Elsevier

Physics of the Dark Universe

Volume 11, March 2016, Pages 74-78
Physics of the Dark Universe

Energy peak: Back to the Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

We propose a novel mechanism enabling us to have a continuum bump as a signature of gamma-ray excess in indirect detection experiments of dark matter (DM), postulating a generic dark sector having (at least) two DM candidates. With the assumption of non-zero mass gap between the two DM candidates, the heavier one directly communicates to the partner of the lighter one. Such a partner then decays into a lighter DM particle along with an “axion-like” particle (ALP) or dark “pion”, which subsequently decays into a pair of photons, via a more-than-one step cascade decay process. Since the cascade is initiated by the dark partner obtaining a non-trivial fixed boost factor, a continuum γ-ray energy spectrum naturally arises even with a particle directly decaying into two photons. We apply the main idea to the energy spectrum of the GeV γ-rays from around the Galactic Center (GC), and find that the relevant observational data is well-reproduced by the theory expectation predicted by the proposed mechanism. Remarkably, the relevant energy spectrum has a robust peak at half the mass of the ALP or dark pion, as opposed to popular DM models directly annihilating to Standard Model particles where physical interpretations of the energy peak are not manifest. Our data analysis reports substantially improved fits, compared to those annihilating DM models, and 900MeV mass of the ALP or dark pion.

Introduction

There is astrophysical and cosmological evidence that DM exists in the Universe (see, for example, Ref.  [1]). Relevant observations, mostly rooted in its gravitational effects, can be explained by postulating new stable particles, not belonging to particle species in the Standard Model (SM). With this situation, there is a tremendous amount of effort to detect DM candidates: (1) direct detection experiments by measuring recoil energy of nuclei scattered off by DM, (2) indirect detection experiments by observing signals stemming from DM annihilation or decay, and (3) collider searches by actively producing DM particles and observing associated collider signatures. Among those experimental efforts, satellite-based cosmic-ray detection experiments such as PAMELA  [2], [3], AMS-02  [4], [5], and Fermi-LAT  [6], [7] have received particular attention due to their great sensitivity to cosmic-ray signals, giving rise to better chance to have not only confirmation of the existence of DM but also the information for deducing DM properties.

The Fermi-LAT Collaboration has provided the public data based on their observations, and a γ-ray excess at O(GeV) coming from the GC has been found. In particular, it has recently reported in Ref.  [8] that the excess exists, even assuming different foreground/background models. The relevant program was initiated by Ref.  [9], and their intriguing observation has been strengthened by a series of their follow-up analyses and other independent groups  [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Unlike other photon excesses such as 3.5 keV line  [21], [22], 511 keV line  [23], and 130 GeV line  [24], [25], this is characterized by a continuum bump. The basic claim is that the γ-ray excess spectrum is sufficiently consistent with the expected emission spectrum from charged particles in the SM into which DM particles are annihilated. More specifically, the GeV excess is well-accommodated by a DM scenario where a pair of DM particles with a mass of 3040GeV annihilate into a bb̄ pair with an annihilation cross section of σv2×1026cm3/s   [17], [20]. As an alternative annihilation channel, lepton pairs have been studied as well in Ref.  [18] where they pointed out the significance of the contributions coming from the diffuse photons from primary and secondary electrons that are produced in DM annihilation processes. They further analyzed the data including the inverse Compton scattering and bremsstrahlung contributions from electrons, and found that the data is well-described by 10GeV DM annihilating into a ̄ pair, for which the associated annihilation cross section is given by σv(12)×1026cm3/s   [18]. Moreover, Ref.  [26] showed that the GeV excess can be reproduced by other heavy SM final states such as W+W/ZZ/hh/tt̄ with a DM particle of mDM80200GeV and σv(28)×1026cm3/s, depending on the final state with the systematic uncertainties in the gamma-ray background modeling taken into account. In Ref.  [20], it was also shown that gg/W+W/ZZ/hh/tt̄ final states can provide a good fit to the excess with mDM40200GeV and σv(18)×1026cm3/s.

We remark that some of the realistic DM models have been proposed and studied: for example, Refs.  [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32] for the bb̄ final state through a Higgs portal type interaction, Refs.  [33], [34] for the ̄ final state, Refs.  [35], [36], [37] for DM annihilating to a pair of on-shell particles that subsequently decay into SM ff̄ pairs, Ref.  [38] even for 2n pairs of SM ff̄ final states from on-shell mediator pairs through multi-step cascades, and Ref.  [39] for generic model constraints. Although the recent report from the AMS-02 Collaboration  [40] has started to rule out the qq̄ final state dominant DM scenarios explaining the measured relic abundance  [41], it is straightforward to invoke hybrid scenarios where bb̄ and ̄ modes are mixed together.

One should notice that the astrophysical uncertainty in γ-rays coming from the GC in conjunction with the background modeling for the emission in the inner galaxy is still large. In addition, pions from the collision between cosmic-rays and gas  [10], [11], [12], [14] and millisecond pulsars  [10], [11], [12], [14], [16], [42] can be sources to the GeV scale γ-rays. Therefore, they have been proposed as a different approach to interpret the excess although the relevant spectral shape appears too soft at the sub-GeV energy regime to accommodate the observed energy spectrum  [43]. When it comes to the morphological feature for the observed excess, it is extended to more than ∼10° from the GC beyond the boundary of the central stellar cluster that could contain a large number of millisecond pulsars  [18], and observed distributions of gas seem to give a poor fit to the spatial distribution of the signal  [18], [44], [45]. We finally point out that very recently, another non-DM interpretation has been suggested by Ref.  [46], [47]. They basically came up with a new method to characterize unresolved point sources based on which the excess can be explained by a population of unresolved point sources, giving a distribution consistent with the observed GeV γ-ray excess in the relevant region.

