Elsevier

Economics Letters

Volume 145, August 2016, Pages 15-18
Economics Letters

A dynamic model of bank valuation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We model the Price-to-Book ratio of bank equity in terms of fundamental variables.

  • Deviations from long-run equilibrium indicate equity over- or undervaluation.

  • We examine a panel of large and systemic US bank holding companies (BHCs).

  • Equity valuation for these BHCs has a stable long-run relationship to fundamentals.

  • There are substantial and persistent deviations of market from fundamental value.

Abstract

We present a model of price-to-book (PB) valuation for banks that establishes a dynamic relationship between the PB valuation of equity and the cost of equity, expected growth of net income, and modified dividend payout ratio.

Introduction

We develop a dynamic model of equity valuation for banks. This model establishes the long-run equilibrium price-to-book (PB) ratio of equity in relationship to fundamental variables such as the cost of equity (COE), the expected growth of net income (NI) and the modified dividend payout ratio (DPR). The model is dynamic in that it allows short-run deviations of the PB ratio from its long-run fundamental value. Deviations of actual from fundamental long-run valuation indicate whether any particular common stock is under- or overvalued, relative to its long-run equilibrium valuation. As it is derived from a generalized dividend discount model (DDM) of stock valuation we call it the Dynamic Dividend Discount Model or 3DM. The model uses the pooled mean group (PMG) method of dynamic heterogeneous panels estimation proposed by Pesaran et al. (1999) in order to estimate the long-run equilibrium relationship, provided that it exists, as well as the dynamic behavior of the PB ratio.

Valuation models calculate the firm/equity value or a financial ratio, such as PB, either with single formulas (e.g. discounted cash flow models) or with an econometrically estimated equation. Our model, 3DM, belongs to the second category, which includes static valuation models (for recent examples see Jordan et al., 2011, and Calomiris and Nissim, 2014) as well as dynamic valuation models that assume or imply cointegration (e.g.  Campbell and Shiller, 1989, Vuolteenaho, 2002, and Jiang and Lee, 2007). Our key contribution is to provide a novel model of PB ratios that is structural, fully dynamic, specific to banks, and allows for temporary divergences of market PB ratios from long-run equilibrium values.

We apply this model to the stock market valuation of large and systemic US bank holding companies (BHCs) over a decade encompassing the financial crisis. These BHCs participated in a series of capital assessment exercises and stress tests conducted by US federal regulators starting in 2008. We establish a dynamic relationship between the PB ratio of equity and the cost of equity, expected growth of net income and modified dividend payout ratio. The fundamental value of the PB ratio implied by this long-run relationship tracks market movements quite well (see Fig. 1). In our sample of 25 BHCs, we find large heterogeneity in the degree to which PB ratios are temporarily above or below their long-run equilibrium valuation. These divergences are persistent. A year after a shock almost 29.5% of the initial disequilibrium still remains. Our model is agnostic about the reasons for the existence of deviations of stock market valuation from a long-run equilibrium value. Williams (2013) contains a review of economic models that attempt to explain such deviations.

In the next section, we develop the dynamic model for fundamental equity valuation based on PB ratios and in section three we apply it to large and systemic US BHCs. We conclude with some directions for future research.

Section snippets

A model of fundamental bank valuation

According to DDM, the value of equity is calculated as the present value of expected dividends discounted by the present COE.1 We transform DDM from a model of intrinsic valuation to one of relative valuation as will be shown below.

To overcome difficulties in interpretation when NI becomes negative, we consider a modified DPR as the ratio of dividends (augmented by the amount spent for

Application to large and systemic US BHCs

As a demonstration of the use of 3DM, we apply it to 25 large and systemic US BHCs that participated in a series of capital assessment exercises and stress tests conducted by US federal regulators starting in 2008. A review of these exercises can be found in Clark and Ryu (2013), and in Neretina et al. (2014). Our sample spans 2003:Q4 to 2014:Q1. Data sources are Datastream and the companies’ SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q).4

Direction for future work

We intend to apply 3DM to a larger and more representative panel of US and international BHCs. Our aim is to examine whether short-run divergences of market PB from fundamental value, in other words under- or overvalued stock, are related systematically to observable bank characteristics and whether these relationships changed after the recent financial crisis. Has the recent financial crisis and the ensuing regulatory response to this crisis altered substantially the way that market

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Spyros Skouras, Efthimios Tsionas, George Dikos, Mathias Hoffman, Edwin Neave, Manthos Delis and seminar participants at the 1st Conference on Recent Developments on Financial Econometrics and Applications, 2015 World Finance Conference, University of Zurich, ETH — Zurich, ALBA, Luxembourg School of Finance, 2015 CRETE conference, Paris Financial Management Conference 2015 and University of Glasgow for useful comments, and Conrad Landis for his assistance with the

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • Did the financial crisis affect the market valuation of large systemic U.S. banks?

    2017, Journal of Financial Stability
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another feature that differentiates our work from Calomiris and Nissim (2014) is that we concentrate only on the group of the largest U.S. BHCs.1 We contrast market movements in BHCs’ PB ratios to those derived from the Dynamic Dividend Discount Model (3DM), a model of fundamental valuation developed by Bertsatos and Sakellaris (2016), and analyze divergences between these two valuations. 3DM has attractive features: it establishes an equilibrium relationship among the PB ratio of equity and measures of fundamentals such as the cost of equity, the expected growth of net income (NI) and modified dividend payout ratio (DPR), and allows for temporary deviations from that relationship.

  • A dynamic model for bank valuation in Iran

    2021, Estudios de Economia Aplicada
View full text