Associations between polysubstance use and psychiatric problems in a criminal justice population in Sweden

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.02.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Polysubstance use is common in substance users, and may complicate their clinical course. This study, in a criminal justice setting in Sweden, examines the association between the number of concurrently used substance types and psychiatric symptoms during 30 days before incarceration, while controlling for background variables such as family history (drug and alcohol problems, psychiatric problems, criminality), demographic data and history of emotional, physical or sexual abuse.

Methods

The data material comprised 5659 criminal justice clients reporting a substance use problem, examined with the Addiction Severity Index. Variables were compared in a multinomial regression analysis, comparing clients reporting one (n = 1877), two (n = 1408), three (n = 956), four (n = 443) and five or more (n = 167) substance types.

Results

The 30-day prevalence of most psychiatric symptoms included in the study (depression, anxiety, cognitive problems, hallucinations, difficulty controlling violent behaviour, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts) was higher in individuals with a higher number of concurrent substance types used. In multinomial regression analysis, while controlling for background variables, these associations remained for concurrent suicidal ideation, cognitive problems, hallucinations and violent behaviour, with the latter two being associated with the higher numbers of substance types. Binge alcohol drinking, tranquilizers, opioids and the number of substance types reported were associated with several of the psychiatric symptoms.

Conclusions

In the present criminal justice setting in Sweden, the use of multiple substance types and concurrent psychiatric symptoms appear to be associated, and a sub-group reporting particularly high numbers of concurrent substance types are particularly likely to report potentially severe psychiatric problems.

Introduction

Polysubstance use is commonly reported in clinical populations of alcohol and drug users (Darke and Hall, 1995, Gossop et al., 1998, Kedia et al., 2007, Martinotti et al., 2009). The misuse of different substances, simultaneously or within a short period of time, has been described as representing a pattern of drug use with particularly problematic features. Polydrug use also has been shown to be associated with non-fatal and fatal drug overdose (Coffin et al., 2003, Darke et al., 2005, Warner-Smith et al., 2001), and with attempted suicide among substance users (Darke et al., 2007, Martinotti et al., 2009), and polydrug use appears to be a risk factor for prospective death in substance users seeking treatment (Gossop et al., 2002). Polydrug use may complicate treatment, such as in heroin users who also use cocaine (Williamson et al., 2006), and a link between psychiatric comorbidity and polydrug use has also been demonstrated among clinical substance use patients (Carrà et al., 2006, Marsden et al., 2000) and in a twin study (Lynskey et al., 2006). Pirard et al. (2005) reported from a population examined with the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) that substance users with a history of sexual or physical abuse may have more polydrug use and more severe psychiatric problems. It has also been reported that self-reported childhood trauma may be more common among polysubstance users than among monosubstance users (Martinotti et al., 2009), and that childhood sexual abuse may be associated with subsequent polysubstance use in adolescence (Shin et al., 2010).

In addition to the literature describing higher problem severity in polydrug users, there is also, more specifically, data indicating that a higher number of abused substances may be associated with a more severe clinical picture. An association has been seen between the number of drug dependence diagnoses and the number of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses in heroin injectors (Darke and Ross, 1997). It has also been reported that suicidal behaviour (Borges et al., 2000) and the risk of unnatural death in substance users (suicide or drug overdose) were associated with the number of addictive substances used (Bradvik et al., 2009).

The present study intended to test the hypothesis that the use of a larger number of substance types may be associated with a higher prevalence of psychiatric problems, in a large database of interviews with substance users in the Swedish criminal justice system. In this setting, we aimed to examine a potential association between the number of concurrent substance types used and the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms within the same narrow time frame (30 days). Also, the study aims to examine this association when controlling for family background factors, history of emotional, physical or sexual abuse, and demographic data.

Section snippets

Methods

The present study analyses data extracted from a database of Addiction Severity Index (ASI) interviews in the Swedish Prison and Probation Service. The ASI, a semi-structured interview instrument, has been reported to have acceptable validity (Hendriks et al., 1989, McLellan et al., 1980, McLellan et al., 1992, McLellan et al., 2006, Zanis et al., 1994), and it is a well-established assessment tool for substance use and substance-related problems. It assesses variables in several areas of life,

Results

Polysubstance use during the 30 days prior to intake into the criminal justice system was commonly reported in the present material. While 1877 clients (33.2%) reported using one substance type, 52.6% reported using two or more types of substances (1408 clients used two types of substances, 956 clients reported three substance types, 443 clients reported four substance types, and 167 clients reported five or more substance types). In addition, 808 clients (14.3%) did not report any substance

Discussion

The present study tested the hypothesis that there are associations between the use of a higher number of substance types and higher odds of reporting psychiatric problems. To a large extent, and even when controlling for other possible background factors likely to affect a client's symptom status, the present data appear to support this hypothesis. Also, a more problematic background situation was seen in clients reporting a high number of substance types, with higher rates of problematic

Role of funding sources

The present work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, and Malmö University Hospital. They had no further influence on the study design, analysis or writing of the manuscript.

Contributors

Anders Hakansson and Mats Berglund were responsible for the study design and statistical analysis. Frans Schlyter was responsible for the data collection. All authors were involved in, and accepted, the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts declared.

Acknowledgements

The work of the present study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, and Malmö University Hospital. The authors are particularly grateful to the staff of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service for their work with the data collection.

References (44)

  • N. Niv et al.

    Women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs: service needs, utilization and outcomes

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2007)
  • S. Pirard et al.

    Prevalence of physical and sexual abuse among substance abuse patients and impact on treatment outcomes

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2005)
  • S.H. Shin et al.

    Childhood sexual abuse and adolescent substance use: a latent class analysis

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2010)
  • A. Williamson et al.

    The effect of persistence of cocaine use on 12-month outcomes for the treatment of heroin dependence

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2006)
  • D.A. Zanis et al.

    Reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index with a homeless sample

    J. Subst. Abuse Treat.

    (1994)
  • T. Beswick et al.

    Multiple drug use: patterns and practices of heroin and crack use in a population of opiate addicts in treatment

    Drug Alcohol Rev.

    (2001)
  • G. Borges et al.

    Associations of substance use, abuse, and dependence with subsequent suicidal behavior

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (2000)
  • L. Bradvik et al.

    Number of addictive substances related to increased risk of unnatural death: a combined medico-legal and case-record study

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • G. Carrà et al.

    Severity profiles of substance-abusing patients in Italian community addiction facilities: influence of psychiatric concurrent disorders

    Eur. Addict. Res.

    (2006)
  • P.O. Coffin et al.

    Opiates, cocaine and alcohol combinations in accidental drug overdose deaths in New York City, 1990–98

    Addiction

    (2003)
  • S. Darke et al.

    Non-fatal heroin overdose, treatment exposure and client characteristics: findings from the Australian treatment outcome study (ATOS)

    Drug Alcohol Rev.

    (2005)
  • M. Earlywine et al.

    Concurrent versus simultaneous polydrug use: prevalence, correlates, discriminant validity, and prospective effects on health outcomes

    Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text