Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 291, Part 3, March 2022, 132981
Chemosphere

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in soils and sediments: Sustainable approaches for extraction and remediation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132981Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The fate of PAHs in contaminated soils and sediments was summarized.

  • Greener methods of PAH extraction for quantitative analysis were reviewed.

  • Sustainable approaches to remediate PAH contaminated soils/sediments were discussed.

  • Biosurfactant-mediated remediation efficiency and toxicity needs further research.

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogenic environmental pollutants that are extremely hydrophobic in nature and resistant to biological degradation. Extraction of PAHs from environmental matrices is the first and most crucial step in PAH quantification. Extraction followed by quantification is essential to understand the extent of contamination prior to the application of remediation approaches. Due to their non-polar structures, PAHs can be adsorbed tightly to the organic matter in soils and sediments, making them more difficult to be extracted. Extraction of PAHs can be achieved by a variety of methods. Techniques such as supercritical and subcritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted solvent extraction, plant oil-assisted extraction and some microextraction techniques provide faster PAH extraction using less organic solvents, while providing a more environmentally friendly and safer process with minimum matrix interferences. More recently, more environmentally friendly methods for soil and sediment remediation have been explored. This often involves using natural chemicals, such as biosurfactants, to solubilize PAHs in contaminated soils and sediments to allow subsequent microbial degradation. Vermiremediation and microbial enzyme-mediated remediation are emerging approaches, which require further development. The following summarises the existing literature on traditional PAH extraction and bioremediation methods and contrasts them to newer, more environmentally friendly ways.

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental pollutants generated through incomplete combustion and pyrolysis of organic matter. Natural and anthropogenic sources, including volcanic eruptions, forest fires, incomplete combustion of fossil fuels in vehicles, wood, and fuel oils in heating systems, contribute heavily to environmental PAH contamination (Abdel-Shafy and Mansour, 2016). PAHs consist of two or more fused benzene rings and possess low water solubility, which decreases almost linearly with increasing molecular weight (Kuppusamy et al., 2017; Mohan et al., 2006). Hence, PAHs generally associate primarily with the particulate phase, specifically with organic matter in soils and sediments (Wilson and Jones, 1993).

Vapour and particulate matter such as soot, pollens, dust, pyrogenic metal oxides and fly-ash, can act as airborne PAH carriers. Atmospheric PAHs settle on the soil and enter water bodies via dry deposition, precipitation and dissolution associated with wet deposition. Over 90% of the environmental PAH burden is in soils and sediments (Wild and Jones, 1995). In soil, PAHs remain sorbed to soil particulate matter, making them less mobile and less bioavailable for microbial degradation. Loss or removal of PAHs from the soil can occur via processes such as leaching to groundwater, irreversible sorption to soil organic matter, volatilisation, photooxidation, abiotic losses and uptake by plants or microbial degradation (Okere and Semple, 2012). The deposition of PAHs in sediments is quite similar to that in the soil. PAHs in the particulate phase in the atmosphere settle on water reservoirs and eventually accumulate in the sediment phase (Boitsov et al., 2009). Sediment bound PAHs enter pore water through the pores in sediments and attach to colloids. Colloid bound PAHs contribute to the most significant proportion of the bioavailable fraction in the environment.

PAHs cause teratogenic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects to humans and other organisms (Kuppusamy et al., 2016). While many chemicals are classified as PAHs, only 28 of them are considered hazardous by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2008, and among them, 16 are considered EPA priority pollutants in terms of their toxicity (Gan et al., 2009). According to the classifications of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, benzo[a]pyrene (Group 1), naphthalene, chrysene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[k]fluoranthene and benzo[b]fluoranthene (Group 2B) are probably carcinogenic to humans (Cancer & Organization). Terrestrial invertebrates show a higher accumulation of PAHs, mainly from contaminated soils. Aquatic organisms are more prone to PAH contamination due to the direct contamination with PAHs in water and sediments and absorption from plants (Meador et al., 1995; Tao et al., 2004). PAHs can accumulate in mammals through inhalation, ingestion, or dermal contact, affecting processes such as reproduction, development, and immunity (Abdel-Shafy and Mansour, 2016).

