Landscape-level impact of tropical forest loss and fragmentation on bird occurrence in eastern Guatemala
Introduction
Habitat destruction and fragmentation caused by wood extraction, forest plantations, crops and cattle ranching are the greatest threats to the maintenance of biological diversity in the Neotropics (Wilcove, 1985, Jullien and Thiollay, 1996, Turner, 1996), where the loss of forests is occurring at an accelerated rate (Bolin, 1977, Sader and Joyce, 1988, Kaimowitz, 1996, FAO, 2005). Habitat modification at the landscape scale mainly consists of two aspects: the loss of habitat per se and habitat fragmentation (Fahrig, 2003). The effects of habitat loss are obvious: when habitat is removed from the landscape, animals subsequently displaced can also be eliminated, producing a population decline (Bender et al., 1998). Fragmentation effects are less obvious, but could nonetheless be very important. Habitat fragmentation determines the subdivision and reduction in habitat area, a potential increase of edge effects and changes in the surrounding habitat matrix, effects by which landscape continuity can be reduced and thus threaten the survival of sensitive species (With, 1997).
At present, there is no general consensus concerning the relative importance of cover or configuration in determing species presence and survival, in particular regarding bird species persistence in modified landscapes (McGarigal and McComb, 1995, Villard et al., 1999, Fahrig, 2003, Westphal et al., 2003). It is important to distinguish between pure habitat loss and true fragmentation effects when assessing bird population responses, because resultant land management and conservation recommendations may differ (Schmiegelow and Mönkkönen, 2002).
Fragmentation effects on bird communities have been well documented in the boreal temperate zone (Robbins et al., 1989, Boulinier et al., 1998, Burke and Nol, 2000). For forest-interior species, fragmentation reduces their abundance and richness (Askins et al., 1990). In the Neotropics, studies of the effect of habitat fragmentation undertaken by the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) have demonstrated that terrestrial insectivorous birds are particularly sensitive to disturbance, evidenced by the reduction in their abundance as patch size decreases and their local extinction in the smallest fragments (Stouffer and Bierregard, 1995, Gascon et al., 1999). Besides these few very important studies, other research on the effect of forest fragmentation on Neotropical birds, particularly at the landscape scale, is virtually non-existent, and the aforementioned studies are patch-oriented, as opposed to being landscape-oriented. More importantly, results from landscape-level effects of fragmentation demonstrated for temperate zone birds should not be extended directly to tropical birds, due to the fact that these possess different evolutionary and life histories, which make them vulnerable to a different suite of threats than those normally considered for birds from temperate regions (Stratford and Robinson, 2005). Species in temperate regions are under strong selection pressure from abiotic factors (e.g. climate) whereas in tropical regions biotic selection pressures are most important. Interactions with other species (plant and animal) have played a key role in shaping the behavioral adaptations of tropical birds (Stutchbury and Morton, 2001). Tropical birds have high nest predation, high adult survival and small clutch sizes (Skutch, 1954, Skutch, 1960, Skutch, 1969, Ricklefs, 1969, Stutchbury and Morton, 2001), as opposed to temperate birds. Food is abundant throughout the year in the tropics (Janzen, 1973, Janzen, 1975), and this year-round availability means that most species are residents (non-migratory) and many that eat insects defend territories all year (Stutchbury and Morton, 2001). Also, unlike birds of temperate zones, tropical birds breed at all times of the year, breeding seasons are more protracted (Ricklefs, 1969), and are timed to coincide with fruit or insect abundance or reduced predation pressure, not climate per se (Stutchbury and Morton, 2001).
Typical tropical species also have a large number of complex and unique adaptations (Stutchbury and Morton, 2001). Many tropical birds tend to be sedentary or specialized in their habitat requirements, and such species are expected to have lower persistence in fragments, and are also the ones that are more extinction prone (Mac Nally et al., 2000, Sekercioglu, 2007, Sekercioglu and Sodhi, 2007). Area needs may be greater in the tropics, due to larger territory size (Terborgh et al., 1990, Robinson et al., 2000), and greater areas are often related to particular behavioral adaptations, like obligate army-ant following, and interspecific flocking (Terborgh et al., 1990). Species with these particular adaptations are often the first to disappear from fragments (Stouffer and Bierregard, 1995, Van Houtan et al., 2006, Ferraz et al., 2007). With respect to forest isolation through forest fragmentation, poor colonizers that rarely cross open areas, have relatively low patch occupancy in Amazonia, and thus are more vulnerable to fragmentation effects (Ferraz et al., 2007).
