Dissolved Fe(II) in a river-estuary system rich in dissolved organic matter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.09.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Reduced iron, Fe(II), accounts for a significant fraction of dissolved Fe across many natural surface waters despite its rapid oxidation under oxic conditions. Here we investigate the temporal and spatial variation in dissolved Fe redox state in a high dissolved organic matter (DOM) estuarine system, the River Beaulieu. We couple manual sample collection with the deployment of an autonomous in situ analyser, designed to simultaneously measure dissolved Fe(II) and total dissolved Fe, in order to investigate processes operating on the diurnal timescale and to evaluate the performance of the analyser in a high DOM environment.

Concentrations of dissolved Fe available to the ligand ferrozine are elevated throughout the estuary (up to 21 μM in freshwater) and notably higher than those previously reported likely due to seasonal variation. Fe(II) is observed to account for a large, varying fraction of the dissolved Fe available to ferrozine (25.5 ± 12.5%) and this fraction decreases with increasing salinity. We demonstrate that the very high DOM concentration in this environment and association of this DOM with dissolved Fe, prevents the accurate measurement of dissolved Fe concentrations in situ using a sensor reliant on rapid competitive ligand exchange.

Introduction

Fe(II) has been reported to account for a large fraction of dissolved Fe in a range of both fresh and marine waters (Hong and Kester, 1985, Landing and Westerlund, 1988, Sarthou et al., 2011). The dominant source of Fe(II) in surface waters is normally photochemical (Collienne, 1983, Croot et al., 2008, Roy et al., 2008). Despite its presence in marine and fresh surface waters, and its greater solubility than Fe(III) (Shaked and Lis, 2012), little information is available on the distribution and speciation of dissolved Fe(II). As formation of Fe(II) is generally represented as a poorly characterised solubilisation process (Emmenegger et al., 2001), this mechanistic gap in our knowledge may impede the development of better global ocean models (Tagliabue and Voelker, 2011).

During estuarine mixing, dissolved Fe is known to be strongly non-conservative (Boyle et al., 1977). However, few studies have distinguished between the estuarine mixing of dissolved Fe(II) and total dissolved Fe. Hong and Kester (1985) demonstrated that oxidation of Fe(II) is not a significant contributor to dissolved Fe removal at low salinities. Given the importance of humic materials in initiating flocculation and the significant difference in the metal-ligand binding preferences of the two redox states of Fe (Sholkovitz et al., 1978), the question is therefore raised as to whether the ratio of dissolved Fe(II):Fe(III) present in riverine waters is maintained during estuarine mixing and delivery to the ocean. If so, estuaries would be a source of Fe(II) to coastal waters.

Measuring the concentration of Fe(II) during estuarine mixing in a high DOM estuary will establish whether or not Fe(II) is removed similarly to Fe(III) in the presence of high concentrations of natural organic compounds. Coastal waters are known to contain organic material that can stabilise higher Fe(II) concentrations than would be possible inorganically under oxic conditions (Zhuang et al., 1995, Rose and Waite, 2003a, Okada et al., 2005). If estuaries are a source of such material we would expect to see a relatively high fraction of dissolved Fe present as Fe(II) throughout estuarine waters. The main objective here was therefore to use the Beaulieu as a model of a high DOM river to investigate the forms of dissolved Fe present and to see how Fe(II) concentration changes during estuarine mixing.

Section snippets

The River Beaulieu

The River Beaulieu drains the New Forest (Hampshire, UK) and thus contains water primarily from exposed heathland and some mixed coniferous/deciduous forest. The river water has a near neutral pH (6.57.8), high dissolved organic carbon (DOC, 250–1800 μM) and high total dissolved (<0.45 μm) Fe (18 μM) content (Holliday and Liss, 1976, Moore et al., 1979, Jones, 1993, Fang, 1995, Smith, 1995).1

Sample collection

All sampling apparatus and

Temporal and spatial variation in riverine water

Dissolved oxygen in 10 °C river water averaged 370 ± 20 μM (calculated saturation at 10.0 °C is 352 μM). Diurnal changes in irradiance, DFe and Fe(II) concentrations (17 December 2012), as determined manually and using an in situ analyser, are shown in Fig. 4. DFe and Fe(II) concentrations determined manually throughout the day had mean values (and standard deviations) of 20.1 ± 0.40 μM and 3.96 ± 0.87 μM respectively. Over the sampling period, pH increased from 6.4 to 6.6 and water level fell

Temporal and spatial variation at King's Hat

Two features of Fig. 4 are particularly striking. First, there is a very large difference between reported dissolved Fe(II) and DFe using the two sampling and analysis methods. Second, there is an apparent absence of a diurnal sinuous trend in Fe(II). Such a trend has been reported in both fresh and marine surface waters (Johnson et al., 1994, Emmenegger et al., 2001).

