Elsevier

Carbohydrate Polymers

Volume 267, 1 September 2021, 118188
Carbohydrate Polymers

Review
Sustainable isolation of nanocellulose from cellulose and lignocellulosic feedstocks: Recent progress and perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118188Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sustainable alternative nanocellulose isolation methods are analyzed and summarized.

  • Methods are grouped into organic acid, anhydride, solid acid, ionic liquid, and DES.

  • Key nanocellulose characteristic from different isolation methods are tableted.

  • One-pot isolation and surface modification are introduced for diverse applications.

  • Key knowledge gaps for economically feasible nanocellulose isolation are proposed.

Abstract

As a type of sustainable nanomaterials, nanocellulose has drawn increasing attention over the last two decades due to its great potential in diverse value-added applications such as electronics, sensors, energy storage, packaging, pharmaceuticals, biomedicine, and functional food. Sourcing nanocellulose from lignocellulose is commonly accomplished via the use of mineral acids, oxidizers, enzymes, and/or intensive mechanical energy. Yet, the economic and environmental concerns associated with these conventional isolation techniques pose major obstacles for commercialization. Considerable progress has been achieved in the last few years in developing sustainable nanocellulose isolation technologies involving organic acid/anhydride, Lewis acid, solid acid, ionic liquid, and deep eutectic solvent. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these alternatives with regard to general procedures and key advantages. Important knowledge gaps, including total biomass utilization, complete life cycle analysis, and health/safety, require urgently bridging in order to develop economically competitive and operationally feasible nanocellulose isolation technology for commercialization.

Introduction

As the oldest and most abundant polymer on earth, cellulose has played a significant and irreplaceable role in polymer history. Cotton, hemp, and bamboo fibers were the primary fiber sources in ancient China for clothing, building, and papermaking. Industrial application of cellulose and its derivatives started shortly after its first extraction in lab in 1838 by French chemist Anselme Payen (Payen, 1838). Cellulose nitrate was the first synthetic polymer synthesized by Pelouze in 1838 (Pelouze, 1838), followed by a more scientific approach by Christian Friedrich Schonbein in 1846 using sulfuric acid and nitric acid (Schonbein, 1846; Seymour & Kauffman, 1992). The first commercially practical synthetic fiber from nitrocellulose, with the intention to replace the expensive oriental silk, was synthesized by French chemist Comte de Chardonnay in 1884 (Kauffman, 1993). Regenerated cellulose was among the first in producing aerogel (Kistler, 1931, Kistler, 1932). However, the role of cellulose in modern life gradually shattered with the success of petroleum-based polymers in the 20th century.

Over the past two decades, cellulose has resurrected with renewed interest, owing to its natural abundance, renewability, biodegradability, and inherent biocompatibility. Such interest in cellulose was further boosted as advanced nanotechnology and characterization techniques were developed to isolate, modify, and characterize cellulose. Looking into its microscopic structure, the elementary fibril of natural cellulose consists of 30–40 glucan chains with cross section width of 3–5 nm (Moon et al., 2011). The glucan chains are highly orientated and packed in parallel through interchain hydrogen bonding and inter-sheet Van der Waals interactions to form a crystalline domain (Nishiyama et al., 2002). Along the elementary fibrils, some segments are distorted due to internal strains, forming tilted and twisted regions, deemed as amorphous region with highly accessible surface (Fig. 1) (D. Klemm et al., 2011; Rowland & Roberts, 1971). Some elementary fibrils form weak hydrogen bond with adjacent fibrils, as the surface glucan chains are slightly distorted from the highly ordered internal chains (Rowland & Roberts, 1971). With the presence of these accessible surfaces, either on the surface of the elementary fibrils or in the distorted region along the elementary fibrils, that are more susceptible to chemicals/enzymes and mechanical energy, it is possible to isolate the whole (or part of) elementary fibrils as nanocellulose.

As a type of green and sustainable nanomaterial, nanocellulose has exhibited great potential for applications in flexible electronics (Hoeng et al., 2016; D.W. Zhao, Zhu, et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), sensors (Thomas et al., 2018; Q. Wang, Yao, et al., 2019; Ye et al., 2020), energy storage materials (W.S. Chen et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2020; Vilela et al., 2019), packaging (Norrrahim et al., 2021), food and pharmaceuticals (Kedzior et al., 2020; D. Klemm et al., 2018), biomedicine (Heise et al., 2021; N. Lin & Dufresne, 2014), and nanocomposite (Guan et al., 2020; Dufresne, 2019; Barhoum et al., 2018). The growing interest in utilizing nanocellulose has driven fervent research in the top-down isolation of nanocellulose, including cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs). Though the terminology may vary from one study to another, CNCs typically refer to short, rigid, and rod-like nanocrystals with the distorted amorphous region completely degraded along the elementary fibrils (Fig. 1). CNFs commonly refer to long, flexible, and fibril-like nanofibrils. There are mainly two different kinds of nanofibrils, one is essentially made of individual elementary fibrils (with complete breaking of inter-fibril hydrogen bonding), while the other one contains bundles of elementary fibrils (with partial breaking of inter-fibril hydrogen bonding) (Fig. 1). The following text will not distinguish these two different CNFs.