Given the complex nature of simultaneously evaluating the effects of landscape-level cover and configuration on population persistence, statistical presence/absence modelling (as a special case of generalized linear models, or GLM's) has become an important tool in conservation biology, improving the understanding of factors that determine the distribution of habitats, the species that occupy them and the human factors that lead to changes in the habitat (Guisan and Zimmermann, 2000, Guisan et al., 2002). Models represent ecological processes in simplified (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), general ways that provide information on those factors responsible for the observed patterns (Johnson and Omland, 2004, Austin, 2007).
Habitat fragmentation indices are usually strongly correlated with habitat amount, thus making it difficult to evaluate area-independent fragmentation effects on species presence (Fahrig, 2003). This means that in real-world situations, habitat fragmentation usually increases with decreasing habitat cover (see Figure 2.5, page 19, in Lindenmayer and Fischer, 2006). Thus, most empirical studies have attempted to distinguish between these effects using statistical regression models (McGarigal and McComb, 1995, Trzcinski et al., 1999, Villard et al., 1999, Westphal et al., 2003). Our main objective was to evaluate the relative and independent contributions of landscape-scale cover and fragmentation of tropical forest in determining the presence of forest-dependent birds in the Caribbean region of Guatemala. To examine the potential relation between species’ occurrence and landscape indices, we constructed occupancy-based habitat models using logistic regression, with forest area, fragmentation and their interaction as predictive variables. These relationships were examined at three different scales (200-, 500- and 1000-m scales).
Following Betts et al. (2006b), models with area and fragmentation variables at different scales were related to a series of hypotheses concerning population responses to landscape modification. At the smallest scale, we sought a response related to the “random sample hypothesis” (Haila, 1983), which states that only factors (specifically the amount of suitable habitat) at the scale of an individual territory are important in determining habitat quality. This hypothesis also implies that species have high dispersal capabilities, and are able to find patches with a size that corresponds to their territory size. Alternatively, a response related to scales greater than territory size would correspond to the so-called “landscape composition hypothesis”, which states that species respond to the amount of suitable habitat, but at larger spatial scales than the individual territory (Fahrig, 2003, Betts et al., 2006b). We also sought evidence for the “landscape fragmentation hypothesis”, which expects populations to decline with increasing fragmentation, independent of the effects of habitat loss (Villard et al., 1999, Betts et al., 2006b). Finally, an area-dependent effect of fragmentation is described by the “non-linear landscape fragmentation hypothesis”, which states that landscape fragmentation is important only below some critical amount of habitat (Andrén, 1994b, Fahrig, 1998, Betts et al., 2006b). This would result in multiplicative (non-linear) effects of fragmentation on habitat loss, i.e., a statistical interaction between landscape configuration and composition (Trzcinski et al., 1999, Betts et al., 2006b).
In theoretical studies, the relative importance of fragmentation appears to depend on the life-history traits of hypothetical species (Fahrig, 1998, With and King, 1999). Mixed results of fragmentation studies have been attributed to differences in such traits (Ewers and Didham, 2005). We investigated the relationship of species responses to fragmentation and one particular life-history trait, habitat breadth, because of its fundamental association to species’ dispersal ability. Assuming that dispersal is a key aspect of species’ persistence in fragmented landscapes, the important question is whether a species is able to disperse through (and survive in) the landscape matrix (Opdam, 1991, Fahrig, 2001, Ricketts, 2001). Terrestrial habitats are often surrounded by a complex mosaic of other cover types, which may differ in their resistance to the movement of individuals among habitat patches (Gustafson and Gardner, 1996, Ricketts, 2001, Laurance et al., 2002). A species’ ability to use matrix habitats may affect their vulnerability in fragmented landscapes (Gascon et al., 1999). A direct prediction of this hypothesis is that a species with a wider habitat breadth will find less resistance to move through the matrix and therefore will be less susceptible to fragmentation effects. In terms of resources, species that are able to exploit secondary habitats might have higher survival probability (at the individual and population level), supplementing their resource intake by using a substitutable resource in nearby patches of secondary habitats (landscape supplementation, Dunning et al., 1992).
