Elsevier

Engineering Structures

Volume 69, 15 June 2014, Pages 49-61
Engineering Structures

Dynamic behaviour of a short span soil–steel composite bridge for high-speed railways – Field measurements and FE-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The dynamic response from passing trains at high speed is studied for a short span soil–steel composite bridge.

  • Soil material damping properties are estimated through analysis of the field measurements.

  • Both 2D and 3D continuum models are compared with the measured response.

  • The 3D-model enables estimation of the load distribution, which is found to increase at higher train speeds.

  • An effective width to be used in 2D analyses is proposed.

Abstract

The dynamic response from passing trains at high speed is studied for a short span soil–steel composite bridge. Field measurements have been performed, comprising steel strains, vertical crown displacements and accelerations in the steel and the backfill. Soil material damping properties are estimated through analysis of the field measurements. Approaches for numerical modelling are presented, focusing on the dynamic response from passing trains. Both 2D and 3D continuum models are compared with the measured response. Based on the models, the influence of the Young’s modulus of the backfill on the bridge behaviour is investigated. The 3D-model also enables estimation of the load distribution, which is found to increase at higher train speeds. An effective width to be used in 2D analyses is proposed. A dynamic design check using the high-speed train load models in the Eurocode is presented, that for the studied bridge envisage a resonance peak at about 320 km/h.

Introduction

Soil–steel composite bridges (SSCB) refer to structures where a buried flexible corrugated steel pipe works in composite action with the surrounding soil. The section of the steel pipe is often rather slender and the load bearing capacity as well as the stability relies on the confinement from the backfill. These structures are being increasingly used in road and railway projects as an alternative to standard type bridges, e.g. short- and medium span concrete beam- and portal frame bridges. They are often found to be cost effective, both due to less material consumption and reduced construction times. The development during recent years has resulted in longer spans, more efficient arch geometries and less height of fill cover.

The Swedish regulations for design of bridges [1] refer to the design method described in [2] for design of SSCB. This method was developed by [3] that also presented validation with full-scale testing. Additional field tests are reported in [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], comprising static full-scale models, in situ tests and dynamic measurements of passing trains. In [6], the dynamic response of a soil steel composite bridge with a span of 11 m is measured during passages of a locomotive at speeds from 10 km/h to 125 km/h. Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) of 1.2 for displacements and thrusts and 1.45 for moments are found. The highest vertical acceleration in the ballast is found to be 0.45 m/s2. Field tests of the dynamic response from passing trains at moderate speeds are reported by [12], [13], [14], [15], generally showing small displacements and accelerations. In [16], the static and dynamic responses of four steel culverts are measured under passages of truckloads at speeds from 10 km/h to 70 km/h. The DAFs are found to be in the range of 1.12–1.26 for displacements, and 1.11–1.29 for strains.

The behaviour of soil–steel composite bridges under live loads has been studied in a number of papers such as [17], [18], [19], [20]. In these papers, the static behaviour of these structures is studied due to the truck loads through FE-analysis. However no research has been found regarding dynamic FE-analysis of these structures due to the train loads.

For railway bridges on high-speed railway lines, extensive dynamic design checks are usually needed. The main dynamic criterion is the vertical deck acceleration, a measure to prevent ballast instability during resonance. For such analyses [1], refers to the methods in Eurocode [11], which is mainly valid for beam like structures. The dynamic behaviour of SSCB may be significantly different than beam like structures due to the composite action with the surrounding soil. To the authors’ knowledge, no design recommendations for SSCB on high-speed railway lines currently exist.

Section snippets

The bridge

The studied bridge is named ‘’Rörbro i Märsta’’ in Swedish which is a closed shaped corrugated steel culvert (km 43 + 765). It is located in Sweden, about 40 km North of Stockholm. The bridge was built in 1995 during an extension of the North junction of the Arlanda Express line, a link between the East Coast railway line and Arlanda Airport. It has elliptic cross section with a horizontal and vertical diameter of 3.75 m and 4.15 m, respectively. The total length transverse to the tracks

Response to train X52

Table 1, Table 2 contain a summary of bridge responses under 11 passages of train X52. The entire measured responses are filtered by low-pass Butterworth filter [22], with a cut-off frequency of 30 Hz and an order of 8th. Maximum differences are calculated as (max–min)/mean. The lowest scattering belongs to deflections which makes it the most reliable parameter for calibrating the finite element models. The critical section in terms of stress is at the haunch which shows the lowest scattering

Procedure

To model these structures, there is a need to adopt a suitable geometry and appropriate material properties. The geometry is defined based on the available technical drawings. However, there are no certain values for static and dynamic properties of the soil material, which is determined through parametric studies and the calibration against the field measurements (Sections 5.3 Influence of the soil stiffness, 5.4 Influence of the material damping, 5.5 Influence of the soil density). These

Comparison of FEM results and field measurements

Fig. 17 presents the responses of the bridge calculated by FE-analysis in comparison with the field measurements. Entire results are filtered by low-pass Butterworth filter, with a cut-off frequency of 30 Hz and order of 8th. In the 3D model, two middle bogie loads are applied in order to decrease the cpu-time. Generally, there is a fair agreement between the field measurements and the FEM results. The main noticeable discrepancy is observed for the stress at the top fibre of the crown.

Conclusions

  • Maximum deflection and stress at the crown is 0.4 mm and 6 MPa, respectively. Maximum acceleration at the crown of the culvert is 0.8 m/s2, and, in the ballast above the crown between two sleepers is 1.5 m/s2.

  • The damping properties of the soil material can be modelled using mass proportional Rayleigh damping curves with an alpha value of 3.9 in average.

  • Calculated effective widths from the 3D model show higher values than those calculated based on the assumption of 2:1 stress distribution in soil.

Acknowledgements

The field testing was funded by Viacon and performed by the technician at the Division of Structural Engineering and Bridges, KTH.

References (30)

  • Bayoglu-Flener E. Field testing of a long-span arch steel culvert railway bridge over Skivarpsån, Sweden, Part I. Royal...
  • Bayoglu-Flener E. Field testing of a long-span arch steel culvert railway bridge over Skivarpsån, Sweden, Part II....
  • Bayoglu-Flener E. Field testing of a long-span arch steel culvert railway bridge over Skivarpsån, Sweden, Part III....
  • CEN, Eurocode 1990:2002/A1: Basis of structural design, European Committee for Standardisation...
  • D. Beben

    Dynamic testing of corrugated steel plate culverts using radar

    IACSIT Int J Eng Tech

    (2012)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Ultimate capacity of large-span soil-steel structures

      2023, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
    • Experimental study on anti-shallow-buried-explosion capacity of a corrugated steel-plain concrete composite structure

      2023, International Journal of Impact Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the one hand, they have conducted more structural tests and collected more test data to modify existing design methods. On the other hand, they have begun to pay attention to the mechanical properties of corrugated steel structures reinforced by concrete composite [19–21]. In 2005, Morrison [20] proposed concrete composite reinforcement of deep corrugated steel plates, which can increase the span of culverts.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text