Although the trend (Fig. 4) observed throughout the day by both measurement methods is similar, manually collected samples

Conclusions

Five transects measuring dissolved Fe are now reported for the Beaulieu (15 January 2013; 5 February 1974 (Holliday and Liss, 1976); 17 March, 13 May and 22 September 1994 (Fang, 1995)) providing snapshot images of an estuarine Fe distribution that varies hourly and only the transect reported here distinguishes between Fe(II) and DFe. We demonstrate that Fe(II) decreases as a fraction of DFe with increasing salinity. A range of DFe removal factors are reported for the Beaulieu estuary (60–90%),

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Gillings Foundation for studentship support (MJH), the crew of RV Bill Conway, Dr Gary Fones (University of Portsmouth) for ICP-MS data and Mr Mario Esposito (University of Southampton) for analysis of DOC samples. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for comments that improved the manuscript.

References (57)

  • K.S. Johnson et al.

    Iron photochemistry in seawater from the equatorial Pacific

    Mar. Chem.

    (1994)
  • W.M. Landing et al.

    The solution chemistry of iron(II) in Framvaren Fjord

    Mar. Chem.

    (1988)
  • G.W. Luther et al.

    Dissolved organic Fe(III) and Fe(II) complexes in salt marsh porewaters

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1996)
  • L.M. Mayer

    Aggregation of colloidal iron during estuarine mixing – kinetics, mechanism, and seasonality

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1982)
  • R.M. Moore et al.

    Behavior of dissolved organic material, iron and manganese in estuarine mixing

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1979)
  • J.W. Murray et al.

    Geochemistry of iron in puget sound

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1978)
  • M.J. Pullin et al.

    Colorimetric flow-injection analysis of dissolved iron in high DOC waters

    Water Res.

    (2001)
  • M.J. Pullin et al.

    The effects of pH, ionic strength, and iron-fulvic acid interactions on the kinetics of nonphotochemical iron transformations. II. The kinetics of thermal reduction

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2003)
  • R. Raiswell

    Towards a global highly reactive iron cycle

    J. Geochem. Explor.

    (2006)
  • A.L. Rose et al.

    Kinetics of iron complexation by dissolved natural organic matter in coastal waters

    Mar. Chem.

    (2003)
  • P.M. Sarradin et al.

    Fe analysis by the ferrozine method: adaptation to FIA towards in situ analysis in hydrothermal environment

    Talanta

    (2005)
  • A.M. Shiller et al.

    Trace-elements in the Mississippi River-delta outflow region – behavior at high discharge

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1991)
  • E.R. Sholkovitz et al.

    The removal of dissolved humic acids and iron during estuarine mixing

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1978)
  • P.J. Statham

    Nutrients in estuaries – an overview and the potential impacts of climate change

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • P.J. Statham et al.

    The measurement of organically complexed Fe-II in natural waters using competitive ligand reverse titration

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2012)
  • Y. Suzuki et al.

    Existence of stable Fe(II) complex in oxic river water and its determination

    Water Res.

    (1992)
  • R. Vuillemin et al.

    CHEMINI: a new in situ CHEmical MINIaturized analyzer

    Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.

    (2009)
  • R.D. Waterbury et al.

    Long pathlength absorbance spectroscopy: trace analysis of Fe(II) using a 4.5 m liquid core waveguide

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1997)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Dissolved and particulate iron redox speciation during the LOHAFEX fertilization experiment

      2022, Marine Pollution Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      The commonly accepted paradigm is that, since many Fe(III) reduction reactions require the effect of solar radiation, DFe(II) concentrations show a daily period that peaks around midday and reaches a minimum at nighttime (Bowie et al., 2002; Rijkenberg et al., 2005; Waite et al., 1995), notwithstanding the fact that Fe(II) oxidation is accelerated during daytime by (photo)formation of ROS. However, many previous studies have also shown, against the referred paradigm, steady surface DFe(II) concentrations throughout a day/night cycle (Croot et al., 2001; Hansard et al., 2009; Hopwood et al., 2014; Sarthou et al., 2011). Appropriate interpretation of Fe(II) concentrations determined during field surveys must, therefore, consider that iron redox speciation is a very dynamic process with strong spatial and temporal variations.

    • Porewater inputs drive Fe redox cycling in the water column of a temperate mangrove wetland

      2018, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      cm−1 (Stookey, 1970) to determine the Fe(II) concentrations. Measurements of absorbance were taken every 2 min for 118 min to examine the possibility of ongoing Fe(III) reduction induced by FZ (Bowie et al., 2002; Hopwood et al., 2014; Pullin and Cabaniss, 2003). Duplicates of each sample were measured in each microplate and replicate runs were performed on consecutive days.

    • Measuring total dissolved Fe concentrations in phytoplankton cultures in the presence of synthetic and organic ligands using a modified ferrozine method

      2018, Marine Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The presence of NOM in samples can also retard Fe(II)-FZ complexation, resulting in development of an asymptotic absorbance over time (Box, 1984; Rose and Waite, 2003). Some workers have described a possible underestimation of Fe(II) concentrations as a result of inadequate mixing and equilibration time for FZ in the presence of NOM (Croot and Hunter, 2000; Hopwood et al., 2014). Jeitner (2014) also reported an impact of pH and temperature on equilibration duration of Fe(FZ)3 complexes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text