Analysis of user's characteristics of three different playgrounds in districts with different socio-economical conditions
Introduction
Urban planning, design and architecture can create the conditions necessary for the development of a sociable city [1]. In modern cities, open spaces, such as parks, sport areas and playgrounds are limited for people. Playgrounds also become more structured in modern cities [2].
Play is essential to children's growth and development and an essential aspect of children's culture and quality of life. Children learn about the world and come to an understanding of their own nature and capabilities by playing [3], [4]. Play is fundamental to how children develop their emotional, physical and intellectual potential. Play encourages children to explore, practice, build up skills, take risks, make mistakes and learn how to think imaginatively and creatively. Above all, play makes learning fun [5].
In literature, it was indicated that playground design influenced subjects, social as well as physical skill development and motor abilities [2], [6], [7]. Wachs [8] has focused on the development of effective child care environments. Three principles of early environmental action were; (1) the physical environment may be important for children development (2) different environmental components influence different aspects of development; (3) the effect of the environment on development would be moderate by individual characteristics of the child.
Researchers have focused on children's play at, well-designed, safe [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and also natural [2], [8], [15], [16] playgrounds.
The United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) promote children's participation as the best way to make cities more sustainable [17]. Understanding children's interest and wishes help us to provide for their needs in playgrounds [18]. We must identify their needs, their aspirations and ways of using new opportunities to build a sustainable future.
According to Francis and Lorenzo [19], participation of children in recreational planning and design has enjoyed increased among policy makers, designers and researches. They suggest that play areas are best planned with participation of children.
It was reported that in a survey of children's views, commissioned for National Playday, children said their playgrounds do not provide the equipment they want and prevent them from playing the games they enjoy. This survey showed that, 45% of the children said they could not play with water, 36% of them said they are prevented from climbing trees, 27% said they could not play on climbing equipment while 23% said they are prevented from riding bikes or skateboards [20].
In another research which was also followed by 2002 theme for Playday from Middlesex University shows that British children are in danger of having their mental and physical development stifled if prevented from taking risks in play.
In a study in England, The Play Space survey was based on the responses of 800 children aged between 4 and 16 years of age, contacted through the Playday Network and projects run by The Children's Society. Of the 800 children who completed the survey, 358 (44%) were from southern England, 222 (%28) from the North of England, 144 from Scotland and 76 (%10) from the English Midlands. The analysis show that, 221 (%27) children most often play in street, 255 (%31) children's favorite place to play out is park, 520 (%65) children have enough places for play out in the way they want [21].
User surveys are important sources of data to aid the planning, designing and management processing of playgrounds and also important to identify children's needs. The aim of the present study was to source data with user surveys. In this study, main objectives were; (1) to analyze three playgrounds in different status, (2) to describe how children's play was related to economic status of their families and their living areas, and (3) to source problems and requirements of children.
Section snippets
Materials and method
Erzurum is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey (39° 55; 41°46) .The average altitude is 1860 m; Erzurum city centre has an area of 3850 acres. The city is situated among steep mountains that are mostly higher than 3000 m ranging on the direction from east to west [22].
Playgrounds constructed in three different neighborhoods of the city, which are in different socio-economic conditions, were evaluated. These playgrounds are in the neighborhoods of the Ataturk University Campus,
Results
Totally 300 children, 110 female and 190 male with ages of 0–4 (30 children), 5–9 (150 children), 10–14 (120 children) were participated in the study (Table 2). From the outcomes it was seen that playgrounds are used mostly by male children (63.3%). For the neighborhoods studied, these percentages were 60%, 50% and 80% for male children in the playgrounds of 100.Yil Park, University and Telsizler, respectively. From these findings, it was determined that in low income area playground was mostly
Discussion and conclusion
In the present study, the questionnaires completed over three playgrounds in three different neighborhoods of whose socio-economic conditions were different, were evaluated using χ2 test. In the survey economic conditions of the users’ families were determined (Table 5) and it was found that income levels of families were significantly different than each other (χ2=371.416, p=0.000< 0.001).
In low socio-economic area (Telsizler), playground is used by mostly boys (80%) while in other two areas
References (24)
- et al.
The natural environment as a playground for children landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2000) - et al.
Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of children's outdoor play environments
Landscape and Urban Planning
(1998) The impact of playground design on the play behaviors of children with differing levels of physical competence
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(1999)- et al.
Applying the BeSafe method to product safety evaluation
Applied Ergonomics
(1998) - et al.
Risk factors for severe injuries associated with falls from playground equipment
Accident Analysis & Prevention
(2000) - et al.
Search for a simple means to identify dangerous surfaces under play equipment
Journal of Safety Research
(2000) - Anonymous. (2002a). Playlink publications: Play as culture. Changing the balance: A city for children and adults alike,...
- Caborn R, (2001). Children's play council....
- Ashton, B., Lewis, I. (2001). Creating opportunity, releasing potential, achieving excellence. Department for education...
Importance of Play Areas in Child Development and Guidelines for Play Areas
(1999)
The development of effective child care environments: contributions from the study of early experience
Children's Environments Quarterly
Playground injuries: a scientific appraisal of popular concerns
Journal of the Royal Society of Health
Cited by (11)
Adaptive school grounds design in response to COVID-19: Findings from six primary schools in South East England
2022, Building and EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Titman (1994) [18] identified how school grounds potentially hold value, or not, for children themselves, in meeting their own perceived needs for experience, exploration, experimentation, and security. It has also been suggested in literature that playground design has an impact on individuals' social and physical skill development and motor capacities [19]. Whilst school grounds access is vital for children's wellbeing it is critical to reconsider how schools can stay open without being SARS-CoV-2 transmission hubs [20].
Playground planning and management: An evaluation of standard-influenced provision through user needs
2010, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningThe impact of free-choice motor activities on children’s balance control
2015, Australasian Journal of Early ChildhoodAre park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics
2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity