Swinging boat moorings: Spatial heterogeneous damage to eelgrass beds in a tidal ecosystem
Introduction
Despite their high ecological, economical and conservation value (Costanza et al., 1997; Jackson et al., 2013), seagrass meadows are known to be largely impacted by a wide range of direct and indirect human-induced disturbances (Orth et al., 2006 and reference therein) leading to accelerated seagrass losses across the world over the last decades (Short and Wyllie-Echeverria, 1996; Waycott et al., 2009). Among the major causes, repeated physical disturbances such as those caused by swinging boat moorings are one of the major reasons of local decline (Orth et al., 2006). Damage occurs when the heavy mooring chains rotate with the tidal current and wind movements associated with the buoy. This movement causes the chain to scrape up the surrounding substrate, uprooting seagrasses and resulting in clear damage on the seagrass cover around the fixing point of the mooring (Walker et al., 1989; Hastings et al., 1995; Demers et al., 2013; Unsworth et al., 2017; Sagerman et al., 2019). This always produces long-lasting impacts due to direct regular physical disturbance such as sediment erosion, and partial or total destruction of the seagrass cover (see Jackson et al., 2013). This has been clearly demonstrated on both slow-growing tropical species such as Posidonia sp. and Amphibolis sp. (Walker et al., 1989; Hastings et al., 1995; Demers et al., 2013) and temperate eelgrass such as Zostera marina (Collins et al., 2010; Unsworth et al., 2017). However, a recent systematic review on the effects of mooring infrastructure on benthic vegetation concluded that (1) the effects could vary according to the study and (2) there were too few studies to identify the reasons (Sagerman et al., 2019).
Even if the loss of seagrass habitats seems to be relatively restricted to a few meters surrounding the mooring, at least 18% of the seagrass lost between 1941 and 1992 at a regional scale are thought to be the consequence of boat mooring in Western Australia (Hastings et al., 1995). The over-dispersion of mooring areas along the coastline still largely constitutes a substantial source of repeated destruction of seagrass beds (Walker et al., 1989; Unsworth et al., 2017; Sagerman et al., 2019). In addition, seagrass loss must also be considered by including the critical alteration of the functional role of seagrass at the local and regional scales. It is well known that the loss of surface area as well as increased fragmentation could modify the functions and ecosystem services supported by the seagrass bed. This could therefore affect the associated biodiversity (Backhurst and Cole, 2000), and more generally ecosystem functioning. The decline of the dominant Atlantic species Zostera marina L. (1753), which is widespread across Europe, could notably affect the carbon storage capacity (Martin et al., 2005; Ouisse et al., 2011 for example) and reduce resuspension and turbidity (Widdows et al., 2008; Reidenbach and Thomas, 2018 for example). Habitat loss may also result in loss of refuge for juveniles, thereby directly or indirectly diminishing the role of this area as a nursery and its feeding functions for many organisms (Boström et al., 2014), including epifauna and flora (Reed and Hovel, 2006; Gustafsson and Boström, 2009), infauna (Silberberger et al., 2016), benthic macrofauna (Fredriksen et al., 2010), fish and birds (Plummer et al., 2013). It is also well known that these highly productive areas provide important carbon sources that directly or indirectly sustain coastal food webs (Jaschinski et al., 2008; Jephson et al., 2008; Baeta et al., 2009; Ouisse et al., 2012), related biodiversity and commercial resources (Wennhage and Pihl, 2002; Cole and Moksnes, 2016).
Initiatives proposed by international conventions on biological diversity (Ramsar Convention, Bern Convention) and then European directives (Habitat Directive EU, Ospar Convention) have led to eelgrass habitats being specifically targeted for conservation and restoration (Wynne et al., 1995). More recently, policy and management aimed at protecting Z. marina habitats in France was tiered from an international scale down to a regional scale. Although seagrass beds have been recorded all around the western coasts of France, they consist of more or less isolated population units growing best when located in shallow subtidal (10–15 m maximum) or intertidal water areas, on muddy-sandy seabeds (and sometimes even on gravel) (Borum et al., 2004). Unfortunately, despite the European directives, these sheltered bays and estuaries represent excellent sites for the expansion of new marina moorings.
