Using social and economic incentives to discourage Chinese suppliers from product adulteration☆
Section snippets
Unsafe products and food items made in China
As more western firms outsource their production to foreign suppliers, price competition intensifies and suppliers are under tremendous pressure to cut cost. Unfortunately, in response to this pressure, many foreign suppliers have reduced cost by lowering product quality. Some have even produced adulterated products (i.e., products that do not meet specification) that can cause physical harm. Product adulteration has become a common cause of many recent product recalls. In 2007, public concern
Underlying causes for product adulteration in China
Given the public outcry regarding unsafe products made in China, there is obviously global concern about Chinese suppliers and their unethical business practices. We ask the seemingly simple question: Why don’t Chinese firms produce safe products? However, the answer is far from simple, and approaches to improve the safety of products from Chinese suppliers are complex.
To explore the underlying reasons why Chinese suppliers produce unsafe products, let us dispel the myth that Chinese suppliers
What to do?
We now discuss the gamut of plausible actions that western manufacturers can take to reduce product adulteration risks. Some solutions are traditional and are known to managers already; others are less so. Traditional approaches include sourcing elsewhere (e.g., reshoring), requiring supplier certification, conducting product inspections, obtaining insurance, contracting with supplier warranties, making suppliers liable, and deferring payments. Non-traditional approaches include threatening
More effective approaches for deterring product adulteration
Recognizing that abandoning sourcing from China is not an attractive option and that requiring supplier certification, conducting more inspections, and forcing suppliers to assume liabilities are not foolproof tactics, it is more constructive to think of ideas to discourage Chinese suppliers from product adulteration. Specifically, by considering the four key factors that create incentives for Chinese suppliers to adulterate—severe price pressure, short-term opportunism, asymmetric information,
Conclusion
By using a combination of threats (e.g., public exposure, contingent payments, contract laws) and rewards (e.g., increased orders, higher prices, better payments, more capability), manufacturers can establish a mechanism to counteract factors enticing Chinese suppliers to adulterate. However, manufacturers should be aware that such a mechanism can reduce the risk of product adulteration, but not completely eliminate it: some Chinese suppliers are risk-prone, regardless. It is therefore critical
References (38)
- Anjoran, R. (2009, August 16). Tie payments to quality acceptance, for each shipment. Quality Inspection Tips....
- Anjoran, R. (2010, March 1). Corruption of inspectors: The role of social pressure. Quality Inspection Tips. Retrieved...
The honest truth about dishonesty
(2012)- et al.
Managing opportunistic supplier product adulteration: Deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
(2012) - Bradsher, K. (2012, March 6). Signs of slowing in China. The New York Times, p....
- Bristow, M. (2010, March 29). Murky world of corruption in China. BBC News. Retrieved from...
- Burros, M. (2007, July 18). FDA inspection lax, congress is told. The New York Times. Retrieved from...
- Chiu, C., Lin, D., & Silverman, A. (2012, May). China's social-media boom. New York: McKinsey and...
- A decade of dangerous food imports from China. (2011, June 8). Food and Water Watch Report. Retrieved from...
- The end of cheap in China. (2012, March 10). Economist. Retrieved from...
The road ahead
National Geographic
A study of the comparative structure of guilt and shame in a Chinese society
Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
The cultural traits and trace of traditional Chinese legal culture—the origination, development, and prospect of Qing-Li-Fa
Legal System and Society Development
Cited by (28)
Chicanery in the food supply chain! Food fraud, mitigation, and research needs in low-income countries
2023, Trends in Food Science and TechnologyThe strategic impact of vertical integration on non-deceptive counterfeiting
2023, International Journal of Production EconomicsA study on the food fraud of national food safety and sample inspection of China
2020, Food ControlCitation Excerpt :Moreover, a FF media-monitoring system has been established to monitor FF incidents reported by the global media (Bouzembrak et al., 2018). Some scholars have analyzed the characteristics of FF incidents reported by databases or the media (Tähkäpää, Maijala, Korkeala, & Nevas, 2015), and others have also explored the causes of FF (Manning & Soon, 2014; Tanga & Babichb, 2014). These studies provide more insights into FF.
Cold chain transportation decision in the vaccine supply chain
2020, European Journal of Operational ResearchCitation Excerpt :Babich and Tang (2012) compare three mechanisms for managing product adulteration problems: deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms. Tang and Babich (2014) discuss how to use social and economic motives to reduce Chinese product adulteration. They first identify four underlying motives: severe price pressure, short-term opportunism, asymmetric information, and rampant government corruption and ineffectual legal system.
Barriers and benefits to the adoption of a third party certified food safety management system in the food processing sector in Shanghai, China
2016, Food ControlCitation Excerpt :The food processing industry in China covers a multitude of sectors including meat, poultry and dairy products, fruit and vegetables, confectionary and snack products, cereals, oils and fats, beverages and seafood. While most food processors acknowledge that some basic food safety and hygiene system is necessary to protect consumers and their reputation, frequent reports of food adulteration continue to erode consumer confidence in both domestic and international markets (Jia & Jukes, 2013; Lam, Remais, Fung, Xu, & Sun, 2013; Ortega, Wang, Wu, & Olynk, 2011; Tang & Babich, 2014; Yan, 2012). Although numerous internationally recognised third party certified food safety management systems (FSMS) including BRC, HACCP, IFS, ISO 22000 and QS are available to minimise the risk, there is some evidence to suggest that the uptake of these systems is well below expectations.
Push it real good: the effects of push notifications promoting motivational affordances on consumer behavior in a gamified mobile app
2023, European Journal of Marketing
- ☆
The original draft of this article was completed when Christopher S. Tang visited the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.