Elsevier

Dental Materials

Volume 22, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages 283-290
Dental Materials

Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: The effect of surface conditioning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

This study evaluated the effect of three surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to a glass-infiltrated zirconia-reinforced alumina-based core ceramic.

Methods

Thirty blocks (5×5×4 mm) of In-Ceram Zirconia ceramics (In-Ceram Zirconia-INC-ZR, VITA) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in resin composite. The specimens were polished and assigned to one of the following three treatment conditions (n=10): (1) Airborne particle abrasion with 110 μm Al2O3 particles + silanization, (2) Silica coating with 110 μm SiOx particles (Rocatec Pre and Plus, 3M ESPE) + silanization, (3) Silica coating with 30 μm SiOx particles (CoJet, 3M ESPE) + silanization. The ceramic-composite blocks were cemented with the resin cement (Panavia F) and stored at 37 °C in distilled water for 7 days prior to bond tests. The blocks were cut under coolant water to produce bar specimens with a bonding area of approximately 0.6 mm2. The bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine (cross-head speed: 1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths of the specimens of each block were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α≤0.05).

Results

Silica coating with silanization either using 110 μm SiOx or 30 μm SiOx particles increased the bond strength of the resin cement (24.6±2.7 MPa and 26.7±2.4 MPa, respectively) to the zirconia-based ceramic significantly compared to that of airborne particle abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 (20.5±3.8 MPa) (ANOVA, P<0.05).

Significance

Conditioning the INC-ZR ceramic surfaces with silica coating and silanization using either chairside or laboratory devices provided higher bond strengths of the resin cement than with airborne particle abrasion using 110 μm Al2O3.

Introduction

Etching the inner surfaces of ceramics with glassy matrix using hydrofluoric acid followed by the application of a silane coupling agent is an efficient conditioning method for bonding resin composite [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However neither etching with this agent nor adding silane resulted in an adequate resin bond to some new high-strength ceramics [7], [8]. Particularly high-alumina [9], [10], [11], [12] or zirconia-reinforced ceramics [13], [14] cannot be roughened by hydrofluoric acid etching since such ceramics do not contain a silicon dioxide (silica) phase. Similarly, cement adhesion to glass-infiltrated zirconia–alumina ceramic (In-Ceram Zirconia-INC-ZR) is also not favorable since this ceramic presents the same characteristics due to its high crystal content (aluminum oxide: ±67 wt%; zirconium oxide: ±13 wt%) and limited vitreous phase (lanthanum aluminum silicate: ±20 wt%) [15]. For this reason, special conditioning systems are indicated for these types of ceramics [16].

Previous investigations revealed that most clinical failures have initiated from the cementation or internal surfaces. Failure rates due to high-strength ceramic fractures have been reported to range between 2.3 and 8% [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, the integrity of the luting cement to ceramic surfaces plays a major role in the longevity of the restoration and the failures originated from cementation surfaces identified the need for a reliable conditioning method to strengthen this critical area.

Modern surface conditioning methods require airborne particle abrasion of the surface before bonding in order to achieve high bond strength. One such system is silica coating. In this technique, the surfaces are air-abraded with aluminum oxide particles modified with silisic acid [20], [21]. The blasting pressure results in the embedding of silica particles on the ceramic surface, rendering the silica-modified surface chemically more reactive to the resin through silane coupling agents. Silane molecules, after being hydrolized to silanol, can form polysiloxane network or hyroxyl groups cover the silica surface. Monomeric ends of the silane molecules react with the methacrylate groups of the adhesive resins by free radical polymerization process. When a ceramic exhibits chemical states of silicon and oxygen, then siloxane bond will be achieved as these represent the binding sites for the coupling agent to the ceramic surface. Since silane coupling agents do not bond well to alumina, the bond strengths of resin composite to such ceramics could be affected [10].

Air-particle abrasion is a prerequisite for achieving sufficient bond strength between the resins and high-strength ceramics that are reinforced either with alumina or zirconia [22]. The air abrasion systems rely on air-particle abrasion with different particle sizes ranging from 30 to 250 μm [16], [23]. The abrasive process removes loose contaminated layers and the roughened surface provides some degree of mechanical interlocking or ‘keying’ with the adhesive. It can be argued that the increased roughness also forms a larger surface area for the bond. While these mechanisms explain some of the general characteristics of adhesion to roughened surfaces, it may also introduce physico-chemical changes that affect surface energy and wettability. Such conditioning systems could be applied either at the laboratory or chairside, using large or small size particles. However, there is limited knowledge as to whether micromechanical retention using large or small particle size increase resin bond to high-strength ceramics of different microstructures and chemical compositions.