While there is a wealth of information on the impacts of anchoring and boat mooring on growth and reproductive success processes, especially for slow-growing seagrasses (Francour et al., 1999; Hastings et al., 1995; Montefalcone et al., 2006; Demers et al., 2013), studies of boat mooring damage on faster-growing seagrasses such as Z. marina are relatively scarce. Aerial satellite imaging and in situ video imaging evidenced that boat mooring led to complete destruction of the Z. marina cover up to 5 m around the weighted mooring point in mega-tidal ecosystems (Unsworth et al., 2017). Nevertheless, size range of vessels, depth and maintenance on boat mooring can be modify the impact on seagrass bed (Glasby and West, 2018). In addition, tidal amplitude and current direction variability over each tidal cycle could influence the distance and the direction of scraping by the mooring chain. This repeated circular non-regular movement of the mooring chain could thus entail non-homogeneous disturbances on Z. marina according to the direction and the distance from the fixing point of the mooring. In addition, Z. marina has a relatively huge capacity to recover from repeated environmental disturbances such as clam harvesting (Qin et al., 2016) by adapting its energy allocation according to environmental conditions. This phenotypical plasticity (number of leaves, canopy height, biomass) could thus result in more complex responses of seagrasses to human-induced disturbances than just the scarred area.
The present study aims to address how irregular movements of mooring chains induced by the tidal cycle affect the structure of Z. marina bed responses, in order to understand a key issue for the management of boat mooring areas along European coasts. We tested the hypothesis that mooring impact in mega-tidal system would (1) depend on distance and direction from the fixing point of each mooring and (2) vary over the neap and spring tides cycle. To test these hypothesis we first mimicked the theoretical scraping movement of the mooring chain to highlight the critical scraping phases of the tidal cycle based on the results of the hydrodynamic model. Second, shoot density, seagrass canopy height and leaf dry weight were analyzed to detect the potential variations of the impact of the chain according to distance and direction to the mooring.
Section snippets
Study area
The extensive swinging boat moorings of Dinard (Brittany, France) cover 200 ha (gray area in Fig. 1A). The 130 permanent moorings, separated by approximately 30 m, are regularly distributed all over the bay (Fig. 1B). Each swinging mooring is composed of a heavy chain (15 m long) rotating around a large concrete block completely buried in the sediment. The chains and blocks are permanently positioned. Most of moorings are used throughout the Zostera growing season (Spring to Autumn) by pleasure
MARS3D model simulation
The theoretical scouring effect on the seagrass bed simulated from the 3D hydrodynamic model MARS varied both in direction and distance over each tide cycle. This variation resulted from the combination of the mooring chain length (fixed parameter), the current direction, and the sea level which varied at each time point. As illustrated during a neap tide from November 20, 2015 at 12:11 p.m. to November 21, 2015 at 01:11 a.m. (Fig. 2a), the theoretical mooring chain trajectory was composed of
Discussion
The present study aims to address how irregular movements of mooring chains induced by tidal circulation affect the structure of Z. marina bed responses. Coupling hydrodynamic model simulation and in situ observation approaches, we describe non-circular and predictable effects of mooring chains on seagrass meadows resulting from the shift of the current direction and the variation of the mooring chain length in contact with the sediment during tidal cycles. An effect of the disturbance was also
Conclusions
Our study is one of the first focused on the impacts of mooring on a fast-growing species in a temperate area subjected to macro-tidal currents. We specifically analyzed the structure of seagrass patches still in place and still growing under the continuous impact of a chain, at a very fine scale. Given the modeling of the chain trajectory, the four directions selected to monitor these impacts allowed us to analyze the responses of the seagrass cover under different scraping intensities. We did
Acknowledgements
This study forms part of the Master's degree of I. Marchand-Jouravleff. The authors would like to thank J. Guillaudeau, C. Ronval, T. Diméglio and V. Danet for their field participation, M. Jouan (ACRI-HE) for producing MARS3D simulations, G. Messiaen for his help on cartography artworks and Annie Buchwalter for improving English redaction.
