XBP1U inhibits the XBP1S-mediated upregulation of the iNOS gene expression in mammalian ER stress response
Introduction
Eukaryotic cells have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to sense stress in various intracellular compartments and respond appropriately by modulating nuclear gene expression. Within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), stress is induced by the presence of large amounts of unfolded or misfolded proteins, which lead to signal transduction events in both the cytosol and nucleus. Cells can alleviate this stress by degrading or refolding these improperly folded proteins [1], [2], [3]. ER stress activates a set of signaling pathways, collectively termed the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR consists of three molecular branches (inositol requiring enzyme 1, IRE1; PKR-like ER-resistant kinase, PERK and activating transcription factor 6, ATF6), which promote cell survival by reducing misfolded protein levels. Human X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) is a signaling molecule downstream of IRE1 and ATF6 (in the IRE1-XBP1 pathway of the UPR), and participates in IRE1 α-mediated UPR signal transmission. XBP1 also helps to coordinate IRE1α-dependent XBP1 mRNA splicing [4], [5], [6], [7]. XBP1 exists in two forms; following transcription, XBP1 mRNA can either undergo processing or remain unprocessed to generate spliced (XBP1S) or unspliced (XBP1U) isoforms. In mammalian cells, IRE1 is activated by ER stress and subsequently processes XBP1 mRNA to generate the spliced form of XBP1 protein (XBP1S). XBP1S activates the promoters of many genes, including those coding for enzymes necessary for the degradation of improperly folded ER proteins. XBP1S performs this task by binding to unfolded protein response elements (UPRE) with the consensus sequence GTGNNGT/CAAC [8], [9].
XBP1, which contains a basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) structure, is an important transcription factor within the cAMP Response Element Binding Protein/Activating Transcription Factor (CREB/ATF) family. XBP1 is ubiquitously expressed in adult tissues. It contains a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain and a transcriptional activation domain, each encoded by a separate open reading frame. In vitro, XBP1-binding sites have been shown to contain a consensus 8-bp core motif that is very similar to CREB binding sites and identical to the ATF6-binding site [10], [11], [12]. Although there is strong evidence that XBP1 plays an important role in regulating the cell's response to ER stress, little is known about the modulation and physiological significance of XBP1 induction. Specifically, efforts to identify and characterize the target genes of XBP1 have been incomplete.
We previously reported that XBP1S can bind to the promoter of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene, as determined using a human liver cDNA library screen via phage display [20]. Nitric Oxide (NO) is a short-lived biological mediator that plays a key role in many physiological and pathological conditions, including inflammation, neurotransmission, and ER stress. The human iNOS (hiNOS) gene, which regulates NO production, is located on chromosome 17, spans 37 kb, and contains 26 exons. hiNOS is tightly regulated at the level of transcription, and the mechanisms of iNOS induction and suppression are cell, species, and stimulus specific [13], [14]. Moreover, depending on the cell type studied, different regions of the 5′-flanking sequence can mediate cytokine induction of the hiNOS gene. All of these findings suggest that cell and stimulus-specific control of the hiNOS promoter may be important in determining its functional role in different tissues [15], [16]. In the liver, lipopolysaccharide and inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) can induce iNOS expression and provoke prominent NO production. It has been found that the iNOS promoter sequence spans from − 400 bp to the initiation of transcription. Within this region, there exist three conserved motifs for the potential binding of transcription factors. They are as follows: distal binding site for CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) (− 334 bp to − 326 bp in the human gene); proximal C/EBP-binding site (− 192 bp to − 183 bp) corresponding to the A-activator-binding site (AABS) (“GTGNNGYAA”); and nuclear factor (NF)-κB-binding site (− 115 to − 106 bp). In hepatocytes, iNOS expression is highly regulated by cytokines, endotoxins, and glucocorticoids. The functional binding between AABS and the active form of C/EBPβ (LAP) is essential for liver specific transcriptional regulation of the hiNOS gene [17], [18]. However, the regulatory role of the iNOS gene during conditions of ER stress is unknown. Additionally, it is unknown whether XBP1S, an important activator of the UPR during ERS [6], plays any role in the regulation of the iNOS gene.