A high and reliable resin bond to alumina and zirconia ceramics was also achieved with airborne particle abrasion and by using a phosphate monomer (MDP) containing resin composite luting cement. Although there are some studies on bond strength of resin cements to the zirconium-based ceramics [24], [25], [26], to the authors' knowledge, no study has investigated the bond strength of phosphate-monomer based resin cement to zirconium-reinforced ceramics in combination with conditioning methods that rely on chairside conditioning systems.

The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the effect of three surface conditioning methods based on airborne particle abrasion, employing three types of sand particles, on the microtensile bond strength of the resin cement to a glass-infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Thirty blocks (5×5×4 mm) of zirconia-reinforced alumina-based ceramics [In-Ceram Zirconia-INC-ZR (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany)] were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ceramic surfaces were ground finished up to 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive (3M, St. Paul, USA) in a polishing machine (Labpol 8–12, Extec, USA) and cleaned for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath (Quantrex 90, L&R Ultrasonics, Kearny, NJ, USA) containing ethylacetate and air-dried. Each ceramic block

Results

The results of the microtensile bond strength tests for three surface conditioning methods are presented in Table 2.

Silica coating with silanization either with 110 μm SiOx particles or 30 μm SiOx revealed significantly higher bond strengths of the resin cement (24.6±2.6 MPa and 26.7±2.4 MPa, respectively) to the INC-ZR ceramic compared to that of airborne particle abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 (20.5±3.8 MPa) (ANOVA, P=0.0004). There were no significant differences between both silica coating groups (P

Discussion

In this study, roughening the zirconia-reinforced ceramic surfaces with air particle abrasion and applying silane prior to cementation provided high bond strengths and silica coating followed by silanization evidently enhanced the bond between the luting cement and the ceramic surfaces. The silica layer left by silica coating on the ceramic surface provides a basis for silane to react. In the ceramic-resin bond, silane functions as a coupling agent, which adsorbs onto and alters the surface of

Conclusions

Silica coating either with 110 μm SiOx particles or 30 μm SiOx followed by silanization increased the bond strength of the phosphate monomer-based resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic when compared with airborne particle abrasion using 110 μm Al2O3 and silanization.

Acknowledgements

We express our appreciation to the Wilcos Ltd in Brazil (Petrópolis/RJ, Brazil) and VITA Zahnfabrik (Bad Säckingen, Germany) for providing some of the materials used in this study. We also thank Prof. Dr. Ivan Balducci, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University at São José dos Campos, Brazil, for his assistance with statistical analysis.

References (37)

  • M.B. Blatz et al.

    Resin–ceramic bonding: a review of the literature

    J Prosthet Dent

    (2003)
  • C. Piconi et al.

    Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial

    Biomaterials

    (1999)
  • Y. Shimada et al.

    Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics

    Dent Mater

    (2002)
  • J.R. Mackert et al.

    Water-enhanced crystallization of leucite in dental porcelain

    Dent Mater

    (2000)
  • J.R. Calamia

    Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art

    Quintessence Int

    (1985)
  • I. Stangel et al.

    Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain

    J Dent Res

    (1987)
  • J.I. Nicholls

    Tensile bond to resin cements to porcelain veneers

    J Prosthet Dent

    (1998)
  • D.M. Wolf et al.

    Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain

    Am J Dent

    (1993)
  • Cited by (198)

    • A split-Chevron-Notched-Beam sandwich specimen for fracture toughness testing of bonded interfaces

      2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the superior bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse systems over one-step systems has been widely reported in both in-vitro experiments (Van Meerbeek et al., 2010) as well as in clinical trials (Peumans et al., 2014), with universal adhesives eventually (Wagner et al., 2014), but not consistently showing better performance than original one-step systems (Chen et al., 2015; Perdigão, 2020). As far as the pre-treatment of zirconia is concerned, grit-blasting has been repeatedly shown to upgrade the bond quality of untreated surfaces (Amaral et al., 2006; Blatz et al., 2004; Valandro et al., 2006), with silicatization procedures yielding comparable or improved bonding than alternative strategies (Attia et al., 2011; Otani et al., 2015; Ozcan et al., 2008; Thammajaruk et al., 2022). Our results further show that the use of an additional coat of an MDP-primer results in improved debonding energy compared to using solely an MDP-containing luting agent (Group 1 vs. Group 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text