Influence of additives on microstructure and property of microarc oxidized Mg–Si–O coatings
Introduction
By virtue of a unique combination of low density, high specific strength and good electromagnetic shielding characteristics [1], magnesium alloys show promise for use in many industrial applications. However, they are restricted in practice by their poor corrosion resistance [2], [3], [4], [5]. There are many coating technologies available for corrosion protection and surface hardening of Mg alloys, such as anodizing [6], [7], chemical conversion [8], electroplating, thermal spraying [9], biomimetic approach [10] and electrochemical deposition [11], [12]. However, with inevitable limitations, they are not adequate for use in harsh service conditions, so proper surface treatment which can produce a relatively thick, dense, hard and anti-corrosive coating is required to improve properties of Mg alloys.
Microarc oxidation, based on conversional anodic oxidation technology, is a new promising surface treatment method to form in situ-grown ceramic coatings directly on so-called value metals, such as magnesium, aluminum, titanium and their alloys in weak-alkaline electrolyte without chromates at the voltage of alternating current up to 1000 V, usually accompanied by sparking and intensive gas evolution phenomenon at the anode surface [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. The method of MAO has a lot of advantages over other surface treatments, e.g. excellent adhesion between coating and substrate, low energy consumption, easy controlling for processing and ecology-friendly process and products [18], [19], [20], [21].
The structure and property of microarc coatings depend on many factors, such as substrate materials, electrolyte compositions, electrical parameters and so on. It is found that the electrolyte compositions play a key role in the MAO process [22], and some additives, such as KF, NH4HF2, C3H8O3 and H2O2, are favorable to the MAO process and promising for the formation of ceramic coatings with good properties. The influence of C3H8O3 on the characteristics of MAO coatings on AZ91D magnesium alloy has been studied [23]. However, research with MAO process on ZK60 magnesium alloy with introduce of KF, NH4HF2, C3H8O3 and H2O2 in the base electrolyte is seldom conducted.
In this paper, KF, NH4HF2, C3H8O3 and H2O2 were added into the silicate electrolyte one by one. Ceramic MAO coating with different performance were formed on ZK60 magnesium alloy. The effects of these additives on discharge phenomenon, coating appearance, phase composition and corrosion resistance were evaluated and a modified additive formula was obtained.
Section snippets
Samples and solutions
Rectangular specimens (with dimensions of 8 mm × 10 mm × 12 mm) made of wrought magnesium alloy ZK60 (Zn 6%, Zr 0.45%, Mg balance) were used as the substrate material in the present study. Prior to the oxidation treatment, the samples were mechanically polished with carborundum waterproof abrasive paper up to 1000 grit, degreased with acetone following by rinsing with distilled water, and then immersed in electrolyte for MAO treatment after dried in warm air.
The base electrolyte was prepared from
Phenomenon of MAO process
It was observed that the discharge spark color was different with introduce of different additives in base electrolyte during MAO process. The variation of the spark color represents reaction energy change, and the energy of white spark is much higher than that of orange one. The higher the energy is released, the denser the coating is formed. When KF alone was added into the base electrolyte, the discharge sparks were white and well distributed all over the sample surface. When NH4HF2 alone
Conclusion
- (1)
The four kinds of additives (i.e. KF, NH4HF2, C3H8O3 and H2O2) play different roles in the formation of MAO coatings. Both KF and NH4HF2 promote discharge and accelerate reaction. C3H8O3 can effectively reduce the poor thermal effect produced by oxidation reaction of magnesium alloys as stabilizer. The introduce of H2O2 results in oxygen libration and makes coating surface rough.
- (2)
The MAO coatings are mainly composed of Mg2SiO4, MgSiO3 and SiO2 in spite of different additives, but the intensity
Acknowledgments
This work is part of a research program financed by Science and Technology Supporting System Item of Resource-conserving Society of Shandong Province (Project No. 2007JY05) and the Development Project of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (Project No. 2010GSF10627).
References (30)
- et al.
Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys—a critical review
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
(2002) - et al.
Corrosion behaviour of the amorphous Mg65Y10Cu15Ag10 alloy
Corrosion Science
(2003) - et al.
Corrosion behavior of high pressure die-cast and semi-solid cast AZ91D alloys
Corrosion Science
(2002) - et al.
Influence of chloride, sulfate and bicarbonate anions on the corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
(2010) - et al.
Study on the environmentally friendly anodizing of AZ91D magnesium alloy
Surface and Coatings Technology
(2002) - et al.
Black anodizing of a magnesium–lithium alloy
Metal Finishing
(1996) - et al.
Conversion-coating treatment for magnesium alloys by a permanganate-phosphate solution
Materials Chemistry and Physics
(2003) - et al.
Two zones microstructure of suspension plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings
Surface and Coatings Technology
(2010) - et al.
Two zones microstructure of suspension plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings
Surface and Coatings Technology
(2007) - et al.
Growth of ceramic coatings on AZ91D magnesium alloys by micro-arc oxidation in aluminate-fluoride solutions and evaluation of corrosion resistance
Applied Surface Science
(2005)