In our modelling approach, we used a combination of traditional null hypothesis tests (NHT) and information-theoretic model-selection approaches, specifically the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), for model-selection (Luckacs et al., 2007, Stephens et al., 2005). The Kullback–Leibler information-theoretic (KLIT) framework cannot assess model goodness-of-fit, which in contrast is provided for by the NHT framework. Alternatively, KLIT methods allowed us to compare models of different scales, comparisons not possible with inferential approaches: with NHT, only comparisons of reduced models which are nested within full models are possible (Agresti, 1996). From a practical conservation perspective, we evaluated the model's ability in predicting species presence and absence, and discuss their applicability to the study region.
Section snippets
Study area
The study was conducted in Cerro San Gil Watershed Protection Reserve (hereafter CSGWPR), in the Caribbean region of Guatemala. The predominant natural vegetation is very humid tropical and sub-tropical forest (Holdridge, 1967), with an average annual rainfall of 3010 mm and a mean annual temperature of 26.7 °C (INSIVUMEH, 2005). Originally, the study area was completely covered by mature tropical forest, and since the late 1970s, 65% of it has been converted to cattle pasture or cropland
Results
All models except the area model for Ramphastos sulphuratus had non-significant results in the Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) GOF statistic, indicating adequate model specification. The likelihood-ratio (LR) statistic was significant (α = 0.05) or marginally significant (α = 0.10) for all models except for Trogon melanocephalus and D. magnolia. Table 3 shows results for the three models with strongest support, based on Akaike weights, for each study species.
All species except T. melanocephalus and D. magnolia
Discussion
Our adoption of the concept of multiple working hypotheses (Chamberlin, 1965, Anderson et al., 2001, Burnham and Anderson, 2001, Betts et al., 2006b), and the KLIT framework allowed us to simultaneously contrast the random sample, landscape composition and linear and non-linear landscape fragmentation hypotheses, sensu Betts et al. (2006b). This framework allowed us to contrast models with variables corresponding to different scales. Our results indicate that bird response to landscape forest
Conclusions
Our results indicate that bird response to landscape forest loss and fragmentation at the 1000-m scale was much stronger than at the 200- and 500-m scales. We thus conclude that the persistence of these species in fragmented landscapes depends on factors which operate beyond the territory scale, namely extra-territorial dispersal movements.
With regard to the relative importance of tropical forest area and fragmentation in determining species presence, forest area was generally more important
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the Tennessee Chapter of the Nature Conservancy and the Foundation for Ecodevelopment and Conservation (FUNDAECO) for providing financial support. We also extend our gratitude to Teresa Boca, at the Institute of Climate and Water, National Institute of Agrarian Technology (Instituto de Clima y Agua, INTA-Castelar) of Argentina, for allowing us to perform statistical analyses with the SAS package at their facilities. Finally, we
References (123)
Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches
Ecol. Model.
(2007)- et al.
The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence
Ecol. Model.
(2006) - et al.
Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using gaussian and logit models
Ecol. Model.
(2007) When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival?
Ecol. Model.
(1998)How much habitat is enough?
Biol. Conserv.
(2001)- et al.
Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants
Biol. Conserv.
(1999) - et al.
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models
Biol. Conserv.
(2004) - et al.
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
Ecol. Model.
(2000) - et al.
Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene
Ecol. Model.
(2002) - et al.
Model selection in ecology and evolution
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2004)
Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box-ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia
Biol. Conserv.
Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression
Ecol. Model.
Categorical Data Analysis
Logistic Regression Using the SAS System
Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative
J. Wildl. Manage.
Kullback–Leibler information in resolving natural resource conflicts when definitive data exist
Wild. Soc. Bull.