Hence, developing appropriate remediation methods is required to mitigate the possible risk of PAHs on environmental and human health. However, remediation of PAHs in soils using industrial chemicals and high temperatures can be problematic due to their cost, energy intensiveness and environmentally unsustainable nature. Therefore, bioremediation is gaining importance as a safer, more economical, and more environmentally sustainable technology to remediate PAH contaminated soils. Biosurfactant mediated-remediation of PAH contaminated soils and sediments is less explored and will be extensively discussed in the current review.

Understanding the extent of PAH contamination through an efficient PAH extraction method is necessary, before applying a remediation approach. Typical PAH extraction techniques used for quantification utilise a large amount of hazardous organic solvents, which are highly volatile and difficult to contain. Hence, organic solvents themselves can be pollutants and show health hazards. From a green chemistry perspective, the use of hazardous solvents for PAH extraction and determination should be replaced with solvents that are less hazardous. However, cleaner techniques for the extraction of PAHs from soils and sediments have not been systematically reviewed.

This paper aims to review the eco-sustainable techniques used for PAH extraction and remediation of contaminated soils and sediments. The review covers PAH extraction techniques that utilise sustainable solvents or low concentrations of hazardous organic solvents during quantification, and remediation methods that are less harmful to the environment.

Section snippets

PAH extraction methods used for quantification

Quantification of the PAHs in contaminated environmental matrices is essential to understanding the extent of PAH contamination. Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic extraction, liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction are some established techniques regularly used to extract PAHs from soils and sediments. However, consumption of large solvent volumes, longer extraction times, limited extraction efficiency, requirement of purification steps and analyte loss complicate their application (Khan et al.,

Bioremediation of PAH contaminated soils and sediments

PAHs in the environment can be removed through bioremediation, photocatalytic oxidation, chemical oxidation, electrokinetic and thermal technologies, soil washing and by adsorption using carbonaceous sorbents (Bianco Prevot, Gulmini, Zelano and Pramauro, 2001; Gan et al., 2009). In certain situations, the implementation of widely used remediation technologies is offset by their non-environmentally friendly existence, energy intensiveness and treatment expense.

Adsorption of PAHs onto

Conclusion

Of the PAH extraction technologies discussed here, MAE, SFE, plant oil-assisted extraction and several microextraction techniques seem to be the most effective extraction techniques. SFE however, is more suitable than MAE due to high selectivity, less usage of solvents and reduced matrix interferences. On the other hand, plant oil assisted extraction is a low-cost and straight forward extraction method. Better extraction times could be achieved by coupling SFE and oil-assisted extraction and

Credit author statement

Thiloka Kariyawasam: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft Gregory S. Doran: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Julia A. Howitt: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing Paul D. Prenzler: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Thiloka Kariyawasam acknowledges Charles Sturt University for the provision of Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (AGRTP) for her PhD study. Julia Howitt, who contributed greatly for this paper unfortunately passed away before this paper was submitted. She will be deeply missed by her loved ones.

References (179)

  • S. Boitsov et al.

    Natural background and anthropogenic inputs of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in sediments of South-Western Barents Sea

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2009)
  • F. Bordas et al.

    Conditions for effective removal of pyrene from an artificially contaminated soil using Pseudomonas aeruginosa 57SJ rhamnolipids

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2005)
  • S. Bøwadt et al.

    Supercritical fluid extraction in environmental analysis

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (1995)
  • F. Cazals et al.

    Production of biosurfactant using the endemic bacterial community of a PAHs contaminated soil, and its potential use for PAHs remobilization

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • B.V. Chang et al.

    Anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in soil

    Chemosphere

    (2002)
  • K.K. Chee et al.

    Optimization of microwave-assisted solvent extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments using a microwave extraction system with high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (1996)
  • Z.Y. Chong et al.

    Enhanced desorption of PAHs from manufactured gas plant soils using different types of surfactants

    Pedosphere

    (2014)
  • S.M. Contreras-Ramos et al.

