Social media as a new playing field for the governance of agro-food sustainability
Introduction
Agro-food sustainability is a contentious theme on social media that pulls together farmers, citizen-consumers, businesses, politicians, journalists and other actors. Issues such as animal welfare, GMO and food safety generate high levels of social media activity. The rapid and fluid interaction on social media combined with high public concerns about the transparency and sustainability of the agro-food sector generates opportunities and challenges for different actors in the agro-food system. Since social media bring together commercial, political, and public interests in a new arena, with new roles and new rules, we consider social media to constitute an important new playing field in the governance of agro-food sustainability.
It is yet unclear however, what dynamics are at play in this new field and in what ways these dynamics influence the governance of agro-food sustainability. Despite the rise of studies on social media and politics1 this body of literature lacks integration and theoretical reflection to capture social media as a field of governance. Moreover, there is little research on social media in the agro-food domain specifically. This paper combines different strands of literature in order to infer the ways in which social media could influence the governance of agro-food sustainability. The results are presented in the form of three pathways, which highlight how the interaction of players generates emergent dynamics that affect the governance of agro-food sustainability.
Section snippets
Method and conceptual lens of the review
The literature review for this paper was conducted at the interfaces of four fields: social media, governance, agro-food and sustainability (Figure 1a). With a list of key-words for each field we searched all overlapping areas.2 Because of the limited number of studies at the intersection of all areas, this review mainly applied the insights from social media literature
Pathway 1: hypes on agro-food sustainability issues
The agro-food sector is frequently confronted with media hypes on issues of food safety, transparency and other sustainability issues. Recent ‘food scandals’, such as the salmonella outbreak in 2012 and the horse-meat adulteration scandal in 2013, are prime examples. Media hypes can influence public opinion and impact the governance of agro-food systems. Although hypes have only been studied as news waves in mass media, social media are likely to play a key role in today's hypes, particularly
Pathway 2: opportunities for the self-organization of food movements
Since 2010, scholars increasingly talk about a ‘food movement’3 to signify various forms of civic action around agro-food, from global activism to local food systems [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. The ‘food movement’, or perhaps we should say ‘movements’, is unified by little more than the claim that industrial food production is in need
Pathway 3: data for new forms of agro-food governance
Although organizations in the agro-food system are challenged by the disruptive effects of erratic information flows, mass self-communication on social media also generates data for new forms of governance. Social media data informs organizations about their environment. This is used for public or customer engagement, issue-management, risk and crisis communication, but especially for advertising and marketing purposes.
Although little empirical research has been carried out in the agro-food
Conclusion and directions for further research
In this article we have presented social media as a space where various players and games converge and through their interactions create emergent dynamics that have implications for the governance of agro-food sustainability. Social media was reviewed as a space for public information dissemination in the form of networked mass communication, a space for interactive communication as the basis of social organisation, and as a space for information sourcing to support decision-making.
In the
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
References (56)
- et al.
The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations
Gov Inf Q
(2012) - et al.
Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical
Gov Inf Q
(2012) - et al.
Social media communication strategies of government agencies: twitter use in Korea and the USA
Asian J Commun
(2014) A review of social media use in E-government
Admin Sci
(2012)- et al.
Predicting the future with social media
Arxiv Prepr arXiv10035699
(2010) - et al.
Theorising social media, politics and the state
Soc Media Polit State
(2014) Environmental governance in the Information Age: the emergence of informational governance
Environ Plan C Gov Policy
(2006)The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication?
J Commun Inq
(2005)- et al.
Discourse theory and critical media politics
Eur J Commun
(2013) Re-constructing digital democracy: an outline of four “positions”
New Media Soc
(2011)