Why are some obsessions more upsetting than others?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Little is known about why certain obsessional thoughts are more upsetting than others for people with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Obsessional thought content often seems arbitrary to sufferers. The current study examined three possible reasons why particular thoughts would be especially upsetting for individuals, based on suggestions put forth by cognitive theories of obsessional thoughts. Twenty-eight individuals with a principal diagnosis of OCD completed questionnaires and interviews at two different periods of time on (1) their most upsetting current obsession and (2) their least upsetting current obsession. Results suggested that more upsetting obsessions were evaluated as more meaningful or significant than less upsetting obsessions, and more upsetting obsessions contradicted valued aspects of the self to a greater degree. All examples of current obsessions, both most and least upsetting, arose in the context of life concerns or issues. Results support cognitive theories in that the strength and nature of appraisal appears to be linked with the distress associated with a thought, and more upsetting thoughts are those that have implications for a person's sense of self.

Section snippets

Why are some obsessions more upsetting than others?

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in understanding the development and persistence of obsessional thoughts. Much of this interest has been generated from cognitive theories of obsessions, which propose a number of factors to explain the persistent nature of obsessions. A fundamental assumption of these theories is that obsessional thoughts arise from commonly occurring intrusive thoughts that are appraised as significant or meaningful (e.g., Rachman (1997), Rachman (1998);

Participants

Twenty-eight individuals with a principal diagnosis of OCD were recruited for this study (mean age of 32, SD=10.6, 71% female). Participants were recruited from among patients presenting to a specialty anxiety disorders clinic in Hamilton, Ontario. All diagnoses were made using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1996). The principal diagnosis (i.e., the problem causing the most distress and functional impairment) was determined by the

Data screening

Data were examined for the presence of outliers. No outliers were found on the variables of interest.

Thought content

A wide range of thought content was reported for both the most upsetting and least upsetting obsessions. For most upsetting obsessions, 43% were aggressive, religious, or sexual obsessions, 32% were contamination concerns, and the rest (25%) were “other” obsessions, including needs for symmetry and exactness, need to know or remember, thoughts about saving things, and doubts about actions. For

Discussion

The results of the current study suggest several reasons why certain obsessions are so upsetting and persistent for people with OCD. The first factor is appraisal. Upsetting obsessions were appraised as more significant than less upsetting obsessions. This difference in strength of appraisals occurred for appraisals about the importance or meaning of simply having the thought, about the need to exercise control over one's thoughts, and about appraisals of responsibility for one's thoughts and

References (33)

  • S. Rachman

    A cognitive theory of obsessionselaborations

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1998)
  • P.M. Salkovskis

    Obsessional-compulsive problemsa cognitive behavioural analysis

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1985)
  • P.M. Salkovskis et al.

    Multiple pathways to inflated responsibility beliefs in obsessional problemspossible origins and implications for therapy and research

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1999)
  • G. Steketee et al.

    Religion and guilt in OCD patients

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1991)
  • S. Akhtar et al.

    A phenomenological analysis of symptoms in obsessive compulsive neurosis

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (1975)
  • D.A. Clark

    Cognitive behavior therapy for obsessions and compulsionsnew applications and emerging trends

    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

    (2000)
  • Cited by (77)

    • A cognitive dissonance perspective on threats to self-concept in obsessive-compulsive disorder

      2021, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      In one study, Rowa and Purdon (2003) showed that the intrusive thoughts identified by nonclinical individuals as the most disturbing were more in conflict with their values than their least disturbing thoughts. They subsequently replicated this finding using participants with OCD (Rowa, Purdon, Summerfeldt, & Antony, 2005). In a naturalistic study of language used in online comments by individuals self-identified as suffering from sexual-orientation OCD (SO-OCD), Coimbra-Gomes and Motschenbacher (2019) found that expressions involving “don't want” featured prominently, particularly in connection to the possibility of a gay identity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text