CNCs, since its first isolation in 1947 by treating cotton with 2.5 N sulfuric acid (Nickerson & Habrle, 1947), has been isolated using various types of mineral acids, including sulfuric acid (Dong et al., 1998), hydrochloric acid (Araki et al., 1998; Battista & Smith, 1962), hydrochloric acid vapor (Kontturi et al., 2016), and phosphoric acid (Espinosa et al., 2013). CNF was firstly isolated from wood using homogenizer in 1983 by Herrick et al. (1983) and Turbak et al. (1983), followed by the development of other high-shear treatments, including microfluidizer (Zimmermann et al., 2004), grinder (S. Iwamoto et al., 2007), aqueous counter collision (F. Jiang et al., 2016; Kose et al., 2011), high-speed blender (F. Jiang & Hsieh, 2013), and ultrasonication (W.S. Chen et al., 2011). However, high shear treatment alone cannot completely break the inter-fibril hydrogen bonds to liberate individual elementary fibrils. To overcome this difficulty, chemical or biological pretreatments can be introduced prior to high shear operation to yield CNFs. These pretreatment methods include the use of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) mediated oxidation (T. Saito et al., 2006; T. Saito & Isogai, 2004), periodate-chlorite oxidation (Liimatainen et al., 2012), carboxymethylation (Aulin et al., 2010), and enzymatic degradation (X.S. Han et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021; Henriksson et al., 2007). All these conventional technologies for nanocellulose isolation have been well and extensively reviewed by many researchers, covering CNCs (Brinchi et al., 2013; Habibi et al., 2010; Mishra et al., 2019; Trache et al., 2017; Vanderfleet & Cranston, 2020), CNFs (Isogai et al., 2011; Nechyporchuk et al., 2016), and MFCs (Khalil et al., 2014; Osong et al., 2016). For instance, Vanderfleet and Cranston examined various factors including the sources of biomass, pretreatment methods, and isolation routes and their impact on the key characteristics of the isolated nanocellulose, such as surface chemistry and charge density, aspect ratio, colloidal stability, thermal stability, and crystallinity (Vanderfleet & Cranston, 2020). In this review, these conventional isolation methods will not be elaborated further.

Despite their capability in producing nanocellulose, the commercialization of conventional nanocellulose isolation approaches is challenged by the associated economic and environmental concerns. Implementing sulfuric acid, a most commonly-used mineral acid, not only incurs the generated CNC with lowered yield and reduced thermal stability, but also leads to costly recovery of the mineral acid and other valuable hydrolysates (Filson & Dawson-Andoh, 2009; F. Jiang et al., 2010; J. Wang et al., 2021). Alternatively, the use of hydrochloric acid alone, another common mineral acid, results in a limited CNC yield of <20% (Corrêa et al., 2010; Rosa et al., 2010), unless cation exchange resin (L.R. Tang et al., 2011) or energy-intensive hydrothermal treatment (H. Yu et al., 2013) is applied simultaneously. For CNF production, the application of high shear treatment alone is hindered by the high energy intensity and the low uniformity of the product (F. Jiang & Hsieh, 2013; Y. Jiang et al., 2018; C. Wang, Yuan, et al., 2020). On the other hand, chemical pretreatments involve the handling and consumption of toxic and/or costly reagents such as TEMPO (T. Saito et al., 2006; T. Saito & Isogai, 2004) and periodate (Liimatainen et al., 2012), or employ the intensive use of organic solvents for carboxymethylation (Aulin et al., 2010), making these techniques less attractive for potential industrial operators. Though enzymatic degradation appears to be a promising method for sustainable nanocellulose production (X.S. Han et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021; Henriksson et al., 2007), the current protocol barely has a chance to be commercialized given the limitations, predominantly including the extremely long reaction time, the use of pricy reagent (enzyme) and its poor recyclability.

Over the past few years, isolating nanocellulose in a more sustainable and efficient way has drawn extensive interest. Particular interest has been focusing on certain pretreatment techniques that employ the use of organic acids/anhydride, solid acid, Lewis acid, ionic liquid, and deep eutectic solvent (DES). All these techniques share one or more “green” perspectives including less corrosion to reactors, higher nanocellulose yield, easier chemical recyclability, lower energy consumption, reduced treatment and purification steps, as well as improved processing robustness towards various substrates. As more attention is being paid to the overall sustainability of nanocellulose isolation, this article provides a critical review of these sustainable nanocellulose isolation methods. The terminology of nanocellulose used in this paper aligns with Fig. 1, and therefore may be different from the source papers. Key pretreatment conditions of selected representative works with the characteristics of the isolated nanocellulose are summarized in Table 1.