In the present study, we analyzed the 1032 bp promoter of the human iNOS gene and constructed a series of iNOS promoter deletion reporter plasmids. We then measured the transcriptional activity of the human iNOS gene promoter and its deletions in HepG2 cells. Our assays revealed that the region of the iNOS promoter from − 286 bp to transcription initiation (including the AABS and NF-κB-binding sites), is required for iNOS gene expression. To study the transcriptional regulation of hiNOS by XBP1 during conditions of ER stress, we determined 1) whether XBP1S can regulate iNOS gene transcription and expression; 2) whether there exists a protein interaction between XBP1U and XBP1S during conditions of ERS; 3) whether XBP1U interferes with XBP1S expression during ERS; and 4) whether XBP1U interferes with XBP1S-mediated regulation of iNOS during ERS. The results we present here indicate that XBP1U can bind to and inhibit XBP1S, thus reversing the XBP1S-mediated upregulation of iNOS expression during ERS.
Section snippets
Construction of plamids
The XBP1S expression plasmid, iNOS reporter plasmid were generated using standard DNA techniques. The human XBP1S, including 1130 bp of open reading frame, was cloned between the BamHI and HindIII (underlined) restriction sites of the pcDNA3.1(−) vector(Oligoengine) using the following primer pair: 5′-GGATCCATGGTGGTGGTGGC AGCCGC-3′, 5′-AAGCTT GACACTAATCAGCTGGGGAAAGAG-3′. pGL2-iNOS, which contains the luciferase reporter gene adjacent to the iNOS 3′-UTR, was generated by cloning the iNOS 3′-UTR
XBP1S binds to the AABS in iNOS promoter in vitro
Using phage display analysis of a human liver cDNA library, we previously discovered that XBP1S binds to the iNOS promoter. In our initial sequence analysis of the human iNOS promoter, we found an AABS at − 192 bp of the hiNOS 5′-flanking region [19], [20]. This site was a 9/9 nucleotide match for the AABS consensus sequence. However, the mere presence of a DNA consensus sequence does not necessarily establish the presence of a functional cis-acting protein–DNA interaction. To determine whether
Discussion
Eukaryotic cells have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to sense stress in various intracellular compartments and respond appropriately by modulating nuclear gene expression. Within the endoplasmic reticulum, stress is induced by the presence of large amounts of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen, which lead to signal transduction events in both the cytosol and nucleus. ERS activates a variety of signaling pathways and modulates the activity of a host of transcription factors,
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC, No. 2009 BB5062, Education Ministry Study Abroad Staff Foundation, No. 2009-1590, and ChongQing Medical University Key Research Foundation, No. XBZD200803.
References (49)
Cell
(Mar 2010)- et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(Jul 2006) - et al.
Cell Metab.
(Jun 2009) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(Jun 2004) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(Mar 2006) - et al.
Cell
(Sep 2008) - et al.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(Apr 1994) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(Mar 1994) - et al.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(Apr 2004) - et al.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(Nov 2006)
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
J. Biol. Chem.
Mol. Immunol.
Cell
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
Methods
Nature
Nature
Physiol. Rev.
J. Cell Biol.
J. Biochem.
Cited by (42)
The ER stress sensor inositol-requiring enzyme 1α in Kupffer cells promotes hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury
2022, Journal of Biological ChemistryPlasma Cells: From Cytokine Production to Regulation in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
2021, Journal of Molecular BiologyProtein Palmitoylation Regulates Cell Survival by Modulating XBP1 Activity in Glioblastoma Multiforme
2020, Molecular Therapy OncolyticsLACC1 Required for NOD2-Induced, ER Stress-Mediated Innate Immune Outcomes in Human Macrophages and LACC1 Risk Variants Modulate These Outcomes
2019, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :We now extend these findings to show that LACC1-dependent ER stress is required for optimal PRR-induced ROS and for the induction of the NADPH oxidase subunits p40phox, p47phox, and p67phox in human MDMs. Furthermore, one study showed that ER stress-induced spliced XBP1 was required for induction of NOS2 in HepG2 cells (Guo et al., 2010), and we find that in human MDMs PRR-induced NOS2 is mediated by LACC1-dependent ER stress. Our findings therefore indicate that PRR-induced, LACC1-dependent ER stress upregulates multiple pathways and mechanisms required for PRR-induced bacterial clearance in macrophages.
Effects of environmental stress on shrimp innate immunity and white spot syndrome virus infection
2019, Fish and Shellfish ImmunologyCitation Excerpt :XBP1s moves into the nucleus and initiates the transcription of downstream genes. It has also been reported that peptide encoded by the XBP1 precursor mRNA has a role in XBP1s inhibition [10]. The key genes in the IRE1-XBP1 signaling pathway (IRE1 and XBP1) have been cloned in shrimp [11].
Crosstalk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and brain inflammation in Alzheimer's disease
2018, Neuropharmacology