Seasonal dynamics of meiofauna in a South African temporarily open/closed estuary (Mdloti Estuary, Indian Ocean)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.09.020Get rights and content

Abstract

One hundred and eighty-four of the 250 estuaries in South Africa are currently classified as temporarily open/closed and close off from the sea during the dry season, under low river inflow. The subtropical Mdloti Estuary, on the KwaZulu-Natal north coast, is one of these systems and hardly any information is available on its meiofauna. The abundance, biomass, composition, and grazing impact of meiofauna, as well as the key environmental factors that affect these variables, were investigated with emphasis on the contrast between open and closed phases of the estuary. Microphytobenthic chlorophyll a concentrations varied between 1.4 to 480 mg m−2. Meiofauna were composed of nematodes, harpacticoid copepods, crustacean nauplii, mites, turbellarians, polychaetes, oligochaetes, ostracods and chironomids. Total abundance of meiofauna showed large variability both spatially and temporally and ranged from 0.4 to 88×104 ind. m−2. Nematodes, mites and harpacticoid copepods occurred more often than other groups in the sediment. Total meiofauna carbon biomass exhibited similar temporal as well as spatial patterns as abundance and varied from 0.5 to 440 mg C m−2. A carbon-based grazing model, applied to the total meiofauna, provided estimates of potential daily ingestion rates ranging from 1.8 to 857 mg C m−2. Nematodes, mites and harpacticoid copepods contributed the most to the total potential daily ingestion rate of meiofauna in the Mdloti Estuary. Potential ingestion rates, determined using allometric equations, showed that meiofauna consumed from 0.1 to 254% of the microphytobenthic standing stock. Overall, meiofauna were likely not food limited and grazing on microphytobenthos was low, averaging 11% for the whole survey. A principal component analysis, applied to the whole study area and sampling period, indicated that major variations in meiofaunal community are mainly controlled by temperature and the state of the estuary's mouth (i.e. open/closed). Typically, meiofauna abundance in the estuary peaked after periods of prolonged mouth closure and decreased dramatically after the breaching of the estuary at the mouth.

Introduction

Meiofauna constitute a substantial component of marine heterotrophic assemblages (Giere, 1993), influencing the transfer of material and energy through the ecosystem (Li et al., 1997). In estuarine and coastal benthic systems, meiofauna represent an important link between primary producers and higher trophic levels. They are important consumers of microphytobenthos (Blanchard, 1991, Montagna, 1995, Pace and Carman, 1996, Moens et al., 2002, Pinckney et al., 2003) and serve as a food source for other members of the meiobenthos (Elmgren, 1976), benthic macrofauna (Ronn et al., 1988, Walters et al., 1996, Gregg and Fleeger, 1998, Tita et al., 2000) as well as juvenile fish species (Marinelli and Coull, 1987, McCall and Fleeger, 1995).

Although a number of studies have examined the ecology and the role of meiofauna in the energy transfer in South African permanently open estuaries (Dye, 1978a, Dye, 1978b, Dye, 1983a, Dye, 1983b, Dye and Furstenburg, 1978, Dye and Furstenburg, 1981, Dye et al., 1978, De Decker and Bally, 1985, Dye and Lasiak, 1986, Wynberg and Branch, 1994, Heymans and Baird, 1995), nothing is known about temporarily open/closed estuaries in this regard. These systems are closed off from the sea during the dry season, when they receive low or no river inflow and are exposed to the dominant effect of longshore sand movements in the marine nearshore (Day, 1981). During spring/summer, high rainfall and freshwater runoff result in freshwater rising to levels sufficiently high to cause the breaching of the sandbar at the mouth of the estuary. The water level then drops very rapidly, often exposing large areas of substratum, which had been previously submerged and colonized by a rich community of plants and animals (Perissinotto et al., 2000).

The lack of information on the meiofauna of temporarily open/closed estuaries is unfortunate since these systems: (1) represent 73% of South African functioning estuaries (Whitfield, 1998); (2) support a high microphytobenthic biomass (Nozais et al., 2001a, Perissinotto et al., 2002, Mundree et al., 2003); and (3) are important nursery areas for estuarine-dependent fishes (Whitfield and Marais, 1999). Moreover, in estuarine ecosystems, meiofauna are known to play a more significant role than macrobenthos, with respect to benthic energy flow and biogeochemical processes, i.e. remineralization and recycling of organic matter (Castel, 1992).

The purpose of the present investigation was, therefore: (1) to investigate the composition, abundance, and biomass of meiofauna in a typical temporarily open/closed estuary; (2) to estimate the potential grazing impact of meiofauna on the rich microphytobenthic biomass that these estuaries exhibit; and (3) to identify the key variables that affect the meiofaunal community structure and composition on a temporal scale, the emphasis being on the contrast between open and closed phases.

