Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete
Introduction
In recent years, high strength concrete has been used widely in buildings, bridges and other structures. Use of high strength concrete in columns can significantly reduce the size of the column and consequently reduce the dead load on the foundation system. Moreover, the available floor space for a building can be increased due to the reduction in column size. Partially encased composite (PEC) columns are one of the recent developments in steel-concrete composite construction. This new composite system is composed of very thin steel plates that are welded together into an H-shape, as shown in Fig. 1. Transverse links are installed between the flange tips to inhibit the occurrence of local buckling, and concrete is then poured between the web and the flange plates.
Extensive experimental research has been conducted on thin-walled PEC columns with built-up sections by several research groups [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] to investigate their behaviour under various loading conditions. A series of tests on PEC columns with normal strength concrete under monotonic concentric and eccentric axial loads have been performed by Filion [1], Tremblay et al. [2], Chicoine et al. [3], [4], Bouchereau and Toupin [5] and Prickett and Driver [6]. The results of these experimental investigations on PEC columns indicated that the behaviour of this composite column is significantly affected by the local instability of the thin steel flanges. The failure of the composite columns occurred by a combination local buckling of the steel flanges between the transverse links, yielding of the steel and crushing of the concrete. Experiments on short PEC columns with high performance concrete under pure axial compression, as well as combined axial and flexural compression have been carried out by Prickett and Driver [6] under monotonic conditions. Behaviour of PEC columns under axial compression and cyclic horizontal loads has been studied by Bouchereau and Toupin [5] and Chen et al. [7]. Tests of beam-to-column connections were also performed for beams framing into the weak axis of the PEC column by Muise [8].
Numerical simulations on partially encased composite columns have been performed by Maranda [9], Chicoine et al. [10], Begum et al. [11] and Chen et al. [7]. Maranda [9] and Chicoine et al. [10] modelled one-quarter of the column cross-section with a length of one link spacing. The model developed by these researchers provided a very good representation of the capacity and load versus displacement response of short PEC test specimens with normal strength concrete [2], [3] up to the ultimate load. However, the researchers identified significant challenges in simulating the local instability of the thin flanges and the triaxial behaviour of the partially confined concrete in the column. Begum et al. [11] were able to overcome these challenges in the finite element model through the implementation of a dynamic explicit formulation along with a damage plasticity model for concrete and a contact pair algorithm at the steel-concrete interface. These researchers implemented the model for reproducing the test results of a large number of normal strength concrete PEC test columns [3], [5], [6] encompassing a wide variety of geometric properties and loading conditions. The model has been shown to predict the behaviour of tested PEC columns accurately when they are constructed with normal strength concrete [11]. However, the suitability of this model for predicting the response of PEC columns with high strength concrete had not been explored previously. Moreover, the reference test database for PEC columns with high strength concrete is not as rich as the database for those with normal strength concrete. The primary difference in modelling PEC columns with high strength concrete as opposed to normal strength concrete lies in the unique nature of the constitutive relationship of high strength concrete. Though the effects of high strength concrete on the behaviour of fully encased composite columns are relatively well-understood through tests as well as numerical simulations [12], the results cannot be used directly for PEC columns where the effect of confinement on the concrete is negligible [3], [4], [5], [6]. Therefore, the effects of high strength concrete on the strength and ductility of PEC columns with various geometric properties needs to be explored through parametric investigations.
