Elsevier

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volume 478, March 2018, Pages 74-81
Clinica Chimica Acta

Preanalytical and analytical challenges in gas chromatographic determination of cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.12.032Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Non-cholesterol sterols (NCSs) serve as cholesterol homeostasis markers.

  • Sample storage conditions and freeze-thaw stability are important preanalytical factors.

  • Plastic labware can influence the validation and analytical results.

  • The first study dealing with derivatization yield cut off estimations.

  • Study dealing with plasticizer-related interference identification.

Abstract

Introduction

Cholesterol homeostasis disruption contributes to the development of different pathologies. Non-cholesterol sterols (NCSs) serve as cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol and lathosterol), and cholesterol absorption surrogate markers (campesterol, stigmasterol and β-sitosterol). The study aimed to resolve certain new pre-analytical and analytical problems and ensure a reliable and validated method.

Materials and methods

Method optimization, validation and stability studies were executed in human serum and plasma. Freeze-thaw cycles were done with and without antioxidant. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) was used for NCSs confirmation and plasticizer identification, while GC-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) was used for NCSs quantitation.

Results

Intra- and inter-assay variabilities for all NCSs were 2.75–9.55% and 5.80–7.75% for plasma and 3.10–5.72% and 3.05–10.92% for serum, respectively. Recovery studies showed satisfactory percentage errors for all NCSs: 93.4–105.7% in plasma and 87.5–106.9 in serum. Derivatized samples were stable up to 7 days at − 20 °C and derivatization yield was affected by presence of plasticizers. Fatty acid amids were identified as interfering plastic leachates. Statistically different NCSs concentrations were observed after the 1st freeze-thaw cycle, in antioxidant-free samples, and after the 4th cycle in antioxidant-enriched samples.

Conclusions

All of the in-house procedures proved to be useful for minimizing the preanalytical and analytical variations, as proven by the validation results.

Introduction

Although the overall cholesterol metabolism is still not entirely clarified, it is known that the cholesterol homeostasis is maintained through the balance between cholesterol synthesis and absorption [1]. Non-cholesterol sterols (NCSs) can provide an important insight into the cholesterol synthesis and absorption pathways. Plasma concentrations of endogenous sterols, which basically represent cholesterol precursors, are indicators of cholesterol endogenous production, while exogenous phytosterols serve as surrogate markers of cholesterol gastrointestinal absorption [2]. Disturbance of cholesterol homeostasis, which occurs at synthesis or absorption level, can be associated with the development of hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis, obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular, cerebrovascular as well as certain neurodegenerative diseases [1], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Results of recent studies indicate the importance of estimating the efficiency of cholesterol absorption and synthesis for better identification of individual differences in cholesterol metabolism, and the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic approach (lifestyle changes or drug therapy with statins or ezetimibe) [2], [7].

Despite of its acknowledged clinical and diagnostic potential, sterol bioanalysis still lacks measurement harmonization and methodology standardization. So far, a considerable number of studies examined the clinical significance of sterols as cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Nevertheless, a limited number of studies dealt with method validation and even fewer studies examined preanalytical factors which may influence the NCSs quantitation. Over the past decade, a positive trend towards reduction of laboratory errors is observed, but preanalytical phase still represents the most critical area to target [8].

Gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods for separation and quantification of NCSs represent an analytical challenge because NCSs concentrations in plasma are 200–1000 times lower compared to cholesterol levels [8], [9]. Various authors have pointed out the importance of proper sample type selection and sample storage conditions [10]. However, hardly there is a study examining freeze-thaw cycle and analyte stability which can also represent potential sources of errors leading to unsatisfactory validation results. Sample preparation prior the NCSs quantitation requires multiple steps. Along with saponification and extraction, many authors state the necessity for the derivatization, while others try to avoid this procedure because of its complexity [8], [11]. If one chooses to encompass the derivatization into the sample preparation procedure, an additional optimization of the whole process is needed. According to our best knowledge, there are no papers on this subject.

A recent study by Mackay et al. showed that humidity content and temperature which are present during the sample preparation greatly influence NCSs quantitation [8]. However, a small number of studies comprehensively examined the influence of labware on NCSs quantitation. Nevertheless, it often represents the overlooked preanalytical factor. Plastic labware and consumables are widely used in the laboratory setting, although plastics may spontaneously release its contents and interfere with the results [12], [13]. Even if there is a growing concern regarding this issue, it isn't backed up with considerable literature data, especially regarding compound leakage due to the usage of organic solvents with plastic consumables during extraction and derivatization of steroid compounds.

Steroid structures are susceptible to oxidative changes. Therefore long-term preparation may cause the structural changes and represent a great preanalytical issue. It is acknowledged that this process can be accelerated by the presence of metal ions originating from the various labware components, such as tube seals [14], [15]. During the employment of contemporary analytical techniques such as chromatographic methods with high-sensitive detection, every structural change of the analyte may influence the quantitation.

The aim of this study was to examine the most common variability causes, in particular those deriving from pre-analytical sample preparation, as well as gas chromatographic conditions, through comprehensive optimization process in order to ensure a reliable, validated method for further employment into the clinical studies based on NCSs quantitation.

Section snippets

Reagents, samples and instrumentation

Peaks of desmosterol, lathosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol and β-sitosterol were identified by comparison with authentic standards (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Internal standard (IS) 5α-cholestane (GC grade), 0.5 M methanolic potassium hydroxide (KOH) and tetrahydrofuran (HPLC grade) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) were used. KOH was purchased from POCH (Center Valley, PA, USA), and ethanol, chloroform, petroleum ether, n-hexane and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) from Fisher (Pittsburgh,

Statistical analysis

Regression analysis was used for standard curve generation and the Recovery test. Continuous variables were compared by Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Between-group differences were tested by Tukey test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analysed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 22 software.

Results

Sample preparation and instrumental conditions described in experiment 2 showed optimal separations of all five sterols. Each peak of interest was identified according to the retention time of the corresponding analytical standard after derivatization, as well as by the GC/MSD spectral analysis and concordance with the Wiley on-line mass spectral database. Retention time, relative retention time and their coefficient of variation (CV%), as well as mass spectrum for each compound of interest

Discussion

The increasing interest in cholesterol homeostasis assessment by NCSs determination is accompanied by the necessity for precise and accurate quantitative method.

The optimal sample preparation method for NCSs analysis includes the following steps: saponification, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and silylation as a derivatization technique.

Saponification is usually performed with methanolic or ethanolic NaOH or KOH solutions, followed by incubation for 30–120 min at 60–100 °C, while LLE of sterol

Conclusion

A sensitive and precise method was optimized and validated for quantification of NCSs. Both serum and plasma were tested and it was found that both of them represent appropriate sample types for the validated GC-FID method. Derivatization, as well as derivatization yield assessment, was shown to be necessary in order to accomplish the reliable quantitation of the cholesterol precursors. Also, when applying derivatization, special care must be taken during the selection of appropriate labware

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Serbia (Project number 175035). The authors would like to thank Emeritus Professor Slavica Spasic who advised the authors through the development of this work.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References (30)

Cited by (5)

NCSs method validation and preanalytical problems

View full text