Resin viscosity determines the condition for a valid exposure reciprocity law in dental composites
Introduction
In photochemistry, using different combinations of irradiance (radiant flux per unit area) and exposure time is justified by the Bunsen–Roscoe reciprocity law [1] (also referred to as the exposure reciprocity law, ERL). For example, in restorative dentistry the ever-increasing demand from dentists for reducing the exposure time (i.e., reducing chairside time) in photocuring composites has led to high irradiance LED curing units (e.g., >2 W/cm2) [2]. The ERL states that for a given radiant exposure (defined as the total radiant energy received per unit area = irradiance × exposure time), the polymerization (the degree of conversion from monomers to polymers, DC) of the resin does not change with any combination of irradiance and exposure time. However, studies in the literature have debated rather inconclusively about the validity of the ERL in dentistry [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. The results of these studies depended on the combination of the photocuring conditions (irradiances and radiant exposures) and materials (model dental resins/composites and commercial composites) used. The objective of this work is to address the discrepancies regarding the validity debate and, hence, promote a better understanding of the applicability of the ERL as it pertains to resin-based dental composites.
Although a few studies showed that the ERL for dental materials was valid [14,15], a majority of the studies showed that the ERL was invalid. These studies can be divided broadly into two categories. In the first category, the ERL has been demonstrated not to be valid since a higher DC was obtained using a higher irradiance in comparison to lower irradiances [5,13,17]. For example, Wydra et al. [13] showed that using a high irradiance (0.024 W/cm2) UV-cure on a dimethacrylate resin mixture resulted in a higher DC when compared to using a low irradiance (0.003 W/cm2). Leprince et al. [5] showed the same trend when a dimethacrylate resin and composite were cured with Lucirin-TPO as the initiator. Some theoretical arguments made in these studies, in support of their results, state that the ERL cannot be valid since the DC, derived from the classical equation for the rate of photopolymerization [18,19], is not proportional to the first order of the radiant exposure. Conversely, in the second category, a large number of studies have indicated the ERL not to be valid as a lower DC was obtained using a higher irradiance in comparison to lower irradiances [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12],16]. For example, Hadis et al. [10] showed that DC achieved using a higher irradiance of 3 W/cm2 was significantly lower than that using an irradiance of 0.4 W/cm2 for a range of commercial dental composites. Similar trends were seen by Feng et al. [3,4] when they examined the validity of the ERL on a range of multifunctional acrylate resins, methacrylate resins, and commercial composites. Due to the clinical resemblance of the materials used in these studies, this study will primarily address the ERL validity in this category. Also, subsequently, results and discussion are provided regarding the first category as mentioned earlier.
In addition to exploring the validity of the ERL, some studies also discussed the effect of irradiance, at a constant radiant exposure, on other key properties of the composites. These properties involve, but are not limited to, polymerization stress (PS) due to shrinkage, the temperature change (TC) due to the reaction exotherm and absorbance associated with the photocuring process, and the hardness. For example, it has been discussed that photocuring with high irradiance may increase PS and effectively decrease the bond strength to the tooth [[20], [21], [22]]. Although an increase in irradiance will increase the rate of PS, it is speculative as to whether this will lead to a higher PS [13,[23], [24], [25], [26], [27]]. The exothermic temperature increases due to the increase of irradiance, along with the temperature rise due to the absorbance. This can potentially lead to pulpal and dental tissue damage [[28], [29], [30]]; however, only a few studies on the validity of the ERL [17,31] have measured TC. The hardness of the composites was also evaluated, sometimes as a substitute to measuring the DC, to test the validity of the ERL [16]. As these properties are clinically relevant, in the current study they will also be measured and discussed in conjunction with the discussion of the ERL.
A systematic study involving the variation of the composition of model dental composites and the photocuring conditions has been carried out in this work to address the validity of the exposure reciprocity law (ERL) with respect to the DC. Model dimethacrylate dental resins blended of Bis-GMA (bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate)/TEGDMA (triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate) or UDMA (urethane dimethacrylate)/TEGDMA at different ratios were used. The resin blends were mixed with a fixed mass of visible-light initiator system (camphorquinone and ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate) and with varied content of a silanized micro-sized glass filler. A NIST-developed standard reference instrument (NIST SRI 6005) [32,33] coupled with NIR spectroscopy and a microprobe thermocouple, which simultaneously measures DC, PS, and TC in real time during the photocuring process, was used in this study. After the measurement of the polymerization properties, the Vickers hardness test was performed for the composites. The result from this study indicates that for every dental composite there exists a minimum radiant exposure required for adequate polymerization (i.e., insignificant increase in polymerization will be produced with any further increase in the radiant exposure). This minimum depends primarily on the resin viscosity of composite; an empirical model as a function of the resin viscosity is established and verified based on experimental results to predict it. The validity of the ERL should be discussed only if the radiant exposure used in the photocuring process is above this minimum. The ERL is valid with respect to DC for high-fill composites (filler contents >50% by mass, which are clinically relevant to dental composites) while invalid for low-fill composites. The difference between the high-fill and low-fill composites on the ERL validity is largely due to the significance of polymerization temperature effect on the resin viscosity during the photocuring process. The result of the study clarifies discrepancies reported in the literature and gives guidance on the validity of the exposure reciprocity law for dental composites. Also, the empirical model can enable one to determine the exposure time required to adequately cure a given dental composite with the available curing light unit (irradiance). More importantly, when employing a high irradiance and the corresponding exposure time, based on the law, care should be taken such that the associated temperature change in the underlying tissue is clinically acceptable. Finally, although the study is based on dimethacrylate-based resin composites, the conclusions made in this study are applicable to other resin composite systems where the nature of the photopolymerization reaction is primarily influenced by the diffusion-controlled polymerization.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Model composites comprising of typical commercial dental resins filled with silanized inorganic fillers were tested (Table 1). The fillers were mixed with resin blends using a centrifugal mixer (DAC 150FVZ, FlackTek Inc., Landrum, South Carolina, USA).