Section snippets
Uniaxial compression
Complete stress–strain curves for concrete under uniaxial compression and tension are necessary to predict the structural response of PEC columns by nonlinear finite element analysis. There have been many attempts [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] to develop analytical formulations to represent stress–strain relationships for normal and high strength concrete in uniaxial compression. These models tend to be good at predicting the overall mechanical behaviour of
Properties of PEC column test specimens with high strength concrete
Prickett and Driver [6] conducted a comprehensive experimental research project to study the behaviour of thin-walled PEC columns made with high performance concrete. Nine short PEC columns, designated H3 to H11 and described in Table 1, constructed with high strength concrete were tested under concentric and eccentric axial loading conditions. The test columns had a gross cross-section of 400 mm × 400 mm, with the steel plates having a b/t ratio of 25. Three link spacing values – 0.3d, 0.5d and 1.0
Mesh description
The finite element model for this new composite system is implemented using the ABAQUS [33] finite element code. The full length and cross-section of the test specimens are included in the numerical analysis to ensure that all features of the response are simulated accurately. The steel section of the PEC column is constructed with thin plates, which are susceptible to local buckling causing large rotations at the flange plates and, hence, adding geometric nonlinearity to the behaviour. In the
Ultimate strength and failure behaviour
The values of experimental and numerical peak loads and peak strains, along with their ratios, for the seven PEC columns with high strength concrete are shown in Table 3. The mean value of the experimental-to-numerical peak load ratio, Pexp/Pnum, is 0.99, with a standard deviation of 0.03. This indicates the excellent performance of the finite element model in predicting the ultimate capacity of PEC columns with high strength concrete in both concentrically and eccentrically loaded conditions.
Effect of concrete strength on PEC column behaviour
The compressive strength of concrete plays an important role in increasing the load-carrying capacity of concrete, thereby reducing the required column size for a particular design load. However, limited experimental investigations have been performed, to date, on PEC columns with high strength concrete. This research presents a parametric study of PEC column behaviour conducted using the validated finite element model. The study investigates the influence of high strength concrete in
Summary and conclusions
Finite element analyses were conducted to study the behaviour of thin-walled PEC columns constructed with high strength concrete. Both nonlinear material behaviour and geometric nonlinearities caused by large deformations were accounted for in the numerical model. To simulate the nonlinear material behaviour of high strength concrete, a constitutive model capable of tracing the overall stress–strain behaviour of high strength concrete, including the post-peak softening branch and residual
Acknowledgements
Funding for this research program was provided by the Canam Group, Saint-Georges, Québec and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
References (36)
- et al.
Eccentrically loaded concrete encased steel composite columns
Thin-Walled Struct
(2011) A numerical approach to the complete stress–strain curve of concrete
Cem Concr Res
(1973)- et al.
Crack growth resistance curves in strain–softening material
J Mech Phys Solids
(1986) - Filion I. Étude Expérimentale des Poteaux Mixtes Avec Section d’acier de classe 4”. Report no. EPM/GCS-1998-06, Dept of...
- Tremblay R, Massicotte B, Filion I, Maranda R. Experimental study on the behaviour of partially encased composite...
- Chicoine T, Tremblay R, Massicotte B, Yalcin M, Ricles J, Lu L-W. Test programme on partially-encased built up...
- et al.
Long-term behavior and strength of partially-encased composite columns with built up shapes
J Struct Eng, ASCE
(2003) - Bouchereau R, Toupin J-D. Étude du Comportement en Compression-Flexion des Poteaux Mixtes Partiellement Enrobés. Report...
- Prickett BS, Driver RG. Behaviour of partially encased composite columns made with high performance concrete....
- et al.
Test and numerical simulation of partially encased composite columns subject to axial and cyclic horizontal loads
Int J Steel Struct
(2010)
Finite element modelling and design of partially encased composite columns
Steel Compos Struct
Finite element modeling of partially encased composite columns using the dynamic explicit solution method
J Struct Eng, ASCE
Equation for stress–strain curve of concrete
ACI J
Stress–strain curves of normal and lightweight concrete in compression
ACI J
Stress–strain relationship for plain concrete in compression
ACI J
Uniaxial compression stress–strain relation of concrete
J Struct Eng, ASCE
Cited by (82)
Experimental investigation and design method of axial compression behavior of T-shaped partially encased steel-concrete composite stub columns
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringConstitutive models of constrained concrete in cross-shaped PEC column under axial compression
2024, Journal of Constructional Steel ResearchFlexural behavior of castellated partially encased composite (PEC) beams
2024, Journal of Constructional Steel ResearchExperimental investigation of CFRP-confined partially encased composite columns under axial compression
2024, Journal of Building Engineering