Notwithstanding those potential issues, we here propose another novel mechanism to attain continuum energy spectra of the γ-ray excess, positing the DM interpretation. We first remark that there could exist multiple DM species, and the DM models based on such a DM framework can give rise to not only non-trivial cosmological implications (e.g., “assisted freeze-out”  [48]) but interesting phenomenology (see, e.g., “boosted DM”  [49], [50], [51]). In this context, we assume a DM partner having a non-trivial and fixed boost, which could be achieved by the annihilation of another (heavier) DM. The DM partner is further assumed to undergo a 2 step “dark” cascade decay, and emit, in the final step, a (lighter) DM particle along with an ALP or dark pion that subsequently decays into two photons. Fig. 1 schematically depicts the example “dark” cascade scenario of our interest. We shall discuss the minimality of this DM scenario in conjunction with the elaboration of formalism later. We emphasize that the relevant ALP or dark pion comes with a non-trivial boost distribution, typically rise-and-fall-shaped. As a consequence, the resulting photon energy spectrum becomes a broad distribution.1

A novel feature of this type of energy distribution is that the peak of the photon energy distribution is exactly the same as half the mass of the ALP or dark pion  [52], [53]. In other words, such a peak position is robustly connected to a physical property. This is not the case for other interpretations such as the DM models directly annihilating to SM particles because their energy peak highly depends on models of parton showering, diffusion mechanism, and so on from which the final photon spectrum is generated. We emphasize that the proposed strategy is completely generic to be applicable to any continuum bump in cosmic-ray energy spectra, not restricted to the γ-ray excess at hand even if we employ it as a concrete and realistic example.

Section snippets

Model set-up and formalism

To set up the dark matter scenario to which our strategy is applied,2 we first introduce a dark sector containing (at least) two DM candidates. We then assume that one of the DM particles is heavier than the other and the heavier one (henceforth denoted by χh) communicates to the SM sector via the lighter one (henceforth denoted by

Data analysis and discussions

We next conduct the fit to the spectrum of the observed GC GeV γ-ray excess with the expected shape in Eq. (6). The relevant data points are taken from Ref.  [17]. Since their data is reported in the plane of Eγ versus Eγ2dNdEγ, i.e., weighted energy spectra, we practically perform the fit with Eγ2fM(Eγ). The fits are done with both of their regions of interest (ROIs): (i) 1°<|b|<20° and |l|<20°, and (ii) full-sky with |b|>1°, where b and l are the Galactic latitude and longitude, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have shown that for the GC GeV γ-ray excess, an alternative avenue of generating continuum bump is available with the DM interpretation. More specifically speaking, as a basic and minimal set-up, we introduced a dark sector in which there exist (at least) two DM candidates, the heavier and the lighter ones. The heavier DM particle is set to communicate to the SM sector via the lighter DM particle, but heavier DM particles are assumed to annihilate into an intermediate state

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Kaustubh Agashe and Kyoungchul Kong for a careful reading of the draft and useful discussions. D.K. is supported by the LHC Theory Initiative postdoctoral fellowship (NSF Grant No. PHY-0969510) and J-C.P. is supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2061561). We appreciate CETUP* (Center for Theoretical Underground Physics and Related Areas) for its hospitality during

References (61)

  • G. Bertone et al.

    Phys. Rep.

    (2005)
  • D. Hooper et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2011)
  • D. Hooper et al.

    Phys. Dark Univ.

    (2013)
  • T. Mondal et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2015)
  • B. Kyae et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2014)
  • K. Kong et al.

    Nuclear Phys. B

    (2014)
  • K. Kong et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2015)
  • K. Agashe et al.

    Phys. Dark Univ.

    (2013)
  • D. Kim et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2015)
  • O. Adriani

    Nature

    (2009)
  • O. Adriani

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • M. Aguilar

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • L. Accardo

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2014)
  • M. Ackermann

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2010)
  • M. Ackermann

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2012)
  • M. Ajello, et al. [Fermi-LAT Collaboration], arXiv:1511.02938...
  • L. Goodenough, D. Hooper, arXiv:0910.2998...
  • D. Hooper et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2011)
  • K.N. Abazajian et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2012)

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2013)
  • C. Gordon et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2013)

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2014)
  • W.C. Huang, A. Urbano, W. Xue, arXiv:1307.6862...
  • K.N. Abazajian et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2014)
  • T. Daylan, D.P. Finkbeiner, D. Hooper, T. Linden, S.K.N. Portillo, N.L. Rodd, T.R. Slatyer, arXiv:1402.6703...
  • T. Lacroix et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2014)
  • F. Calore et al.

    J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.

    (2015)
  • F. Calore et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2015)
  • E. Bulbul et al.

    Astrophys. J.

    (2014)
  • A. Boyarsky et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2014)
  • P. Jean et al.

    Astronom. Astrophys.

    (2003)
  • T. Bringmann et al.

    J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.

    (2012)
  • View full text