Uncured composite specimens of disk shape (2.5 mm diameter, 2 mm height, C-factor = diameter/(2 × height) = 0.625) were prepared. The photopolymerization properties of composites were measured using the NIST-developed cantilever beam-based instrument
Results and discussion
It is known that the photopolymerization of dimethacrylate-based resins exhibit autodeceleration (the rate of degree of conversion decreases) [38,39]. Also, the time of the autodeceleration occurrence is similar to that of the peak temperature change (PTC) occurrence [40], even for bulk specimens such as those used in restorative dentistry (Fig. 1a). In addition, the autodeceleration is delayed to occur at a higher degree of conversion (DC) when the irradiance is increased [41]. Accordingly,
Conclusions
This study has demonstrated that for every dental composite there exists a minimum radiant exposure for adequate polymerization (i.e., any further increase in the radiant exposure will produce no significant increase in the polymerization). This minimum predominantly depends on the resin viscosity of composite and is predicted using an empirical equation. The validity of the exposure reciprocity law (ERL) can be evaluated only if the radiant exposure is above this minimum. Afterwards, the
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided through an Interagency Agreement between the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) and NIST [ADE12017-0000]. The donation of the monomers from Esstech Inc. and the filler particles from Dentsply Sirona are greatly appreciated.
References (51)
- et al.
A brief history of LED photopolymerization
Dent Mater
(2013) - et al.
Insufficient cure under the condition of high irradiance and short irradiation time
Dent Mater
(2009) - et al.
Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins
Dent Mater
(2011) - et al.
Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity
Dent Mater
(2003) - et al.
Influence of curing protocol on selected properties of light-curing polymers: degree of conversion, volume contraction, elastic modulus, and glass transition temperature
Dent Mater
(2009) - et al.
High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials
J Dent
(2011) - et al.
Examining exposure reciprocity in a resin based composite using high irradiance levels and real-time degree of conversion values
Dent Mater
(2015) - et al.
Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite
Dent Mater
(2002) - et al.
The reciprocity law concerning light dose–relationships applied to BisGMA/TEGDMA photopolymers: theoretical analysis and experimental characterization
Dent Mater
(2014) - et al.
Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites
Dent Mater
(1996)
Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights
Biomaterials
The effect of ultra-fast photopolymerisation of experimental composites on shrinkage stress, network formation and pulpal temperature rise
Dent Mater
Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers
Prog Polym Sci
Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems
J Dent
Contraction force rate of polymer composites is linearly correlated with irradiance
Dent Mater
Effect of light power density variations on bulk curing properties of dental composites
J Dent
Analyses of a cantilever-beam based instrument for evaluating the development of polymerization stresses
Dent Mater
Simultaneous measurement of polymerization stress and curing kinetics for photo-polymerized composites with high filler contents
Dent Mater
A method for calculating the compliance of bonded-interfaces under shrinkage: validation for Class I cavities
Dent Mater
Influence of instrument compliance and specimen thickness on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurement of light-cured composites
Dent Mater
Progress in dimethacrylate-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency
Dent Mater
Relationships between conversion, temperature and optical properties during composite photopolymerization
Acta Biomater
Rheological properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA flowable resin composites with various macrofiller/microfiller ratio
Dent Mater
Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations
Dent Mater
Analysis of camphorquinone in visible light-cured composite resins
Dent Mater
Cited by (24)
Shrinkage stress evolution during photopolymerization: Theory and experiments
2023, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of SolidsEffect of thickness on the degree of conversion of two bulk-fill and one conventional posterior resin-based composites at high irradiance and high temporal resolution
2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :This network traps the radicals and growing chains and limits further access to more of the unreacted monomers, thus reducing the overall polymer production (Feng and Suh, 2007; Kurdikar et al., 2002). The unimolecular termination process associated with radical trapping becomes more critical at lower degrees of conversion, and higher viscosity RBCs are thought to be more likely to exhibit exposure reciprocity compared to their flowable counterparts (Hadis et al., 2011; Palagummi et al., 2020). However, exposure reciprocity should hold near the end of the polymerization because the monomolecular radical trapping pathway terminates most of the radicals.
Direct and indirect eluates from bulk fill resin-based-composites
2022, Dental MaterialsCitation Excerpt :It is used as a paint and coating additive and as a photosensitive chemical. In composites, as well as for food packaging, it is used with CQ as a photoinitiator [41,42]. It is found in the eluates from all BF-RBCs independent from the group.