Elsevier

European Journal of Radiology

Volume 97, December 2017, Pages 8-15
European Journal of Radiology

Research article
Impact of experimental design on PET radiomics in predicting somatic mutation status

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

PET-based radiomic features have demonstrated great promises in predicting genetic data. However, various experimental parameters can influence the feature extraction pipeline, and hence, Here, we investigated how experimental settings affect the performance of radiomic features in predicting somatic mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

348 NSCLC patients with somatic mutation testing and diagnostic PET images were included in our analysis. Radiomic feature extractions were analyzed for varying voxel sizes, filters and bin widths. 66 radiomic features were evaluated. The performance of features in predicting mutations status was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). The influence of experimental parameters on feature predictability was quantified as the relative difference between the minimum and maximum AUC (δ).

Results

The large majority of features (n = 56, 85%) were significantly predictive for EGFR mutation status (AUC  0.61). 29 radiomic features significantly predicted EGFR mutations and were robust to experimental settings with δOverall < 5%. The overall influence (δOverall) of the voxel size, filter and bin width for all features ranged from 5% to 15%, respectively. For all features, none of the experimental designs was predictive of KRAS+ from KRAS− (AUC  0.56).

Conclusion

The predictability of 29 radiomic features was robust to the choice of experimental settings; however, these settings need to be carefully chosen for all other features. The combined effect of the investigated processing methods could be substantial and must be considered. Optimized settings that will maximize the predictive performance of individual radiomic features should be investigated in the future.

Introduction

Functional positron emission tomography imaging with the glucose analog 18F-fluorodoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET) is widely used for diagnosis and staging in oncology. 18F FDG PET plays an increasingly important role in the assessment of treatment response [1] and planning of radiotherapy [2]. Furthermore, 18F FDG PET imaging can capture the different metabolic phenotypes that exist between tumors [3], [4]. Quantification of these phenotypes may improve tumor characterization for individualized therapy [4], [5]. Radiomics extracts an atlas of features that describe the tumor phenotype from standard of care images through the utilization of advanced mathematical algorithms that quantify the relationship between image voxels [6], [7]. Recently, PET radiomic features have demonstrated tremendous promise in predicting clinical outcomes [8], [9], treatment response [10], [11], and genomic data [3] in various malignancies.

As part of the feature extraction pipeline, PET images undergo two image processing methods [5]. First, the voxel sizes are resampled. Thus far, radiomic studies have relied on retrospective PET imaging data, which are often acquired on different scanners and are reconstructed differently, leading to variability in the voxel size [12], [13]. Therefore, for radiomic analysis, many research groups resample the voxel size with an interpolation filter in order to obtain a uniform size across all patients [5], [14]. Second, the image intensity of PET images are often discretized (or binned) into a limited range of intensity values to reduce image noise [5] and increase feature computational efficiency [6].

The values and methods chosen for these image processing steps are often selected without clear justification or are simply not mentioned in many radiomic studies. Therefore, it is unclear whether these parameters impact the performance of PET radiomic features in predicting outcomes or status and what parameters will maximize the predictability of the features. Researchers have reported that the quantitative value of PET radiomic features is sensitive to the choice of discretization methods [15], [16]. However, the effects of the resampled voxel size and interpolation filter on PET feature quantification have not been investigated. Furthermore, the impact of these settings on the ability of radiomic features to predict clinically valuable information has not been reported. With the overall goal of the clinical implementation of radiomics, it is important to study the impact of these parameters on the predictive performance of radiomic features.

Due to the high incidence and recurrence rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [17], there has been considerable interest in applying radiomics to characterize the disease in order to improve prognosis and better tailor treatments for individual patients [4]. Initiation and progression of NSCLC tumors are driven by somatic mutations in key oncogenes (e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)) [18]. Early prediction of the oncogene mutation status may provide information for individualized therapy for NSCLC patients [18]. PET-based radiomic features have shown to be significantly associated with NSCLC mutation status [3]. Furthermore, unlike prediction of treatment outcomes (e.g. overall survival), the prediction of somatic mutations is not confounded by treatment methods as they are an intrinsic characteristic of the tumor. In this study, we investigated how various experimental settings influence the feature quantification and performance of radiomic features in predicting somatic mutations.

