Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 279, Issues 1–3, 15 September 2011, Pages 210-218
Desalination

Impacts of silica on the sustainable productivity of reverse osmosis membranes treating low-salinity brackish groundwater

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Brackish water desalination is increasingly being considered as an alternative drinking water treatment processes. The impacts of high silica (63 mg/L) on the performance of brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) while treating a brackish groundwater (1315 mg/L of TDS) were investigated. This study demonstrated the importance of pilot-scale testing in understanding the long-term impacts of silica fouling in order to maintain the sustainable flux and recovery of new generation BWRO membranes. Two commercial membranes, selected from bench-scale coupon testing, were evaluated at pilot scale. The results suggested that due to the presence of high silica, operational flux and recovery were limited to 16.9 Lm 2 h 1 and 75%, respectively, for both RO membranes. The silica fouling predominantly occurred in the second stage of the RO systems, and membrane autopsy revealed that the foulant layer was primarily comprised of inorganic elements (10% organic, 90% inorganic) including silicon and a small amount of aluminium. The antiscalant and chemical cleaning were essential to minimize silica scaling and to restore flux; however, the flux decline rates were faster in the subsequent cycles indicating the detrimental effects of silica deposition. The annual chemical cost could be significantly high due to the increased frequency of chemical cleaning.

Research highlights

► Impacts of silica fouling on sustainable flux and recovery of BWRO membranes were studied through pilot-scale testing. ► Effects of membrane type, recovery, antiscalant type and dose in minimizing silica scaling were examined. ► Potential economical impact of silica scaling on chemical cleaning schemes was investigated.

Introduction

Brackish groundwater constitutes more than half of the total available groundwater comprising the global water balance [1]. This water is expected to be considered more frequently as an alternative source of drinking water in the near future [2], [3], [4], [6]. Based on a recent survey, about 19% of the desalination plants in the world are installed for brackish water treatment [5]. Brackish groundwater typically contains a high level of total dissolved solids (TDS) ranging from 1000–10,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L). As such, the treatment of this water requires a desalination process such as reverse osmosis, electrodialysis reversal, multiple effect distillation, or multistage flash evaporation. Reverse osmosis (RO) is one of the most widely considered treatment technologies for brackish groundwater desalination in the US and other parts of the world [7], [8], [9], [10]. According to a recent survey, about 59% of the total desalination systems installed in the world (i.e. 13,869 desalination plants) are reverse osmosis systems [5]. Moreover, with the continual emergence of micro-contaminants, water treatment trains are increasingly being designed to achieve multiple treatment objectives that can be effectively met by this technology [10].

High concentration of ions in the brackish groundwater source often increase membrane scaling through precipitation of sparingly soluble salts [11], [12]. In brackish RO systems, the dissolved salts are normally concentrated 4 to10 times, often causing high concentrations of ions exceeding the solubility at the membrane surfaces [13], [14]. Therefore, the inorganic composition and scaling potential of the brackish groundwater need to be carefully examined prior to designing RO systems for desalination. While seawater chemistry is dominated by sodium and chloride ions; divalent calcium and sulfate ions constitute a major fraction of the TDS content of the brackish groundwater [15], [16]. Thus, mineral scaling primarily through crystallization and particle formation at the membrane surface by these ions are important factors determining the operational conditions of the RO process [17], [18], [19], [20]. Calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, and barium sulfate are some of the most common inorganic salts responsible for surface (i.e., heterogeneous) crystallization and scaling on the membrane surface [21], [22]. In order to alleviate mineral precipitation and improve membrane productivity, strategies like pH adjustment, antiscalant addition, and chemical cleaning have been successfully used [23], [24], [25], [26].

The presence of high levels of silica along with sparingly soluble ions may pose substantial challenge to the implementation of brackish groundwater desalination using RO membranes [27]. The complex chemistry of silica could cause scaling effects in various ways [28]. A number of mechanisms of silica scaling have been hypothesized including (i) colloidal submicron silica deposition on the membrane in an agglomerated form [29], (ii) polymerization of silicates in the bulk solution and on the membrane surface [30], [31], and (iii) co-precipitation of silicates and deposition on the membrane surface [32]. Koo et al. (2001) showed that an increase in the concentration of calcium and magnesium enhanced the polymerization of silica on the membrane surface [33].

Many of these published studies investigated silica scaling on RO membranes through short-term bench-scale tests, some of which demonstrated that the scaling caused by silica could be different compared to mineral salt precipitation. For example, Braun et al. demonstrated that the scaling layer formed by divalent ions (e.g., Ca2+) is significantly different from the scaling layer developed by silica [34]. Forensic evaluation of the exhausted membrane surface indicated that silica formed an amorphous solid layer rather than a crystalline solid typically caused by heterogeneous crystallization of divalent ions [29], [33]. Therefore, due to the difference in scaling mechanisms, the effectiveness of mineral scaling inhibition strategies (e.g., antiscalant addition, chemical cleaning) in minimizing the effect of silica scaling on the membrane performance is still requires better understanding. For instance, there is still a need to understand the impact of silica on the RO membranes over an extended period of time in order to determine the impact of silica scaling on the chemical cleaning interval and consequently on annual chemical consumptions.

