Quarter-controlled milking in dairy cows

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

The design of a milking stall with special functions for monitoring and control is described. The milk removal process per quarter is described. The milking stall was equipped with four milk containers, whose advancing weight was recorded permanently. The data were online converted into milk flow rate profiles for each quarter. Quarter milk flow profiles were analysed and translated into variables such as milk yield and milking duration for the whole milking or for the increase, steady state, declining and overmilking phases. These variables were used to test the effect of technical milking machine settings (pulsation or milking vacuum, pulsation rate or ratio and detachment level) on quarter milking performance. Also the effects of the factors of quarter position and milking time were examined. An experiment with three milking vacuum levels, carried out in a milking parlour with these quarter milking facilities is described. Significant effects of vacuum level, quarter position and time of milking on milk yield and milking duration in the defined milk removal phases were shown. Moreover, the effects differed significantly among cows and quarters.

The study reveals marked differences in milk flow profiles per quarter. For optimal milking the milking process control should anticipate these differences and use the information for more efficient milking and safeguarding teat and udder health.

Introduction

Genetic progress, improved management and feeding, and higher milking frequencies are causing a strong increase in the daily milk yields per cow. As a consequence, the duration of milk removal increased drastically (Ipema and Benders, 1992). More mechanical stress is exerted on the cows’ teats and udder, which is reflected by harmful effects on teat sphincters (Ipema and Benders, 1992). Severe abnormalities in sphincters are often associated with mastitis (Neijenhuis et al., 2004). In current milking practice, often only half of the machine-on time is needed for removing more than three quarters of the available milk (Hogewerf and Ipema, 2000). The large inefficient parts in the milk removal process might also lead to a higher somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk (Naumann et al., 1998) and occasionally result in mastitis. High SCC in milk is undesirable for further processing into consumer products. Moreover, mastitis is a painful disease for the cow. Together with the growing public concern about items as food safety, animal welfare and animal health, these aspects require the milking process to be adapted to a more animal friendly approach.

It is important to realize that the quarters of the udder are four separate compartments. Milk in a quarter can be divided in two categories: the alveolar milk stored in the alveoli and small ducts, and the cisternal milk, stored in the larger ducts of the udder and in the teat cistern. Mechanical stimulation of udder and teats causes the release of the hormone oxytocin in the blood. This release results in the milk letdown reflex, whereby milk from the alveoli is pressed into the ducts and cisterns of the udder.

The action of the milking unit removes the milk from the teat. Milking units consist of a pulsator, milking claw with teat cups, milk container, tubes and pipelines. A teat cup consists of a shell and a liner. The pulsator provides a regular opening and closing of the liner. During a pulsation cycle of about 1 s the liner is open for 50–70% and closed for 30–50% of the time. When the liner is open milk flows from the teat (suction phase). During the time the liner is closed milk removal is stopped.

For efficient milk removal, information about the amount of available milk in the teat cistern is needed. Four main phases in the availability of milk during milking can be distinguished. In the first phase, milk ejection from the alveoli has not started yet. Milk removed from the udder is cisternal milk that has leaked from the alveoli during the interval since last milking. The duration of this first phase is normally less than 90 s. In the second phase, the flow rate of milk removed from the udder and teat cistern is at least equal to the flow rate of ejected milk from the alveoli. In the third phase, the flow rate of milk ejected from the alveoli is smaller than the flow rate of the removed milk. In the fourth phase, the flow of milk from the alveoli has stopped and the available amount in the udder and teat cistern approaches the zero level.

The objectives of this paper were to present: (1) a technique for measuring milk flow per quarter; (2) a description of the general pattern of the milk flow and differences between quarters and (3) the effect of milking machine technical settings.

Section snippets

Milking stall

In Fig. 1, a schematic layout of a milking stall for quarter-controlled milking is given. Cows are milked in a milking box. In a subway, devices were installed for measuring and controlling the milking process for each quarter.

A service arm in the milking box carried the claw with teat cups. This special claw had four chambers for transporting the milk of each quarter independently. Milk flowed to four containers that were installed in the subway. The containers were equipped with load cells.

Results

A total of 2236 quarter milk removal profiles obtained from 16 cows during 18 days were analysed. The mean and standard deviation of quarter milk yield and milking duration parameters are given in Table 1. The results for phase 4 are left out of consideration, because in this phase the milking machine was switched into an almost non-milking setting. In phase 4, less than 1% of the total milk yield was removed. The mean duration of this phase was 0.98 min.

