Integrated PV in shading systems for Mediterranean countries: Balance between energy production and visual comfort
Introduction
The issue of Building Integrated PV (BIPV) has been developed extensively since the 90s. It is still though under extensive research in relation to the transparency of the PV material, the position of the integration in the building [1] and to the tracking system used [2], [3].
Integration of Photovoltaic (PV) materials to shading systems was proposed in 1998 [4]. Since then, various shading types have been used mostly according to their energy balance and less according to esthetics and interior comfort conditions [5], [6], [7]. The most of the researches though, experiments with specific simple geometries of canopy horizontal or inclined systems and louvers systems [8]. There is a gap in the research bibliography on other geometrical types of shading systems. Especially for office units, due to the specific demands for visual comfort and the increased needs for quality lighting, balancing the above mentioned facts is more crucial.
Additionally, a gap exists concerning the efficiency of PV shading systems in Mediterranean countries where the amount of solar radiation is higher than the rest of Europe. The annual solar energy at horizontal plane is exceeding 1650 kWh/m2 [9] and encourages the installation of such shading systems.
The main objective of this paper is to evaluate various types of fixed shading systems with integrated PV facing south in Mediterranean countries according to their ability to save energy and to provide visual comfort. Measurements and experimental work has been done for two typical cities in Mediterranean area: Athens (37.58° N, 23.42° E) and Chania in Crete (35.30° N, 24.01° E). Some useful details are already presented in another publication [10]. In this paper a more detailed analysis is presented in relation to visual comfort conditions and to specific geometrical detailing of the integrated PV. We examine the resulting visual comfort conditions that most energy efficient systems can create. We additionally examine the influence of the changeability of the PV thickness to the improvement of the interior visual comfort conditions.
Section snippets
Methodology
Basic aim of the current research is to find optimization points of the shading system with integrated PV, between energy savings for heating, cooling, lighting the space and visual comfort conditions. The results of Mandalaki et al. [10] are used in the part that concerns energy consumption for heating, cooling and lighting (Geometry A). Further on, different geometrical configurations of PV shading systems are examined, in order to evaluate the effect to visual comfort conditions and to
Geometry A – energy savings
According to Mandalaki et al. [10], all examined systems can support the electricity needs during the hours when the daylight level falls below 500 lux. If the electricity produced from the PV will be used to heat and cool the internal space, the most energy efficient system (the system consuming the least energy from non renewable sources), is the system of Surrounding Shade. The systems of Brise–Soleil Full facade, Canopy inclined double and Canopy inclined single are also considered to be
Geometry A – evaluating visual comfort conditions
In order to evaluate visual comfort conditions, both daylight levels through the value of Daylight Autonomy Levels (DA) and daylight quality through the values of Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) and Daylight Glare Index (DGI) are examined.
Geometry A – balancing energy savings and visual comfort
In order to evaluate the performance of the examined shading systems, a table is being created that incorporates all the examined values related with visual comfort and energy savings examined in previous paragraphs (Fig. 8). This table brings together conclusions in relation to all examined factors. The measuring scale is based on three basic categories, starting from the most efficient in terms of the factor examined: Best – Middle–Low. When values of the same examined factor are very close
Geometry B – visual comfort conditions
As a next step for evaluating the potentials of integrating PV in Shading Systems we evaluated the reduction of the thickness of the PV panels and how this is affecting the interior visual conditions.
Firstly, we evaluated the influence of this change to the experimental work that we did in order to evaluate daylight levels. We compared measurements of the daylight levels calculated by Mandalaki et al. [10] to the new simulations done for louver shading systems of 1.5 cm thickness. We showed that
Discussion and conclusions
We have attempted to combine the different and occasionally contradicting properties of the various shading systems with integrated PV examined in relation to their ability to save energy and to provide high quality of daylight. We have concluded that systems of Brise–Soleil Full and Semi facade can best achieve these two goals.
According to Mandalaki et al. [10] the most energy efficient systems are Surrounding Shading, Canopy Inclined Double, Brise Soleil Full facade and Canopy Inclined
References (22)
- et al.
A maximum power point tracking technique based on bypass diode mechanism for PV arrays under partial shading
Energy and Buildings
(2014) - et al.
Building integrated photovoltaics: a Korean case Study
Solar Energy
(1998) Building integration of solar energy systems
Solar Energy
(1999)- et al.
Theoretical analysis of the blinds integrated Photovoltaic modules
Energy and Buildings
(2012) - et al.
Assessment of fixed shading devices with integrated PV for efficient energy use
Solar Energy
(2012) - et al.
Optimization of the building integrated photovoltaic system in office buildings – focus on the orientation, inclined angle and installed area
Energy and Buildings
(2012) - et al.
Optimum design of shading-type building-integrated photovoltaic claddings
Applied Energy
(2012) - et al.
Study on thermal performance of semi-transparent building-integrated photovoltaic glazings
Energy and Buildings
(2008) - et al.
Evolutionary based maximum power point tracking technique using differential evolution algorithm
Energy and Buildings
(2013) - et al.
Building – integrated photovoltaic, design for commercial and institutional structures
A Source Book for Architects
(2000)
Experimental investigation of performance of a multι – purpose PV -slat window
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Cited by (80)
A review of the effect of semi-transparent building-integrated photovoltaics on the visual comfort indoors
2024, Developments in the Built EnvironmentExperimental study of a vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic sunshade
2023, Renewable EnergyOptimal design method for photovoltaic shading devices (PVSDs) by combining geometric optimization and adaptive control model
2023, Journal of Building EngineeringThe effect of photovoltaic shading with ideal tilt angle on the energy cost optimization of a building model in European cities
2022, Energy for Sustainable Development