and implementing policies. We then conclude by reflecting on future policy options.

From 1992 to 2017, the Sri Lankan government issued twelve outstanding documents that are related to climate change policies, including the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP), National Environment Policy (NEP) in 2003, and Capacity Assessment and Action Plan for Developing Capacity for Compliance with Global Conventions on Biodiversity, Climate Change, and Land Degradation in 2006. We examined these documents. Also, the Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment (MMD&E) has made relevant cabinet memoranda public, and we used them to clarify the law-making process for climate change policies from 2008 to 2017. We have reviewed these documents to better trace the evolution of climate change policies with the focus on institutional roles in policy implementation. We also tried to place policy history within a global context by examining information from the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Our research identified three landmark events in the history of Sri Lanka’s climate change policy development: (1) the establishment of the Climate Change Secretariat (CCS) under the Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment, (2) the development of the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) by the CCS, and (3) the further institutional development under the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP). We first discuss the period that led to the establishment of the CCS. In examining the second period we illustrate how the CCS led the formulation of the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) for the period of 2008-2012. In discussing the third period, we focus on activities that were implemented under the NCCP from 2012 and 2017.

Section snippets

Pre-establishment of the CCS (1992–2008)

The origin of environmental policies that included climate change issues in Sri Lanka dates back to 1992 when the government formulated its first National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) in 1991 for the period of 1992–1996. The NEAP highlighted concerns over the potential risk of climate change and identified priority areas. This document spearheaded the national policy formulation movement among developing countries (GEF, 2018a). The NEAP implementation process coincided with Sri Lanka’s

Conclusion

This paper examined the historical development of climate change policies in Sri Lanka from 1992 to 2017. It took 16 years for Sri Lanka to establish a relatively strong and specialized institutional mechanism. Partly due to the roles the Environmental Economics and Global Affairs Division played, this long formative period led to the establishment of the CCS in 2008, and by that time tasks for stakeholder coordination had become relatively feasible, making it easier to gain support for

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

References (48)

  • Adaptation fund

    10 Years of the Adaptation Fund

    (2018)
  • AEU

    Framework for the National Climate Change Policy of Sri Lanka

    (2010)
  • L.W. Bedsworth et al.

    Adaptation to climate change

    J. Am. Plan. Assoc.

    (2010)
  • S. Chowdhury

    Climate Change Adaptation Policy Actions in the Coastal Areas of Bangladesh

    (2018)
  • CCS

    Designated National Authority

    (2012)
  • CCS

    Preparation of Second National Communication (SNC) on Climate Change Project

    (2013)
  • CCS

    Climate Change Secretariat of Sri Lanka (CCS)

    (2017)
  • Constitution

    Directive Principles of State Policy

    (1978)
  • GEF

    Enabling Sri Lanka to Fulfil Its Commitments to the UNFCCC. Project Proposal

    (2018)
  • GEF

    Climate Change Enabling Activity (Additional Financing for Capacity Building in Priority Areas)

    (2018)
  • V. Hewawasam et al.

    An analysis of climate change secretariat initiatives to achieve the national climate change policy in Sri Lanka

    Int. J. Clim. Change Impacts Responses

    (2018)
  • INC

    Initial National Communication (INC)

    (2000)
  • INDCs

    Intended Nationally Determined Contributions in Sri Lanka

    (2016)
  • IPCC

    Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects, Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    (2014)
  • IPS

    Mainstreaming the Climate Change for Sustainable Development in Sri Lanka

    (2009)
  • Kyoto Protocol

    Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

    (1998)
  • R. McInnes

    Responding to the Risks from Climate Change in Coastal Zones: A Good Practice Guide

    (2006)
  • ME&NR

    Climate Change in Sri Lanka. Climate Change Enabling Activity (phase II) Project. Environmental Economics and Global Affairs Division

    (2004)
  • ME&NR

    Global Warming: A Warning to All

    (2008)
  • MMD&E

    Readiness Plan for Implementation of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs): 2017–2019

    (2016)
  • MMD&E

    Annual Performance Report & Accounts 2017

    (2017)
  • MoE

    Climate Change Vulnerability Data Book. Maps and Data by Sector

    (2011)
  • NAP

    National Adaptation Plan for Climate Change Impacts in Sri Lanka: 2016–2025

    (2016)
  • NARP

    National Agriculture Research Policy: 2012–2016

    (2012)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Green building's heat loss reduction analysis through two novel hybrid approaches

      2023, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
      Citation Excerpt :

      30 % of the initial energy usage in the world and nearly-one-third of the world's carbon emissions are attributable to the construction industry [11]. Because of increased urbanization, climate change, future water resources, and other factors, global building energy demand has constantly been growing [10,12,13]. The pertinent criteria emphasize the enhancement of thermal function, and associated regulations are absent.

    • Climate pledges versus commitment: Are policy actions of Middle-East and North African countries consistent with their emissions targets?

      2022, Advances in Climate Change Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, studies (Cosimo and Giovanni, 2019; Bayomi and Fernandez, 2019) suggest that the MENA region's carbon emissions dynamics currently demand greater attention from global institutions such as United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund. Subsequently, literature suggests that climate change has begun to adversely impact the MENA countries (Nordhaus, 2017; Hewawasam and Matsui, 2019; Huang and Zhai, 2021). That is, Huang and Zhai (2021) have shown that the MENA region is the most vulnerable2 to climate change impacts in terms of dry soil, low rainfall with increased temperature, and these climate conditions turn to primarily affect public health and agricultural outputs (Shahbaz et al., 2019; Wesseh and Lin, 2019).

    • Climate financing barriers and strategies: the case of Sri Lanka

      2023, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction
    • THE POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN SOUTH ASIA

      2022, Routledge Handbook of the International Relations of South Asia
    • Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability, and Mitigation in the Indian Ocean Region: Policy Suggestions

      2021, Climate Resilience and Environmental Sustainability Approaches: Global Lessons and Local Challenges
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text