Section snippets

Organic acids

CNCs production mediated by strong mineral acid (such as H2SO4) are challenged by several key drawbacks including massive production of contaminated effluent, high corrosion hazards to the facility, and limited yield (Bondeson et al., 2006; L.H. Chen, Zhu, et al., 2016b). In contrast, organic acid may serve as a more sustainable alternative, due to its weaker acidity, non- or reduced corrosivity, and easier recycling nature. Particularly, the relatively lower boiling temperature of most organic

Organic acid anhydrides

Acetic anhydride has been primarily used in synthesizing cellulose acetate following either heterogenous or homogeneous reactions, as discussed in Section 2.1.1 of this article. Recently, acetylated nanocellulose (both CNCs and CNFs) has been isolated following the same pyridine catalyzed acetic anhydride esterification reaction (Jonoobi et al., 2010; Sofla et al., 2019) (Fig. 4a). This processing medium can help swell cellulose fibers, leading to a DS value of 1.16. The acetylated kenaf fibers

Solid acid

In order to counteract the negative effect of mineral acid hydrolysis, such as the strong acidity that leads to reactor corrosion and excessive hydrolysis, as well as the difficulty in the recovery and reuse of chemicals, solid acid has been employed in isolating nanocellulose, including acidic cation exchange resin (Ahmed-Haras et al., 2020; L.R. Tang et al., 2011), lignin based solid acid (Hu et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2020), and bio-char based solid acid (Y.F. Zhao, Lei, et al., 2020).

Other soluble Brønsted and Lewis acid

The major obstacle with regard to solid acid catalyzed hydrolysis is the low contact area in the heterogeneous reaction medium, which limits cellulose hydrolysis efficiency. To address this issue, soluble heteropoly acids such as phosphotungstic acid and transition metal-based Lewis acid have been used to isolate nanocellulose. Phosphotungstic acid (H3PW12O40, HPW) contains abundant Brønsted acid sites that can break the glycosidic bonds in cellulose and enables CNC isolation at high

Ionic liquid

Ionic liquid (IL), composed of an organic cation and an inorganic or organic anion, features its appearance as a liquid at room temperature or near room temperature (Sankhla et al., 2021). IL has recently drawn wide attention in providing a sustainable alternative to volatile organic solvents for industrial processing, due to its special characteristics of low flammability, non-volatility, non-explosiveness, possible high thermal stability, and ease of recycling (Q. Zhang et al., 2011). Many

Deep eutectic solvent

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are a type of solvents typically comprising two compounds, a hydrogen bond donor and a hydrogen bond acceptor (Le Gars et al., 2019). The correlation between these two compounds at a particular ratio leads to a eutectic mixture with the melting point much lower than any of its constituents. Depending on whether the nanocellulose surface group is modified, DESs systems for nanocellulose isolation can be classified into two types: non-derivatization and

Conclusion and perspectives

In conclusion, this article provides a critical review on recent progress in sustainable nanocellulose isolation technologies, including hydrolysis and/or derivatization using organic acid and anhydride, solid acid, recyclable Brønsted and Lewis acid, ionic liquid, and deep eutectic solvent. Compared to the conventional approaches that incur numerous economic and environmental concerns, these novel methods demonstrated clear advantages covering one or more of the following aspects: reduced

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jungang Jiang: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Yeling Zhu: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Feng Jiang: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgment

This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program (231928). We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Province of British Columbia through the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (FLNRORD).

References (216)

  • W.S. Chen et al.

    Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2011)
  • Y.W. Chen et al.

    Pyrus pyrifolia fruit peel as sustainable source for spherical and porous network based nanocellulose synthesis via one-pot hydrolysis system

    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

    (2019)
  • Y.W. Chen et al.

    Revalorization of selected municipal solid wastes as new precursors of “green” nanocellulose via a novel one-pot isolation system: A source perspective

    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

    (2018)
  • Y.W. Chen et al.

    Investigation of optimal conditions for production of highly crystalline nanocellulose with increased yield via novel Cr(III)-catalyzed hydrolysis: Response surface methodology

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2017)
  • J. Dou et al.

    Lignin containing cellulose nanofibril production from willow bark at 80 °C using a highly recyclable acid hydrotrope

    Industrial Crops and Products

    (2019)
  • H.S. Du et al.

    Sustainable valorization of paper mill sludge into cellulose nanofibrils and cellulose nanopaper

    Journal of Hazardous Materials

    (2020)
  • P.C.C. Faria et al.