Section snippets

Study area

Monthly measurements of biological and physical variables were carried out from June 1999 to November 2000 at three stations (L: Lower Reaches; M: Middle Reaches; U: Upper Reaches) in the subtropical temporarily open/closed Mdloti Estuary, KwaZulu-Natal north coast (29°38′ S, 31°08′ E), 25 km north east of Durban, South Africa (Fig. 1). Temporarily open/closed estuaries in KwaZulu-Natal are generally perched (i.e. the level of water inside the estuary exceeds that of the sea) and their salinity

Environmental parameters

The Mdloti Estuary was closed between June and October 1999, in May 2000 and from July to October 2000. During the closed phase, the average depth of the water column was 1.9 m. Mouth-breaching and the consequent drainage resulted in a dramatic drop in the average depth of the estuary to 0.5 m. The temperature at the sediment-water interface, which varied according to the season, exhibited a similar trend at all stations, varying from 15.7 to 29 °C (Fig. 2A). During the study period, salinity

Discussion

The abundance of meiofauna was highly variable in the Mdloti Estuary during the study period, with values ranging from 0.42 to 88×104 ind. m−2 and averaging 13×104 ind. m−2 (Fig. 5). These values are generally lower than those reported by Castel, 1992, McArthur et al., 2000 for lagoonal systems in the northern hemisphere. The Mdloti values are also lower than meiofaunal abundances recorded in South African permanently open estuaries. For instance, meiofaunal abundance averaged 520×104 ind. m−2

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from a Joint Venture Project between the National Research Foundation (NRF, Pretoria) and the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEADEATT). C.N. was funded through a postdoctoral fellowship from the NRF (1999–2001) and a foreign partnership grant from the International Science Liaison (NRF). We wish to thank the Marine Section of Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife (EKZNW) for granting research permits and for providing logistical support. Thanks

References (72)

  • C. Ronn et al.

    Predation as a mechanism of interference within infauna in shallow brackish water soft bottoms, experiments with an infaunal predator Nereis diversicolor O.F. Müller

    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

    (1988)
  • G. Tita et al.

    Predation and sediment disturbance effects of the intertidal polychaete Nereis virens (Sars) on associated meiofaunal assemblages

    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

    (2000)
  • K. Walters et al.

    Experimental studies of predation on metazoans inhabiting Spartina alterniflora stems

    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

    (1996)
  • R.M. Warwick et al.

    Ecological and metabolic studies on free-living nematodes from an estuarine mud-flat

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    (1979)
  • G.C. Young et al.

    The ichthyofauna of an intermittently open estuary: Implications of bar breaching and low salinities on faunal composition

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    (1997)
  • A.S. Baker

    Mites and Ticks of Domestic Animals; An Identification Guide and Information Source

    (1999)
  • P.J.S. Boaden

    Grazing in the interstitial habitat: a review

  • J. Castel

    The meiofauna of coastal lagoon ecosystems and their importance in the food web

    Vie Milieu

    (1992)
  • B.C. Coull

    Long-term variability of estuarine meiobenthos: an 11-year study

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1985)
  • R. Danovaro et al.

    Biodiversity and trophic structure of nematode assemblages in seagrass systems: evidence for a coupling with changes in food availability

    Marine Biology

    (2002)
  • R. Danovaro et al.

    Meiofauna response to a dynamic river plume front

    Marine Biology

    (2000)
  • J.H. Day

    The nature, origin and classification of estuaries

  • H.P. De Decker et al.

    The benthic macrofauna of the Bot River estuary, South Africa, with a note on its meiofauna

    Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa

    (1985)
  • A.W. Decho et al.

    Bacterial exopolymer utilization by a harpacticoid copepod: a methodology and results

    Limnology and Oceanography

    (1990)
  • V.N. de Jonge

    Fluctuations in the organic carbon to chlorophyll a ratios for estuarine benthic diatom populations

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1980)
  • Dye, A.H., 1977. An ecophysiological study of the benthic meiofauna of the Swartkops estuary. MSc Thesis, University of...
  • A.H. Dye

    Diurnal vertical migrations of meiofauna in an estuarine sandflat

    Zoologica Africana

    (1978)
  • A.H. Dye

    Seasonal fluctuations in the vertical distribution of meiofauna in the Swartkops estuary

    Zoologica Africana

    (1978)
  • A.H. Dye

    Composition and seasonal fluctuations of meiofauna in a southern African mangrove estuary

    Marine Biology

    (1983)
  • A.H. Dye et al.

    An ecophysiological study of the meiofauna of the Swartkops estuary. 2. The meiofauna: Composition, distribution, seasonal fluctuation and biomass

    Zoologica Africana

    (1978)
  • A.H. Dye et al.

    Estuarine meiofauna

  • A.H. Dye et al.

    Microbenthos, meiobenthos and fiddler crabs: trophic interactions in a tropical mangrove sediment

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1986)
  • A.H. Dye et al.

    An ecophysiological study of the meiofauna of the Swartkops estuary. 3. Partition of benthic oxygen consumption and the relative importance of the meiofauna

    Zoologica Africana

    (1978)
  • R. Elmgren

    Baltic benthos communities and the role of meiofauna

    Contr Asko Lab

    (1976)
  • R.J. Feller et al.

    Energetics

  • O. Giere

    Meiobenthology — the Microscopic Fauna in Aquatic Sediments

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text