Elsevier

Engineering Structures

Volume 181, 15 February 2019, Pages 233-245
Engineering Structures

Structural grading of three sympodial bamboo culms (Hitam, Andong, and Tali) subjected to axial compressive load

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.026Get rights and content

Highlight:

  • Structural grading of bamboo culm could be conducted by using strength or capacity grading.

  • Density is good predictor for estimating the compressive strength, while linear mass is the best one for estimating the load carrying capacity.

  • Capacity approached is better than strength approach in bamboo construction design.

Abstract

Bamboo culm is commonly utilized in columns that are subjected to axial compressive load, thus it is necessary to measure its compressive strength and load-carrying capacity. The variability of culm dimension, geometry, moisture content, density, and linear mass of three sympodial bamboo species belonging to the Gigantochloa genus [Hitam (Gigantochloa atroviolacea), Tali (G. apus), and Andong (G. pseudoarundinacea)] were studied to determine the best predictor for structural grading of these culms based on their compression properties. Two types of structural gradings, strength and capacity gradings, were examined. Strength grading was developed assuming a hollow or solid circular section of the bamboo culm. Both strength and capacity gradings sufficiently classified culms of all three species into several structural quality classes based on a strong correlation (r) between the predictor and dependent variable (r = 0.83–0.97); however, capacity grading proved to be the best type of structural grading because the maximum compressive load carrying capacity (Fc) of bamboo culm could be predicted more precisely and accurately compared with the compressive strength (σc). Additionally, it was found that linear mass was the best predictor for estimating the compressive capacity (Fc) (r = 0.89–0.98), culm density for estimating compressive strength assuming a solid circular section (σcc) (r = 0.84–0.92), and wall density for estimating compressive strength assuming a hollow circular section (σcw) (r = 0.73–0.89). Based on these predictors, capacity and strength gradings for bamboo culms subjected to compressive load were developed, permitting categorization of bamboo culms into structural quality classes. Each structural quality class had a 5% lower value and characteristic value for σc and the maximum compressive load, which became design values for bamboo structural design.

Introduction

Bamboo is an eco-friendly and renewable material and is traditionally used for construction of housing in Asia, the Pacific Islands, the United States of America, and Africa. Bamboos grow rapidly, at a maximum rate of approximately 21–30 cm/day when they are young [4]. Bamboo forests create a microclimate that improves the comfort of the surrounding community because of its contribution in maintaining the temperature and relative humidity thus the heat index is in comfort zone for longer period daily [6]. Bamboo cultivation should therefore be encouraged to improve environmental conditions and to support the sustainability of green building materials. Traditional bamboo houses are commonly constructed using culms and bahareque as primary building materials, whereas modern bamboo houses may be built using culms, laminated boards, veneer, and panels. Bamboo buildings are light and strong and can reliably withstand earthquakes. In addition to housing, bamboo is used in the building industry (for constructing bridges, frames, and scaffolding) and for flooring, cabinet-making, furniture, and fencing. It is also suitable for decoration such as in fountains, grates, and gutters.

Construction design may follow a stress-based or capacity-based approach. The stress-based approach involves material properties such as modulus of elasticity (E), modulus of rupture (σb), tensile strength (σt), and compressive strength (σc), whereas the capacity-based approach involves parameters such as flexural rigidity (EI), maximum bending moment (Mmax), axial stiffness (EA), and maximum axial load (Pmax). Trujillo et al. [26] suggested that the capacity-based approach is more suitable for bamboo construction designs than the stress-based approach because bamboo structural grading could predict EI and Mmax better than E and flexural strength of bamboo culms. Chaturvedi [7] and Jangra [14] also suggested applying EI and Mmax for bamboo structural grading. Nurmadina et al. [22] conducted similar research on bamboo structural grading of Gigantochloa apus and reported that a combination of linear mass (q) and square of diameter (qD2) and qD were the best predictors for EI and Mmax, respectively. Findings of several studies [26], [7], [14], [22] analyzing bamboo flexural properties justified that capacity grading was better than strength grading. In the present study, both capacity and strength gradings were developed based on bamboo culm compressive properties. The mechanical properties, including axial compressive strength of bamboo culm are frequently studied, but the structural grading of bamboo culm subject to axial compression load is still missed.

This research analyzed the variability of culm dimensions and geometric and physical properties of three sympodial bamboo species of the genus Gigantochloa [Hitam (G. atroviolacea), Tali (G. apus), and Andong (G. pseudoarundinacea)]. Subsequently, the parameters that were the most suitable for predicting compressive properties of bamboo culm were determined. Both strength and capacity gradings were developed and compared to obtain the best method for bamboo structural grading based on compressive properties. The structural quality class interval, 5% lower value (R0.05), and characteristic value (Rk) of each class were developed using the confidence band [22] and ISO 22156 methods [12]. Rk was the design value of a bamboo member.

Section snippets

Sample condition

A number of 50, 51, and 54 stems of bamboo hitam, tali, and andong culms were cut from villagers’ plantation in Sukabumi, West Java, Indonesia. This research used only 7 m long of the bottom of bamboo culm. Two pieces of sample were cut from every 7 m culm, one pieces from the top and one pieces from the bottom. Short lengths of 100, 102, and 108 pieces of Hitam, Tali, and Andong bamboo culms, respectively, were compression tested. The sample length (L) was approximately equal to the diameter (D

Dimensions

D and t varied by the species and environmental conditions. For Hitam bamboo culms, mean D was 67.27 (range, 46.92–94.4) mm (Table 1), which was similar to that of Tali (mean, 63.93 mm; range, 39.59–96.0 mm) (Table 2). For Andong bamboo culms, D was larger, with a mean of 91.57 (range 57.68–114.7) mm (Table 3). Based on D, bamboo culm of the three species was found to be suitable as a structural material. Kaminski et al. [17] suggested that bamboo culm for structural use should have a D of

Conclusions

Structural grading of Hitam, Andong, and Tali bamboo culms subjected to compressive load could be conducted using either strength or capacity grading because they have strong correlation with the indication predictor; however, capacity grading is preferred because compressive load-carrying capacity has strongest correlation value with linear mass (q) among others. q was the best predictor for maximum compressive load (Fc) estimation, ρc was the best for estimating compressive strength assuming

Acknowledgment

Authors would like to acknowledge Ministry of Research and Higher Education–The Republic of Indonesia, and Bogor Agricultural University for providing an opportunity to conduct this research.

References (33)

  • E.T. Bahtiar

    Keandalan Bambu untuk Material Konstruksi Hijau [Dissertation]

    (2015)
  • E.T. Bahtiar et al.

    Eccentricity effects on Bamboo’s flexural properties

    J Biol Sci

    (2013)
  • E.T. Bahtiar et al.

    Human comfort period outside and inside bamboo stands

    J Environ Sci Technol

    (2014)
  • Chaturvedi R. Nondestructive test for grading of bamboo poles for structural use. 16th Nocmat, Winnipeg. 2015 Aug...
  • A. Firmanti et al.

    Mechanical stress grading of tropical timbers without regard to species

    J Wood Sci

    (2005)
  • R. Gnanaharan et al.

    Bending strength of Guadua bamboo: comparison of different testing procedures

    (1995)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Inference of mechanical properties and structural grades of bamboo by machine learning methods

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      The first objective of this study was to pool datasets to have a more robust, and hence conclusive, process for the determination of characteristic values. A secondary objective was to complement and continue the work undertaken by others [12–15] regarding the determination of the most appropriate geometrical and/or physical properties that provide reliable correlations to infer mechanical properties. The analysis procedures are linked to the new ISO standards.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text