The total milk yield of 4.10 kg was

Discussion

A milking system with accurate milk removal recording per quarter and with quarter adjustable milking machine settings offers possibilities to study the effects of biological (cows, quarters within cows), management (milking frequency, milking times) and technical factors (pulsation settings, liners, detachment criteria) on quarter milk removal parameters.

The main effects of some factors will be discussed with the aim to present directions for further developments in quarter-controlled milking

Conclusions

Milking systems should be able to reach a high capacity expressed in harvested amount of milk per time unit and maintain good udder health (no mastitis) and milk quality (low SCC). Main effects of factors like milking time, teat position and milking machine settings can easily be determined in experiments. However, for controlling a milking process knowledge from the main effects is not sufficient. The effects of many factors arise from interactions, in which factors, such as cow, quarter

References (10)

  • M.D. Rasmussen et al.

    Reverse pressure gradients across the teat canal related to machine milking

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1994)
  • M.A. Davies et al.

    Considerations of teat morphology and milking characteristics for robotic milking conditions

  • Genstat for Windows, Release 7.1, 2003. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, United...
  • P.H. Hogewerf et al.

    Analysis of differences in yield and milk flow properties between front and rear quarters

  • Ipema, A.H., Benders, E., 1992. Production, duration of machine-milking and teat quality of dairy cows milked 2, 3 or 4...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Short communication: Increasing the teatcup removal settings of the last milking quarter did not reduce box time in a pasture-based automatic milking system

    2021, Journal of Dairy Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The 49-s difference in MDQ between the SQ and second SQ observed in this study was similar to that reported by Tančin et al. (2006), who showed an average 43-s MD difference between the quarter with the shortest and longest MD, but a much smaller 3-s difference in MD between the quarters with the average longest and second longest MD. Our results were larger than those of Ipema and Hogewerf (2008), who reported differences in MD of 16 s between the 2 rear quarters, with the 2 rear quarters also identified as having the longest MD. Milk yield influences MD, as previously cited by Edwards et al. (2014); however, it is not the sole factor that can drive MD.

  • Association of quarter milking measurements and cow-level factors in an automatic milking system

    2018, Journal of Dairy Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This result is not in agreement with Tancin et al. (2003), who found similar QPMF between quarters, but supports results from 2 other studies in which higher QPMF was observed in rear quarters than in front quarters (Rothenanger et al., 1995; Tancin et al., 2006). The mean QPMF observed here were greater than the 0.58 to 0.70 kg/min previously reported by Rothschild et al. (1980) and 1.03 kg/min reported by Ipema and Hogewerf (2008), although the SD of 0.36 kg/min observed by Ipema and Hogewerf (2008) was similar to results of the current study. If our observed mean QAMF were aggregated to an approximate mean UAMF (4.0 kg/min), it would be a considerably higher UAMF than the 2.51 and 2.50 kg/min observed in 2 previous AMS studies (de Koning and Ouweltjes, 2000; Hogeveen et al., 2001).

  • Short communication: Cow- and quarter-level milking indicators and their associations with clinical mastitis in an automatic milking system

    2017, Journal of Dairy Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Quarter milk yield was not a potential confounder in our study and, because of this, quarter milk yield was not used as a matching criteria for cases and controls. Quarter peak milk flow rate in case and control quarters ranged from 1.43 to 1.64 kg/min (Table 1) and was greater than QPMF of 1.03 kg/min reported by Ipema and Hogewerf (2008), who enrolled cows that had average daily milk yield of 32 kg that may be considered comparable to our study group. A high degree of correlation between udder (Rothenanger et al., 1995; Halley et al., 2001) and quarter (Weiss et al., 2004) AMF and peak milk flow rate (PMF) has been observed; thus, PMF provides a sound predictor of overall milking speed as indicated by AMF.

  • Online detection of dairy cow subclinical mastitis using electrical conductivity indices of milk

    2016, Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the somatic cell count (SCC) technique cannot provide immediately mastitic information in milking as it requires costly and time-consuming laboratory practice. Online mastitic alert during milking is an essential requirement for automatic milking systems (Mottram, 1997; Hogeveen et al., 2010; Ordolff, 2001; Leitner et al., 2012), based on which, mastitic milk can be isolated from healthy milk to assure quality milk product and it could help in shortening the elapsed time till treatment (Ipema and Hogewerf, 2008). Hence efforts have been devoted to introducing computers and electronics to milking, through which, various milking data are analysed for building an automated subclinical mastitis detection system (Maatje et al., 1997; Mottram, 1997; Kim and Heald, 1999; Shahid et al., 2011).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text