References (58)
- et al.
Biological impacts of boating at Kawau Island, north-eastern New Zealand
J. Environ. Manag.
(2000) - et al.
δ15N and δ13C in the Mondego estuary food web: seasonal variation in producers and consumers
Mar. Environ. Res.
(2009) - et al.
Disturbance and recovery of the macroflora of a seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson) meadow in the Abrolhos Marine National Park, Brazil: an experimental evaluation of anchor damage
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(1999) - et al.
A comparison of the impact of “seagrass-friendly” boat mooring systems on Posidonia australis
Mar. Environ. Res.
(2013) - et al.
Environmental impacts of dredging on seagrasses: a review
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2006) - et al.
Long-term changes in area distribution of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Danish coastal waters
Aquat. Bot.
(2004) - et al.
Spatial and temporal variation in eelgrass (Zostera marina) landscapes: influence of physical setting
Aquat. Bot.
(2004) - et al.
Seasonal modification of tidal flat sediment dynamics by seagrass meadows of Zostera noltii (Bassin d'Arcachon, France)
J. Mar. Syst.
(2013) - et al.
Effects of plant species richness and composition on epifaunal colonization in brackish water angiosperm communities
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(2009) - et al.
Seagrass loss associated with boat moorings at rottnest-island, western-Australia
Ocean Coast Manag.
(1995)
Distribution and aspects of the production and biomass of eelgrass, Zostera marina L., at Roscoff, France
Aquat. Bot.
An external-internal mode coupling for a 3D hydrodynamical model for applications at regional scale (MARS)
Adv. Water Resour.
Comparison of Zostera marina and maerl community metabolism
Aquat. Bot.
Recovery of the eelgrass Zostera marina following intense Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum harvesting disturbance in China: the role and fate of seedlings
Aquat. Bot.
Guidelines for seagrass restoration: importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effects
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
Effect of boat moorings on seagrass beds near Perth, western-Australia
Aquat. Bot.
Modeling coupling between eelgrass Zostera marina and water flow
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Monitoring submerged aquatic vegetation in Hillsborough bay, Floride. Chapter 10
Distribution, structure and function of Nordic eelgrass (Zostera marina) ecosystems: implications for coastal management and conservation
Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst.
Valuing multiple eelgrass ecosystem services in Sweden: fish production and uptake of carbon and nitrogen
Front. Mar. Sci.
The impacts of anchoring and mooring in seagrass, Studland Bay, Dorset, UK
Underw. Technol.
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Nature
Analyse spatiale de l’impact d’une perturbation anthropique sur un herbier de zostères en baie de Locquirec (Bretagne nord)
Norois
Effects of boat anchoring in Posidonia oceanica seagrass buds in the Port-Cros National Park (north-western Mediterranean sea)
Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst.
Infauna from Zostera marina L. meadows in Norway. Differences in vegetated and unvegetated areas
Mar. Biol. Res.
Sexual recruitment in Zostera marina: a patch to landscape-scale investigation
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Inventaire des herbiers de zostères. Baie de Saint-Malo/Rance/Haut estuaire du Trieux
Monitoring of Seagrass Friendly Moorings in Shoal Bay – Report of 2010 Monitoring
Cited by (2)
Regulation of ships at anchor: Safety and environmental implications
2022, Marine PolicyCitation Excerpt :The environmental impacts of anchoring have received increasing attention since the earliest identified scientific publication [1]. Most studies have focused on leisure boats [4–11] but there are also a growing number of studies on anchorage by commercial ships [2,12–15]. Still, there are significant knowledge gaps relating e.g. to long term impacts on different kinds of benthic environments from anchoring of large ships [2,12].
A review of carbon monitoring in wet carbon systems using remote sensing
2022, Environmental Research Letters