    Eisenia fetida increased removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2006)
  • S.M. Contreras-Ramos et al.

    Characteristics of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) in PAHs contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge or vermicompost

    Appl. Soil. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • M. Crampon et al.

    Low effect of phenanthrene bioaccessibility on its biodegradation in diffusely contaminated soil

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • M. Čvančarová et al.

    Influence of the bioaccessible fraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the ecotoxicity of historically contaminated soils

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2013)
  • A.A. Dadkhah et al.

    Hot water extraction with in situ wet oxidation: PAHs removal from soil

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2002)
  • V. Flotron et al.

    Rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage sludges using microwave-assisted solvent extraction: comparison with other extraction methods

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2003)
  • I. Gabriele et al.

    Phytoremediation of pyrene-contaminated soils: a critical review of the key factors affecting the fate of pyrene

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2021)
  • S. Gan et al.

    Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • Z. Gong et al.

    Dissolution and removal of PAHs from a contaminated soil using sunflower oil

    Chemosphere

    (2005)
  • Z. Gong et al.

    Influence of soil moisture on sunflower oil extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from a manufactured gas plant soil

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2005)
  • Z. Gong et al.

    Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from manufactured gas plant-contaminated soils using sunflower oil: laboratory column experiments

    Chemosphere

    (2006)
  • Y. Gou et al.

    Enhanced degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aged subsurface soil using integrated persulfate oxidation and anoxic biodegradation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2020)
  • L.A. Green et al.

    Supercritical CO2 extraction of soil-water slurries

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (1996)
  • L. Guo et al.

    Microwave assisted extraction combined with solvent bar microextraction for one-step solvent-minimized extraction, cleanup and preconcentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil samples

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2013)
  • L.D. Hansen et al.

    Extended bioremediation of PAH/PCP contaminated soils from the POPILE wood treatment facility

    Chemosphere

    (2004)
  • J. Harmsen et al.

    25 years monitoring of PAHs and petroleum hydrocarbons biodegradation in soil

    Chemosphere

    (2018)
  • K. Hartonen et al.

    Nordic laboratory intercomparison of supercritical fluid extraction for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbon, polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2002)
  • S.B. Hawthorne et al.

    Comparisons of Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2000)
  • X.-D. Huang et al.

    Responses of three grass species to creosote during phytoremediation

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2004)
  • M. Islam et al.

    Thermodynamic and kinetic study for subcritical water extraction of PAHs

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • M.N. Islam et al.

    Thermodynamic and kinetic study for subcritical water extraction of PAHs

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • M.N. Islam et al.

    Remediation of PAHs contaminated soil by extraction using subcritical water

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • Y. Khanjari et al.

    Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil using superheated water extraction

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2016)
  • J. Kronholm et al.

    Destruction of PAHs from soil by using pressurized hot water extraction coupled with supercritical water oxidation

    Waste Manag.

    (2003)
  • O. Krüger et al.

    Comparison of stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in complex aqueous matrices

    Talanta

    (2011)
  • M. Kumar et al.

    Remediation of soils and sediments polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: to immobilize, mobilize, or degrade?

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • S. Kuppusamy et al.

    Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by novel bacterial consortia tolerant to diverse physical settings – assessments in liquid- and slurry-phase systems

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.

    (2016)
  • S. Kuppusamy et al.

    Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils: technological constraints, emerging trends and future directions

    Chemosphere

    (2017)
  • A.E. Latawiec et al.

    Sequential extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using subcritical water

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • E. Lau et al.

    Extraction of phenanthrene and fluoranthene from contaminated sand using palm kernel and soybean oils

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2012)
  • K.L. Lau et al.

    Use of spent mushroom compost to bioremediate PAH-contaminated samples

    Chemosphere

    (2003)
  • D.W. Lee et al.

    Biosurfactant-assisted bioremediation of crude oil by indigenous bacteria isolated from Taean beach sediment

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • V. Leonardi et al.

    Bioavailability modification and fungal biodegradation of PAHs in aged industrial soils

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (45)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text