Can one use nested subset pattern to reject the random sample hypothesis? Examples from boreal bird communities
Oikos
Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat
Oikos
Population declines in migratory birds in eastern North America
Curr. Ornithol.
Statistical aspects of point count sampling
Reliability of the Breeding Bird Survey: effects of restricting surveys to road
Auk
Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect
Ecology
Independent effects of fragmentation on forest songbirds: an organism-based approach
Ecol. Appl.
Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure
Conserv. Biol.
The biological dynamics of tropical forest fragments
Bioscience
Changes of land biota and their importance for the carbon cycle
Science
Habitat models and their transfer for single and multi species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest
Ecography
Higher temporal variability of forest bird communities in fragmented landscapes
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.-Biol.
Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size?
Can. J. Zool.
Landscape and fragment size effects on reproductive success of forest-breeding birds in Ontario
Ecol. Appl.
Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach
Kullback–Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies
Wildl. Res.
Uso de hábitats modificados por aves dependientes de bosque tropical en la región caribeña de Guatemala
Int. J. Trop. Biol.
The method of multiple working hypotheses
Science
Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape
Conserv. Ecol.
Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review
Ecography
Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests
Ecol. Monogr.
Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes
Oikos
Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses
Ecol. Appl.
Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes
Biometrics
Anthropogenic landscape changes and avian diversity at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico
Biodivers. Conserv.
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Biol. Rev.
Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis
Ecol. Appl.
Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.
A removal model for estimating detection probabilities from point-count surveys
Auk
A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds
Science
A review fo methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
Environ. Conserv.
Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions
Cited by (26)
Turnover-driven loss of forest-dependent species changes avian species richness, functional diversity, and community composition in Andean forest fragments
2021, Global Ecology and ConservationCitation Excerpt :Our results furthermore echo other Andean studies showing that a subset of species is sensitive to forest loss (Aubad et al., 2010; Cazalis et al., 2020) and edge effects (Restrepo and Gomez, 1998), and that specific functional groups are lost from fragments (Palacio et al., 2020b). Like Carrara et al. (2015) and Cerezo et al. (2010), we found that proportion of forest within 1 km was the primary driver of species presence in fragments. However, area-sensitivity in forest-dependent birds was highly correlated with edge-sensitivity, providing further support for the idea that edge effects, and therefore habitat configuration, may drive negative species responses to declining habitat amount (Banks-Leite et al., 2010), particularly for cloud-forest birds (Martínez-Morales, 2005; Jankowski et al., 2021).
Effects of landscape context and vegetation attributes on understorey bird communities of cloud forest riparian belts
2021, Ecological EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Next, four circular areas with different radii (commonly referred to as buffers in GIS analysis) were drawn at 250, 500, 750 and 1000 m, from the centroid of each riparian belt (Fig. 1). These buffer distances have been previously reported as relevant to birds, particularly for small forest birds (Bird and Lenore, 2012; Cerezo et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2011). For each of these distances or landscape areas –also referred frequently as ‘landscape scales’ (see McGarigal et al., 2012; Dunning et al., 2006) – and for each of the three land cover classes defined above, the following metrics were estimated from the classified images using the Patch-Analyst extension in ArcGIS®: total area in hectares (CA); number of patches (NP) for the forest and urban classes only; and total length of the forest edge along open areas (TE).
Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico
2015, Biological ConservationCitation Excerpt :This can help to explain why the associations between the landscape predictors and β-diversity were weaker than the associations with α-diversity. Our findings support the idea that a multi-scale analysis is required to accurately assess the impact of landscape structure on species’ responses (Cerezo et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2011; Thornton et al., 2011; Fahrig, 2013), as in our study, bird diversity was more strongly influenced by local-scale landscape patterns (i.e. by landscape metrics measured at the 100-ha than landscape metrics at the 500-ha). This can be associated with the fact that species diversity was evaluated at the patch level, and our samples were probably more representative of the 100-ha landscapes than of the 500-ha landscapes.
Environmental suitability of a highly fragmented and heterogeneous landscape for forest bird species in south-eastern Brazil
2012, Environmental Conservation
- 1
Tel.: +1 301 497 5641; fax: +1 301 497 5545.