Survey dataset for the perceived consciousness towards environmental sustainability by undergraduate students

The scope of the dataset allows to examine undergraduate hospitality and tourism students’ intentions towards environmental sustainability. Moreover, it is possible to compare factors (knowledge, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention) towards environmental sustainability between hospitality and tourism students based on different socio-demographic characteristics. To fulfill these objectives, data was collected through a bilingual questionnaire containing 312 valid responses from undergraduate students studying towards a business degree. The questionnaire was administered at the Prince of Songkla University in Phuket, Thailand in the fourth quarter of 2021. Moreover, the data collection adhered to the NESH principles applicable for Social Science Research. The data collection instrument was validated for international consistency and reliability through a three-person panel of research experts and validated using the IOC method. Furthermore, the questionnaire was tested with a targeted sample consisting of ten students prior to its implementation. The dataset serves as an insightful reference for practitioners and policymakers in higher education to adjust their pedagogy, in addition to, as a secondary data source for educational researchers to examine undergraduate hospitality and tourism students’ intentions towards environmental sustainability.


a b s t r a c t
The scope of the dataset allows to examine undergraduate hospitality and tourism students' intentions towards environmental sustainability. Moreover, it is possible to compare factors (knowledge, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention) towards environmental sustainability between hospitality and tourism students based on different socio-demographic characteristics. To fulfill these objectives, data was collected through a bilingual questionnaire containing 312 valid responses from undergraduate students studying towards a business degree. The questionnaire was administered at the Prince of Songkla University in Phuket, Thailand in the fourth quarter of 2021. Moreover, the data collection adhered to the NESH principles applicable for Social Science Research. The data collection instrument was validated for international consistency and reliability through a threeperson panel of research experts and validated using the IOC method. Furthermore, the questionnaire was tested with a targeted sample consisting of ten students prior to its implementation. The dataset serves as an insightful reference for practitioners and policymakers in higher education to adjust their pedagogy, in addition to, as a secondary data source for educational researchers to examine undergraduate hospitality and tourism students' intentions towards environmental sustainability.

Value of the Data
• The dataset allows examination of factors influencing intentions towards sustainability of hospitality and tourism students in Thailand. • The dataset reveals correlations between factors (knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and intentions) towards environmental sustainability between hospitality and tourism students. • The dataset serves as an insightful reference for practitioners and policymakers in higher education to adjust their pedagogy. • The dataset serves as secondary data source for educational researchers to examine undergraduate hospitality and tourism students' intentions towards environmental sustainability.

Data Description
Environmental sustainability is a very articulated and complex concept that is widely discussed in many disciplines and many streams of the literature [1] . Increased awareness toward environmental sustainability manifests and leads to the adoption of the concepts to address environmental challenges, which played a key role in the birth of environmental movements [2] . Tourism is dependent upon the environment for much of its well-being [ 1 , 3 ]. Moreover, tourism education is at the forefront of impacting environmental sustainability in one way or another by educating tomorrow's tourism stakeholders [4] . The associated dataset can be interpreted for further analysis based on the tags and labels presented in Tables 1 and 2 underneath, as well as a copy of the survey can be found in the supplementary material.

Sampling and collection
The data were collected from undergraduate students through simple random sampling, which is a probability sampling method that allows the sampling error to be calculated [5] . Etikan and Bala [6] noted that in social science research, it is advantageous to eliminate selection bias by the researcher or volunteer bias by the participant for representativeness of the results (p. 215). In the absence of an existing methodological frame, random sampling is deemed an appropriate method to apply for this study [ 5 , 6 ]. However, a disadvantage of random sampling is the lack of sufficient responses that fit the desired characteristic of interest. To manage such potential limitations, the questionnaire was administered in the final phase to specific sociodemographic clusters (i.e. gender or year of study) to increase the probability of reaching the desired population. The questionnaire was administered with a bilingual option, i.e. Thai and English. Moreover, the questionnaire was administered at the Prince of Songkla University in Phuket, Thailand in the fourth quarter of 2021. After screening the collected data, 9 inconclusive/incomplete responses were discarded from inclusion. The sample size included was 312 to represent the population in data analysis. The confidence level of accurate sampling was estimated at 95% ( p < 0.05), based on the total student enrolment and sample size that were included, and the margin of error was quantified as 5%. Based on eligible responses, the representative demographic profile in Table 3 summarizes the respondents' gender, year of study, age range, nationality, and place of study (institution).

Research instrument
The adaptation of seven (7) instead of five (5) points on the original Likert-type scale is described as a universal instrument to efficiently measure and evaluate the attitudes of respondents [7] . Fryer and Nakao [8] further added that gathering data to predict a population sample's sentiment on a particular issue is the primary advantage of this approach (p. 11). The default responses offer the participants seven answer options to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction, with a neutral option at the midpoint. The questionnaire included a total of 28 attributes of which 8 were used to establish the socio-demographic profile and 20 to assess and evaluate the students' attitudes. The default responses on the Likert-type scale ranged from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest), i.e. Strongly Disagree (1), Disagree (2), Somewhat Disagree (3), Neither Agree or Disagree (4), Somewhat Agree (5), Agree (6), and Strongly Agree (7).
Moreover, the index of item-objective congruence (IOC) is a tool used to improve the validity and reliability of administered surveys and was used as the basis for screening the item quality. The survey was evaluated by three impartial research experts for content validity using an adapted version of the IOC index developed by Turner and Carlson [9] . The mean IOC score was 0.92, which is above the acceptable threshold of 0.80 [10] . Additionally, Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient ( α) was calculated to "ensure consistency of test scores over different parts of the survey" [11] . The IOC (0.92) and previously reported Cronbach's Alpha (0.895) indicated high reliability for the research instrument that was used to collect the data. Lastly, the questionnaire was tested for comprehension with a limited sample ( n = 10), although these responses were not included in the analysis.

Ethics Statements
Institutional approval was obtained prior to collecting the data and before answering the survey, written informed consent was a precondition for participation. The participants were informed about the research and its purpose, that they had the right to withdraw at any stage, and that the data collected would be treated as confidential (i.e. anonymized in all reporting). For ethical considerations and to protect the identity of the participants, some specific information in the socio-demographic profile was generalized before disclosure in this paper, namely some specific minority nationalities were labeled as "foreign" instead of displaying the particular nationality as this could potentially allow exposing the identity of the participant. The foundation for ethical considerations is based on the principles formulated by the Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees [12] .

Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

CRediT Author Statement
Kevin Fuchs: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing -original draft.

Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank Dr. Nam Aghaee and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seppo Karrila for their assistance to validate the methodological framework. Moreover, many thanks to the participants for their contributions by sharing their views through the questionnaire.

Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107985 .