    Activated carbon catalytic ozonation of oxamic and oxalic acids

    Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

    (2008)
  • P.B. Filson et al.

    Sono-chemical preparation of cellulose nanocrystals from lignocellulose derived materials

    Bioresource Technology

    (2009)
  • S. Galland et al.

    Holocellulose nanofibers of high molar mass and small diameter for high-strength nanopaper

    Biomacromolecules

    (2015)
  • J. Han et al.

    Characterization of cellulose II nanoparticles regenerated from 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2013)
  • M. Henriksson et al.

    An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers

    European Polymer Journal

    (2007)
  • J. Henschen et al.

    Preparation of cellulose nanomaterials via cellulose oxalates

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2019)
  • S. Hong et al.

    Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of birch cellulose pretreated with natural deep eutectic solvent

    Industrial Crops and Products

    (2020)
  • F. Jiang et al.

    Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2013)
  • J. Jiang et al.

    Acidic deep eutectic solvent assisted isolation of lignin containing nanocellulose from thermomechanical pulp

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2020)
  • D. Klemm et al.

    Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: Today’s state

    Materials Today

    (2018)
  • S.B. Abd Hamid et al.

    Synergic effect of tungstophosphoric acid and sonication for rapid synthesis of crystalline nanocellulose

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2016)
  • J. Al Hakkak et al.

    Generation of spherical cellulose nanoparticles from ionic liquid processing via novel nonsolvent addition and drying

    Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

    (2019)
  • C. Aulin et al.

    Self-organized films from cellulose I nanofibrils using the layer-by-layer technique

    Biomacromolecules

    (2010)
  • A. Barhoum et al.

    Emerging applications of cellulose nanofibers

    (2018)
  • O.A. Battista et al.

    Microcrystalline cellulose – The oldest polymer finds new industrial uses

    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

    (1962)
  • H.Y. Bian et al.

    Effect of fiber drying on properties of lignin containing cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced through maleic acid hydrolysis

    Cellulose

    (2017)
  • H.Y. Bian et al.

    Producing wood-based nanomaterials by rapid fractionation of wood at 80 degrees C using a recyclable acid hydrotrope

    Green Chemistry

    (2017)
  • H.Y. Bian et al.

    Recyclable and reusable maleic acid for efficient production of cellulose nanofibrils with stable performance

    ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

    (2019)
  • T.J. Bondancia et al.

    Production of nanocellulose using citric acid in a biorefinery concept: Effect of the hydrolysis reaction time and techno-economic analysis

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

    (2020)
  • D. Bondeson et al.

    Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis

    Cellulose

    (2006)
  • B. Braun et al.

    Single-step method for the isolation and surface functionalization of cellulosic nanowhiskers

    Biomacromolecules

    (2009)
  • B. Braun et al.

    Supra-molecular EcoBioNanocomposites based on polylactide and cellulosic nanowhiskers: Synthesis and properties

    Biomacromolecules

    (2012)
  • C. Cai et al.

    Maleic acid as a dicarboxylic acid hydrotrope for sustainable fractionation of wood at atmospheric pressure and <=≤ 100 degrees °C: Mode and utility of lignin esterification

    Green Chemistry

    (2020)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids

    Green Chemistry

    (2016)
  • L.H. Chen et al.

    Rapid and near-complete dissolution of wood lignin at <= 80 degrees C by a recyclable acid hydrotrope

    Science Advances

    (2017)
  • L.H. Chen et al.

    Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids

    Green Chemistry

    (2016)
  • W.S. Chen et al.

    Nanocellulose: A promising nanomaterial for advanced electrochemical energy storage

    Chemical Society Reviews

    (2018)
  • M. Cheng et al.

    Efficient extraction of cellulose nanocrystals through hydrochloric acid hydrolysis catalyzed by inorganic chlorides under hydrothermal conditions

    ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

    (2017)
  • G.C. Chitanu et al.

    Behavior of nonalternating maleic acid copolymers in aqueous solution

    Langmuir

    (1999)
  • A.C. Corrêa et al.

    Cellulose nanofibers from curaua fibers

    Cellulose

    (2010)
  • G.M. DeLoid et al.

    Toxicological effects of ingested nanocellulose in in vitro intestinal epithelium and in vivo rat models

    Environmental Science: Nano

    (2019)
  • X.M. Dong et al.

    Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose

    Cellulose

    (1998)
  • H. Du et al.

    Sustainable preparation and characterization of thermally stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils via formic acid hydrolysis

    Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts

    (2017)
  • H.S. Du et al.

    Preparation and characterization of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals via a sustainable approach of FeCl3-catalyzed formic acid hydrolysis

    Cellulose

    (2016)
  • Cited by (81)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text