Section snippets

Patient imaging

This retrospective study was conducted under a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board approved protocol. This study included 348 patients with NSCLC who received diagnostic 18F FDG PET/CT scans prior to treatment between September 2003 and December 2013.

Patients were injected with 348–921 MBq of 18F FDG and PET images were acquired approximately 65 min after injection on a GE Discovery (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), Siemens Biograph (Siemens AG,

Results

This study investigated how various experimental settings influence the quantification of radiomic features as well as the performance of these features in predicting somatic mutations in a large cohort of 348 NSCLC patients. The cohort was predominantly female (61%) and Caucasian (91%). 42% (146/348) and 58% (202/348) of the patients had early and advanced stages of NSCLC, respectively. 13% (44/348) of the patients harbored EGFR mutations.

Discussion

PET radiomic features have great potential to predict mutation status, treatment response, and prognosis by quantifying the tumor metabolic phenotype. Before feature extraction, PET images need to be resampled and interpolated to uniform voxel grids. Furthermore, the intensity histogram of PET images need to be discretized. However, the impact of these image processing steps on the predictability of radiomic features has not been carefully investigated. Here, we report how different settings

Conclusions

Radiomic features with excellent predictive performance for EGFR mutation status were robust to the parameters chosen for image processing steps, and therefore, these parameters may potentially be arbitrarily chosen for mutation prediction in NSCLC patients. However, the parameters need to be carefully chosen for other radiomic features that may be less predictive. Regardless of the experimental settings, some radiomic features were still unable to significantly predict EGFR mutations, and

Ethical consideration

This retrospective study was approved by a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Institute of Health Award NumberU01CA190234 and U24CA194354, and the Research Seed Funding Grant from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The authors would also like to thank the PROFILE team for their help with somatic mutation testing.

References (30)

  • S.S. Yip et al.

    Associations between somatic mutations and metabolic imaging phenotypes in non-small cell lung cancer

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2016)
  • G.R. Cook et al.

    Radiomics in PET: principles and applications

    Clin. Transl. Imaging

    (2014)
  • M. Hatt et al.

    Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future?

    Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2016)
  • S.F.S. Yip et al.

    Applications and limitations of radiomics

    Phys. Med. Biol.

    (2016)
  • H.L. Aerts

    The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review

    JAMA Oncol.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Preoperative prediction of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer based on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT radiomics

      2023, Clinical Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kang et al.20 reported that PET/CT radiomics signatures could effectively decrease the false-positive rate of manual diagnosis of lung cancer (manual diagnosis 30.6%; PET/CT radiomics 5.4%). Numerous past studies revealed that 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic prediction models could identify molecular subtypes or disease-free survival of lung cancer.21–25 Additionally, PET/CT radiomics has the capacity to predict the prognosis of patients undergoing radiotherapy, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%.26

    • [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: Technical Aspects and Potential Clinical Applications

      2022, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tumors with EGFR mutation tend to have more heterogeneity,168, 169 which might be captured by radiomics. Employing [18F]FDG-PET/CT conventional radiomics and ML for the prediction of EGFR mutation, a wide range of predictive power has been reported (AUC = 0.5-0.87), mostly around 0.75-0.80.168, 170-174 [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT-based features seemed superior over CT and PET-only radiomics (AUC = 0.80-0.84, 0.67-0.72, and 0.74-0.79, respectively).168, 175

    • CT-based radiomics for predicting brain metastases as the first failure in patients with curatively resected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

      2021, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As shown in the results, the radiomics signature is composed of the following features: (original.shape.Maximum2DDiameterColumn), (original.glcm.Correlation), (wavelet.LHL.glszm.LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis), (wavelet.LLH.ngtdm.Strength), (wavelet.HLH.glcm.MCC), (wavelet.HLH.glcm.Imc1), and (wavelet.HLH.firstorder.Median). Some radiomics features in this study have been reported to be related to EGFR mutations in previous studies, such as SHAPE, GLCM, and GLSZM [38]. EGFR mutations play an essential role in the BM of NSCLC and may support risk stratification, especially in East Asian patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text