Furthermore, bench-scale testing and computer modeling approaches for membrane performance prediction have inherent limitations to evaluate the effects of antiscalants and chemical cleaning on the sustainable flux and recovery. Such information could be critically important for widespread application of the RO for the brackish groundwater treatment containing high concentrations of silica. The specific objectives were to: (a) evaluate the long-term effect of high silica on the sustainable flux and recovery of two BWRO membranes, (b) understand the rate of flux decline for a number of subsequent cleaning cycles, (c) determine the effectiveness of antiscalants and chemical cleaning minimizing the impacts of silica scaling, and (d) estimate economic impacts of the silica scaling on the chemical consumption.

Section snippets

Feed water

Groundwater samples from the San Pasqual Basin of San Diego, CA were employed. Upon receipt, the water samples were stored at 4 °C to prevent any precipitation and microbial growth during storage. Historical water quality of the groundwater source is presented in Table 1. The average TDS and silica concentrations were about 1315 and 63 mg/L, respectively.

Membranes

Four BWRO membranes were evaluated at bench scale: Membrane A (Saehan BLR), Membrane B (Toray TMG10), Membrane C (Hydranautics ESPA2) and

Selection of membranes for piloting

A large number of RO membranes are available from different manufacturers for brackish groundwater desalination. The evaluation of a wide variety of membranes through pilot-scale testing is often time consuming and economically prohibitive. Therefore, flat-sheet bench-scale evaluations were utilized in this study to select two BWRO membranes. Specific fluxes of four tested membranes, a measure of membrane resistance and productivity, were determined. The results suggested that Membranes A (0.82 

Conclusions

Silica scaling and its impacts on RO membrane performance has been a major concern for water utilities. This study conducted with two new generation BWRO membranes showed that the presence of 63 mg/L of silica limited the operational flux and recovery to 16.9 Lm 2 h 1 and 75%, respectively for a brackish groundwater with a TDS content of about 1315 mg/L. Silica scaling predominantly occurred in the second stage of the RO system while the first stage specific flux was fairly consistent. At that

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following individuals and organizations for their contributions to the successful completion of the project: Dr. Samer Adham with Conoco Philips, and Dale Rohe, Karla Kinser, Zakir Hirani and Eric Bruce of MWH for their valuable advice. Susan Brannian and lab staffs at the City of San Diego Alvarado Water Quality Laboratory are also acknowledged for analytical support. This research was funded through California Proposition 13 under the

References (48)

  • A. Al-Amoudi et al.

    Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2007)
  • R. Semiat et al.

    Technique for evaluating silica scaling and its inhibition in RO desalting

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • R.Y. Ning

    Discussion of silica speciation, fouling, control and maximum reduction

    Desalination

    (2003)
  • R. Semiat et al.

    Scaling of RO membranes from silica supersaturated solutions

    Desalination

    (2003)
  • R. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Effects of water quality on silica fouling of desalination plants

    Desalination

    (1999)
  • R. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Pretreatment and the effect of cations and anions on prevention of silica fouling

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • C.J. Gabelich et al.

    The role of dissolved aluminum in silica chemistry for membrane processes

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • T. Koo et al.

    Silica fouling and cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • G. Braun et al.

    Investigation of silica scaling on reverse osmosis membranes

    Desalination

    (2010)
  • M. Elimelech et al.

    Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1997)
  • R.P. Schneider et al.

    Analysis of foulant layer in all elements of an RO train

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2005)
  • R. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Performance of RO membranes in silica bearing waters

    Desalination

    (2000)
  • P.H. Gleick

    Water resources

  • H. Cooley et al.

    Desalination, with a grain of salt — a California perspective

    Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security

    (2006)
  • Cited by (55)

    • Mitigation mechanisms of silica scaling on different organic-fouled nanofiltration membrane surface

      2024, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    • Impact of polarity reversal on inorganic scaling on carbon nanotube-based electrically-conducting nanofiltration membranes

      2023, Chemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, inland brine disposal presents numerous ecological concerns, as brine disposal solutions (e.g., evaporation ponds) can damage the environment [10]. BGW contains elevated concentrations of dissolved divalent ions (calcium, magnesium, carbonates, and sulfate), as well as silicates [11–13]. During BGW desalination, these ions accumulate in the CP layer where their concentrations exceed the solubility of CaCO3, CaSO4, and silica gels (SiO2); importantly, the membrane/water interface facilitates heterogeneous nucleation of these solids, which is the reason for their rapid formation [14,15].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text