An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates
Introduction
There has been a growing interest, particularly in the few last decades, in the use of composite materials in structural applications ranging from aircraft and space structures to automotive and marine applications. However, their behavior under impact loading is one of the major concerns [1], since impacts do occur during manufacture, normal operations, maintenance and so on. Especially, unidirectional laminated plates are highly susceptible to the transverse impact loads resulting in significant damages such as matrix cracks, delaminations, and fiber fractures. Therefore, a lot of studies have been carried out to help understand and improve the impact response of composite materials and structures [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
In the literature, a lot of experimental, numerical, and analytical studies on the impact response of laminated composite structures in many aspects can be found. Among them, Sadasivam and Mallick [7] have studied on the low energy impact characteristics of four different E-glass fibers reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting matrix composites. Caprino et al. [8] have performed low velocity impact tests on carbon/epoxy laminates of different thicknesses. They have examined the force and absorbed energy at the onset of delamination, the maximum force and related energy, and penetration energy. Some experimental investigations have been carried out by Hosur et al. [9] to determine the response of four different combinations of hybrid laminates subjected to low velocity impact loading. They have indicated that there was considerable improvement in the load carrying capability of hybrid composites as compared to carbon/epoxy laminates with slight reduction in stiffness. Datta et al. [10] have investigated the effects of variable impact energy and laminate thickness on the low velocity impact damage tolerance of GFRP composite laminates. Critical values of impact energy and laminate thickness were also defined. Baucom and Zikry [11] have addressed an experimental study to understand the effects of reinforcement geometry on damage progress in woven composite panels under repeated impact loading. Fuoss et al. [12], [13] have worked on the effects of key stacking sequence parameters on the impact damage resistance in composite laminates.
Wu and Chang [14] have conducted a transient dynamic finite element analysis for studying the response of laminated composite plates subjected to transverse impact loading by a foreign object. They have calculated displacements, the transient stress and the strain distributions through the thickness of laminate during the impact event. A finite element analysis of fiber-reinforced composite plates subjected to low velocity impact has been also done by Tiberkak et al. [15]. Cho and Zhao [16] have investigated the effects of geometric and material parameters such as span to stiffness ratio, out-of-plane stiffness, stacking sequence on mechanical response of graphite epoxy composites under low velocity impact. Aslan et al. [17], [18] have done a numerical and experimental analysis to investigate the effects of the impactor velocity, thickness and in-plane dimensions of target and impactor mass on the response of laminated composite plates under low velocity impact. They have concluded that the peak force in an impact event increases with the thickness of the composite as the contact time decreases.
Mitrevski and co-authors [19], [20] have investigated the effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates using a drop weight test rig. A very useful work regarding the effect of an initial pre-stress on the response of carbon–fiber/epoxy laminated plates subjected to low velocity impact has been carried out by Whittingham et al. [21]. Prior to being impacted, the samples in their study were loaded either uniaxially or biaxially using a specially designed test rig. An energy profiling method, which has been used by some recently [22], [23], seems to be useful to characterize some impact properties, e.g. penetration and perforation thresholds. Hence, the damage process of individual laminates can be reconstructed from comparing the corresponding load–deflection curves, energy profile and images of damaged specimens.
In this study, impact response of the cross-ply and angle-ply glass/epoxy laminates has been investigated. [0/90/0/90]s stacking sequence was chosen for the cross-ply lamination while [0/90/+45/−45]s for the angle-ply one. Damage modes and damage process of laminates under varied impact energies are also discussed. Thanks to the optically transparent nature of glass–epoxy composite, in determining damage mechanism, the impacted samples were visually inspected by using a strong backlighting.
Section snippets
Fabrication of laminates
For making composite plates, unidirectional E-glass fabric having weight of 509 g/m2 was used as reinforcing material. An epoxy matrix based on CY225 resin and HY225 hardener was used. A hot lamination press was used for fabrication of composite plates. For curing process, laminated plates were retained at a constant pressure (15 MPa) and 120 °C during 2 h. The plates fabricated were of two different stacking sequences; [0/90/0/90]s and [0/90/+45/−45]s. Their nominal thicknesses were approximately 3
Impact testing
The tests were performed using an instrumented drop weight testing system, Instron-Dynatup 9250 HV. It is a test system suitable for a wide variety of applications requiring low to high impact energies. A tup insert, which was assumed to be perfectly rigid, with a hemispherical nose of 12.7 mm in diameter was used. The testing machine has a force transducer with capacity of 22.24 kN. The total mass of the impactor used was 5.22 kg. The composite specimen with dimensions of 100 mm by 100 mm was
Energy profiling method (EPM)
Impact energy (Ei) and absorbed energy (Ea) are two important parameters to assess impact response and resistance of composite structures. The impact energy is defined as the total amount of energy introduced to a composite specimen. The absorbed energy is the energy absorbed by the composite specimen through the impact event by formation of damage inside specimen. The diagram showing relationship between Ei and Ea is called as “energy profile”. By comparing the corresponding load–deflection
Results and discussion
A number of tests were performed under various impact energies ranging from 5 J to 80 J in order to examine damage process in stacking sequences [0/90/0/90]s and [0/90/+45/−45]s at room temperature. The overall damage expansion in specimens after impact event is evaluated by visual inspection. Especially, it enables to obtain useful information about overall damage extent of optically transparent composite components, e.g. transparent glass/epoxy plates, by examining them against a brightly lit
Conclusion
This study presents an experimental investigation on the impact response of unidirectional glass/epoxy composite laminates. The concluding remarks drawn from this study can be summarized as:
- •
Except for post-perforation region, the data points of [0/90/0/90]s orientation were nearly overlapped with those of [0/90/+45/−45]s. However, it was observed that the extent and shape of damage shows slight differences for the same impact energies.
- •
An alternative method, based on variation of the excessive
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this study was provided by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), (Project Number: 104M426). Partial financial support by Izoreel firm, in Izmir-Turkey, is also gratefully acknowledged.
References (24)
- et al.
The impact resistance of composite materials – a review
Composites
(1991) - et al.
Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials
Compos Part A
(1996) - et al.
Influence of material thickness on the response of carbon–fabric/epoxy panels to low velocity impact
Compos Sci Technol
(1999) - et al.
Studies on the low-velocity impact response of woven hybrid composites
Compos Struct
(2005) - et al.
Low-velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems
Compos Part A
(2005) - et al.
Effects of stacking sequence on the impact resistance in composite laminates – Part 1: parametric study
Compos Struct
(1998) - et al.
Effects of stacking sequence on the impact resistance in composite laminates. Part 2: prediction method
Compos Struct
(1998) - et al.
Transient dynamic analysis of laminated composite plates subjected to transverse impact
Comput Struct
(1989) - et al.
Damage prediction in composite plates subjected to low velocity impact
Compos Struct
(2008) - et al.
The response of laminated composite plates under low velocity impact loading
Compos Struct
(2003)
The effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates
Compos Struct
The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composite laminates
Compos Struct
Cited by (233)
Experimental investigation on impact behavior of curved sandwich composites with chiral auxetic core
2024, Composite StructuresQuasi-static compression tests of overwrapped composite pressure vessels under low velocity impact
2024, Composite StructuresRole of super-elastic shape memory alloy (SE-SMA) embedment designs on energy absorption in GFRP composites
2022, Materials Today CommunicationsMechanical characterization of novel Parthenium hysterophorus and Jute reinforced polymer matrix composites for light weight medium load applications and application of MADM-VIKOR approach
2024, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science